
Having a child's baby seat in specific position could lead to fines of up to £500
Parents could face significant fines and points on their licence if they don't have their baby seat in the correct position while driving
Parents could be hit with hefty fines and points on their licence if they fail to position their baby seat correctly while driving. It's a legal requirement for everyone in a car to wear a seatbelt, and babies in car seats must also be properly secured.
The Highway Code stipulates that all passengers in a vehicle must wear a seatbelt, with additional rules for those travelling in baby seats. Specifically, children under three years old must be secured in an appropriate child restraint in both the front and rear seats, although exceptions are made for taxi journeys where no such restraint is available.
The regulations differ slightly for children aged between three and 12.
Children shorter than 1.35m (4ft 5in) are required to use a child restraint in the front seat and either a child restraint or adult belt in the back seat if no restraint is available. However, it's not just the type of restraint that matters - its placement within the vehicle is also crucial to avoid legal repercussions.
It's important to note that rear-facing baby seats should never be placed in front of an active airbag. While airbags can significantly reduce the risk of serious injury in adults, they can have the opposite effect on children small enough to require a rear-facing seat.
Moreover, official guidelines emphasise that child car seats should never be positioned in side-facing seats as this could also compromise safety.
The UK's child seat laws accommodate certain specific exceptions. For taxis or minicabs without the correct car seat, or during an "unexpected necessity over a short distance", children can be excused from the standard requirements.
This flexibility extends to scenarios where a vehicle already contains two fitted child seats, making the installation of a third impractical.
According to Rule 100 of The Highway Code, children shorter than 1.35 metres must use a suitable restraint system, which spans from infant carriers to booster seats adhering to the manufacturers installation instructions.
The legislation intensifies under the Road Traffic Act 1988, which explicitly states: "A person who drives or rides in a motor vehicle in contravention of regulations under this section is guilty of an offence; but, notwithstanding any enactment or rule of law, no person other than the person actually committing the contravention is guilty of an offence by reason of the contravention."
It's incumbent upon the driver to ensure all passengers adhere to seatbelt laws to avoid fines for non-adherence. Specifically, not properly securing a child under 14 in a recognised car seat can result in a fine up to £500.
Medical exemptions
Individuals with certain medical issues may qualify for exemptions, freeing them from these legal obligations:
Despite these exceptions, the general rule applies: seatbelts are compulsory unless medically advised otherwise, with special considerations made for pregnant women and individuals with disabilities. Disabled drivers and passengers may require vehicle adaptations to accommodate their needs appropriately.
For a comprehensive understanding of the latest seatbelt requirements as per the Highway Code, a full breakdown is accessible online here.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Scotsman
4 hours ago
- Scotsman
The bizarre reason a Twix advert has been banned from TV
A Twix ad has been banned for 'condoning dangerous driving' 😬 Sign up to the weekly Cost Of Living newsletter. Saving tips, deals and money hacks. Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to Edinburgh News, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... Twix has had an advert banned for 'condoning dangerous driving'. The Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) has issued the ruling. But why has the advert been controversial? An advert for the chocolate bar Twix has been banned for 'condoning dangerous driving'. The rule was handed down by the Advertising Standards Authority after multiple complaints were made. The ad - called 'Two is More Than One' - was broadcast on TV and VOD in March of this year, according to the ASA. It depicted a man driving off an empty road and falling down a rocky hill before landing upside down on top of an identical car. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Mars Wrigley, owners of Twix, claimed the advert was 'set in a separate world that was absurd, fantastical and removed from reality'. However it has now been banned. Why has the Twix advert been banned? A television advert for Twix biscuits has been banned by the ASA for promoting "dangerous" and "irresponsible" driving | Twix/YouTube After it was broadcast on TV - and online - the ASA received multiple complaints about it. Viewers felt that it 'encouraged dangerous driving' and was 'irresponsible'. The ASA's findings ruled: 'Because we considered the driving depicted in the ads condoned unsafe driving, that appeared likely to breach the legal requirements of the Highway Code, we concluded the ads were irresponsible.' Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad It did agree that the ad 'contained some clearly fantastical elements' but found that 'the scenes were depicted as a chase with the emphasis on speed'. Responding to the ruling, Mars told ITV News : 'We always take pride in maintaining high standards across all our communications and every advert we produce is submitted for approval through the appropriate review channels. "In our view, this particular advert adopts a fantastical tone that is neither realistic nor intended to be imitated. "Nonetheless, we take our responsibility as an advertiser seriously and never intended to cause any offence or concern, so we are reviewing the ruling carefully in order to work collaboratively towards a resolution." Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Have you got a story you want to share with our readers? You can now send it to us online via YourWorld at . It's free to use and, once checked, your story will appear on our website and, space allowing, in our newspapers.


BBC News
7 hours ago
- BBC News
Twix ad banned for encouraging unsafe driving
But the watchdog the Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) ruled the ad "must not appear again" in its current form because it "condoned unsafe driving". While the ASA acknowledged that the stunt performed highlighted the fantastical nature of the advert, it took issue with the first half of the video that showed driving "that appeared likely to breach the legal requirements of the Highway Code". It said there was an "emphasis on speed" including with "fast paced beat and music" in the car chase, noting the "visible skid marks" left on the road. Mars defended the advert, saying "the cars were shot driving at lawful speeds and any emulation would only reflect the legal and safe driving presented". The sweet giant, who also own M&Ms, Celebrations and Maltesers, added that Twix is known for its absurd and playful humour, which was reflected in the advert. The final scene shows a Twix bar falling through the sunroofs of the two cars, before they drive off - still attached - and with the tagline "two is more than one". For its part, Clearcast told the ASA that the style of the video made it clear it wasn't meant to be emulated nor did it suggest "safe driving was boring." In the ASA's ruling, it said it told Mars "not to condone or encourage irresponsible driving that was likely to breach the legal requirements of the Highway Code in their ads."


Scotsman
7 hours ago
- Scotsman
The bizarre reason a Twix advert has been banned from TV
A Twix ad has been banned for 'condoning dangerous driving' 😬 Sign up to the weekly Cost Of Living newsletter. Saving tips, deals and money hacks. Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... Twix has had an advert banned for 'condoning dangerous driving'. The Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) has issued the ruling. But why has the advert been controversial? An advert for the chocolate bar Twix has been banned for 'condoning dangerous driving'. The rule was handed down by the Advertising Standards Authority after multiple complaints were made. The ad - called 'Two is More Than One' - was broadcast on TV and VOD in March of this year, according to the ASA. It depicted a man driving off an empty road and falling down a rocky hill before landing upside down on top of an identical car. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Mars Wrigley, owners of Twix, claimed the advert was 'set in a separate world that was absurd, fantastical and removed from reality'. However it has now been banned. Why has the Twix advert been banned? A television advert for Twix biscuits has been banned by the ASA for promoting "dangerous" and "irresponsible" driving | Twix/YouTube After it was broadcast on TV - and online - the ASA received multiple complaints about it. Viewers felt that it 'encouraged dangerous driving' and was 'irresponsible'. The ASA's findings ruled: 'Because we considered the driving depicted in the ads condoned unsafe driving, that appeared likely to breach the legal requirements of the Highway Code, we concluded the ads were irresponsible.' Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad It did agree that the ad 'contained some clearly fantastical elements' but found that 'the scenes were depicted as a chase with the emphasis on speed'. Responding to the ruling, Mars told ITV News : 'We always take pride in maintaining high standards across all our communications and every advert we produce is submitted for approval through the appropriate review channels. "In our view, this particular advert adopts a fantastical tone that is neither realistic nor intended to be imitated. "Nonetheless, we take our responsibility as an advertiser seriously and never intended to cause any offence or concern, so we are reviewing the ruling carefully in order to work collaboratively towards a resolution." Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad