Trump stuns NATO with 'extraordinary' Iran peace victory and more top headlines
1. Trump stuns NATO with 'extraordinary' Iran peace victory
2. Hegseth says FBI is investigating leak of intel report on Iran strike
3. Cuomo concedes in NYC Democratic primary for mayor
OFF THE CLOCK – Teen DOGE staffer resigns amid department shakeup under Trump administration. Continue reading …
MEAN STREETS – Rodney King-era 'rooftop Korean' calls left-wing riots manufactured. Continue reading …
STAR WITNESS – Diddy's freedom 'rises and falls' on Cassie Ventura testimony. Continue reading …
MANHUNT GOES COLD – Reward offered as search for 'armed and dangerous' dad takes grim turn. Continue reading …
FINAL BOW – '60s heartthrob dead at 81, leaving behind legacy of music and public service. Continue reading …
--
FOG OF WAR – Trump slams Israel and Iran over broken ceasefire, attacks media coverage. Continue reading …
GHOSTWRITER – Top Biden aide admits she directed autopen signatures without knowing who gave final OK. Continue reading …
JUSTICE ON TRIAL – Top DOJ official faces test in Senate over nomination to become federal judge. Continue reading …
FROM BLUE TO RED – Former Trump ambassador launches bid to flip key swing state Senate seat. Continue reading …
JUMPED THE GUN – Blinken blasts Trump for 'pouring gasoline' on Iran's nuclear program after strikes. Continue reading …
TOP OF THE LIST – Sanders says what he would prioritize from 'first day' and beyond if he won White House. Continue reading …
EXIT STAGE LEFT – Ex-MSNBC star speculates what led to her firing from liberal network. Continue reading …
DIVINE PARDON – Chrisleys thank God for Trump pardon in emotional first interview since release. Continue reading …
ASRA NOMANI – Iran's ideological foot soldiers wage proxy war in America. Continue reading …
SEAN O'BRIEN – 'Big, beautiful' bill could give a free pass for Big Tech to kill jobs. Continue reading …
--
STAR-STUDDED SOIRÉE – Amazon founder reportedly abandons wedding party location as activists claim 'victory.' Continue reading …
FOLLICLE FIX – New stem cell therapy shows 'promising' results for treating hair loss. Continue reading …
AMERICAN CULTURE QUIZ – Test yourself on beachside bars and coaster creations. Take the quiz here …
OVERHEAD OUTRAGE – Sneaky airline passenger's carry-on hack sparks debate over flight etiquette. Continue reading …
FLYING HIGH – Daredevil athlete hopes to make her mark in the sky. See video …
TOM HOMAN – For the U.S., the open border is the biggest national security issue. See video …
SEN. TED CRUZ – CNN immediately takes the side of America's enemies. See video …
Tune in to the FOX NEWS RUNDOWN PODCAST for today's in-depth reporting on the news that impacts you. Check it out ...
What's it looking like in your neighborhood? Continue reading…
Thank you for making us your first choice in the morning! We'll see you in your inbox first thing Thursday.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
35 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump Policies Will Cut Deficits Up to $11 Trillion, White House Economist Says
(Bloomberg) -- President Donald Trump's policies will reduce US fiscal deficits by up to $11 trillion over the coming decade, according to the White House's chief economist — a projection that defies analysts who say government debt is poised to climb to record highs in coming years. Bezos Wedding Draws Protests, Soul-Searching Over Tourism in Venice US Renters Face Storm of Rising Costs US State Budget Wounds Intensify From Trump, DOGE Policy Shifts Commuters Are Caught in Johannesburg's Taxi Feuds as Transit Lags 'We calculate that, overall, the reduction in deficits as a result of the total suite of the president's policies is going to be roughly $8.5 to $11 trillion over the 10-year budget window,' Stephen Miran, chair of the Council of Economic Advisers, told reporters on a call Wednesday. 'Those are very big numbers.' About half the savings, or $3 trillion to $5 trillion, would come from faster economic growth — thanks to the pending Republican tax cut bill, along with deregulation efforts — Miran argued. He also cited a $3 trillion bump in revenues from Trump's tariff hikes, referring reporters to the Congressional Budget Office's recent calculation — which came in at $2.8 trillion. Reduced debt loads thanks in part to those savings will help to bring down the US Treasury's interest costs by approximately $1 trillion to $1.5 trillion, he said. Miran was speaking on a call touting the benefits of the GOP's 'One Big Beautiful Bill' of tax and spending cuts that Trump has called on his party to pass in Congress by July 4. The House passed one draft last month, and the Senate is now aiming to approve its version this week. The House-passed version of the package was most recently estimated by the CBO to boost the deficit, not cut it, by some $2.8 trillion. The CBO analysis on tariffs also assumed that the tariff rates in effect as of mid-May would be in place for a decade — even though trade talks are under way that may reduce those levies, and Trump won't be in office throughout that period. Trade Agreements A preliminary analysis from the Tax Foundation found the Senate bill would cost $3.9 trillion over a decade, after accounting for economic impacts. Miran also said that he's optimistic there will be a flurry of framework agreements with US trading partners getting announced by July 9, the expiration date for Trump's pause on reciprocal tariffs. Agreements will depend on the willingness of other countries to engage, Miran said, adding that he expects there to be 'some stubborn holdouts.' Any agreements notwithstanding, Miran said there's no downside risk to the CBO's $2.8 trillion estimate for increased revenue from tariffs. The CEA offered a breakdown of its analysis showing the impact of Trump's policies, which included the following estimates: Faster growth thanks to the tax cuts will shrink fiscal deficits by $2.1 trillion to $2.3 trillion over a decade. Stronger growth due to deregulation and Trump's energy policies will narrow the deficit by another $1.3 trillion to $3.7 trillion. The US debt-to-gross domestic product ratio will fall to 94% by 2034, instead of rising to 117% if Trump's 2017 tax cuts were allowed to expire at year-end. Analysis by the non-partisan CBO in January that incorporated an expectation for the expiration of the 2017 tax reductions showed the US on course for a 107% debt-to-GDP ratio by 2029 — exceeding the all-time high reached in 1946, just after the end of World War II. For his part, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent earlier this month said there's 'varying scoring' of the tax bill, telling lawmakers, 'It is my view that over the 10-year window, it will decrease.' Federal budget deficits have exceeded 6% of GDP the past two years, despite strong economic growth and job gains. Bessent said this month that the 2025 gap would come in between 6.5% and 6.7%. When it downgraded the US sovereign rating last month, Moody's Ratings said it expected deficits to widen, reaching nearly 9% of GDP by 2035, 'driven mainly by increased interest payments on debt, rising entitlement spending, and relatively low revenue generation.' (Updates with additional estimates starting in third paragraph after 'Trade Agreements' subheadline.) Inside Gap's Last-Ditch, Tariff-Addled Turnaround Push Luxury Counterfeiters Keep Outsmarting the Makers of $10,000 Handbags How to Steal a House Ken Griffin on Trump, Harvard and Why Novice Investors Won't Beat the Pros Is Mark Cuban the Loudmouth Billionaire that Democrats Need for 2028? ©2025 Bloomberg L.P. Sign in to access your portfolio
Fox News
37 minutes ago
- Fox News
CNN host touts 'friendliness' of Iranians who shouted 'Death to America,' calls it jarring juxtaposition
CNN host Erin Burnett took time during her report on Tuesday to remark on the "friendliness" of the Iranians who chanted "Death to America" when she visited the country years ago. The "OutFront" host reported live from the United Arab Emirates on "Inside Politics with Dana Bash" to discuss the sentiment in the Middle East after the fragile ceasefire between Iran and Israel. Burnett said that despite news of both Israel and Iran reportedly violating the agreement, most people on the ground felt optimistic that the ceasefire would ultimately hold. Burnett then described her own experience with "whiplash" from Iran, recounting how she once spoke with Iranians after they chanted "Death to America." "I remember at one point being in Tehran years ago, and they're chanting 'Death to America' all around me, even as I say, 'Oh, I'm an American, reporting for CNN.' And they were happy to speak to me. So those two sort of jarring realities of the chant and yet, the friendliness, have existed together," Burnett said. "Death to America" has been a slogan used by Iranian leaders for years and was referenced by President Donald Trump as a motivator behind his decision to launch airstrikes against the nation's nuclear facilities on Saturday. "For 40 years, Iran has been saying, 'Death to America. Death to Israel.' They have been killing our people, blowing off their arms, blowing off their legs with roadside bombs," Trump said on Saturday evening from the White House. "That was their specialty. We lost over a thousand people, and hundreds of thousands throughout the Middle East and around the world have died as a direct result of their hate in particular." Trump called out CNN reporters as "gutless losers" and "scum" early Tuesday morning for downplaying the success of the U.S. strikes. "But when I see CNN, all night long, they're trying to say, 'Well, maybe it wasn't really as demolished as we thought.' It was demolished. You take a look at the pinpricks, and you see that place is gone. And I will say, I think CNN ought to apologize to the pilots of the B-2s," Trump said.
Forbes
37 minutes ago
- Forbes
3 Key Issues Surrounding Zohran Mamdani's New York City Tax Increase
New York City mayoral candidate and Democratic State Representative Zohran Mamdani campaigns in New ... More York City on April 16, 2025. Voters will head to the polls on June 24, 2025, to vote in the Democratic primary in the New York City mayoral election. (Photo by ANGELA WEISS / AFP) (Photo by ANGELA WEISS/AFP via Getty Images) As reported by Forbes, Zohran Mamdani won the New York City Mayoral Democratic Primary and is poised to become one of the most powerful mayors in the US. What makes his campaign unique is that Mandani ran on a more socialist-type platform, which raises taxes on some to pay for enhanced services. This article discusses who Mamdani is, what Mamdani proposes to alter the tax landscape of New York City, and three key issues with his plans to increase taxes on New York City taxpayers. Who Is Zohran Mamdani? Mamdani is a 33 year old politician. He was born in Uganda, and his family moved to South Africa before moving to New York City at the age of seven. Mamdani spent much of his life in New York City before attending Bowdoin College in Maine. Following college, Mandani started a hip-hop music career. According to Rolling Stone, he first appeared under the stage name of Young Cardamom and later changed it to Mr. Cardamom. The article also discusses that he did not become a rap sensation, but that Mamdani had many funny moments that showed that he was not taking himself too seriously. After his time as a hip-hop artist ended, Mamdani campaigned to become a representative in New York's 36th State Assembly district. He won in 2020, defeating a four-term incumbent, and was re-elected without opposition in 2022 and 2024. According to the New York State Assembly records, Mamdani was the primary sponsor on 20 bills, three of which have become laws. In 2024, Mamdani announced his candidacy for mayor of New York City in the 2025 election. He has defeated former Governor Andrew Cuomo for the Democratic nomination. As of the morning of June 25th, Polymarket estimates his lead over incumbent Mayor Eric Adams to be 52%. Mamdani's Tax Plan According to Mamdani's campaign website, he has big ambitions to alter New York City's socio-economic landscape. These plans include freezing rent, making bus transportation free, building dedicated priority lanes for busses, creating a new department focusing on community safety, providing free childcare at no cost for every New Yorker between six weeks and five years old, creating city-owned grocery stores designed to keep prices low, building new affordable housing, and many more. Mamdani estimates these spending increases will cost $10 billion annually. This marks a staggering increase relative to the city's $115 billion annual budget. The New York Times reports that his socialist-leaning platform has drawn promotion from the likes of Alexandra Ocasio-Cortez and Bernie Sanders, both of whom have openly endorsed his candidacy. Mamdani is also very transparent about how he plans to pay for these large spending increases. In his platform, he clearly lays out where $10 billion can come from. His two main funding sources are: 3 Key Issues Surrounding Mamdani's Tax Increase 1) The Numbers May Not Add Up In his platform, Mamdani transparently suggests that at the current corporate tax rate of 9%, New York City collects $6.5 billion annually in corporate income taxes. However, his platform then claims that raising the rate by 2.5% will then increase collections to $11.5 billion. While Mamdani's platform can be applauded for transparency, it does not connect the dots on where the numbers come from. Nationwide, collections from individuals tend to dwarf those from corporations. This notion is because of the simple fact that there are far more individuals and non-corporate owned businesses than corporate entities. Thus, even though major corporations earn significant amounts of money, it is unclear how a small increase in the corporate tax rate of 2.5% can have such a drastic effect on the tax collections for New York City. 2) Most Large-Scale Tax Changes Happen At The State Level Very few cities enforce their own individual and corporate income tax, making comparisons to how this increase will affect taxpayers opaque. In Mamdani's platform, he calls the tax increases 'A Tried and True Approach' and references how Massachusetts, Washington DC, and New York have all raised taxes on the wealthy and done so successfully. Mamdani also cites how state taxation differentially taxes corporations in New York, and how New York has had a history of increasing taxes on its taxpayers throughout the years. However, nowhere in the platform does Mamdani demonstrate a time when cities have done this effectively. As reported by The New York Post, the scale of Mamdani's plans rely on buyoff from the state legislature. In fact, The New York Times Podcast: The Daily discusses that providing free transportation and free childcare requires raising money from the state, and the state is very reluctant to do so at this time. Different from the Federal government, cities and states cannot go into debt. Thus, there is significant pressure on these spending increases to ensure that they are paid for, and the tax increases appear to require substantial state-level support. This notion has led outlets like Forbes to question whether Mamdani understands the realities of governance. 3) Wealthy Individuals And Corporations May Just Leave New York City In an interview with PIX 11, New York Governor Hochul provided a stunning critique over Mamdani's tax plans. Hochul discusses the concerns with raising taxes at a time when affordability is low, as well as the notion that the heightened costs are 'pushing New Yorkers to Palm Beach.' A natural question arises of whether New Yorkers would really leave because of taxes. While providing causal links to the question may be tricky, The Tax Foundation, points to the notion that most studies examining this topic suggest that state and local taxes affect migration. Academic work by Agrawal and Tester published in the American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, provides evidence that this does, in fact, happen and the risk of capital flight has grown over recent years due to increased technology. A particularly problematic concern for New York City is that many of the academic studies in this realm focus on state taxation and how individuals and corporations might face a difficult decision of a physical move to an entirely different state. However, if New York City taxes become too high, the taxpayers might have a less tumultuous choice of simply relocating just outside of the city, a much easier move than moving to an entirely different state. If wealthy individuals and corporations choose to depart New York City due to the tax hikes, then it is unclear where the funds to pay for the increased spending will come from. Despite the substantial transparency provided in his platform, Mamdani does not appear to consider this important notion.
