
Gang mum had 2kg of meth delivered to home
By Al Williams, Open Justice reporter
'Delete all of your conversations and stop ringing and calling people Mum; you're going to put us all in jail bro, they've already got the big KO in jail, we're trying to get him out.'
That's what Tribesmen MC gang member Michael Erikson told his mother Sherryn Elizabeth Erikson as they arranged for close to 2kg of methamphetamine to be dropped off and picked up from her Auckland home.
Erikson was referring to Tribesmen national vice president Ricky Michael Te Rangi Poa, also known as big KO, Sarge and Rick, in the message.
Poa was at the helm of the multimillion-dollar methamphetamine, cocaine and money laundering operation based out of Christchurch.
But it all came to an end when Poa, along with 10 co-defendants, including the Erikson family, were caught up in a police investigation code-named Operation Italian Sky.
It was then revealed that Sherryn's home in Blockhouse Bay had been used as the key dispatch point for large quantities of methamphetamine and cocaine.
It was a family operation with Michael working alongside his brother Jaxxon Erikson to manage receipt of the drugs from their cousin and Sherryn's nephew, Jordan Rapana. A family affair
Rapana collected the drugs in Auckland and took them to Christchurch on commercial flights and tow-trucks.
Michael and Jaxxon would organise the onward sale and distribution of the drugs, with Michael very closely connected to the principal offender and the operation's main beneficiary - Poa.
Michael would then return to Auckland with large quantities of cash to pay for subsequent shipments.
Another courier involved in the network was Tramayne Rauhihi, who was also responsible for delivering cash to Auckland and returning to Christchurch with the drugs.
He would complete the deliveries using tow trucks associated with a co-defendant who cannot be named.
Sherryn allowed them to use her home on multiple occasions as a drop-off and collection point for wholesale kilogram quantities of the drugs. A 'cog in the machine'
Sherryn, 52, was sentenced for her role in the network this week.
She appeared in the Christchurch High Court facing charges of permitting a premises and vehicle to be used for supplying meth and cocaine.
The court heard she was a 'cog in a machine'.
Crown prosecutor Will Taffs said the offending was elevated due to its nature, tied in with financial gain, and the variety and class of drugs.
'There has been financial gain here, this is not drugs in the glove box, culpability is attached because of financial reward.'
While Sherryn was paid for her involvement, Justice Lisa Preston said she did not gain a significant amount compared to those involved in the underlying offending.
Taffs said he accepted the financial reward she received was minimal compared to the overall value of the drugs going through her property.
The summary of facts showed she received six payments between March 2022 and July 2023.
The payments were made by her sons, her nephew and one of his associates.
That included an electronic transfer of $1350 from Jaxxon in March 2022, one of $1250 from Michael in February 2023, one of $600 from Rapana's associate in March 2023, one of $1000 from Jaxxon in April 2023, and a cash payment of $800 from Rapana in June 2023.
Rapana had messaged Michael clarifying that he was being paid $2500 and Sherryn was being paid $800 for their respective involvement in a delivery on the same day.
On July 18, 2023, she received an $850 electronic payment from Michael, the same day that a delivery of 1.97kg of methamphetamine was intercepted by police at Christchurch Airport.
Rapana was arrested at the time.
Taffs told the court it was a significant operation of which she was a smaller part.
The summary said Michael told an associate in August 2023 that he needed $15,000 taken to his mother's house.
About two weeks later he told the same associate that he needed meth and cocaine collected from her house.
The associate went to the house to collect the drugs.
On October 3, 2023, Michael contacted his mother and discussed that a quantity of meth would be delivered to her address.
He said that he had 'someone dropping something else as well and you will need to put those two things together and put them somewhere safe till I've got someone.'
He also told her to 'delete all of your conversations and stop ringing and calling people Mum; you're going to put us all in jail bro, they've already got the big KO in jail, we're trying to get him out.'
Rauhihi was subsequently directed to collect the meth from her house and collected 1.987kg of it in a black shopping bag. The package was intercepted by police later that day. Background issues
Defence lawyer Marie Taylor-Cyphers said her client had a less serious financial gain than her co-defendants.
She asked the court what Sherryn may have been aware of and her mental state at the time of the offending.
Justice Preston said it was a difficult submission based on Sherryn's guilty plea and the summary of facts.
Taylor-Cyphers said there were features of dislocation between Sherryn and her whānau, substance dependency issues similar to the ones she had grown up with.
'If her upbringing had not involved these features, would she be standing here today?'
While there was no excuse, and a guilty plea had been entered, how Sherryn got to this point in her life was relevant, Taylor-Cyphers said.
Her background had shaped her choices, she said.
She had made an effort while on bail, completing a rehabilitation programme, she had reconnected with whānau, including an auntie, 'and put it to good use'.
Taylor-Cyphers said Sherryn had learned about putting in firmer boundaries in terms of her sons. A profound sense of shame
Justice Preston said the transfer of money from her sons was out of proportion, given her involvement and her offending was lesser than theirs.
'The offending would have occurred regardless of your knowledge.'
However, she was more than a passive bystander, the judge said.
'By permitting the wholesale supply for many months, you were clearly a trusted cog in that distribution network, this came about at the behest of your sons and nephew, it would have occurred regardless of you, but you were connected to an extremely serious drug operation over a period of time between 2022 and 2023.'
The culpability was in the quantity of drugs and the time period, the judge said.
A contributing factor had been her poor decision-making, informed by her background, Justice Eaton said.
'You have faced many challenges, including abuse, loss of your parents, solo parenting and your own substance abuse.
'I am satisfied your relationship with your sons has contributed, you express a deep sense of remorse, you say this has been a deep painful lesson and you realise the damage meth has done to your whanau and community.
'I sense you express a profound sense of shame.'
Juston Eaton said Sherryn had been on bail for 18 months, subject to curfews.
She was assessed as low risk of reoffending and home detention would achieve the purpose of sentencing, the judge said.
The Crown did not oppose home detention, and a suitable address was available at a home in Blockhouse Bay.
Justice Eaton convicted and sentenced her to nine months' home detention, telling her to travel to Christchurch Airport and return to the Auckland address.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

RNZ News
a day ago
- RNZ News
Campervan driver assaults elderly man on South Island highway
By Tracy Neal, Open Justice reporter of Photo: 123RF A campervan driver head-butted a 71-year-old who stopped on the side of a highway and confronted him about his dangerous driving. The victim had been following Daniel Juan Daly on SH1 in the lower South Island last September. The man saw Daly pass a large truck in a dangerous manoeuvre that forced an oncoming driver off the road. Further up the road the victim watched as Daly pulled over in his campervan, got out, stepped out into the path of the truck and bashed the side of it as it went past. "It's really quite astonishing behaviour," Judge Jo Rielly said in sentencing Daly in the Nelson District Court today on charges of assault and dangerous driving. The court heard how the 39-year-old was driving a campervan north on the state highway near Waitaki on September 5 last year. He was following the large haulage truck and trailer unit which was travelling at a governed speed of 90km/h, meaning it was unable to travel faster. The vehicles then entered a section of the road with an 80km/h speed limit, when Daly, who was frustrated at not being able to pass, made several "erratic moves". As Daly pulled out to pass, he crossed the centre line and accelerated, forcing a south-bound vehicle to take evasive action to avoid a collision. The older driver was travelling two vehicles behind the truck, the police said. When he saw Daly walk out in front of the truck, he pulled off the road and parked in front of his campervan. Daly asked the driver in a confrontational way what he wanted, before lunging at him and knocking him to the ground. The victim got up before Daly again knocked him down and then head-butted him. Police said that after a brief tussle, Daly helped the man to his feet. He was uninjured, but his glasses were damaged. Judge Rielly said he was lucky to be facing a low-level assault charge. Daly, who was no stranger to the court system, including having been earlier convicted on a dangerous driving charge, now lives in a remote area of Marlborough where he works as a pest controller. In Nelson he was convicted, sentenced and fined on the charges, despite his lawyer requesting a sentence that he come up for sentence if called upon. Judge Rielly said that was "an unrealistic submission". Defence lawyer Josh Friend said Daly accepted his manoeuvre in passing the truck was unsafe and that ordinarily he was a "reliable driver". Last year he received his heavy vehicle licence. Friend said Daly's last conviction for violence matters was 11 years ago, and in 2019 he was convicted on a theft charge. Friend said it was Daly's perspective that the scuffle ensued after he was approached by the other driver, but "he took the wrong action by head-butting him". Judge Rielly said Daly's actions had been particularly dangerous, not only because of the type of vehicle he had been driving but because of the sustained period he had been trying to get past the truck. She said his driving had put other road users at risk but his attempt to get in the path of the truck was "really quite astonishing behaviour". On the charge of dangerous driving, Daly was convicted and fined $400 and disqualified from driving for eight months. On the assault charge he was sentenced to 80 hours of community work and ordered to pay $200 in emotional harm reparation. * This story originally appeared in the New Zealand Herald .

RNZ News
4 days ago
- RNZ News
Tenant quits lease after apartment hits almost 44C, bond refunded
By Tracy Neal, Open Justice multimedia journalist of File pic Photo: 123RF A tenant says the sweltering heat inside their apartment reached temperatures well into the 40s - ruining a laptop, killing pot plants and requiring medicines to be stored in a car where it was cooler. Now the tenant has been allowed to break a year-long lease and get their bond back, a month after moving in. It comes after NZME reported concerns this year that tens of thousands of Auckland families would suffer in overheating terraced houses and vulnerable people could risk "dying of heatstroke" unless construction designs changed. That story described how large windows, a lack of eaves or other shade, no consideration of a property's direction towards the sun and poor ventilation were causing overheating in old and new builds. In this instance, the tenant, whose name was suppressed after a Tenancy Tribunal hearing, said the excessive heat inside their one-bedroom, sixth-floor apartment was evident soon after moving in. The building, in an undisclosed location, was managed by a body corporate, but the landlord remained liable to the tenant under the rental agreement and by law. On a day in March this year, the tenant recorded the temperature inside the east-facing unit at 43.6C before midday. The next day, the mercury had risen to 38.5C before 9am, even with the living room window open and after the air conditioning had been running, according to evidence presented to the tribunal. The tenant said it was difficult to sleep in such heat, pot plants didn't last beyond a day and that it was not safe storing a co-tenant's medication inside the apartment, so they left it in a car. The tenant said the heat had caused the battery in a laptop to expand, damaging the computer beyond repair. The tenant also said the windows in the apartment did not open wide enough to allow sufficient draught, but the landlord disagreed and suggested the tenants "had not been using them properly". The landlord also took temperature readings in the living room with the curtains closed and then open. The afternoon temperatures, 26.4C and 28.3C were high, the tribunal said, but not as high as those recorded by the tenant. The landlord also produced a Healthy Homes Standards report showing that the unit complied with the applicable ventilation requirements. In a recently released decision, the tribunal ordered the $2440 bond be returned to the tenant, plus partial reimbursement of electricity charges it cost to run air conditioning, over and above standard power charges. The tenant was surprised to receive two invoices totalling $96 to cover the cost of running the heat pump/air conditioning unit while they lived there. However, the landlord said they had explained at the start of the tenancy that the power supply to the air conditioning unit, which was based on usage only, was controlled by the body corporate and invoiced separately. The tenant paid the invoices but claimed there was insufficient evidence to support the calculation of the charges or to prove the usage claimed was exclusively attributable to themselves. The landlord produced spreadsheets provided by the body corporate, which they claimed set out how the charges were calculated. The tribunal said that based on the evidence, it accepted the tenant's submission that the method of calculation was unclear, but there was no dispute that the tenant had used the air conditioning unit and was therefore liable for some of the costs claimed. The tenant's application to reduce the fixed term was dismissed. Agreement was instead reached between the tenant and landlord to end it earlier than the contracted date. A new tenancy began on 11 April, the tribunal said. The New Zealand Property Investors Federation told NZME that investors should do due diligence on any property they buy, especially in light of recent media coverage about hot townhouses. Advocacy manager Matt Ball said there was nothing in the tribunal's decision, or in general, to say that new townhouses would not make a good investment. He said there were opportunities for investors willing to do any necessary remedial work, such as installing ventilation or air conditioning. -This story originally appeared in the New Zealand Herald .


Otago Daily Times
03-06-2025
- Otago Daily Times
Man loses Dunedin flat after threatening neighbours
A man who threw plastic chairs at his frightened neighbours before letting off a gas bottle in the shared hallway and shouting "Boom, boom, you can all die", has lost his Salvation Army flat. Quinton Rihari couldn't be reached for the Tenancy Tribunal's hearing, where the Salvation Army sought to terminate the tenancy on his central Dunedin flat, saying he'd threatened to assault other tenants in the complex. According to the tribunal's recently released decision, Rihari received written warnings about his behaviour at his Thomas Burns St flat on three occasions. The first was on December 27 last year, when he broke a painting in the corridor during a fight outside his room. It began at 3.30am and lasted for an hour and a half. Then, in February, he verbally abused tenants when they asked him to turn his music down. Two months later, on April 14, the Salvation Army says Rihari became angry and threw plastic chairs off a shared balcony, frightening other tenants. After returning to his room, Rihari let off a 9kg LPG bottle in the hallway, yelling, "Boom, boom, you can all die". Police were called and took Rihari away, only for him to return and begin yelling at the other tenants, calling them "narks". Later that day, he told another tenant he was going to "punch her head in". Again, police were called and Rihari was taken away. Under the Residential Tenancies Act, the tribunal can terminate a tenancy if it's satisfied a tenant has engaged in antisocial behaviour on three separate occasions during a 90-day period and received written notice on each occasion. Antisocial behaviour includes harassment or any act (whether intentional or not) that reasonably causes significant alarm, distress or nuisance. The decision found that while Rihari received separate notices for each incident, the three incidents spanned 108 days, outside the 90-day period. Despite this, the tribunal found Rihari had threatened to harm his neighbours over the gas cylinder incident and threatened to assault another neighbour. As a result, it agreed to terminate Rihari's tenancy. When the Salvation Army was approached for comment late this afternoon, its media officer Kai Sanders said no one was available for comment, adding this wasn't something the organisation would usually comment on because of its strict rules around privacy. - Catherine Hutton, Open Justice reporter