US Anti-Ship Missiles Challenge Nearby Chinese Aircraft Carrier
The United States deployed anti-ship missiles on a strategic Philippine island during a drill while a Chinese aircraft carrier staged a show of force against the allies in the nearby waters.
Newsweek has contacted the Chinese Defense Ministry for comment by email.
The Philippines, a U.S. ally that has territorial disputes with China over the South China Sea, forms the first island chain with Taiwan and Japan under a U.S. containment strategy that seeks to restrict China's military access to the Pacific Ocean using Washington-aligned territories.
The Chinese military-which has the world's largest navy by hull count-has been expanding its reach and presence beyond the first island chain. The U.S. is arming its regional allies and partners with ship-sinking missiles to counter China's navy.
The Navy-Marine Expeditionary Ship Interdiction System (NMESIS) was deployed for the first time during a bilateral exercise, code-named Balikatan 2025, on Batan Island in the northern Philippines on April 26, the U.S. Marine Corps announced on Sunday.
The NMESIS is a ground-based launcher. It consists of a remote-operated vehicle equipped with two Naval Strike Missile containers and is designed for facilitating sea denial and sea control by striking enemy ships from a distance of more than 100 nautical miles (115 miles).
Batan Island is north of the Luzon Strait, which is an important waterway for China's navy to accomplish a breakthrough of the first island chain. The strait is situated between Taiwan and the Philippines, linking the South China Sea and the Philippine Sea.
The American anti-ship weapon held a simulated fire mission during the deployment. "We're not here practicing a war plan. We're practicing for the defense of the Philippines," U.S. Marine Corps Lieutenant General Michael Cederholm told reporters.
Washington and Manila signed a mutual defense treaty in 1951, which says an attack on either side in the Pacific region would prompt the partnered countries to take action. This includes attacks on Philippine military, public vessels or aircraft in the South China Sea.
Meanwhile, the Japanese Defense Ministry reported that a Chinese naval strike group, which was led by the aircraft carrier CNS Shandong, sailed toward the South China Sea on Friday, following its deployment to east of Luzon, an island in the northern Philippines, on Wednesday.
The Shandong and three escorting warships transited the Luzon Strait as they were spotted 323 miles south of Yonaguni Island in southwestern Japan, a map by Newsweek shows.
During its three-day deployment in the Philippine Sea, the Shandong's carrier-based fighter jets and helicopters conducted 70 and 60 takeoffs and landings, respectively, Tokyo added.
U.S. Marine Corps Lieutenant General Michael Cederholm said: "We don't broadcast when we're going in, when we're coming out and how long things are going to stay. All I'll say is we're here at the invitation and with the support of the Philippine government."
Philippine Brigadier General Michael Logico said: "A peaceful region can only be maintained through a proper balance of strength between opposing forces until such time that … both countries decide that it's not going to be worth it to fight over this area."
It remains to be seen whether the NMESIS will stay behind following the conclusion of the exercise. Another American missile system, the U.S. Army Mid-Range Capability, has been stationed in the Philippines since April 2024, which was deployed for drills at first.
Related Articles
Americans Share Best Financial Advice They Ever Received-It's Eye-OpeningUber Could Be Halted For Millions of AmericansMap Shows US and Chinese Aircraft Carriers in Pacific This WeekWhat's at Stake for the U.S. if India and Pakistan go to War?
2025 NEWSWEEK DIGITAL LLC.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


WIRED
21 minutes ago
- WIRED
'100% Stupid': MAGA World Is Cautiously Turning on Elon Musk
Much of the right-wing media ecosystem appeared unsure how to react to the seeming public implosion of the relationship between President Donald Trump and Elon Musk on Thursday and into Friday morning. Outlets and influencers that typically react savagely to criticism of Trump played the spat more or less down the middle. Even much of the criticism of Musk was relatively genteel. 'He's gotta let Trump be Trump,' former Fox News host Eric Bolling said on Steve Bannon's broadcast network, Real America's Voice. 'You can be First Bro,' he said of Musk, 'but you can't be de facto president." Behind the scenes, they tell WIRED, Republican operatives could not help but be entertained at the torrent of messages flooding their group chats. They tended to take Trump's side. One Trumpworld consultant tells WIRED that the entire episode reminded them of a line in a recent Wall Street Journal report, about how Trump had privately described Musk as '50% genius, 50% boy.' 'After today,' the consultant says, 'I think he's just 100% stupid.' (Musk did not immediately reply to a request for comment.) While Musk had been railing against the Republican budget reconciliation package formally known as the One Big Beautiful Bill Act for several days on X, things turned ugly once Trump denounced the billionaire during an Oval Office appearance on Thursday with the German chancellor Friedrich Merz. 'Elon and I had a great relationship,' Trump said. 'I don't know if we will anymore.' Musk subsequently agreed with an X user who called for the president's impeachment. Still, some presented the conflict as a positive thing, even while calling for it to end.

Associated Press
27 minutes ago
- Associated Press
U.S., Chinese officials to meet in London next week for new round of trade talks
WASHINGTON (AP) — Senior U.S. administration officials will meet with a Chinese delegation on Monday in London for the next round of trade negotiations between Washington and Beijing, President Donald Trump said Friday. The meeting comes after a phone call between Trump and Chinese leader Xi Jinping on Thursday, which the U.S. president described as a 'very positive' conversation as the two countries attempt to break an impasse over tariffs and global supplies of rare earth minerals. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick and U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer will represent the U.S. side in the trade talks. 'The meeting should go very well,' Trump wrote on his social media platform Friday afternoon. ___
Yahoo
28 minutes ago
- Yahoo
'This is a disaster of epic proportion': How the Trump–Musk feud sparked a $150 billion meltdown
A high-profile feud between President Trump and billionaire Elon Musk reached a fever pitch on Thursday, triggering a $150 billion-plus wipeout in Tesla (TSLA) shares. The sell-off came after Musk slammed Trump's GOP-backed spending bill, prompting fiery responses from the president and raising concerns over the political risk now tied to one of the world's most valuable companies. Read more about Tesla's stock moves and today's market action. "This is a disaster of epic proportion for Tesla and SpaceX," Ross Gerber, CEO of Gerber Kawasaki Wealth & Investment Management CEO, told Yahoo Finance in reaction to the developments. "And whether Elon wants to accept it or not, he did help Trump get elected. It is his fault that Trump is president of the United States." Although shares rebounded on Friday, rising around 6% in mid-afternoon trading as Musk and Trump moved to cool tensions, Gerber warned, "I think we're just getting started for the declines because a lot of the stock price's value isn't based off the underlying business. It's based off the perception that Elon being a part of Tesla is somehow wonderful." The close relationship between Trump and Musk began to take a more active shape during last year's campaign trail. Musk endorsed the then-Republican candidate soon after the assassination attempt on Trump in Butler, Pa. Afterward, Musk frequently appeared at rallies, voicing his support for the Republican Party at large and pledging millions to America PAC, a Trump-aligned super-PAC. Once Trump was elected, the president appointed Musk as head of the newly formed Department of Government Efficiency, otherwise known as DOGE. The purpose of the agency was to eliminate government waste. Musk officially exited the role late last month, claiming the agency had cut billions of dollars in costs. But just a few days later, Musk's tone shifted as he criticized Trump's controversial tax legislation, which is estimated to add trillions to the national debt over the next decade. It would also eliminate EV tax credits, a crucial government incentive for Tesla and a potential "death blow" to the company's sales, according to Gerber. Having cleared the House, the bill now heads to the Senate, with Trump vowing to sign it into law by July 4. "I'm sorry, but I just can't stand it anymore," Musk posted Tuesday on X. "This massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination. Shame on those who voted for it: you know you did wrong. You know it." The post opened the floodgates for a days-long escalation between the once-close confidants turned rivals. Trump wrote he was "very disappointed" in his former ally, while Musk fired back, saying the president wouldn't have won the election if it weren't for him. Investors reacted swiftly to the back-and-forth, sending Tesla shares down roughly 14% by Thursday's close — the largest single-day drop in the company's history. Gerber, whose firm holds about 235,000 Tesla shares, called the plunge "100% justified," pointing out that much of Tesla's stock value is driven more by perception than by the company's fundamentals. Prior to Thursday's sell-off, Tesla shares had rallied dramatically, up about 40% from their April lows, largely fueled by Elon Musk's close relationship with the president, despite ongoing uncertainties around tariffs weighing on the EV giant. "As a shareholder, [this] couldn't be worse for Elon and his properties and his investments and the future that he has because Trump's got another three and a half years," Gerber added. "Elon, in his ego and sort of weird haze of reality, actually thinks he's more powerful than Trump. This is now a showdown." Still, other investors remain optimistic, particularly when it comes to Tesla's upcoming robotaxi rollout and long-term plans for autonomous robots. "I think people are going to be impressed," said Craig Irwin, a senior research analyst at Roth MKM and Tesla shareholder. "The political noise and the other volatility is more short term in nature, at least as far as I see it." Irwin added, "The closeness between these two men is something that needed to change a little bit. These guys have so much in common: tremendous egos, tremendous power, and very strong opinions. ... Their interests are still incredibly well aligned [and] I think cooler heads prevail." On Friday, Morgan Stanley analyst Adam Jonas reiterated his Overweight rating on Tesla and maintained a $410 price target, implying about 40% upside from current levels. Jonas said his bullish stance reflects confidence in Tesla's broader technological strengths spanning autonomous vehicles, robotics, and even space and communications infrastructure, which he believes present far greater long-term growth and margin potential than the company's traditional EV business, currently under pressure. "We believe the challenges facing Tesla's current business are widely reported and well known, while the opportunities in the future business are potentially greatly underestimated," Jonas said. Alexandra Canal is a Senior Reporter at Yahoo Finance. Follow her on X @allie_canal, LinkedIn, and email her at Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data