
School mobile phone ban call rejected after Senedd inquiry
Smartphones should not be banned "outright" from schools in Wales, a Senedd inquiry has concluded.Instead the Petitions Committee report says schools should get more Welsh government support to set their own restrictions.The committee says there is "plenty of evidence" that smartphones cause harm but it also heard that they can support young people's welfare and safety.The Welsh government said it is working with schools "to ensure they have policies and resources to reduce the negative impacts of mobile phones and promote learning".
The Senedd's Petitions Committee held an inquiry in response to a petition signed by more than 3,000 people calling for smartphones to be banned in schools, except in exceptional circumstances.The committee spoke to teachers, pupils and parents as part of its inquiry.It considered the different rules currently adopted by schools in Wales and, what it described as, "the complex relationship" between young people and their smartphones.The committee concluded that an outright "ban" on smartphones in all schools was not "a clear cut call" and that instead it wanted to see more support for schools to set their own restrictions.Kayla Lovell, 25, from Cribyn, Ceredigion, said she did not think phones needed to be banned in schools and argued that banning them only led to pupils hiding phones.
"I think for people like maybe in sixth form, it would be a good idea, and a part of safety," she said.For Sam Herbert, 50, mother to 13-year-old Stephanie, safety is also a valid reason to question a ban."Maybe they should hold them in the school when they attend school, and then give them back to the end of the day, so that they have them for going home or when they need them," she said.But Stephanie, who is diabetic, uses her phone to manage her condition, meaning a ban would be a real cause for concern for her.
Lewis Jarvis-Blower, 23, from Llanwnnen, Ceredigion, said a ban was "probably for the best" but admitted he liked using his phone during breaks and at lunchtime."I would be fuming, really angry," he said, if he were a student now and a ban was introduced. "It already feels like sometimes there's not the freedom there," he added."The schools struggling with it... it's probably best if they have their own rules to cater uniquely to their students."In its report, the committee calls on the Welsh government to establish "clear guidance, alongside a robust decision-making framework, which will give teachers the confidence to set rules that work best for their young people".
It also wants the Welsh government to keep following the evidence of studies into the impact of smartphone restrictions during the school day.Tracey Boothby, 44, from Lampeter, Ceredigion, said a ban would be "tricky" but added that while children were in school, social media was "obviously a no-no"."You're in a place of education, and I do feel, as parents that... we should help with whatever the schools decide," she said.
'Compelling and concerning'
Laura Doel, national secretary of school leaders' union NAHT Cymru, said an outright ban would not work."School leaders need the flexibility and support to develop a policy that works for them to keep the children and staff in their schools and communities safe," she said in a statement."The fact is we live in a society where phone use is prevalent. "But it is important that we educate children and young people, to help them understand and navigate this online world, and make sure they know how to seek help when it becomes unsafe or unhealthy, as well as clamping down on those who do not obey the rules."Carolyn Thomas, the Labour chairwoman of the committee, said it was "a complex" topic."The growing body of evidence about the harms of smartphones outweighing the benefits for children is both compelling and concerning," she said."However, on balance we do not believe that it supports a move to a uniform ban on smartphones in all Welsh schools."The more evidence we heard, the clearer it became that the relationship between young people and their phones is not simple."There are children who experience distraction, cyber-bullying, addiction and anxiety delivered through their phones. "There are others who are liberated by being able to manage health conditions or feel emboldened to walk to school, knowing they can always contact a parent."In England, smartphones are not banned from schools but the UK government has issued guidance encouraging headteachers to prohibit their use.Some Welsh schools already ban smartphones.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Wales Online
12 minutes ago
- Wales Online
Nigel Farage on 20mph, coal mining and steel, as he explains vision for future for Wales
Our community members are treated to special offers, promotions and adverts from us and our partners. You can check out at any time. More info Reform UK leader NIgel Farage has spoken about his vision for the future of Wales, at a press conference today. He took to the stage just after 12pm in Port Talbot, with less than a year until the Senedd elections. His introduction had to be hastily rewritten given the UK Government's announcement, which went live at noon, that the winter fuel payment cuts are being partially reversed. Mr Farage said that Labour "knowing this press conference was taking place", announced they would make a fuel payment announcement at noon, as he was due to speak, but called it a "step in the right direction". He also announced independent councillors Andrew Barry and David Hughes, both members of Merthyr Tydfil council, have joined Reform UK, as they also took to the stage to explain how they had become disillusioned and moved to Reform. The most recent poll for Wales suggests his party is in line to take its first seats in the Senedd at the election in May 2026. Its only representation in Wales at the moment is with councillors, but a YouGov/Barn Cymru poll which asked people their voting intention for the Welsh Parliament in May put Reform UK in second with 25% of the vote. They were only behind Plaid Cymru who were projected to get 30% of the vote and ahead of Labour's 18%, reports Wales Online. In an opinion piece for WalesOnline, the party leader has given his first glimpses of policies ahead of the election. Mr Farage has said the party would allow coal mining again in Wales and says its long term plan is to "reopen the Port Talbot steelworks". The steelworks, owned by Tata, have not closed but its remaining blast furnaces were closed in 2024, with work now ongoing to build an electric arc furnace which will recycle previously-used steel. Thousands of jobs are being lost as part of the change. The Indian-owned company said the blast furnaces were at the end of their operational lives and too expensive to replace. The Port Talbot steelworks were, the company said, losing £1m a day before the blast furnaces were turned off. Reform UK say it would "use Welsh Development Grants to support real industry. We'll redirect economic funding from consultants and NGOs to actual factory floors, machinery, and industrial jobs in places like Llanelli, Shotton, and Ebbw Vale". Nigel Farage has also said the party would also set up "regional technical colleges" for people to have a "path into proper trade". (Image: Getty Images) The party would also, it says, stop any building being used for asylum seeker accommodation, end funding to the Welsh Refugee Council and scrap the Welsh Government's "Nation of Sanctuary". It also vowed to set up an Elon Musk style department to cut costs. "A Reform UK Senedd will also save hundreds of millions each year by cutting bureaucracy, waste and bad management. The establishment of Welsh DOGE will help us uncover where there is woke and wasteful spending and we will make sure those funds are redirected to frontline services," Mr Farage pledges. During the press conference Mr Farage also took aim at the controversial 20mph policy, saying he would reverse it. as he said he doubted the electric arc furnace at the Port Talbot Tata site would "every be switched on", but says their plan is to "reindustrialise Wales". He says in the coming years more steel will be needed and the UK should produce its own steel, and its own coal. "I'm not saying let's open all the pits, there are certain types of coal for certain types of uses, for the blast furnaces, we can use here," Mr Farage said, insisting it would be a small scale, specific mining and not like the "heydays of mining in Wales". Mr Farage also said there would be no going back on devolution, but criticised the running of Wales since. In response, a Welsh Labour spokesperson said: "Nigel Farage has no plans for steel - just a camera crew. You can't restart a blast furnace with a press conference. "Nigel Farage says that hopefully they mightthey'll bring back mining. The people of Wales will see through the false hope and false promises of a public-school boy from England who does not understand them and does not understand Wales. "His answer is to bring back the mines. The only thing Nigel Farage is trying to mine is votes from communities that have already gone through tough times. Nigel Farage has today brought his fantasy politics and magic money tree to Port Talbot. He's gambling with real people's livelihoods." Sign up for the North Wales Live newsletter sent twice daily to your inbox Find out what's happening near you


Wales Online
34 minutes ago
- Wales Online
Rachel Reeves must not fall short on giving Welsh rail a fair deal in this spending review
Rachel Reeves must not fall short on giving Welsh rail a fair deal in this spending review Business Editor Sion Barry makes the case for greater UK Government rail investment in Wales Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander . (Image: Andrew Matthews/PA Wire ) All eyes will be on Chancellor Rachel Reeves next week when she delivers the UK Government's departmental spending allocations for the next three years in the comprehensive spending review. Her fiscal headroom is tight, but for Wales it will require Secretary of State for Transport Heidi Alexander to commit funding to start addressing decades of under-investment in Wales' rail network by successive Westminster governments. Her settlement from the Treasury will mean she cannot please everyone, but having rightly recognised the pressing case to fund much-needed rail enhancement projects in Wales - as highlighted in a welcome joint letter with Welsh Secretary Jo Stevens back in January - she must now deliver, even if it means cutting back elsewhere within her department. The advisory Wales Rail Board, which includes various stakeholders such as the Department for Transport (DfT), the Wales Office, Transport for Wales, and the Welsh Government, has already drawn up a detailed list of priority rail enhancement projects for Wales. These come with a price tag of several billion pounds, including the five Burns stations between Cardiff and Magor, improvements to the North Wales Main Line and connectivity with the north west of England, and the required investment - such as a Coryton loop and a Cardiff west junction - to allow for four trains per hour on the most densely populated part of the South Wales Metro: the Coryton and City Lines running through Cardiff. Once the DfT commits to major projects, like the £16bn rail and bus investment in the Midlands and North of England announced earlier this week, as they take more than three years to complete they will have to be funded for the long-term. Article continues below I would expect the UK Government to announce on Wednesday that it will, as a starting point, deliver the five Burns stations: Cardiff East (off Newport Road), Newport West, Maindy, Llanwern, and Magor on the South Wales Main Line. In a phased investment programme, they will take around five years to complete. The stations were recommended by the Burns Commission, chaired by Lord Burns and commissioned by the Welsh Government to explore ways to boost public transport investment in south-east Wales. This followed former First Minister Mark Drakeford's 2017 decision not to proceed with a Labour Senedd manifesto pledge to deliver a £1bn M4 relief road south of Newport. The stations, with a combined construction cost of £320m, first require £15m for detailed design work and £50m to upgrade the relief lines from Bristol Temple Meads to South Wales to allow for passenger services. The business case for the Burns stations is strong. They would serve a population of around 1.2 million, 20% of whom don't have access to a car. Transport for Wales could bid to run a new service from Bristol Temple Meads, calling at the new stations and potentially running as far west as Carmarthen. For Newport and its growing compound semiconductor sector, the stations and increased services to Bristol Temple Meads would enhance its appeal as an investment location - a city which already benefits from being closer to London than Cardiff. Transport for Wales could reassign its new rolling stock, deploying its tri-mode trains from the Rhymney Line, onto a new Temple Meads to South Wales service. Transport Wales, under the terms of its on order 35 tram-trains, could commission more to back fill the moving of tri-modes from the Rhymney Line and Penarth to Coryton services. Ahead of next spring's Senedd Election, the Burns stations are something the Welsh Government needs to see delivered by the UK Government, having cancelled the M4 relief road. Although little has been said recently about a promised £400m investment for roads and improved integrated public transport around Newport. Meanwhile, the backers of Cardiff Parkway and its integrated business park project at St Mellons are revising costings for what was a projected £120m four-platform station pre-Covid. It would be a welcome addition alongside the Burns stations. Despite accounting for around 10% of the rail network (England and Wales) and making up over 5% of the population, Wales has received less than 2% of rail enhancement investment over the last few decades. Over a 15-year period, Wales should be seeking a rail enhancement commitment from the UK Government of £200m to £300m per annum - equating to £3bn-£4bn in total investment. By contrast, up to 2040 the DfT has committed around £80bn for rail enhancement projects in England, including HS2 from London to Birmingham, a high-speed station at Euston, and the upgrade of the TransPennine Route. Through the Barnett Formula, the Welsh Government used to receive a transfer from changes to the DfT budget based on a comparability factor of around 80% - set against a UK population share of 5%. The transfer was based on any change to the DfT's overall budget. So it's not accurate to say, as many have this week when the UK Government announced the £6.6bn Oxford to Cambridge line, that Wales would have received a £360m consequential if the project was fully barnetised. If the overall DfT budget rose by £6.6bn, then yes - but savings will be made elsewhere. In the round, however, Wales has been hugely short-changed. The high previous comparability factor was due to non-devolved items being a small part of the DfT's budget, and because Network Rail spending was not included. However, with HS2 and Network Rail spending now included - and comprising a much larger share of the DfT's budget - the comparability factor for Wales has fallen to just 33.5%. The figures for Scotland and Northern Ireland remain at 95.6%. Of the DfT's current £37bn annual budget, around £20bn relates to high-speed rail and Network Rail. The 'England and Wales' classification for rail projects has significantly eroded Wales' share. I'm not expecting a significant uplift to the DfT budget. The Treasury's view is effectively: if you want to do more in Wales (via DfT), you have to do so from within existing - or only slightly increased - resources. However, the Treasury should also recognise that part of the rail network in Wales - the Core Valley Lines (CVL) - is devolved. When the £1bn South Wales Metro electrification project is completed and the new turn-up-and-go timetable is bedded in, passenger numbers could climb to around 12 million per year. With further investment in services on the Coryton and City Lines, the aim should be to increase that figure towards 20 million. If the CVL devolved asset were recognised fiscally by the Treasury - based on passenger numbers or track mileage - it would improve the comparability factor for Wales. The Welsh Government could then decide how to invest the resulting Barnett consequentials, potentially ring fencing them to support further CVL investment or future phases of Cardiff Crossrail. Whether this will be addressed by the Chancellor remains to be seen. Devolution would come with a Welsh Government block grant adjustment to reflect new responsibilities and functions – and then Barnett adjustments when DfT budgets change. Article continues below The then Welsh Government's 2004 decision to reject rail devolution - an offer extended by the then-Tony Blair government - must now rank among the worst decisions since devolution. Scotland accepted rail devolution, which has allowed projects like HS2 to be properly classified as England-only, unlocking full Barnett consequentials for the Scottish administration. If England and Wales classified rail projects provided for fair investment in Wales then many could live with that arrangement - though I would still argue for full devolution. The Welsh Secretary has made a strong case for Welsh investment and has the backing of Ms Alexander. Having raised expectations, they cannot afford to fall short.


Daily Mirror
an hour ago
- Daily Mirror
Nigel Farage accused of 'selling fairy dust' over unfunded steelworks plan
Reform leader Nigel Farage said he wants to reopen the Port Talbot steelworks in Wales, but is under pressure to say how he would achieve it after failing to give answers today Nigel Farage has been accused of "selling fairy dust" after saying he wants to reopen Port Talbot's blast furnaces without a plan to pay for it. The Reform leader announced his desire with a wave of fanfare - but was unable to say how he would achieve it. Mr Farage admitted he would need the help of central government and private businesses, and conceded it would cost billions of pounds. During a press conference in Wales he was confronted with claims the furnaces are "beyond recovery", with the cost of building a brand new steelworks costing around £3billion Floundering Mr Farage said: "Nothing is impossible, but it might be difficult, it might be easier to build a new one." He said it was an "ambition" to reopen the blast furnaces, which closed last year as operator Tata moves to a greener electric arc. The Indian-based company said it was losing £1million a day in Port Talbot. The Reform leader has set his sights on winning control of the Welsh Parliament, the Senedd. Following his press conference, a spokesman for the Community Union said: 'We will always support credible policies that create more well-paid jobs in the steel sector, but our steel communities deserve better than to be used as a political football. If Reform have serious plans for the future of our steel sector in Wales, they should set them out in full.' And Labour MP Stephen Kinnock, whose Aberafan Maesteg constituency includes Port Talbot, said Mr Farage was pitching "an operation that no one with any proper knowledge of steelmaking thinks is credible". Mr Kinnock went on: "Farage is a dyed-in-the-wool Thatcherite cosplaying as a socialist. It has been a really challenging time for our community. Politicians should focus on what we can achieve through Labour's £2.5bn Steel Fund - not insulting our intelligence by selling snake oil & fairy dust." A Labour Party spokesman said: ' Nigel Farage is all talk, no plan, and would risk chaos, cuts and decline for Britain. 'He admitted today that it is a 'massive expensive job to reopen blast furnaces' costing 'in the low billions', without offering any explanation for how he would pay for it. Reform UK is just not serious." At his press conference Mr Farage acknowledged it would cost "in the low billions" to repopen the blast furnances, and said "private business partners" would have to be brought in. "Reopening a blast furnace is not an easy thing," he admitted. Darren Millar, leader of the Welsh Conservatives' Senedd group, said: "Nigel Farage's empty and uncosted promises are nothing more than a mirage. The people of Port Talbot won't be taken for fools." And Heledd Fychan, of Plaid Cymru, said: "Today, Reform have shown us what they offer Wales, empty headlines and nonsensical policies. Farage has parachuted himself into a community recently devastated by UK government inaction, and is taking advantage of the loss by claiming to reopen the blast furnaces, something the industry have already told us is impossible."