logo
'Here's what we want to see from Doncaster mayor'

'Here's what we want to see from Doncaster mayor'

Yahoo24-04-2025

Voters in Doncaster will be able to cast their ballot for a directly elected mayor, local councillor and parish representatives on 1 May.
The reopening of the city's airport has been a central point of campaigning from parties but three people involved in Doncaster communities explain what matters most to them.
Michael Price owns what is believed to be the city's only supper club, which he hosts from his home in Town Fields.
The Gourmet Kitchen owner has been running his business for 14 years and also works as a restaurant consultant.
He says the industry has been under "relentless" strain for several years.
"My wife and I are very lucky as we run a very tight, small business but lots of friends within the industry with very successful businesses and Michelin-starred restaurants are really struggling.
"Ever since Covid a lot of them have got loans that need repaying, there's been a massive increase in inflation and the cost of ingredients and the increase in VAT is something that has never been addressed.
"Typically, the hospitality business in the good days would run on a 10% margin.
"Now a lot of businesses are not making any profit whatsoever, if they are just treading water they are doing well, and then we are seeing other restaurants going bust."
Michael wants councillors and the mayor to focus on the city centre.
"Everywhere is struggling with diminishing visitors for town centres and when there are no shoppers in the area, you get all the anti-social behaviour which you can see a lot of in Doncaster. There are people with complex lives and drug addicts.
"I think that really needs to be addressed, even if the council has to fund police officers."
The city centre is also a concern for Chris Cuthbert who owns bike shop Pedal Power.
He says his business's biggest challenge is crime.
"We deal with a lot of burglaries and shoplifting, we have had a string of attempted burglaries pretty much consistently for the last few years.
"We had about 14 attempts within about six months at some point last year and that's not just isolated to us, that's all the businesses locally," he explains.
"We certainly need a reduction in crime. We need to have a general overhaul on a ground level, we need to see more policing and more engagement from the council," he adds.
Chris is also keen to see more investment in apprenticeships for young people as the skills needed to repair bikes is changing with the switch to electric cycles.
"One of the biggest issues we have is staffing.
"Across the board there has been massive governmental support in cycling and green initiatives but we are not seeing any apprenticeships coming through.
"We are spending £20m on cycle networks on the roads in Doncaster but there seems to be nothing coming through to support the growth of these initiatives," he adds.
While reopening Doncaster Sheffield Airport is a key focus for politicians, elderly people are said to be more concerned about roads, says Collette Bunker.
She is chief executive at Be:friend, a charity which helps reduce loneliness and isolation in older people.
They recently held a workshop to find out what issues elderly people were concerned about.
"When it comes to getting out and about, our older neighbours really have to think about what routes to take because they say there's a very short amount of time to cross with the green man on a pedestrian crossing.
"A lot of our older neighbours will really think about where they are going and there are certain roads they won't cross because of the panic of getting across the road in a few seconds.
"It's such an easy fix to look at pedestrian crossings," she says.
Older residents also specifically mentioned housing, according to Collette.
"There are some newly built bungalows for people aged 55-plus, accessible for wheelchair users, but they are built on two huge hills.
"So getting anywhere proves very challenging, in fact, the residents have nicknamed it Cardiac Hill.
"Looking at hills and proximity to shops during planning are little things that would make older neighbours' lives so much easier," she adds.
There are a total of 12 candidates for mayor standing for election on 1 May.
They are:
David Bettney – Social Democratic Party
Frank Calladine - British Democratic Party
Andy Hiles - Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition
Nick Fletcher – Conservative Party
Ahsan Jamil – Workers Party of Britain
Alexander Jones – Reform UK
Ros Jones – Labour Party
Mihai Melenciuc – Liberal Democrats
Richie Vallance – Independent
Andrew Walmsley – Yorkshire Party
Doug Wright – Independent
You can find out more about all the candidates here.
Listen to highlights from South Yorkshire on BBC Sounds, catch up with the latest episode of Look North
The candidates vying to be Mayor of Doncaster
What does the Mayor of Doncaster do?
Who can vote in the May local elections?

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Opinion - Robby's Radar: Elon Musk should join the Libertarian Party
Opinion - Robby's Radar: Elon Musk should join the Libertarian Party

Yahoo

time28 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Opinion - Robby's Radar: Elon Musk should join the Libertarian Party

I have an idea for Elon Musk: join the Libertarian Party! Actually, don't just join it — take it over! Let me explain. Musk and President Trump seem to have entered some kind of détente following their big blowup last week. The world's richest man is no longer tweeting constantly about Trump being on the Epstein client list, or about how he feels betrayed over the big beautiful bill, which will massively increase the deficit despite Republican promises to finally cut government spending. In fact, he's spent the last several days tweeting about the Los Angeles riots and the importance of emerging AI technology. Trump, for his part, is refusing to engage Elon with particular hostility. Trump recently told reporters that he would be keeping the Tesla he bought from Musk, that he would continue using Starlink, Musk's internet service, and that he wished Elon well. I try not to make political predictions, but it actually would not surprise me in the least if Trump and Elon makeup — or at the very least, if the Republican Party maintains a friendly enough connection to Elon so that the tech billionaire remains a financial backer of, say, Vice President JD Vance when he inevitably runs for president. But here's an alternative idea I'd like to plan in Musk's head, as he is currently party shopping. As a Libertarian Party member, and voter, I would be thrilled to welcome Elon into the party — and I suspect I wouldn't be alone. After all, the Libertarian Party is a natural fit for Elon, whose politics mostly seem to align with Rand Paul and Thomas Massie, the two most libertarian members of Congress in the Republican Party. Elon wants low taxes, lower spending, low regulation, and thinks the federal government's priorities should reflect that: Cut the deficit first, get our fiscal house in order, and worry about the other stuff later. He also wants government regulations to be friendly to technological growth, is particularly motivated to prevent censorship on social media, and thinks the federal response to the COVID-19 pandemic was authoritarian. These are all textbook libertarian issues. What's more, the current trajectory of the Libertarian Party makes it ideal for some new leadership. For years, the party has been the nation's third or fourth largest, alongside the Green Party. In the 2016 election, Libertarian nominee Gary Johnson received 4.5 million votes and about 3 percent of the national vote, a record at the time. In 2020, the Libertarian nominee received about 1 percent of the national vote. In both of those elections, it finished ahead of the Green Party. Behind the scenes, however, the party has gone through something for a transformation over the last two cycles. Johnson, the 2016 nominee, was perceived by some within the Libertarian Party as too liberal and mainstream — not based enough to attract contrarians and dissidents to the party. In response, a faction calling itself the Mises Caucus formed and attempted to take control of the party. In 2022, they succeeded. Their strategy was podcast-focused: Find people who listen to Joe Rogan and like-minded independent thinkers and draw them to the Libertarian Party. The strategy had a certain amount of merit. The party ended up flirting with Robert F Kennedy Jr., and found itself having significant audience overlap with him. But eventually, Kennedy made a quasi-endorsement of Trump and essentially withdrew from the presidential race. Meanwhile, at the Libertarian National Convention, delegates bucked the Mises Caucus and picked their least preferred candidate, Chase Oliver. In response, the Mises Caucus leadership barely tolerated the Libertarian candidate, hindering his campaign in numerous ways. The party's chairwoman, Angela McArdle, the highest-ranking Mises Caucus official, subsequently resigned from the party. The new chair is not a member of this faction and is trying to chart a more neutral course and reunite the party, though the Mises Caucus has vowed to retake control. So that's where we are now: The Libertarian Party could use some new people, some new leadership, and probably a new infusion of cash. If Elon Musk really wants to make Republicans sorry that they failed to live up to his expectations and cut government spending — but quite rationally believes that Democrats will never ever, ever do better — he might find he has the most in common with the ticket that gets my vote every year. Robbie Soave is co-host of The Hill's commentary show 'Rising' and a senior editor for Reason Magazine. This column is an edited transcription of his daily commentary. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Biden's COVID czar hammers RFK Jr. over vaccine panel overhaul
Biden's COVID czar hammers RFK Jr. over vaccine panel overhaul

The Hill

time2 hours ago

  • The Hill

Biden's COVID czar hammers RFK Jr. over vaccine panel overhaul

Former White House COVID-19 response coordinator Ashish Jha, who served under President Biden, criticized the decision by Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. to fire all 17 experts on the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's (CDC) vaccine panel. Kennedy announced the decision in an op-ed for The Wall Street Journal Monday, saying, 'A clean sweep is needed to re-establish public confidence in vaccine science.' But in an interview with CNN's Wolf Blitzer, Jha pushed back against Kennedy's reasoning. 'Look what he said in his op-ed was a series of nonsense about a group of individuals, experts…who shape what vaccines, if any, are going to be available to the American people,' Jha said in the interview. 'So obviously this is very concerning,' he continued. 'We'll have to see who he appoints next. But this is a step in the wrong direction.' Jha said he is concerned about what the move foretells about the secretary's agenda on vaccines. Jha pointed to what he characterized as a lackluster response from the secretary to 'the worst measles outbreak of the last 25 years.' He also expressed concern about Kennedy raising questions about vaccines causing autism, which Jha dismissed and said was 'settled science.' 'Then you put this in the middle of all of that,' Jha said, referring to the vaccine panel sweep, 'and what you have is a pretty clear picture that what Secretary Kennedy is trying to do is make sure that vaccines are not readily available to Americans, not just for kids, for the elderly.' 'He could go pretty far with this move, and I really am worried about where we're headed,' Jha continued. He said he's particularly concerned about the effect Kennedy's move will have on kids and whether they will continue having access to certain vaccines in the future. 'Kids rely on vaccines. I'm worried about whether the next generation of kids are going to have access to polio vaccines and measles vaccines. That's where we're heading. That's what we have to push back against.' Kennedy said in his op-ed that he was removing every member of the panel to give the Trump administration an opportunity to appoint its own members. Kennedy has long accused ACIP members of having conflicts of interest, sparking concern among vaccine advocates that he would seek to install members who are far more skeptical of approving new vaccines. But Jha pushed back against criticism that the panel was all Biden-appointed experts, saying, 'When the Biden administration came in, almost all of the appointees had come from the first Trump administration.' 'That was fine because they were good people,' he said. 'They were experts. Right now, it's the same thing. The people he is firing are experts — like a nurse in Illinois who spent her entire career getting kids vaccinated, cancer doctors from Memorial Sloan Kettering — like these are really good people.' 'And generally, CDC has not worried about when were they appointed. The question is, are they good and are they conflict free.'

Mayor Adams' ‘emergency' spending is out of control — now NYC must hit the brakes
Mayor Adams' ‘emergency' spending is out of control — now NYC must hit the brakes

New York Post

time2 hours ago

  • New York Post

Mayor Adams' ‘emergency' spending is out of control — now NYC must hit the brakes

New Yorkers, like all Americans, tend to stock up when any crisis is about to hit: We fill up our gas tanks, empty the bread and egg shelves at grocery stores and buy enough toilet paper to last for months. It's human nature — and for far too long, New York City's government has been behaving the very same way. But City Hall's panic reaction is far worse, and does far more damage. Advertisement In recent emergencies, like the COVID-19 pandemic and the asylum-seeker influx, city government kept on 'crisis buying' for more than a year, without ever comparing prices or rooting out contractor abuse, fraud and waste. It's time for drastic change: We must reform the city's out-of-control emergency procurement practices and add vital checks and balances. Currently, when the mayor declares a state of emergency, the city's comptroller and corporation counsel suspend their ordinary oversight regarding contracts and procurement. Advertisement In theory, this allows City Hall to respond quickly and obtain necessary goods and services to alleviate the crisis. In practice, it means the city can award no-bid contracts for up to one year — contracts that, having bypassed the competitive bidding that's normally required, can be rife with waste and abuse. Imagine purchasing a car or searching for your next apartment without competitively price-shopping for those big-ticket items. That's what City Hall does whenever the mayor declares an emergency. City agencies aren't even required to send 'emergency' contracts to the comptroller for auditing before laying out taxpayer cash. In fact, 84% of such contracts filed between January 2022 and September 2023 were submitted more than 31 days after the contract start date. Advertisement Both Mayor Eric Adams and former Mayor Bill de Blasio spent billions of dollars on the asylum-seeker and COVID crises, respectively, drawing multiple allegations of corruption and pay-to-play politics. This uncontrolled spending was especially acute during the pandemic, as de Blasio extended 'emergency' contracts a whopping 100-plus times and spent nearly $7 billion on emergency supplies with no oversight or limiting guardrails. In the private sector, affordability is a prime factor when choosing bids on contracts. The city's emergency procurement process throws such considerations to the wind, leading to reckless overspending. During COVID, City Hall paid top dollar for ventilators and N95 masks it never received — and in one case, paid an absurd $7.50 apiece for cloth masks. Advertisement Its fire sale of nearly $224 million worth of COVID-era surplus items, from ventilators to face shields, only recouped $500,000, a downright outrage. The current administration is no better, awarding a $432 million emergency contract for asylum-seeker services to an untested company called DocGo. Its dreadful performance — with problems like chronic food waste, moldy hotel rooms, unlicensed security guards and an uncredentialed CEO who was forced to resign — resulted in an investigation by the state attorney general. Even in non-emergency circumstances, the city has never reined in city contractors who utilize loopholes to enrich themselves. Take the company owned by David Levitan, listed as one of New York City's worst landlords. For over a quarter century, the city has repeatedly used Levitan's properties as homeless shelters — buildings with rotted floors, broken elevators, rat infestations and peeling lead paint. Levitan has even required some of the nonprofits operating shelters within his buildings to subcontract with his own maintenance or extermination companies to service the properties — reaping even more revenue from our tax dollars. It's time for reform, top to bottom. Advertisement Emergencies, by their very definition, are short in duration. Accordingly, they should necessitate a strictly time-limited use of no-bid contracts, for instances when competitive bidding will truly hinder the city's response. That's why I am introducing two bills in the New York City Council this week to update our lackadaisical, irresponsible procurement processes. These bills will limit all emergency contracts to 30 days, unless both the comptroller and corporation counsel approve of an extension. If passed, the laws will require all contracts be sent to the comptroller for auditing within 15 days of signing, and will increase subcontractor transparency with fines of up to $100,000 for not disclosing to the city any conflicts of interest or competing contractual obligations. Advertisement New York's broken contracting system has price-gouged our taxpayers for far too long — and recent mayoral administrations have shown no appetite to follow good-government procurement practices. It's up to the City Council to advance this vital legislation, saving precious fiscal resources, restoring responsibility and rooting out corruption. City Council Member Julie Menin (D) represents the East Side of Manhattan and chairs the Consumer and Worker Protection Committee.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store