Quebec Liberals hope to boost their prospects as they choose new leader
After a drawn-out campaign overshadowed by upheaval in Ottawa and threats from the United States, Quebec Liberals will choose a new leader this weekend who they hope will revive the party from years of inertia.
The Liberals suffered back-to-back defeats to François Legault 's upstart Coalition Avenir Québec in 2018 and 2022. The party has struggled to connect to francophone voters in regions outside of Montreal, and has failed to benefit from Legault's waning popularity in recent years.
Instead, the sovereigntist Parti Québécois has surged in the polls and seems poised to form the next government, despite holding just five of the 125 seats in the provincial legislature. With the next election set for October 2026 in a province known for dramatic electoral swings, the pressure is on for the Liberals to prove they're still a vital force.
The question card-carrying Liberals must answer before choosing their new leader is simple, said Pablo Rodriguez, a leadership candidate and former federal minister. 'Who can beat François Legault and the Parti Québécois?' said Rodriguez, 57. 'Who can bring us back to power in 2026?'
The timing of the campaign, which began in January, has made it difficult for the party to capture the public's attention. Former prime minister Justin Trudeau's decision to resign kicked off a whirlwind federal leadership race in February, followed by a general election, with US President Donald Trump's threats of tariffs and annexation looming over it all.
'The (Quebec) leadership race has unfortunately been drowned out,' said Sébastien Dallaire, an executive vice-president with the polling firm Léger.
Rodriguez, the most well-known of the five candidates, is the presumed front-runner. After nine years in Trudeau's government, he left Ottawa last September to seek the provincial leadership and has emphasized his lengthy political resumé. A Léger survey of the general population published in May showed him leading his rivals by a wide margin.
But the party's leadership rules make it hard to predict the results, which will be revealed at a convention in Quebec City on Saturday, said Sophie Villeneuve, a political analyst and former Parti Québécois staffer. The Liberals have assigned an equal number of points to each of Quebec's 125 ridings. In each riding, one third of the points are reserved for members aged 25 and younger.
That means the winner will have to appeal to young voters and those outside Montreal. That could be a challenge for Rodriguez, whose federal seat was in the city, Villeneuve said. 'I think that Mr. Rodriguez is very well-known in Montreal, but not so well-known in the regions of Quebec,' she said. 'And it's through the regions that the Liberal party can hope to win back the trust of Quebec voters.'
Although there is some overlap among members, the provincial Liberals are not affiliated with the federal Liberal party.
The Quebec Liberals currently hold just 19 seats in the provincial legislature, mostly in and around Montreal. The concentration of Liberal voters in the city has allowed them to hang on to Official Opposition status.
Karl Blackburn, former president of a Quebec employers group who hails from the Saguenay area, said the Liberals need to re-establish themselves as the party of the economy and the regions. 'Mr. Rodriguez is zero for two on these issues,' said Blackburn, 57, who is leaning heavily on his business credentials.
Blackburn's campaign has commissioned a poll of party members that it claims shows Rodriguez with a slight lead, but not enough to win on the first round of the party's ranked ballot system. His team says Rodriguez's support is focused in Montreal, which could give Blackburn an advantage in a second round, when voters' second choices start to matter.
Villeneuve also predicted there will be no winner in the first round. But she said Blackburn, who was a member of the provincial legislature during the Liberal government of former premier Jean Charest, 'represents the Liberal party's past' at a time when it's looking for renewal.
Meanwhile, Charles Milliard, former head of the federation of Quebec chambers of commerce, is pitching himself as the youthful option. A political newcomer, he compared himself in an interview to charismatic Parti Québécois Leader Paul St-Pierre Plamondon, who had never held office before taking the reins of the party in 2020.
'I like the way he does politics,' said Milliard, 45. 'We obviously have different views on the future of Quebec, but I think it would be a very interesting match next year.'
Marc Bélanger, an international trade lawyer, and Mario Roy, an economist and farmer, are also seeking the party's leadership.
The leading candidates offer similar lines on many of the major issues facing Quebec. They've attacked Legault's record on the economy, pointing to the record $13.6-billion deficit the government tabled this year. They've expressed openness to new pipeline projects in Quebec, which have long been a non-starter in the province.
And they're promising to unify Quebecers after years of what they call divisive politics under the Coalition Avenir Québec government, pointing to Legault's focus on identity issues such as immigration, secularism and the French language.
'The first job of a premier is to unite the people, not to divide them,' Rodriguez said. 'So just by changing the tone, that will change a lot of things.'
They're also presenting the Liberals as the best option for those who want to avoid another referendum on independence, which the Parti Québécois has promised to hold by 2030.
'I really feel that Quebecers are due for a change,' Blackburn said. 'And that change won't be a referendum like Mr. St-Pierre Plamondon is proposing. It will be a vision that looks to the future.'
Regardless of who the party elects on Saturday, the Liberals will have their work cut out for them if they're to have a shot at forming the next government, Dallaire said.
'Somehow the long-standing relationship between the Liberal party and their francophone voters in Quebec got broken,' he said. 'It should be the first priority of the new leader to put forth a program that more francophones can relate to. It's really been the major issue for the party for the better part of a decade.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Toronto Star
2 hours ago
- Toronto Star
Allan Gregg: At the G7 meeting, look for Canada to do something unusual: Lead
Foreign policy, international affairs and Canada's role in the world have rarely been top-of-mind concerns for most Canadians. In 1911 Liberal Wilfrid Laurier lost an election by proposing lower tariffs with the United States. 77 years later Brian Mulroney won re-election while endorsing pretty much the same proposal. The terrorist attack on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon in 2001 captured public attention — as did Jean Chrétien's decision 18 months later that Canada would not join the 'coalition of the willing' in the invasion of Iraq.
Montreal Gazette
7 hours ago
- Montreal Gazette
Letters: As feds seek unity, Quebec digs heels on divisive tuition hikes
In today's challenging political and economic climate, our newly elected federal government is making a commendable effort to unite Canadians by breaking down provincial barriers and promoting national prosperity. Unfortunately, the latest stance from the Coalition Avenir Québec government — sticking to its contentious tuition hikes for out-of-province students despite a court order — runs counter to this vision. Premier François Legault's claims that the French language is being eroded appear unfounded and risk deepening divisions at a time when unity is more critical than ever. Canada is facing serious external pressures, particularly from our southern neighbour. Now is the time to set aside narrow political interests and focus on strengthening and preserving our country — together. Robert Tellier, Westmount Bill 40 belongs in Supreme Court Re: ' On death, taxes and the fate of minority rights ' (Robert Libman, June 7) Columnist Robert Libman asserts that the Supreme Court should decline to hear the Quebec government's appeal concerning education reform Bill 40. He highlights that two Quebec courts have unanimously ruled on what appears to be a straightforward matter. I respectfully disagree, as this issue extends beyond the jurisdiction of Quebec's interests. In Quebec, our public school system has two governance systems — one for the English-speaking community and the other for the French-speaking community. No other province in Canada has a system of school governance where language determines the rules, resulting in different standards for democracy, accountability and transparency. I feel this situation is unacceptable in any context. The issue requires additional scrutiny. Chris Eustace, Pierrefonds Asylum seekers face more hurdles Re: ' Group holds protest against proposed federal security bill ' (The Gazette, June 10) and ' Critic calls out border security bill provision ' (NP Montreal, June 6) It's perhaps surprising that one of the first pieces of legislation proposed by the Mark Carney government, Bill C-2, will make it far more difficult for refugees to apply for asylum in Canada. Under the bill's provisions, people who have been in Canada for more than a year will not be permitted to go through the refugee determination process. Those who cross by land from the U.S., with some exceptions, will not be permitted to stay, and the post-14-day period through which they can currently apply will be nullified. Bill C-2 would also give the government the power to cancel anyone's pre-citizenship or residency status. It's as though huge 'refugees need not apply' banners were placed at the Canadian border — a throwback to the Mackenzie King era. Shloime Perel, Côte-St-Luc Finding right fit for Bay building Re: ' 'A Trophy Asset' ' (The Gazette, June 10) The recent closing of Hudson's Bay stores has raised the question of the future vocation for the flagship store in downtown Montreal. My preference would be to repurpose it as another department store, at least for its older part fronting Ste-Catherine St. W., to maintain the street's character as a major commercial artery of Montreal. I suggest inviting Galeries Lafayette — a major department store chain in Europe with roots in Paris — to open a branch in the former Bay location. Given Montreal's French character, establishing a store in Montreal would be a natural fit. Robert Hajaly, Montreal Submitting a letter to the editor Letters should be sent by email to letters@ We prioritize letters that respond to, or are inspired by, articles published by The Gazette. If you are responding to a specific article, let us know which one. Letters should be sent uniquely to us. The shorter they are — ideally, fewer than 200 words — the greater the chance of publication. Timing, clarity, factual accuracy and tone are all important, as is whether the writer has something new to add to the conversation. We reserve the right to edit and condense all letters. Care is taken to preserve the core of the writer's argument. Our policy is not to publish anonymous letters, those with pseudonyms or 'open letters' addressed to third parties. Letters are published with the author's full name and city or neighbourhood/borough of residence. Include a phone number and address to help verify identity; these will not be published. We will not indicate to you whether your letter will be published. If it has not been published within 10 days or so, it is not likely to be.
National Observer
9 hours ago
- National Observer
Tories poised to help feds push major projects bill through Parliament
The federal Conservatives are poised to allow the Liberals to rush their trade and major projects bill through the House of Commons by next Friday. Along with removing federal barriers to internal trade, Bill C-5 would allow the federal government to conditionally approve projects it deems 'in the national interest' before regulatory processes take place and also exempt projects from many environmental laws. All other opposition parties are staunchly opposing a government order that aims to force C-5 through the House of Commons before summer break. But with the Conservatives' support, the Liberals may have the majority vote they need. Conservative MPs did not say outright whether they would support the Liberal motion, and took jabs at certain aspects of the legislation. But they did praise some elements of the bill in between criticisms referencing the 'lost Liberal decade' and calls to go further and eliminate environmental regulations. Conservative MP Gérard Deltell even congratulated Intergovernmental Affairs Minister Dominic LeBlanc for tabling the bill, adding that the bill's aim to ensure each project only goes through one environmental assessment is something the Conservatives have been suggesting for years. 'That's a principle we agree with' and 'precisely the approach that the minister is now proposing,' Deltell said in French. The two politicians' brief, friendly exchange illustrated a shared interest on the major projects portion of Bill C-5 and hinted at an unusual Liberal-Conservative alignment after a decade of fierce opposition. The Liberals and Conservatives are joining together to 'deny democracy' by rushing the major projects bill through the Parliament, said BQ MP Xavier Barsalou-Duval Bloc Québécois MPs were quick to dub the apparent alignment on this bill a Conservative-Liberal coalition. 'What's going on in the House is a bit of a show of Conservatives opposing Liberals and vice versa, but ultimately, it's a coalition between the Conservatives and the Liberals working together now, limiting debate on this bill,' BQ MP Andréanne Larouche said in the House of Commons. Despite being a minority government, the Liberals are acting like they have a majority, BQ MP Xavier Barsalou-Duval said on Friday. The government's special time-allocation motion to force Bill C-5 through the House of Commons would greatly limit debate on the proposed legislation, which, along with approving major projects before an environmental assessment, also grants the government sweeping powers to override laws related to those projects. 'Parliamentary committees will just have one and a half days to study this bill,' Barsalou-Duval said. 'Witnesses will appear before the committee without there being enough time to propose amendments. … That is madness, and yet, that is what we are being asked to consider.' The Liberals and Conservatives are joining together to 'deny democracy,' he said. 'They're trying to ram through a bill that has never been debated before the public. No one has been able to look at the bill in detail,' Barsalou-Duval said. BQ Leader Yves-François Blanchet said the Liberals adopted a Conservative agenda and are working with the Conservatives to put it in place. 'Given the scale and the importance and the unprecedented scope of this bill, a detailed examination is in order,' Blanchet said in French. 'It shouldn't be done on the back of a napkin on a sunny June 12 day.' LeBlanc and House Leader Steven Mackinnon both justified the time allocation motion by saying the government was elected on a mandate to move quickly on projects of national interest and remove federal trade barriers. Carney said last week his government would not impose a project on a province, but the wording of the bill does not require consensus from provinces. Like the BQ, the NDP is calling on Carney to slow down and split the bill into two sections for study: one on trade barriers and one on project approvals. NDP House Leader Alexandre Boulerice said earlier this week that the bill is 'like Stephen Harper's dreams coming true.' Debate on the time-allocation motion will resume on Monday and the federal government made another motion intended to ensure a vote is forced by the end of the day.
