Appeals court lets Trump keep national guard in LA, marines on the way
Many of the protests in solidarity for detained immigrants have taken place in downtown Los Angeles. (AP pic)
LOS ANGELES : A US appeals court today allowed President Donald Trump to maintain his deployment of national guard troops in Los Angeles amid protests over stepped-up immigration enforcement, temporarily pausing a lower court ruling that blocked the mobilisation.
The ninth US circuit court of appeals' decision does not mean that the court will ultimately agree with Trump, but it does leave command of the guard with the president for now.
Earlier today, San Francisco-based US district judge Charles Breyer found that Trump's deployment of the guard was unlawful.
Breyer's 36-page ruling had ordered the national guard to return to the control of California governor Gavin Newsom, who had brought the case.
It was a short-lived victory for Newsom, as Breyer's order was paused about two-and-a-half hours later.
Asked for a comment, Newsom's press office referred to the governor's statement after the initial ruling, and noted that the appeals court put a temporary pause on the ruling but did not reverse it.
'I'm confident, on the basis of the review of the 36 pages – absolutely it will stand,' Newsom said of the district judge's order.
Trump welcomed the ruling in a social media post today.
The three-judge appeals court panel consisted of two judges appointed by Trump in his first term and one judge who was appointed by Democratic President Joe Biden.
The panel said it would hold a hearing on Tuesday to consider the merits of Breyer's order.
The court's action, called an administrative stay, gives the appeals judges additional time to consider the Trump administration's request to block Breyer's order while litigation in the case continues.
Trump summoned the national guard on Saturday in response to protests that had broken out over immigration raids, then on Monday ordered the US marines to support the guard.
A battalion of 700 US marines is expected to arrive today, marking an extraordinary use of military forces to support civilian police operations within the US.
The troops have stood guard at a federal detention centre in downtown Los Angeles where many of the protests have taken place in a show of solidarity for immigrants detained inside.
The protests so far have been mostly peaceful, punctuated by incidents of violence, and restricted to a few city blocks.
The guard had also accompanied immigration and customs enforcement (ICE) agents on operations to detain immigrants.
In his ruling, Breyer wrote that the presence of the troops in the city was itself inflaming tensions with protesters – a contention made by Los Angeles mayor Karen Bass, among others – and depriving the state of the ability to use the guard for other purposes.
Mayor wants ICE out of LA
Donald Trump justified the deployment of troops by characterising the protests in Los Angeles as a 'rebellion'. (AP pic)
Bass yesterday called on ICE officers to stand down from the intensified series of raids that led to the protests, saying the local economy could be harmed as immigrants stayed home from work and school for fear of being snatched off the streets.
'The peace that we need to have happen needs to begin in Washington, and we need to stop the raids,' Bass told a press conference as supporters flanking her broke out in a chant of 'Stop the raids'.
'Peace begins with ICE leaving Los Angeles,' said Bass, who has imposed a nighttime curfew over 2.5sq km of downtown LA.
Bass spoke after department of homeland security secretary Kristi Noem pledged to 'liberate' Los Angeles at a press conference that was dramatically interrupted when federal agents dragged Democratic US senator Alex Padilla out of the room, forced him to the ground and handcuffed him.
The court battle and press conference scuffle underscored the political polarisation generated by Trump's hardline approach to immigration enforcement and expansive use of presidential power.
Trump is carrying out a campaign promise to deport immigrants, employing forceful tactics consistent with the norm-breaking political style that got him elected twice.
Democrats have said the use of military force was unnecessary and an example of Trump's authoritarianism.
Americans are divided over Trump's decision to activate the military.
A Reuters/Ipsos poll showed 48% of respondents agreed with a statement that the president should 'deploy the military to bring order to the streets' when protests turned violent, while 41% disagreed.
Between the rulings, Newsom said the national guard would be redeployed to its previous tasks, including border security, preparing for wildfires and countering drug smuggling.
But the Trump administration immediately appealed the judge's order, calling Breyer's ruling 'an extraordinary intrusion on the president's constitutional authority as commander in chief'.
Trump justified the deployment of troops by characterising the protests in Los Angeles as a 'rebellion', but Breyer said in his temporary restraining order that the protests fell far short of that legal standard.
'The court is troubled by the implication inherent in defendants' argument that protest against the federal government, a core civil liberty protected by the first amendment, can justify a finding of rebellion,' Breyer wrote.
Trump today reiterated his comments that if he had not ordered in the national guard the city would be in flames, writing: 'We saved L.A.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Malay Mail
an hour ago
- Malay Mail
Pentagon's late-night pizza orders serve up clues ahead of Israel's Iran strike
WASHINGTON, June 14 — The timing of Israel's plan to attack Iran was top secret. But Washington pizza delivery trackers guessed something was up before the first bombs fell. About an hour before Iranian state TV first reported loud explosions in Tehran, pizza orders around the Pentagon went through the roof, according to a viral X account claiming to offer 'hot intel' on 'late-night activity spikes' at the US military headquarters. 'As of 6.59pm ET nearly all pizza establishments nearby the Pentagon have experienced a HUGE surge in activity,' the account 'Pentagon Pizza Report' posted on Thursday. Not confining its analysis to pizza, the account noted three hours later that a gay bar near the Pentagon had 'abnormally low traffic for a Thursday night,' and said this probably pointed to 'a busy night at the Pentagon.' Both Dominos locations nearby the Pentagon continue to have abnormally high amounts of traffic for a Friday at around 7:08pm ET. The nearest gay bar to the Pentagon is also being reported as having VERY HIGH levels of activity. These are conflicting indicators! — Pentagon Pizza Report (@PenPizzaReport) June 13, 2025 While far from scientific, the Pentagon pizza theory 'is not something the internet just made up,' The Takeout, an online site covering restaurants and food trends, noted earlier this year. Pentagon-adjacent pizza joints also got much busier than usual during Israel's 2024 missile strike on Iran, it said, as there are 'a multitude of fast food restaurants in the Pentagon complex, but no pizza places.' Pizza deliveries to the Pentagon reportedly doubled right before the US invasion of Panama in December 1989, and surged again before Operation Desert Storm in 1991. President Donald Trump told The Wall Street Journal he was fully aware in advance of the bombing campaign, which Israel says is needed to end Iran's nuclear program. 'We know what's going on.' For the rest of Americans, pepperoni pie activity was not the only way to tell something was about to happen. Washington had already announced it was moving some diplomats and their families out of the Middle East on Wednesday. And close to an hour before Israel unleashed its firepower on Iran, the US ambassador in Jerusalem, Mike Huckabee, sent out a rather revealing X post: 'At our embassy in Jerusalem and closely monitoring the situation. We will remain here all night. 'Pray for the peace of Jerusalem!'' — AFP
Free Malaysia Today
an hour ago
- Free Malaysia Today
Oil settles up 7% as Israel, Iran trade air strikes
Israeli strikes have so far spared Iranian energy infrastructure, including Kharg Island, which handles about 90% of Iran's crude exports. (Unsplash pic) HOUSTON : Oil prices jumped on Friday and settled 7% higher as Israel and Iran traded air strikes, feeding investor worries that the combat could widely disrupt oil exports from the Middle East. Brent crude futures settled at US$74.23 a barrel, up US$4.87, or 7.02%, after earlier soaring over 13% to an intraday high of US$78.50, the strongest level since Jan 27. Brent was 12.5% higher than a week ago. US West Texas Intermediate crude finished at US$72.98 a barrel, up US$4.94, or 7.62%. During the session, WTI jumped over 14% to its highest since Jan 21 at US$77.62. WTI climbed 13% to its level a week ago. Both benchmarks had their largest intraday moves since 2022 when Russia's invasion of Ukraine caused a spike in energy prices. Israel said it had targeted Iran's nuclear facilities, ballistic missile factories and military commanders on Friday at the start of what it warned would be a prolonged operation to prevent Tehran from building an atomic weapon. Iran has promised a harsh response. Shortly after trading ended on Friday, Iranian missiles hit buildings in Tel Aviv, Israel, according to multiple media reports. Explosions were also heard in southern Israel. US President Donald Trump urged Iran to make a deal over its nuclear program to put an end to the 'next already planned attacks.' The National Iranian Oil Refining and Distribution Company said oil refining and storage facilities had not been damaged and continued to operate. Iran, a member of the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (Opec), currently produces around 3.3 million barrels per day (bpd), and exports over 2 million bpd of oil and fuel. Spare capacity among Opec and its allies, including Russia, to pump more oil to offset any disruption is roughly equivalent to Iran's output, according to analysts and Opec watchers. The latest developments have also stoked concerns about disruptions to the Strait of Hormuz, a vital shipping passage. 'Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Iraq and Iran are wholly locked into one tiny passage for exports,' said Rabobank in a note, regarding the Strait. About a fifth of the world's total oil consumption passes through the strait, or some 18 to 19 million barrels per day (bpd) of oil, condensate and fuel. 'Israeli action has so far avoided Iranian energy infrastructure, including Kharg Island, the terminal responsible for an estimated 90% of Iran's crude oil exports,' said Ben Hoff, head of commodity research at Societe Generale. 'This raises the possibility that any further escalation could follow an 'energy-for-energy' logic where an attack on one side's oil infrastructure might invite a retaliatory strike on the other's,' Hoff said. Iran could pay a heavy price for blockage of the Strait of Hormuz, analysts said on Friday. 'Iran's economy heavily relies on the free passage of goods and vessels through the seaway, as its oil exports are entirely sea-based. Finally, cutting off the Strait of Hormuz would be counterproductive to Iran's relationship with its sole oil customer, China, said analysts with JP Morgan. Money managers raised their net long US crude futures and options positions in the week to June 10, the US Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) said on Friday. The speculator group raise its combined futures and options position in New York and London by 15,157 contracts to 121,911 during the period. Read full story Baker Hughes said the number of US oil and natural gas rigs fell for seventh week in a row with the total count down by 35 rigs or 6% below this time last year. The oil rig count fell by three to 439 this week, its lowest since October 2021, while gas rigs slipped by one to 113. In other markets, stocks dived and there was a rush to safe havens such as gold, the US dollar and Swiss franc.
Free Malaysia Today
an hour ago
- Free Malaysia Today
Trump approves Nippon Steel's US$14.9bil purchase of US Steel
Nippon Steel's deal ended an 18-month battle for US Steel, which withstood union opposition and national security scrutiny. (EPA Images pic) WASHINGTON : U.S President Donald Trump approved Nippon Steel's US$14.9 billion bid for US Steel on Friday, capping a tumultuous 18-month effort by the companies that survived union opposition and two national security reviews. Trump signed an executive order saying the tie-up could move forward if the companies sign an agreement with the treasury department resolving national security concerns posed by the deal. The companies then announced they had signed the agreement, fulfilling the conditions of Trump's directive and effectively garnering approval for the merger. 'We look forward to putting our commitments into action to make American steelmaking and manufacturing great again,' the companies said in the statement, thanking Trump. They added the agreement includes US$11 billion in new investments to be made by 2028 as well as governance, production and trade commitments. Nippon Steel will buy a 100% stake in US Steel, a spokesperson for the Japanese company in Tokyo said on Saturday. The steelmakers provided no detail on the 'golden share' they pledged to issue to the US government, raising questions about the extent of US control. US senator David McCormick of Pennsylvania, where US Steel is headquartered, said last month the golden share would give the government veto power over key decisions relating to the American steel icon. Reuters has reported that Nippon Steel would invest an additional US$3 billion for a new mill after 2028. The takeover will set up the ailing US firm to receive the critical investment, allowing Nippon Steel to capitalise on a host of American infrastructure projects while its foreign competitors face steel tariffs of 50%. The Japanese firm also avoids the US$565 million in breakup fees it would have had to pay if the companies had failed to secure approvals. For Nippon Steel, the world's fourth-biggest steelmaker, securing a foothold in the US is key to its global growth strategy. The US steel market, including high-grade steel, Nippon Steel's specialty, is growing amid rising global trade tensions. 'Great partner' Still, some Nippon Steel investors are concerned about short-term financial pressure due to the scale of the additional investment commitment. The Japanese government, rushing to try to secure a trade deal with the US by the time Trump and Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba meet at the Group of Seven summit starting on Sunday, applauded the Nippon-US Steel agreement. 'The government of Japan welcomes the US government's decision, as we believe this investment will enhance innovation capabilities in the US and Japanese steel industries and further strengthen the close partnership between our two countries,' Economy, trade and industry minister Yoji Muto said in a statement on Saturday. Friday's announcement was hardly guaranteed, even if many investors had seen approval as likely after Trump headlined a rally on May 30 giving his vague blessing to an 'investment' by Nippon Steel, which he described as a 'great partner.' Shares of US Steel had dipped earlier on Friday after a Nippon Steel executive told Japan's Nikkei newspaper that the takeover required 'a degree of management freedom' to go ahead after Trump said the US would be in control with the golden share. The bid has faced opposition since Nippon Steel launched it in December 2023. After the United Steelworkers union came out against the deal last year, both then-president Joe Biden, a Democrat, and Trump, a Republican, expressed their opposition as they sought to woo voters in the presidential campaign in the swing state of Pennsylvania. Shortly before leaving office in January, Biden blocked the deal on national security grounds, prompting lawsuits by the companies, which argued the national security review they received was biased. The Biden White House disputed the charge. The steel companies saw a new opportunity in the Trump administration, which opened a fresh 45-day national security review into the proposed merger in April. But Trump's public comments, ranging from welcoming a simple 'investment' in US Steel by the Japanese firm to floating a minority stake for Nippon Steel, spurred confusion.
