Federal appeals court set to hear arguments in Trump's bid to erase hush money conviction
President Donald Trump's quest to erase his criminal conviction heads to a federal appeals court on Wednesday (June 11, 2025). It's one way he's trying to get last year's hush money verdict overturned.
A three-Judge panel is set to hear arguments in Mr. Trump's long-running fight to get the New York case moved from state court to federal court, where he could then try to have the verdict thrown out on presidential immunity grounds.
The Republican is asking the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals to intervene after a lower-court judge twice rejected the move. As part of the request, Mr. Trump wants the federal appeals court to seize control of the criminal case and then ultimately decide his appeal of the verdict, which is now pending in a state appellate court.
The 2nd Circuit should 'determine once and for all that this unprecedented criminal prosecution of a former and current President of the United States belongs in federal court," Mr. Trump's lawyers wrote in a court filing.
The Manhattan District Attorney's office, which prosecuted Mr. Trump's case, wants it to stay in state court. Mr. Trump's Justice Department — now partly run by his former criminal defence lawyers — backs his bid to move the case to federal court.
If Mr. Trump loses, he could go to the U.S. Supreme Court.
Mr. Trump was convicted in May 2024 of 34 felony counts of falsifying business records to conceal a hush money payment to porn actor Stormy Daniels, whose affair allegations threatened to upend his 2016 presidential campaign. Mr. Trump denies her claim and said he did nothing wrong. It was the only one of his four criminal cases to go to trial.
Mr. Trump's lawyers first sought to move the case to federal court following his March 2023 indictment, arguing that federal officers including former Presidents have the right to be tried in federal court for charges arising from 'conduct performed while in office.' Part of the criminal case involved cheques he wrote while he was President.
They tried again after his conviction, arguing that Mr. Trump's historic prosecution violated his constitutional rights and ran afoul of the Supreme Court's presidential immunity ruling, which was decided about a month after the hush money trial ended.
The ruling reins in prosecutions of ex-Presidents for official acts and restricts prosecutors in pointing to official acts as evidence that a President's unofficial actions were illegal.
U.S. District Judge Alvin Hellerstein denied both requests, ruling in part that Mr. Trump's conviction involved his personal life, not his work as President.
In a four-page ruling, Mr. Hellerstein wrote that nothing about the high court's ruling affected his prior conclusion that hush money payments at issue in Mr. Trump's case 'were private, unofficial acts, outside the bounds of executive authority.' Mr. Trump's lawyers argue that prosecutors rushed to trial instead of waiting for the Supreme Court's presidential immunity decision, and that prosecutors erred by showing jurors evidence that should not have been allowed under the ruling, such as former White House staffers describing how Mr. Trump reacted to news coverage of the hush money deal and tweets he sent while President in 2018.
Mr. Trump's former criminal defence lawyer Todd Blanche is now the Deputy U.S. Attorney General, the Justice Department's second-in-command. Another of his lawyers, Emil Bove, has a high-ranking Justice Department position.
The trial Judge, Juan M. Merchan, rejected Mr. Trump's requests to throw out the conviction on presidential immunity grounds and sentenced him on January 10 to an unconditional discharge, leaving his conviction intact but sparing him any punishment.
Appearing by video at his sentencing, Mr. Trump called the case a 'political witch hunt,' 'a weaponisation of government' and 'an embarrassment to New York.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
32 minutes ago
- Time of India
Birthday snub? Trump's military parade faces mass Republican no-show amid rising tensions
As US President Donald Trump prepares to organise a grand military parade in Washington, D.C. to celebrate the 250th anniversary of the Army on June 14, which also coincided with his 79th birthday, many of his Republican allies in Congress have opted out and decided not to attend the event, as per a report. Most GOP Lawmakers Say No to the Parade Politico's survey of 50 GOP lawmakers showed that just 7 of 50 Republican lawmakers said that they intended to attend Trump's parade, as per Daily Beast. Notable figures such as Senate Majority Leader John Thune, Majority Whip John Barrasso, and House Majority Leader Steve Scalise, will not be attending, according to the report. ALSO READ: Iran Israel war: Netanyahu on the verge of attacking Tehran's nuke sites, Houthis warn U.S - latest news by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 20 Most Expensive Cars In The World Undo Rand Paul Criticizes Parade's Style Kentucky junior senator Rand Paul shared that he was not a fan of 'goose-stepping soldiers in big tanks and missiles rolling down the street,' and added, 'So if you asked me, I wouldn't have done it. We were always different than the images you saw of the Soviet Union and North Korea. We were proud not to be that,' quoted Daily Beast. Personal Commitments Take Priority According to the report, many lawmakers return to their families and districts on weekends instead of spending time in Washington. While many lawmakers said that they were not going to the event because they had prior commitments, reported Daily Beast. Live Events Senator Markwayne Mullin of Oklahoma said that it is his anniversary this weekend, and 'I choose to be married,' as quoted in the report. Even Senators Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, Rick Scott of Florida and House Freedom Caucus Chair Andy Harris have also planned to not attend the event, which is expected to cost up to $45 million, as per Daily Beast. Some Republicans Will Still Attend However, some Republicans have shown enthusiasm to attend the event on the weekend like the Georgia Republican Marjorie Taylor Greene, who said, 'Yes, of course, I'm going to be there for the 250th anniversary of the Army,' quoted Daily Beast. As per the report, some members from the House will also make an appearance, Byron Donalds, Cory Mills, Elise Stefanik, Rich McCormick, John McGuire, and Lisa McClain. FAQs How many Republicans are attending? Out of 50 surveyed GOP lawmakers, only 7 confirmed they plan to attend. How much will the parade cost? It's expected to cost up to $45 million, as per Daily Beast report.
Time of India
32 minutes ago
- Time of India
Trump Brings Mar-a-Lago to D.C. — Rose Garden lawn torn up for new patio and towering Presidential flagpole
Donald Trump is making a new mark on the White House lawn, and it's raising questions. The president has begun tearing down the historic Rose Garden to create a more "functional" space that echoes the aesthetic of his private Florida resort, Mar-a-Lago. President Donald Trump is transforming the iconic White House Rose Garden into a Mar-a-Lago-style patio with two towering flagpoles. Critics argue that the historic lawn is being erased in favor of Trump's personal style and agenda. According to a report by the Daily Beast, bulldozers have begun tearing up the grass and laying the groundwork for a new flagpole, fulfilling President Donald Trump's intention to install a patio in the Mar-a-Lago style. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Schlechter Stuhlgang? Diese Methode funktioniert wie "auf Knopfdruck" Darmschutz Ratgeber Undo Why is Donald Trump tearing up the Rose Garden lawn? According to the AP, Trump approached reporters to check the work and informed them that he was erecting two "beautiful" flagpoles that he had "paid for" because the grounds "needed flagpoles for 200 years." The American flag and the POW/MIA flag are already flown daily from the White House's roof. Live Events The president had already declared in mid-February that he would remove the Rose Garden lawn, which frequently serves as the location for press conferences, award presentations, bill-signing ceremonies, and formal dinners. Later, he clarified that it was because women found it difficult to walk in high heels on the wet grass. During a March White House tour, he told Fox News that the grass just doesn't work when they use it for press conferences; people fall into the wet grass. ALSO READ: Pope Leo to speak virtually in Chicago — and it will happen right when Trump military parade rolls out Are Donald Trump's renovations erasing history? There are two rose gardens at the White House, the Jacqueline Kennedy Garden , which is south of the East Terrace Colonnade, and the Rose Garden, which is situated along the West Wing. Former First Lady Edith Roosevelt redesigned both flagpoles for the Kennedys in the early 1960s, following their original design in 1903. According to Rose Garden designer Rachel Lambert Mellon, President John F. Kennedy had the idea to revitalize the Rose Garden and turn the lawn that Trump is razing into a venue for formal events. What changes are being made to the White House grounds? Trump has promised to construct a $100 million ballroom that is comparable to the Grand Ballroom at Mar-a-Lago, the president's private club in Palm Beach, Florida, besides renovating the garden. To honor John F. Kennedy Jr., a big magnolia tree was chopped down and replaced with a smaller one outside the Oval Office window last month. The renovation project was started on Monday by staff from the National Park Service, which looks after the White House grounds. According to the Associated Press, they anticipate wrapping up sometime in the first half of August. FAQs Why is President Trump rebuilding the Rose Garden? Donald Trump claims wet grass made it difficult for women wearing heels and wants a more usable, Mar-a-Lago-inspired space. What else is changing? Along with a new patio and flagpoles, Donald Trump intends to construct a $100 million ballroom and has already replaced a historic magnolia tree .
Time of India
32 minutes ago
- Time of India
'Due to increased regional tensions...': US Embassy in Israel restricts employees' travel
US embassy in Israel issues security alert to its employees amid rising tension in the region. The US Embassy in Jerusalem Thursday issued a fresh security alert restricting its employees from traveling amid heightening tensions in the region between Israel and Iran. 'Due to the increased regional tensions, U.S. government employees and their family members are restricted from travel outside the greater Tel Aviv (including Herzliya, Netanya, and Even Yehuda), Jerusalem, and Be'er Sheva areas until further notice,' the embassy said in a Thursday security alert. The security alert came after the Trump administration announced scaling back the number of personnel in the Middle East. Defense secretary Pete Hegseth allowed voluntary departures of military dependents across northeast Africa, the Middle East and portions of South and Central Asia. The State Department said it has ordered the departure of all nonessential personnel from the US Embassy in Baghdad based on its latest review and a commitment 'to keeping Americans safe, both at home and abroad.' The embassy already had been on limited staffing, and the order will not affect a large number of personnel. In Thursday's alert, the US Embassy in Israel stated that it 'reminds U.S. citizens of the continued need for caution and increased personal security awareness — including knowing the location of the nearest shelter in the event of a red alert as security incidents, including mortar, rocket, and missile fire, and unmanned aircraft system (UAS) intrusions, often take place without any warning.' Trump confirmed the precautionary steps that US has been taking. "They (US personnel) are being moved out because it could be a dangerous place, and we will see what have given notice to move out," he said. Trump, who has previously said Israel or the US could carry out airstrikes targeting Iranian nuclear facilities if negotiations failed, gave a less-than-optimistic view about reaching a deal with Iran, telling the New York Post's "Pod Force One" podcast that he was "getting more and more less confident about" a deal. "They seem to be delaying, and I think that's a shame. I'm less confident now than I would have been a couple of months ago. Something happened to them," he said in the interview recorded on Monday and released on Wednesday.
