Qatar Central Bank's foreign reserves grow 3.60% in May 2025
Doha: Qatar Central Bank (QCB) saw a 3.60 percent increase in its foreign currency reserves and liquidity, reaching QR 258.135 billion in May 2025, up from QR 249.165 billion in May 2024.
According to figures released by QCB, its official reserves rose by QR 8.706 billion, or 4.57 percent, year-on-year, reaching QR 198.712 billion by the end of May 2025.
This increase occurred despite a decline of about QR 6.044 billion in QCB's foreign bonds and treasury bills, which totaled QR 132.902 billion in May 2025.
The official reserves include key categories such as bonds and foreign treasury bills, balances with foreign banks, gold, Special Drawing Rights (SDRs), and the State of Qatar's share in the International Monetary Fund (IMF).
In addition to the official reserves, there are other liquid assets, namely foreign currency deposits. Together, these components make up what is referred to as the total foreign reserves.
As of the end of May 2025, gold reserves increased by nearly QR 16.012 billion year-on-year, reaching QR 44.339 billion, compared to QR 28.327 billion in May 2024.
The balance of Special Drawing Rights (SDRs) deposits from the State of Qatar's share with the IMF increased by QR 67 million year-on-year, totaling QR 5.253 billion by the end of May 2025.
Balances with foreign banks decreased by nearly QR 1.328 billion, reaching QR 16.416 billion at the end of May 2025, compared to May 2024.
© Dar Al Sharq Press, Printing and Distribution. All Rights Reserved. Provided by SyndiGate Media Inc. (Syndigate.info).
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Zawya
24 minutes ago
- Zawya
Saudi private conglomerate ERAM eyes debt issuance
Saudi-based private conglomerate ERAM Holdings, which operates across multiple sectors including oil and gas, utilities, and petrochemicals and giga projects, is planning to tap the debt markets before the end of the year and has already started discussions with potential lenders. ERAM currently operates across five key verticals which include specialised technical support services, travel and tourism, healthcare, R&D & manufacturing, and industrial support services. In May 2025, the company secured a global credit rating of B+ and a national Saudi credit rating of BB+ from S&P Global, a development that is expected to support the conglomerate's global expansion efforts and facilitate its transition to capital markets-based funding. 'Very few companies hold the B+ and BB+ Saudi national credit rating. Long term we are looking at what kind of instruments we can use in the global and regional markets,' ERAM's Director of Corporate Development & Partnerships, Sarfraz Mohamed told Zawya. 'While an IPO is under consideration, it is not imminent,' he added. Accessing the debt capital markets would help fuel ERAM's growth across its manufacturing, healthcare, Travel and specialised technical services verticals. 'I believe this is the first step in getting ourselves visible to investors,' he added. The conglomerate has been in discussions with global investment banks and is exploring the investor appetite if it were to issue a sukuk. 'By the end of 2025, perhaps sooner, we should make some announcements and moves towards the debt capital markets,' he said. ERAM is aiming at a 15% growth for 2025 and little more than that for 2026. 'We have already made some capex investments in the manufacturing, R&D facilities, and we have future plans of expansion aligned with vision 2030 mandates and that's one of the major reasons why we are looking at the debt markets, Mohamed said. According to ERAM, its power electronics manufacturing facility in the kingdom is the first of its kind in the GCC. It's R&D center in Bangalore, India, caters product development. S&P anticipates revenue growth of approximately 12%–16% in 2025 and 24%–28% in 2026. The stable outlook reflects expectation that ERAM could significantly expand its EBITDA, benefiting from substantial growth opportunities in Saudi Arabia. The rating agency expects ERAM to report S&P Global Ratings-adjusted leverage of 2.1x in 2024, declining to 1.3x-1.7x in 2025, supported by a strong 30%-40% EBITDA growth and limited financial debt. Dr. Siddeek Ahamed is the Chairman & Managing Director of Eram Holdings, which employs more than 11,000 people and maintains regional offices in India and the UAE. (Reporting by Seban Scaria; editing by Daniel Luiz)
Khaleej Times
43 minutes ago
- Khaleej Times
UAE: Gold prices remain steady after Eid Al Adha holidays
Gold prices were steady at the opening of the markets in Dubai on Monday after the Eid Al Adha holidays as prices continued to trade below Dh400 per gram. The 24K was trading at Dh399 per gram on Monday morning, slightly up from last week's close. Among the other variants of the precious metal, 22K, 21K and 18K were trading at Dh369.5, Dh354.5 and Dh303.75 per gram, respectively. The UAE announced a four-day holiday for public and private sectors on the occasion of Eid Al Adha from Thursday to Sunday. Spot gold was steady at $3,309.97 per ounce, supported by hopes of a US-China tariff deal. The yellow metal fell over one per cent on Friday due to strong US jobs clouding the outlook for the US Federal Reserve's move to cut interest rates. Joseph Dahrieh, managing principal at Tickmill, said gold could come under pressure as Fed members reiterated a cautious monetary policy stance. 'Though markets continue to price in rate cuts later this year, the lack of urgency from policymakers could limit further upside for the bullion,' he said. Linh Tran, a market analyst at said the Russia-Ukraine conflict has entered a new phase. 'Ukraine recently launched a large-scale drone offensive against strategic Russian airbases under the operation named 'Operation Spiderweb'. With over 100 unmanned aerial vehicles launched from inside Russian territory targeting strategic bombers, the campaign inflicted significant damage and notably raised the risk of broader, uncontrolled escalation. Heightened geopolitical tensions between major powers have historically been a powerful driver of safe-haven demand, and gold is typically the first asset to benefit,' said Tran.
Gulf Business
an hour ago
- Gulf Business
Beyond the risk register: Why future-ready leadership demands strategic discomfort
Image: Supplied The year is 2029, and vertical farming has become a symbol of national resilience in the Middle East. Governments had have poured billions into hydroponic megafarms. Food security indices have climbed and export deals rolled in. The region has also been hailed globally as a pioneer of agricultural innovation – a place where technology had triumphed over land scarcity and climate stress. And then it all collapses. A fungal microbe, exploiting the genetic uniformity of hydroponic crops, mutated in a single facility, sweeps through the region's interconnected systems. Within six weeks, 40 per cent of regional crop output is lost. Emergency imports are then scrambled at record costs. What seemed like a shining example of resilience is exposed as dangerously brittle. The risk was known. The signals were there – just not heard, or not heeded. This isn't a possible 'future' story about agriculture. It spotlights leadership under complexity. From pandemic blindspots to supply chain fragilities and climate volatility to AI backlash, organisations across every sector continue to be surprised by visible and often documented disruptions that were ultimately sidelined. Known, but ignored Why does this keep happening? Not because the risks are invisible but because they're inconvenient, ambiguous, or don't fit the dominant narrative. In environments that reward momentum and performance, there is often little appetite for the slow work of horizon scanning or scenario stress-testing – especially when things appear to be going well. Risks that are uncomfortable or unfamiliar are easily dismissed as fringe. And when success stories dominate, dissenting signals – especially weak ones – struggle to break through. The vertical farming collapse followed this exact pattern. Early warnings were buried in obscure journals, dismissed as edge-case thinking. There was no lack of intelligence. But attention was highly selective. The illusion of the list Many organisations believe that because a risk appears on a register, it is being managed. But listing a risk and engaging with it are two very different things. Take the World Economic Forum's Global Risks Report . Each year, it publishes a heat map identifying the most severe and likely risks facing the world over the next decade. Climate volatility. Biodiversity loss. Emerging infectious diseases. Cybercrime. Water crises. Year after year, these threats are mapped, flagged, and even color-coded – often with 'blobs' so large they're impossible to miss. And yet the most common organisational response is to file these risks under 'context', rather than integrate them into core planning. They are acknowledged, but rarely rehearsed. The problem isn't the heat map. The problem is what happens after. The mere appearance of a threat on a list can create a false sense of preparedness – a box ticked, a risk 'covered'. Risk registers often serve as a checklist – useful for reporting, but misleading when it comes to real readiness. Rarely do leadership teams ask: What would we actually do if this happened tomorrow? And most registers fail to consider how risks interact. A CEO scandal, shifting consumer ethics, a tech system failure, and policy fragmentation – individually manageable, perhaps. Together? Catastrophic. Strategic foresight starts where the risk register ends – not with what's on the list but with how those risks might collide. From risk registers to risk realism So, what does it take to build a future-ready organisation in a time of converging disruption? We propose three shifts: Expand peripheral vision: Build structured capacity to detect early signals from the margins – in scientific literature, startup ecosystems, citizen movements, and niche media. Weak signals are often the earliest indicators of system shifts. Unless you design for it, they won't rise through the usual filters. Institutionalise strategic discomfort: Challenge internal optimism regularly. Build in moments to stress-test assumptions and rehearse disruption. Reward people who challenge prevailing wisdom, not just those who confirm it. Map risk interdependencies: Move beyond lists. Use systems thinking to explore how risks could combine. Model chain reactions and secondary effects. Ask not just 'What could go wrong?', but 'What could go wrong together ?' Future-readiness is a cultural trait Foresight isn't about crystal balls or radical prediction. It's about readiness for uncertainty – and a willingness to engage the uncomfortable. The most resilient organisations aren't those that see the future clearly but those that build the muscles to adapt to futures they can't fully see. That begins with humility, curiosity, and the courage to ask: What might we be missing? This demands a cultural shift. One that values critical inquiry over certainty. Signals over noise. And reflection over reaction. In the aftermath of every high-profile shock – from pandemics to tech crashes – leaders demand tighter regulation, faster protocols, and better reporting. But those alone won't build adaptive capacity. Because in every one of these cases, there were warnings. The failure was not one of ignorance – but of attention. Foresight failed because it asked the system to be uncomfortable – and the system declined. Three questions every board should be asking Which of our success stories might be blinding us to emerging fragilities? What signals are we currently incentivised to ignore? If three of our 'low-impact' risks hit at once – what would break first? If your strategy doesn't create space for doubt, it's not a strategy – it's a narrative. If your risk register doesn't provoke discomfort, it's incomplete. And if your future looks smooth and linear, it's probably fiction. Doris Viljoen is a director at the Institute for Futures Research at Read:
