Roche to invest $50 billion in US to avoid Trump tariffs, create 12,000 jobs, ETHRWorld
Advt
Advt
Join the community of 2M+ industry professionals Subscribe to our newsletter to get latest insights & analysis.
Download ETHRWorld App Get Realtime updates
Save your favourite articles
Scan to download App
ZURICH: Roche said on Tuesday it would invest $50 billion in the United States over the next five years, creating more than 12,000 new jobs , in the latest massive investment by companies reacting to President Donald Trump's tariff policy.The announcement comes as drugmakers unveil investments to deal with tariffs from the Trump administration, which is seeking to boost domestic manufacturing Fellow Swiss drugmaker Novartis earlier this month said it would spend $23 billion in the United States, while Eli Lilly and Johnson & Johnson also announced sizeable investments recently."Our investments have also been aligned with the Swiss government and form part of the ongoing discussions between the U.S. and Switzerland," a Roche spokesperson said.Chief Executive Thomas Schinecker said the investment underscored Roche's commitment to the United States, where it employs 25,000 people across 24 sites.Of the 12,000 new positions, nearly 6,500 will be in construction and 1,000 at new and expanded facilities, the Swiss pharma giant said.MORE EXPORTS FROM U.S.Once capacity comes online at the various facilities, Roche will export more medicines from the United States than it imports, the Basel company said.The United States is a crucial market for Roche, which generated nearly 48% of its sales there in 2024, thanks to blockbuster drugs like asthma and food allergy treatment Xolair and Ocrevus for multiple sclerosis.Roche will expand its manufacturing and distribution centres in Kentucky, Indiana, New Jersey and California, although some of the projects have been previously announced.New schemes unveiled on Tuesday included a factory to make weight loss medicines, with the location yet to be announced, and a new plant for continuous glucose monitoring in Indiana."Our investments of $50 billion over the next five years will lay the foundation for our next era of innovation and growth, benefiting patients in the U.S. and around the world," Schinecker said in a statement.The executive did not mention the threat of looming tariffs, although Roche has analysed potential charges in recent weeks and was "well prepared to navigate them, apply mitigation measures, and adapt," a spokesperson said.Roche said there were no plans to cut back on its investments in the rest of world, saying it would provide more details of its investment strategy over the next few weeks.Last week, the Trump administration launched a probe into pharmaceuticals imports, as part of a bid to impose tariffs on the sector.The timing and extent of the levies remain uncertain but the impact could be big, with close to $213 billion in pharmaceutical products imported to the U.S. last year, nearly triple 2014's $73 billion, according to the United Nations trade database.(Reporting by John Revill; Editing by Miranda Murray and Bernadette Baum)
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
18 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Canada PM's emergency economy move amid Trump's '51st State' threats, tariffs
Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney announced economic measures on June 6, in response to mounting fears over U.S. President Donald Trump's threats of new tariffs and rhetoric about Canada becoming America's '51st state.' Speaking at a news conference on Parliament Hill alongside Dominic LeBlanc and Chrystia Freeland, Carney unveiled the 'One Canadian Economy' legislative package, aimed at strengthening internal free trade. Watch for more
Economic Times
20 minutes ago
- Economic Times
SEC's crypto confusion deepens as next-gen ETFs test limits
Live Events (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our ETMarkets WhatsApp channel A new line of yield-chasing crypto funds is forcing the Securities and Exchange Commission to confront unresolved gaps in its regulatory framework, just as the Trump administration eases oversight of digital immediate dispute centres on two proposed funds from ETF firms REX Financial and Osprey Funds that would allow investors to earn rewards by deploying Ether and Solana tokens to help validate blockchain transactions, a process known as staking. The firms said they had cleared an initial SEC registration hurdle last week, but agency staff took the unusual step of objecting that very same evening. Staff warned the products may not meet standards to qualify as investment companies under federal law, raising broader questions about the regulation of a hot corner of the crypto-investment staff noted that to meet the definition of an investment company, a firm must primarily invest in securities. That's a problem when it comes to digital assets: there are no clear lines around what crypto activities trip securities laws and what don't.'When ETFs generate income from staking, they may start to resemble traditional investment companies under the Investment Company Act — especially if investors are relying on the managerial efforts of others to earn those returns,' said Adam Gana, an attorney at law firm Gana Weinstein LLP. 'However, these types of ETFs are testing the boundaries of what counts as an investment company, and the SEC is sending mixed signals.'Gana added that 'just because you throw some stocks into the mix doesn't mean the SEC will look the other way.'The SEC, REX and Osprey declined to comment. The general counsel at REX said earlier that the firm expected to satisfy the SEC's crypto industry has long argued that many tokens aren't securities and shouldn't fall under the SEC rules. Under Trump, the agency has appeared open to these arguments, and its new chair, Paul Atkins, is a proponent of digital currencies. SEC staff guidance has signalled that memecoins and stablecoins may fall outside securities recently as May 29, the staff said federal securities laws generally don't apply to staking activities — further complicating the regulatory picture as firms try to launch novel piecemeal statements create inconsistent policy, according to Corey Frayer, director of investor protection at the Consumer Federation of America.'The SEC and the industry don't get to treat crypto assets as securities when it's convenient, and not as securities when they want weaker regulation,' said Frayer, who served as a senior adviser to former SEC Chair Gary Gensler, a frequent target of crypto industry the crux of the matter is the so-called Howey test , which comes from a 1946 Supreme Court decision that still governs securities classification. Under the test, an asset can be considered a security — and thus will fall under SEC purview — if investors contribute capital with the expectation derived from the managerial efforts of others. Bitcoin is generally considered a commodity but the status of other tokens like Ether and Solana are less Commissioner Hester Peirce, head of the agency's crypto task force, took the unusual step of highlighting the SEC staff's queries about whether the proposed funds met the definition.'I have those same questions,' Peirce wrote in a post on Trump embraced the digital-asset industry during his reelection campaign, pledging to make the US the 'crypto capital of the planet.' Since re-entering the White House, he has established a national stockpile of Bitcoin, anointed a 'crypto czar' and welcomed memecoin enthusiasts to a private dinner in have recently been successful in resolving SEC staff concerns about novel offerings. Earlier this year, agency staffers rebuked an ETF by State Street Corp. and Apollo Global Management — the world's first to invest in private credit — hours after the fund listed over concerns about the fund's liquidity and its ability to comply with valuation rules. The firms took action to rectify the executives are optimistic that US regulators will eventually greenlight the staking ETFs.'They've followed a crawl-walk-run approach — first futures ETFs, then spot ETFs, and hopefully staking ETFs,' said Matt Hougan, chief investment officer at Bitwise Asset Management Inc., which acquired an Ethereum staking platform last year. 'I'm hopeful we'll get to the finish line soon.'
Time of India
20 minutes ago
- Time of India
'It could have gone nuclear': Trump again claims he 'stopped India-Pakistan war'; doubles down on trade angle
US President Donald Trump (PTI photo) US President Donald Trump on Friday once again claimed that he played a key role in stopping a possible war between India and Pakistan - a conflict he said might have gone nuclear if not for his intervention. Speaking to reports on Air Force One, Trump said he used trade as a tool to get both sides to halt hostilities immediately. "You know, I did something that people don't talk about, and I don't talk about very much, but we solved a big problem, a nuclear problem potentially with India and with Pakistan. I spoke to Pakistan, I spoke to India, they have really great leaders, but they were going at it, and they could have gone at it nuclear," US President said. He explained that both countries stopped their attacks after he warned them the US would suspend trade if the fighting continued. "Both nuclear countries, strong nuclear countries, and I talked about trade and said, 'We're not doing trade if you guys are going to be throwing bombs at each other.' They both stopped, and I stopped that war immediately. It was going much further, and hopefully, it would not go to nuclear, but it might have gone to nuclear. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Secure Your Child's Future with Strong English Fluency Planet Spark Learn More Undo In fact, it might have gone to nuclear in the next round, but we stopped it, and I'd like to commend the leaders of both countries, Pakistan and India. " Trump's version of events got a rare endorsement from Moscow. Russian President Vladimir Putin 's aide Yury Ushakov backed Trump's claim, saying his direct involvement helped end the conflict - something that even came up in a phone call between Trump and Putin. "The Middle East was discussed, as well as the armed conflict between India and Pakistan, which has been halted with the personal involvement of President Trump," Ushakov said. The US president's comments, however, stirred diplomatic pushback. Congress MP Shashi Tharoor , who is leading an all-party delegation to the US, said they addressed Trump's mediation claims directly with US Vice President JD Vance. "The meeting with Vice President Vance was outstanding, very good, very clear. I think we made our position amply clear on this question of mediation, and Vice President Vance fully understood our points," Tharoor said. Trump has made similar claims in the past, especially after India carried out Operation Sindoor -- precision strike on terror infrastructure in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Jammu & Kashmir (PoJK) on May 7, in retaliation for the Pahalgam terror attack. India later responded to Pakistani military aggression with airbase strikes. Eventually, tensions eased after Pakistan's Director General of Military Operations (DGMO) contacted his Indian counterpart and agreed to stop further action.
