logo
UN Security Council will vote on a resolution demanding a Gaza ceasefire, with US veto expected

UN Security Council will vote on a resolution demanding a Gaza ceasefire, with US veto expected

Independent3 days ago

The U.N. Security Council will vote Wednesday on a resolution demanding an immediate and permanent ceasefire in Gaza, and the Trump administration is expected to veto it because it does not link the ceasefire to the release of all the hostages held by Hamas.
The resolution before the U.N.'s most powerful body also does not condemn Hamas' deadly attack in Israel on Oct. 7, 2023, which ignited the war, or say the militant group must disarm and withdraw from Gaza — two other U.S. demands.
The U.S. vetoed the last resolution on Gaza in November, under the Biden administration, because the ceasefire demand was not directly linked to the immediate and unconditional release of all hostages. Similarly, the current resolution demands those taken by Hamas and other groups be released, but it does not make it a condition for a truce.
Calling the humanitarian situation in Gaza 'catastrophic,' the resolution, put forth by the 15-member council's 10 elected members, also calls for 'the immediate and unconditional lifting of all restrictions on the entry of humanitarian aid into Gaza and its safe and unhindered distribution at scale, including by the U.N. and humanitarian partners.'
President Donald Trump's administration has tried to ramp up its efforts to broker peace in Gaza after 20 months of war. However, Hamas has sought amendments to a U.S. proposal that special envoy Steve Witkoff has called 'totally unacceptable.'
The vote follows a decision by an Israeli and U.S.-backed foundation to pause food delivery at its three distribution sites in the Gaza Strip after health officials said dozens of Palestinians were killed in a series of shootings near the sites this week. Israel and the United States say they supported the establishment of the new aid system to prevent Hamas from stealing aid previously distributed by the U.N.
The United Nations has rejected the new system, saying it doesn't address Gaza's mounting hunger crisis, allows Israel to use aid as a weapon and doesn't comply with the humanitarian principles of neutrality, impartiality and independence. The U.N. says its distribution system throughout Gaza worked very well during the March ceasefire and is carefully monitored.
The resolution demands the restoration of all essential humanitarian services in line with humanitarian principles, international humanitarian law and U.N. Security Council resolutions.
Several U.N. diplomats from different countries, speaking on condition of anonymity because discussions have been private, said they expect the United States to veto the resolution. They also said they expect a similar vote to the one in November, when the 14 other council members supported the resolution.
Israel's U.N. Mission said Ambassador Danny Danon, who will speak after the vote, will say the resolution undermines humanitarian relief efforts and ignores Hamas, which is still endangering civilians in Gaza. He also will say the resolution disregards the ceasefire negotiations that are already underway, the mission said.
Gaza's roughly 2 million people are almost completely reliant on international aid because Israel's offensive has destroyed nearly all food production capabilities. Israel imposed a blockade on supplies into Gaza on March 2, and limited aid began to enter again late last month after pressure from allies and warnings of famine.
'The world is watching, day after day, horrifying scenes of Palestinians being shot, wounded or killed in Gaza while simply trying to eat,' U.N. humanitarian chief Tom Fletcher said in a statement Wednesday. He called for a flood of aid to be let in and for the world body to be the one delivering it.
The Security Council has voted on 14 Gaza-related resolutions and approved four since the war began. That is when Hamas-led militants stormed into southern Israel on Oct. 7, 2023, killing around 1,200 people, mostly civilians, and abducting 251.
They are still holding 58 hostages, a third of them believed to be alive, after most of the rest were released in ceasefire agreements or other deals.
Israel's military campaign has killed more than 54,000 Palestinians, mostly women and children, according to Gaza's Health Ministry, which doesn't say how many of the dead were civilians or combatants.
The ministry is led by medical professionals but reports to the Hamas-run government. Its toll is seen as generally reliable by U.N. agencies and independent experts, though Israel has challenged its numbers.
___

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

FLOURISHING AFTER 50: My parents made terrible money decisions and now I'm the one paying the price
FLOURISHING AFTER 50: My parents made terrible money decisions and now I'm the one paying the price

Daily Mail​

time29 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

FLOURISHING AFTER 50: My parents made terrible money decisions and now I'm the one paying the price

Dear Vanessa, I'm 57 and never imagined this would be my life. Six months ago, my elderly parents moved in with us after losing their home. My dad had been gambling for years but we didn't realise how bad it was until everything collapsed. They had no savings, no pension worth mentioning, and no plan. There was no choice but for them to move in with us. I still have two adult children at home - one is studying, the other is in between jobs, and now our once-quiet house is packed. I love my parents deeply, but I'm stretched to my limit. My mum is showing early signs of dementia and needs constant care. My husband is supportive, but we're both working full-time and barely keeping our heads above water. We've put our own retirement plans on hold, and I feel like I've lost any space to breathe. I swing between guilt, frustration, and sadness. I don't want to turn my back on my parents, but I also don't know how long I can keep going like this. How do I even begin to navigate something so emotionally and financially complicated? Melissa. Melissa, what you're facing is incredibly tough and, sadly, more common than people talk about. Many people in midlife are part of what's called the 'sandwich generation' - caring for elderly parents while still supporting adult children. It's a huge emotional and financial load to carry, especially when the situation stems from poor decisions like gambling. That brings up a complicated mix of guilt, love, and frustration. You're clearly doing your best, but it's okay to admit this isn't sustainable and to start putting steps in place that protect you and your future. Here are a few things to consider: 1. Talk to a financial professional about your own plans. Even one session can help you see where you stand and what your options are - especially when your finances are under pressure. If you don't know where to start, I offer a free referral service to connect you with someone trusted. 2. Look into care and community support options available in your region. There are often services that help with aged care, home assistance, and respite for carers. It's worth exploring - you don't have to do everything alone. 3. Have the hard conversations. With your children, talk about contributing or becoming more independent. With your partner, discuss your shared priorities. And with your parents, while they're still able, about their care preferences and planning ahead. It's loving to step in when your family needs you - but that doesn't mean you should sacrifice your own future. Setting boundaries isn't selfish. It's how you survive. You're carrying a lot, but you're not alone. Asking for help is the first step in lightening the load. I wish you all the best,

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store