English lord responds to son's $177 million inheritance
An English lord has blocked his eldest son from taking over the family's £85 million ($A177 million) estate because of his 'lack of achievement'.
The Earl of Yarmouth, William Seymour, was left out of the fortune after a fallout, The Sun reports.
According to the BBC, the 31-year-old took his parents and three siblings to court over the estate, which included the 400-year-old family seat Ragley Hall, in Warwickshire.
Lord Yarmouth asked for the two trust corporations to be removed as trustees and replaced with an independent one.
Lord and Lady Hertford, along with Lord Yarmouth's siblings – Lady Gabriella Seymour, Lord Edward Seymour and Lady Antonia Seymour opposed the legal claim.
The three settlements which consist of the estate, including farmland, residential properties and woodland, are valued at around £45 million ($A93 million).
The court heard that while William held a 'very earnest belief' that the trustees failed in their duties in the way Ragley was run, it was unfounded.
In his ruling, Judge James Brightwell said he accepted the 'damaged and fractured' relationship between Lord Yarmouth and his parents and siblings was 'poor'.
The judge added the bad relationship between William and his parents wasn't enough to remove the trustees.
Ragley estate, which is 6,500-acres, includes a 110-room mansion, farms, a sprawling woods, and hundreds of acres of parkland.
It has been in the Seymour Family for about 400 years, and has connections to Jane Seymour, Henry VIII's third wife.
The Earl of Yarmouth has been embroiled in the public spat with his family since 2018.
The aristocrat complained that his parents had led him to believe he would take over the running of the estate when he turned 30.
William also claimed his parents weren't happy he wanted to marry former Goldman Sachs banker Lady Yarmouth, Kelsey Wells.
The court previously heard that William, who was worth £4 million at 21, had not been interested in the estate until he met his wife Kelsey.
After their marriage, William began complaining about how the estate was being run and argued his wife was being shown 'disrespect' for not being invited to the trustee meeting.
His father, Lord Hertford, told the court he had planned for his son to take over the estate but changed his mind – believing he was no longer 'appropriate' for the job.
He said William and Kelsey marrying was not the 'main reason' for the decision, but rather his son's 'lack of achievement'.
In evidence, he said: 'I am proud of the fact that he went to college but made a mistake at university and didn't graduate.
'William has not followed a profession or obtained qualifications or experience to take over the running of Ragley Hall.'
The judge ruled that Lord and Lady Hertford had obviously shown 'deep antagonism' towards their daughter-in-law.
However, the judge said that the son's dispute as to the way Ragley is run was not well-founded.
'The fact that the claimant has a very earnest belief that the trustees have failed in their duties or should have acted differently, in an unspecified way, is no sufficient basis for a finding that they have so failed in their duties,' the judge added.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
ABC News
8 hours ago
- ABC News
Donald Trump's 50 per cent steel and aluminium tariffs have come into effect
Tariffs placed on steel and aluminium products imported into the United States by President Donald Trump have increased from 25 per cent to 50 per cent, in a move that could significantly impact businesses ranging from car manufacturers to home builders. Foreign-made steel and aluminium are used in the US to make household products like soup cans and paper clips, as well as big-ticket items like stainless steel refrigerators and cars. Economists have warned that such heightened levies could significantly squeeze the wallets of both companies and shoppers alike, but Mr Trump argues that his latest import taxes are necessary to protect US industries. The 50 per cent tariffs went into effect just after the clock struck midnight on Wednesday, local time (2pm AEST Wednesday). The two metals had previously faced 25 per cent tariffs worldwide since mid-March when the president's order to remove steel exemptions and raise aluminium's levy from his previously imposed 2018 import taxes went into effect. Steel and aluminium imported from the United Kingdom have been exempted from the latest tariff increase after a recent trade deal was reached between the two countries. The US president says it's all about protecting US industries. He reiterated that argument on Friday, when he first announced the 50 per cent tariff on imported steel during a visit with steelworkers in Pennsylvania, where he also discussed a "planned partnership" between US Steel and Japan's Nippon Steel. In his speech at US Steel's Mon Valley Works–Irvin Plant in suburban Pittsburgh, Mr Trump said the tariff hike would "further secure the steel industry in the US". Shortly after, he took the same tone when sharing plans to also raise tariffs on imported aluminium. In Tuesday's proclamation, Mr Trump also said the higher tariffs would ensure that imported steel and aluminium would "not threaten to impair the national security". A range of US businesses that rely on foreign-made steel and aluminium have already begun feeling the impacts of Mr Trump's previously imposed levies, but the latest hikes could drive up costs even more. The metals are used in a range of products like washing machines, consumer electronics and cars, while much of the auto industry relies on a global supply chain. In the grocery aisle, steel and aluminium are ubiquitous in the packaging for many foods, including canned tuna, soup and nuts. Experts warn that hiking import taxes on these materials could lead to higher grocery prices overall, further straining consumers' wallets. The aluminium and metal tariffs also carry wider implications for construction and transportation as a whole, as many key building parts and materials are made with these metals. Economists have also warned of spillover impacts. Even if a product isn't directly packaged in steel or aluminium, there could be higher costs to build the shelf it's sold on, or the truck used to transport it to the store. Steel prices have already climbed 16 per cent since Mr Trump became president in mid-January, according to the government's Producer Price Index. As of March 2025, steel costs $US984 ($1,516) a metric ton in the US, significantly higher than in Europe or China, according to the US Commerce Department. AP
ABC News
a day ago
- ABC News
Can Albo get a tariff deal with Trump?
As the UK carves out a partial exemption on the Trump administration's tariffs, Opposition leader Sussan Ley is urging the Albanese Government to negotiate the same. It comes as the Prime Minister has labelled the US administration's 50 per cent tariff on steel and aluminium imports "economic self-harm" -- and continues to stare down calls for Australia to increase its defence spending to 3.5 per cent. And in the hotly contested seat of Bradfield, Independent Teal candidate Nicolette Boele has clinched a very narrow win. So, what does this mean for the moderate wing of the Liberal party? Patricia Karvelas and David Speers break it all down on Politics Now. Got a burning question? Got a burning political query? Send a short voice recording to PK and Fran for Question Time at thepartyroom@
News.com.au
a day ago
- News.com.au
Coalition ‘ready to work with' Labor on Trump tariff deal, Sussan Ley says
Sussan Ley says she is 'ready to work with' Labor to get a US tariff carve out after Donald Trump doubled duties on steel and aluminium. The US President signed an executive order on Tuesday afternoon (Washington time), raising the levies from 25 per cent to 50 per cent, following through on his vow to do so last week. Only the UK was spared from the new imposts due to a deal inked in May. The tariffs have effectively blocked Australian-made steel from the US market. Reacting to the order on Wednesday, the Opposition Leader said Australia's inclusion was 'not in the spirit' of the Australia-US alliance. 'We note that the United Kingdom has been able to secure an exemption from the latest American steel tariffs and we stand ready to work with the Albanese government to ensure Australia can achieve the same outcome,' Ms Ley said in a statement. 'President Trump's tariffs on our steelmakers are not in the spirit of our century-old partnership and we urge the Americans to give Australia a fair go and remove them. 'The Coalition wants the government to succeed here because that is in our national interest.' Analysts have questioned the merits of the UK's deal, which has still not come into effect. While it was not included in the latest round, British steel and aluminium have been slugged with the original 25 per cent tariffs. The White House has also said it would slap a quota on UK imports. In exchange, the British government gave US firms greater access to parts of the UK economy, including its agricultural industry. Mr Trump included Australia in the blanket tariffs in March after telling Anthony Albanese an exemption was 'under consideration'. Australia was also hit with 10 per cent levies on most goods as part of Mr Trump's 'Liberation Day' imposts. The Prime Minister said on Tuesday he would raise the duties when he meets the US leader on the sidelines of the G7 summit in Canada later this month. Mr Albanese said it was 'an act of economic self-harm, and it's not the act of a friend, and this just pushes up prices for American purchasers and consumers'. NewsWire understands the details of the leaders' first face-to-face have not been set but both sides expect them to meet. The Albanese government said a deal was before the Trump administration and the ball was in Washington's court.
