L.A. police chief: National Guard focused on immigration agenda, not helping with protests
L.A. Police Chief Jim McDonnell told "CBS Mornings" on Wednesday that the National Guard being deployed to Los Angeles in the midst of ICE protests was not because of President Trump saying the protests were more than McDonnell could handle.
"We don't need the National Guard, and they are not here to help us right now," McDonnell said Wednesday on "CBS Mornings." They are here to facilitate what the federal agencies are doing on the immigration front."
When asked if military assistance was brought in to assist with handling the protests, McDonnell said, "That's not our understanding. They have a different mission. They're working in support of the federal agencies that are working with ICE on civil immigration enforcement and criminal immigration enforcement."
California Gov. Gavin Newsom delivered a statewide address on Tuesday in the wake of immigration operations that sparked days of protests in Los Angeles and the deployment of hundreds of National Guard and U.S. Marines troops to the area by President Trump.
The speech came after Mayor Karen Bass' decision to implement a curfew in downtown Los Angeles after multiple nights of unrest and an emergency motion for a temporary restraining order filed by the state in its lawsuit to block the additional deployment of troops. That curfew prompted dozens of arrests on Tuesday.
Protests have escalated into violent clashes, graffiti, looting, vandalism and debris. Mr. Trump declared that the National Guard would be deployed to Los Angeles, despite opposition from California politicians who said it was largely unnecessary. The deployment of 2,000 more National Guard troops and 700 Marines followed.
But McDonnell expressed concern about members of the military interacting with Los Angeles protesters.
"Anytime anybody comes into the city and we are not clear on what rules and responsibilities are, there's a concern. I worry for our own people."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CBS News
26 minutes ago
- CBS News
Crowd protests conditions inside ICE detention center in Newark
A small crowd of protesters gathered outside Delaney Hall in Newark, New Jersey, on Thursday to demonstrate over allegations of poor conditions at the immigration detention center. One woman whose husband was housed inside the center told CBS News New York that a fight broke out at lunch because the prisoners had allegedly not been fed for about 20 hours, and then were only given a small amount of food. A small crowd of people gathered outside Delaney Hall in Newark, New Jersey, on June 12, 2025, angry over alleged poor conditions at the immigration detention center. Chopper 2 "He said for that reason, a small group of people had started to rile up and started to riot. He said they were breaking things, just trying to get anybody's attention because they are constantly ignored. I asked my husband what was his role and part in it, and he said, 'I'm hiding. I'm scared for my life,'" the woman said. Protesters said the prisoners were also angry over visitation hours. CBS News New York reached out to U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and the Newark Police Department, but has not yet heard back. Delaney Hall was the site of a protest last month that resulted in the arrest of Newark Mayor Ras Baraka by ICE agents on federal trespassing charges. Baraka has since filed a lawsuit over the arrest. The mayor has claimed the 1,000-bed facility opened without the necessary permits and blocked inspections. The Department of Homeland Security has denied those allegations. Earlier this year, ICE signed a 15-year, $60 million contract with the private prison company, Geo Group, to run Delaney Hall. Stay with for the latest on this developing story.
Car and Driver
28 minutes ago
- Car and Driver
Trump Administration Blocks California EV Rules, Threatens Higher Tariffs
The Trump administration officially blocked a rule in California that would have banned the sale of purely gas-powered cars in the state starting in 2035. On Thursday, the president signed joint resolutions of Congress—effectively serving as a federal law to revoke California's policy. The president also threatened to raise automotive tariffs in the near future as a way to increase domestic auto manufacturing. On Thursday, President Trump signed joint resolutions of Congress that block California's attempt to ban the sale of purely gas-powered cars in its state. Allowed to stand, the California rule would have required that electric cars make up progressively larger shares of new car sales each year—until 2035, at which point the sale of new internal-combustion cars would be banned—though, under CAFE, plug-in hybrids would continue to be allowed. Justin Sullivan | Getty Images By signing the joint resolutions of Congress, which were passed by a Republican majority in May, Trump reversed the Biden administration's previous approval of the California law. According to a report by , Trump, speaking at the signing event, called the plan a "disaster" and said it would "effectively abolish the internal combustion engine, which most people prefer." The resolutions also revoke two other California clean-air policies—one requiring half of all new trucks sold in the state to be electric by 2035 and the other limiting the amount of nitrogen oxide cars and trucks emit. In addition to signing the joint resolutions, the president also threatened to increase U.S. automotive tariffs from their current 25 percent. The president said raising auto tariffs from their current level could provide more protection for the domestic auto industry. "I might go up with that tariff in the not too distant future," Trump said. "The higher you go, the more likely it is they build a plant here." The latest threat comes roughly a week after the president increased tariffs on foreign aluminum and steel to 50 percent, further increasing pressure on automakers. Jack Fitzgerald Associate News Editor Jack Fitzgerald's love for cars stems from his as yet unshakable addiction to Formula 1. After a brief stint as a detailer for a local dealership group in college, he knew he needed a more permanent way to drive all the new cars he couldn't afford and decided to pursue a career in auto writing. By hounding his college professors at the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, he was able to travel Wisconsin seeking out stories in the auto world before landing his dream job at Car and Driver. His new goal is to delay the inevitable demise of his 2010 Volkswagen Golf. Read full bio
Yahoo
29 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Judge says Trump illegally deployed National Guard to LA
SAN FRANCISCO — President Donald Trump must return to California Gov. Gavin Newsom control over National Guard troops the president deployed to Los Angeles to assist in immigration enforcement and controlling unrest, a federal judge said in a temporary restraining order Thursday. The order, which takes effect at noon Friday, said the deployment of the Guard was illegal and both violated the Tenth Amendment and exceeded Trump's statutory authority. The White House had no immediate comment on the ruling, but the federal government immediately filed an appeal with the Ninth Circuit court. Hegseth doesn't initially commit to obeying courts on LA deployments U.S. District Judge Charles Breyer said Trump overstepped his bounds in ordering the deployment of roughly 4,000 National Guard members to Los Angeles after protests erupted over the immigration crackdown. It was not immediately clear how that would change the situation on the ground. California Gov. Gavin Newsom sued to block the Guard's deployment against his wishes. California later filed an emergency motion asking the judge to block the Guard from assisting with immigration raids. He argued that the troops were originally deployed to protect federal buildings and wanted the court to block the troops from helping protect immigration agents during the raids, saying that involving the Guard would only escalate tensions and promote civil unrest. The Trump administration called the lawsuit a 'crass political stunt endangering American lives' in its official response Wednesday. In a broad ruling, the judge determined Trump had not properly called the Guard up in the first place. Maj. Gen. Scott Sherman, speaking in an interview with The Associated Press and one other media outlet, said that as of Wednesday about 500 of the Guard troops have been trained to accompany agents on immigration operations. Photos of Guard soldiers providing security for the agents have already been circulated by immigration officials. Sherman is commander of Task Force 51, which is overseeing the Guard troops and Marines sent to Los Angeles. The ruling does not apply to the Marines. Typically, the authority to call up the National Guard lies with governors, but there are limited circumstances under which the president can deploy those troops. Trump federalized members of the California National Guard under an authority known as Title 10. Title 10 allows the president to call the National Guard into federal service under certain limited circumstances, such as when the country 'is invaded,' when 'there is a rebellion or danger of a rebellion against the authority of the Government,' or when the president is unable 'to execute the laws of the United States.' Breyer said in his ruling that what is happening in Los Angeles does not meet the definition of a rebellion. 'The protests in Los Angeles fall far short of 'rebellion,'' he wrote. The lawsuit argued that Title 10 also requires that the president go through governors when issuing orders to the National Guard. Brett Shumate, an attorney for the federal government, said Trump complied with the statute by informing the general in charge of the troops of his decision and would have the authority to call in the Guard even if he had not. Texas governor deploys 5,000 Guardsmen ahead of 'No Kings' protests In a brief filed ahead of the Thursday hearing, the Justice Department said Trump's orders were not subject to judicial review. 'Courts did not interfere when President Eisenhower deployed the military to protect school desegregation. Courts did not interfere when President Nixon deployed the military to deliver the mail in the midst of a postal strike. And courts should not interfere here either,' the department said. 'Our position is this is not subject to judicial review,' Shumate told the judge. Breyer, who at one point waved a copy of the constitution, said he disagreed. 'We're talking about the president exercising his authority, and the president is of course limited in that authority. That's the difference between a constitutional government and King George,' he said. The protests over immigration raids in Los Angeles intensified after Trump called up the Guard and have since spread to other cities, including Boston, Chicago and Seattle. Federal immigration agents have been arresting people at Home Depot parking lots and other businesses, sparking fear in immigrant communities, after the Trump administration said it wanted to dramatically increase arrests under its immigration crackdown. Trump has described Los Angeles in dire terms that Bass and Newsom say are nowhere close to the truth. The Marines have not yet been spotted in Los Angeles, and Guard troops have had limited engagement with protesters. Dozens of mayors from across the Los Angeles region banded together Wednesday to demand the raids stop and the troops leave.
