‘Strategic clarity' over Taiwan is just so much American bombast
People often make a situation worse because they are unhappy with the status quo. The United States is doing exactly that over Taiwan. In doing so, it is, as PLA Major General Hu Gangfeng said, destabilising the whole region.
US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth made headline news at the Shangri-La Dialogue for regional security in Singapore last week by warning of 'devastating consequences' if China tried to 'conquer' Taiwan.
He said America stood shoulder to shoulder with its allies and partners in the region, and that no one should doubt its commitment. Really?
But as a caveat, he said countries in Southeast Asia needed to boost defence spending, possibly to 5 per cent of GDP. That immediately invited ridicule from some conference participants.
Mohd Faiz Abdullah, chairman of the Institute of Strategic and International Studies in Malaysia and a senior adviser to Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim, called it 'mind-boggling' and 'nonsensical' to expect countries in the region to drum up 5 per cent of their GDP in military acquisitions, presumably from US arms manufacturers. It would make more sense, he suggested, for Washington to dispense with its highly destructive tariffs and deepen economic engagement with the region instead. Indeed!
In one breath, Hegseth said the US would support them against Chinese aggression while asking them to ramp up military spending and contribute to the fight. But Asean is not Nato. Most of its member states are not even American military allies. The Philippines is an exception. Asean wants to engage with China, not fight it, especially over Taiwan. The island is not to East Asia what Ukraine is to the European Union or Nato. It's not even their fight.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
South China Morning Post
3 hours ago
- South China Morning Post
Trump-Xi call: China hawk Rubio missing in action as leaders rekindle trade hopes
The conspicuous absence of US Secretary of State Marco Rubio from preparations for the much-anticipated phone call between Chinese and US leaders – and from subsequent trade talk announcements – has raised questions about his influence in shaping bilateral ties. Advertisement US President Donald Trump on Thursday described his 90-minute conversation with Chinese President Xi Jinping as 'very positive', and announced on his social media platform that US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent , Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick and US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer would head future negotiations with China. Observers said the call, following a 90-day truce last month, rekindled hopes of cooling heightened US-China tensions over tariffs and global supplies of rare earth minerals, placing trade talks as the most pressing and dominating issue for bilateral ties in the near future. They noted a shift in Washington's approach to China, driven largely by economic pragmatism and Trump's preference for personal deal-making, while some said it signalled Rubio's diminished role in US-China ties. In the past, direct engagements between US and Chinese leaders were usually preceded by groundwork involving China's top diplomats and their US counterparts, namely, the secretary of state or the national security adviser. Advertisement Regular face-to-face dialogue between Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi, who is also Xi's top foreign policy aide, and former national security adviser Jake Sullivan and former US secretary of state Antony Blinken helped set the stage for Xi's multiple meetings and calls with Trump's predecessor Joe Biden.
South China Morning Post
4 hours ago
- South China Morning Post
Trump-Xi call on US-China trade tensions heightens Taiwanese fears of being marginalised
The call focused on easing trade tensions, but Xi also said that the US 'must handle the Taiwan question with prudence' and make sure 'fringe separatists' did not drag China and the US into 'confrontation or even conflict', according to state news agency Xinhua. While Trump posted on social media that his 90-minute conversation with Xi 'focused almost entirely on TRADE', Xinhua quoted him as saying the US 'will honour the one-China policy'. The call reinforced the sense of growing scepticism in Taiwan towards the US as a result of Trump's comments on defence, semiconductors and the tariffs he imposed on the island. 'Mainland China's usual practice is they only make a phone call when a certain consensus can be reached,' Cheng Chao-hsin, the deputy mayor of Taichung city told local media. 'This makes us very anxious about Taiwan's trade negotiations, as we now find that both Japan and the mainland are ahead of us.'
South China Morning Post
5 hours ago
- South China Morning Post
US-China trade call's impact on manufacturers, Trump and Musk feud: SCMP daily highlights
Catch up on some of SCMP's biggest China stories of the day. If you would like to see more of our reporting, please consider subscribing As two of the world's most powerful leaders – President Xi Jinping and US counterpart Donald Trump – exchanged rare conciliatory words in a phone call that signalled a potential thaw in China-US tensions, the mood on factory floors in China remained far more restrained. The US Senate Foreign Relations Committee has approved a slate of China-focused measures, including bipartisan bills to counter Beijing's overseas military expansion and bolster Taiwan's role in global finance while advancing the nomination of a former ambassador to lead US diplomacy in East Asia. Before their public feud this week, US President Donald Trump and Elon Musk attended a press conference in the Oval Office of the White House on May 30. Photo: Reuters The gloves have come off as the besties turn on each other, attacking policy decisions, threatening repercussions and levelling scandalous accusations.
