logo
Owners vow new appeal in case of CT dog that killed an elderly woman

Owners vow new appeal in case of CT dog that killed an elderly woman

Yahoo08-05-2025

Despite a judge's decision this week levying a $76,000 judgment, the six-year-long court battle over the Connecticut dog that killed an elderly woman is on track to continue even as total expenses run into the hundreds of thousands of dollars.
The owners of Dexter, a pit bull/pointer, say they'll fight to keep from paying the dog's boarding costs and will continue blocking the town of Suffield plan to put him to death.
Annie Hornish did not cite a specific figure on Wednesday, but said 'This has cost us quite a bit financially and emotionally.'
Even so, she and her husband, Neil, intend to take their case to Appellate Court, where they'll ask a judge to overturn Monday's Superior Court decision against them.
'We trust the Appellate Court will make the right decision,' she told The Courant.
The town, meanwhile, has indicated it might pursue a case against the Hornishes for its attorneys' fees.
'The litigants have dragged this case on for far too long and unnecessarily delayed justice. While the town is now able to collect the boarding fees owed, the town will explore additional remedies to make the taxpayers whole for legal expenses.' First Selectman Colin Moll said in a statement.
The town also will continue seeking to have Dexter euthanized.
'The Board of Selectmen is committed to taking all necessary legal steps in this matter to protect the public from this dangerous dog until justice can be carried out,' Moll said.
The Hornishes, who own a Thrall Avenue home with more than 50 acres, have been in court with the town since soon after Dexter killed Janet D'Aleo, a 95-year-old friend visiting their house. The town seized the dog and had it in a private kennel, where it has been ever since.
The Hornishes settled a lawsuit from D'Aleo's estate for $2 million, but have maintained that the town didn't adequately investigate whether the woman's death was a result of Dexter's attack. They've suggested D'Aleo's health aide may have provoked the dog, and at various times during litigation have suggested D'Aleo may have suffered a medical crisis.
But the town and its animal control officer say the dog is a danger. The Hornishes have been in extended litigation to block the euthanasia order.
In a previous decision, Judge Matthew Budzik concluded the Hornishes haven't been realistic about the dog's culpability.
'The Hornishes have refused to take responsibility for Dexter's actions, or acknowledge the severity of his conduct. Indeed, the Hornishes have repeatedly sought to downplay Dexter's conduct and to place blame for Ms. D'Aleo's death elsewhere. The factual record in this matter renders such justifications, in the court's view, disingenuous at best,' Budzik wrote.
Annie Hornish, a former state legislator who has served as Connecticut director for the Humane Society of the United States, said she and her husband have two offers of secure sanctuaries that would accept Dexter for free. One is in Connecticut, the other is 13-acre property in upstate New York where Diana Urban, another former state lawmaker, keeps rescued animals.
Both Hornish and Urban are animal rights activists who contend there's no need to kill the dog, even though the town and the state Department of Agriculture have recommended it.
Annie Hornish said Dexter is about 9 years old. The dog has been in a kennel since November of 2019; the Hornishes covered the first two years' expense, which totaled about $40,000, then refused to pay more. Their argument is that the town should release the animal to a qualified sanctuary, and that charging dog owners to board their pet while a euthanasia appeal is underway would discourage most people for pursuing such an appeal.
Monday's court decision holds the couple liable for about $76,000 in kennel costs since 2021, and warns of a 7.5% annual interest charge on whatever goes unpaid.
In addition, the court said the Hornishes are responsible for roughly $66 a day in kennel costs since Feb. 1. That comes to about another $6,000 so far, with the potential to tack on an additional $15,000 or so before the year ends.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The Trump Administration Is Turning ICE Raids and Protests Into Reality TV
The Trump Administration Is Turning ICE Raids and Protests Into Reality TV

WIRED

time22 minutes ago

  • WIRED

The Trump Administration Is Turning ICE Raids and Protests Into Reality TV

Jun 9, 2025 2:44 PM Whether creating its own memes or working with celebrities like "Dr. Phil" McGraw, the government is treating a volatile situation in Los Angeles like content. Photo-Illustration: Wired Staff;Since the very beginning of the year, President Donald Trump's administration has worked to build a self-sustaining digital media ecosystem in support of its controversial immigration policies. That system is now working overtime as protests bubble up in Los Angeles and get planned across the country, spawning an onslaught of AI-generated slop and reality television-style content. Protests broke out on Friday shortly after ICE officers conducted a series of raids targeting Latino communities in Los Angeles. Reality star Phil 'Dr. Phil' McGraw and the camera crew for his new Merit TV network embedded with immigration officials during Immigration and Customs Enforcement's (ICE) Friday's raids, CNN reported. Merit TV announced in a press release that its footage will be aired throughout a '2-Night Television Event' on Monday and Tuesday. The broadcast includes an exclusive one-on-one interview with Trump's border czar Tom Homan. (There is already an interview with Homan currently streaming on Merit TV's site.) 'Dr. Phil and Tom Homan break down the multi-agency raid targeting cartel-linked businesses in LA's garment district,' states the Merit TV email about Monday night's program. 'With $80 million in undeclared imports uncovered, $17 million in unpaid tariffs identified, and 41 undocumented immigrants detained, the high-impact operation drew fierce public protests. Homan addresses the growing backlash and explains the zero-tolerance policy for interference with federal enforcement.' It's unclear where the highly specific numbers mentioned in the press email come from, or what the source of information is for the claim that affected businesses are tied to cartels. Homan and other heads of law enforcement agencies have repeatedly threatened protesters and even California politicians with arrest. Trump also said he would arrest California Governor Gavin Newsom. MAGA's independent influencers also spent the weekend parroting the Trump administration's talking points. On Sunday, Rogan O'Handley, who goes by DC Draino online, posted what appears to be an AI-generated video on Instagram of Trump pummeling a man holding a Mexican flag on a dirt bike. As the man falls over, a triumphant Trump raises the flag which magically transforms into an American one. 'MAGA won the popular vote and this is what we want,' the caption of the post reads. It currently has more than 50,000 likes. Charlie Kirk, the founder of Turning Point USA and host of an eponymous podcast, posted to X in an apparent attempt to rally the right's outrage over LA into support for the Trump administration's budget plans. 'Infuriated about what you are seeing in LA? Pass the BBB [Big Beautiful Bill]. Watch this and support the bill. We must reclaim America,' Kirk posted on Monday. This didn't come out of nowhere. The Trump administration's crackdown on immigration has been broadcasted across television and the internet for months, as influencers and content creators have been invited to participate in broadcasts and ride-a-longs with Department of Homeland Security (DHS) officials. 'That's been a pretty routine thing. Libs of TikTok was embedded, Tomi Lahren.' CJ Pearson, a conservative influencer tells WIRED of the ridealongs. 'I've been asked as well, so, I think there definitely will be more to come.' In January, agencies assisting with immigration crackdowns were told to be camera-ready, CNN reported. In February, DHS launched a multi-million dollar ad campaign featuring a clip of Kristi Noem, the secretary of DHS, warning undocumented immigrants that they would be deported if they did not choose to leave on their own. These ads were 'hyper-targeted' to 'reach illegal immigrants in the interior of the United States, as well as internally,' according to a February DHS press release. 'If you are here illegally, we will find you and deport you. You will never return,' Noem says in the ad. 'But if you leave now, you may have an opportunity to return and enjoy our freedom and live the American Dream.' Noem has traveled to El Salvador for content as well. In March, she filmed a notorious video, where she stood in front of prisoners at El Salvador's infamous CECOT prison. 'If you come to our country illegally, this is one of the consequences,' Noem said. In April, the far-right influencer Chaya Raichik, who runs the massive Libs of TikTok account on X, joined DHS Secretary Kristi Noem during an immigration enforcement operation in Phoenix, Arizona, posting 'exclusive footage' to her more than four million followers. Both Raichik and Noem wore bullet proof vests with ICE badges pinned to their chests. A DHS spokesperson did not immediately respond to a request for comment from WIRED.

Dearborn Heights man accused of killing woman's 3-year-old chihuahua
Dearborn Heights man accused of killing woman's 3-year-old chihuahua

CBS News

time23 minutes ago

  • CBS News

Dearborn Heights man accused of killing woman's 3-year-old chihuahua

A Dearborn Heights man is accused of stomping on the neck of a 3-year-old chihuahua and killing it. Wayne County prosecutors say the incident happened around midnight on May 24 at a home on the 4500 block of Fleming Street in Dearborn Heights. Prosecutors allege that Haseeb J. Habeeb, 54, stomped on the neck of a 45-year-old woman's chihuahua, killing the dog. Habbeb was arrested by Dearborn Heights police later that same day. He is charged with one count of second-degree killing/torturing of an animal and one count of abandoning/cruelty to an animal. Habbeb was arraigned on May 28 and given a $300 bond. He is back in court on June 11 for a probable cause conference.

State of Oklahoma plans to retry Richard Glossip but will not seek death penalty, top prosecutor says
State of Oklahoma plans to retry Richard Glossip but will not seek death penalty, top prosecutor says

CBS News

time27 minutes ago

  • CBS News

State of Oklahoma plans to retry Richard Glossip but will not seek death penalty, top prosecutor says

Washington — Oklahoma's attorney general said Monday that the state plans to retry inmate Richard Glossip for the murder of his boss after the Supreme Court earlier this year granted him a new trial, but will not seek the death penalty against him. Gentner Drummond, the state's top prosecutor, said in a statement that his office does not intend to dismiss the existing first-degree murder charge brought against Glossip for the 1997 killing of Barry Van Treese, the owner of the Oklahoma City motel where Glossip worked. Instead, the attorney general said his office will seek a sentence of life in prison for Glossip because the man who confessed to bludgeoning Van Treese with a baseball bat, Justin Sneed, is serving a life sentence without the possibility of parole. Sneed, the key witness for the prosecution, claimed Glossip paid him $10,000 to kill Van Treese. Glossip was twice convicted of capital murder and sentenced to death. He has already served 27 years in prison and has long maintained his innocence. "While it was clear to me and to the U.S. Supreme Court that Mr. Glossip did not receive a fair trial, I have never proclaimed his innocence," Drummond, a Republican who is running for governor of Oklahoma, said in a statement. The attorney general said that after the Supreme Court sided with Glossip earlier this year, his office reviewed the merits of the case against him and decided there is sufficient evidence to secure another conviction. "The same United States Constitution that guarantees our rights also ensures the rights of the accused," the attorney general's statement continued. "Unlike past prosecutors who allowed a key witness to lie on the stand, my office will make sure Mr. Glossip receives a fair trial based on hard facts, solid evidence and truthful testimony." Feb. 19, 2021, photo provided by Oklahoma Department of Corrections shows Richard Glossip. Oklahoma Department of Corrections via AP) Glossip had been on death row for more than two decades when the Supreme Court in February ruled 5-3 that violations of his due process rights entitled him to a new trial. The high court reversed a decision from the Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals that upheld Glossip's conviction and death sentence. Glossip had been before the Supreme Court once before, in 2015, when he unsuccessfully challenged Oklahoma's lethal injection protocol on Eighth Amendment grounds. Before the high court ruled in his favor this year, he had nine execution dates scheduled and had eaten his "last meal" three times. At the center of Glossip's Supreme Court case was the testimony of Sneed, who had told prosecutors during the trial that he had never seen a psychiatrist, but was given lithium after he was arrested. But in 2022, the state found prosecutors' handwritten notes in a banker's box, which Drummond said showed that Sneed told the state he was given lithium after seeing a jailhouse psychiatrist and was diagnosed with bipolar disorder. Neither Sneed's diagnosis nor his treatment by the psychiatrist were disclosed to Glossip's defense team, which Drummond said indicated prosecutors elicited false testimony on the matter. "Had the prosecution corrected Sneed on the stand, his credibility plainly would have suffered," Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote for the Supreme Court's majority. "That correction would have revealed to the jury not just that Sneed was untrustworthy ... but also that Sneed was willing to lie to them under oath. Such a revelation would be significant in any case, and was especially so here where Sneed was already 'nobody's idea of a strong witness.'" Following the high court's decision, Drummond said that his office would decide the appropriate course of action. The attorney general said Monday said the "poor judgement and previous misconduct" of the prosecutors originally handling Glossip's case has compounded pain and frustration for Van Treese's family. "While I cannot go back 25 years and handle the case in the proper way that would have ensured true justice, I still have a duty to seek the justice that is available today," he said. Drummond told CBS News in April that he believes Glossip is guilty of at least accessory after the fact, but the question is whether he is guilty of murder. "I do not want to be culpable in executing somebody who is innocent, which is why I took great political risk to review Mr. Glossip and have sought a new trial," he said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store