Is Mike Lee the establishment now? Here's why some Lyman Republicans think so
The state GOP convention on Saturday cracked a faction of the Utah Republican Party that had held firm for more than a decade.
Utah Sen. Mike Lee — the party's favorite product of the caucus system since his 2010 upset — took the stage to endorse his longtime friend, Rob Axson, for reelection as GOP chair.
'I'm here, not to tell you how to vote, but to ask for your help,' Lee told the 2,600 delegates in attendance. 'I can't think of anyone who has done more to mobilize and unify our delegate base.'
By the time he stepped down Lee had become, in the minds of at least a few of the most fervent grassroots activists, a player in what they consider to be the state's establishment machine.
How Lee, one of the most consistently conservative lawmakers in Congress, could be viewed as an enemy by part of the GOP base came down to his repeated support for opponents of former state lawmaker Phil Lyman.
Over the course of a year, Lyman's unsuccessful bid for governor, noted for its unsubstantiated allegations of corruption and its historic write-in results, drew the zealous devotion of many of the party's most engaged members.
In that race, too, Lee endorsed the incumbent, Utah Gov. Spencer Cox, to the disappointment of Lyman, who began reposting messages on X calling for Lee to lose in a primary. (Lyman later said this was a mistake by his campaign staff.)
But it was Lee's appearance at the convention that proved the tipping point for some of Lyman's most loyal defenders, who were, until then, also counted among Lee's most outspoken advocates.
In the hours and days following the convention, the most common posts on X referencing the senator were those criticizing him for his endorsement of Axson — who defeated Lyman with 52.4% of the vote.
'I absolutely believe Mike Lee should be primaried,' said Sophie Anderson, a state delegate from Davis County and one of Lyman's most dedicated volunteers.
Anderson said she is a member of dozens of group chats with fellow party activists where there is a 'sizable number' of people who feel the same way about Lee as she does.
While Anderson believes that Lee started out in Congress committed to reflecting the party grassroots, she said that over time the 'pressures of the establishment' have made Lee part of 'the establishment.'
But much of Utah's Republican Party would say that Lee's 14 years in the Senate show the opposite.
Few lawmakers have put up greater barriers to government spending increases, pushed harder against taxpayer funded abortions and pressured leadership more to follow proper budget processes than Lee.
There is 'no daylight' between Lee and the most conservative wing of the Utah Republican Party, despite some hurt feelings caused by the GOP leadership race, according to Lee's chief strategist, Dan Hauser.
Lee remains friends with most of Lyman's closest supporters, Hauser said, even as some of the 'inner circle' of Lyman's campaign have come out on social media to call Lee 'the establishment' — a claim Hauser considers laughable.
'If the most conservative senator in the nation — who wants to starve off the special interest groups that (the Department of Government Efficiency) found guilty of $100s of billions of dollars in waste, fraud and abuse, while also trying to shrink the size and scope of the government — is now establishment, then God bless America and the strong future that is coming," Hauser said.
Regardless of how small or large the faction is of Lee's newfound critics, their reaction to the convention reveals something about the trajectory of conservative politics in the state, said Jason Perry, director of the University of Utah's Hinckley Institute of Politics.
There appears to be a shift 'within the MAGA movement itself,' which may be overrepresented on social media, that judges candidates by an evolving definition of what it means to be 'anti-establishment' instead of their conservative track record, according to Perry.
'No one really looks at Mike Lee and thinks that he has not been a leader in the conservative space,' Perry said. 'But to some of those Lyman supporters, that is not enough.'
Spencer Stokes, president of lobbying firm Stokes Strategies and Lee's former chief of staff, said he has never seen a senator make themselves more available to delegates than Lee.
For example, throughout his tenure, Lee has never changed his personal phone number and he has remained more consistent in his ideological stances than most politicians, Stokes said, calling Lee 'the most principled elected official that I've seen in my lifetime.'
'He is anything but an establishment candidate,' Stokes said. 'If you say that, you somewhat lose your credibility in the social media world you're in, because I don't think there's anybody in the state of Utah that would call Mike Lee an establishment candidate.'
Stokes doubts that Lee will face a legitimate challenge from his right in 2028 because it would be nearly impossible to find a conservative 'more dedicated to their cause than Mike Lee.' But that doesn't mean someone won't challenge Lee from what Stokes called 'the fringe."
While social media algorithms often exaggerate extreme viewpoints, Mitt Romney's former chief of staff Matt Waldrip said not to underestimate the ability of pro-Lyman delegates to shape the state GOP.
'The active party members do have influence on what happens in the party around the state, and everyone capitulates to them in one way or another,' Waldrip said. 'So it actually does matter that you have these people that are torn up about this.'
And Waldrip doesn't see the criticisms of Lee as stemming purely from anger over his endorsement of Lyman's opponents. It is true that with the rise of President Donald Trump officials like Lee have become something of an 'establishment,' Waldrip said, and there are real ways in which Lee has strayed from the priorities of the GOP base.
Unlike with past massive spending packages, Waldrip pointed out, Lee has remained relatively quite on the 'big, beautiful bill' making its way through Congress which could increase the federal debt by $4-7 trillion over the next decade.
Lee previously made a name for himself arguing that Congress had ceded too much power to the executive branch, Waldrip said. But Lee has not come out in opposition to Trump's flurry of executive orders, including his actions on tariffs, which Lee introduced a bill in 2021 to prevent.
But for one conservative influencer in Utah, the entire debate around Lee is evidence that 'the conservative movement in Utah seems to be falling apart at the seams.'
Following the convention, Eric Moutsos, who posts prolifically about what he proudly calls 'conspiracy theories,' said that despite having some disagreements with Lee, Lyman and other prominent conservatives, he will never attack them publicly.
'Does this mean I will necessarily vote for any of them in certain races? It does not,' Moutsos said, adding, 'To me real conservatism also means being smart enough not to go after people who share the majority of your values and beliefs.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
20 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump tariffs may remain in effect while appeals proceed, U.S. Appeals court decides
By Dietrich Knauth (Reuters) -A federal appeals court allowed President Donald Trump's most sweeping tariffs to remain in effect on Tuesday while it reviews a lower court decision blocking them on grounds that Trump had exceeded his authority by imposing them. The decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in Washington, D.C. means Trump may continue to enforce, for now, his "Liberation Day" tariffs on imports from most U.S. trading partners, as well as a separate set of tariffs levied on Canada, China and Mexico. The appeals court has yet to rule on whether the tariffs are permissible under an emergency economic powers act that Trump cited to justify them, but it allowed the tariffs to remain in place while the appeals play out. The tariffs, used by Trump as negotiating leverage with U.S. trading partners, and their on-again, off-again nature have shocked markets and whipsawed companies of all sizes as they seek to manage supply chains, production, staffing and prices. The ruling has no impact on other tariffs levied under more traditional legal authority, such as tariffs on steel and aluminum imports. A three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of International Trade ruled on May 28 that the U.S. Constitution gave Congress, not the president, the power to levy taxes and tariffs, and that the president had exceeded his authority by invoking the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, a law intended to address "unusual and extraordinary" threats during national emergencies. The Trump administration quickly appealed the ruling, and the Federal Circuit in Washington put the lower court decision on hold the next day while it considered whether to impose a longer-term pause. The ruling came in a pair of lawsuits, one filed by the nonpartisan Liberty Justice Center on behalf of five small U.S. businesses that import goods from countries targeted by the duties and the other by 12 U.S. states. Trump has claimed broad authority to set tariffs under IEEPA. The 1977 law has historically been used to impose sanctions on enemies of the U.S. or freeze their assets. Trump is the first U.S. president to use it to impose tariffs. Trump has said that the tariffs imposed in February on Canada, China and Mexico were to fight illegal fentanyl trafficking at U.S. borders, denied by the three countries, and that the across-the-board tariffs on all U.S. trading partners imposed in April were a response to the U.S. trade deficit. The states and small businesses had argued the tariffs were not a legal or appropriate way to address those matters, and the small businesses argued that the decades-long U.S. practice of buying more goods than it exports does not qualify as an emergency that would trigger IEEPA. At least five other court cases have challenged the tariffs justified under the emergency economic powers act, including other small businesses and the state of California. One of those cases, in federal court in Washington, D.C., also resulted in an initial ruling against the tariffs, and no court has yet backed the unlimited emergency tariff authority Trump has claimed. Errore nel recupero dei dati Effettua l'accesso per consultare il tuo portafoglio Errore nel recupero dei dati Errore nel recupero dei dati Errore nel recupero dei dati Errore nel recupero dei dati

Associated Press
20 minutes ago
- Associated Press
Judge tosses lawsuit over Trump's firing of US African Development Foundation board members
A federal judge has tossed out a lawsuit over President Donald Trump's dismantling of a U.S. federal agency that invests in African small businesses. U.S. District Judge Richard Leon in Washington, D.C., dismissed the case on Tuesday, finding that Trump was acting within his legal authority when he fired the U.S. African Development Foundation's board members in February. In March, the same judge ruled that the administration's removal of most grant money and staff from the congressionally created agency was also legal, as long as the agency was maintained at the minimum level required by law. USADF was created as an independent agency in 1980, and its board members must be confirmed by the U.S. Senate. In 2023, Congress allocated $46 million to the agency to invest in small agricultural and energy infrastructure projects and other economic development initiatives in 22 African countries. On Feb. 19, Trump issued an executive order that said USADF, the U.S. Institute of Peace, the Inter-American Foundation and the Presidio Trust should be scaled back to the minimum presence required by law. At the time, USADF had five of its seven board seats filled. A few days later, an administration official told Ward Brehm that he was fired, and emails were sent to the other board members notifying them that they had also been terminated. Those emails were never received, however, because they were sent to the wrong email addresses. The four board members, believing they still held their posts because they had not been given notice, met in March and passed a resolution appointing Brehm as the president of the board. But Trump had already appointed Pete Marocco as the new chairman of what the administration believed to now be a board of one. Since then, both men have claimed to be the president of the agency, and Brehm filed the lawsuit March 6. Leon said that even though they didn't receive the emails, the four board members were effectively terminated in February, and so they didn't have the authority to appoint Brehm to lead the board. An attorney for Brehm did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Another lawsuit over the dismantling of the agency is still pending before the same judge. In that case, two USADF staffers and a consulting firm based in Zambia that works closely with USADF contend that the Trump administration's efforts to deeply scale back the agency wrongly usurps Congress' powers. They also say Marocco was unlawfully appointed to the board, in part because he was never confirmed by the Senate as required. Leon's ruling in Brehm's case did not address whether the Trump administration had the power to install Marocco as board chair on a temporary basis.


Fox News
21 minutes ago
- Fox News
Trump-backed Jack Ciattarelli captures GOP nomination for New Jersey governor
HOLMDEL, N.J. - The candidate President Donald Trump recently endorsed in New Jersey has won the state's Republican gubernatorial primary, in the 2025 race to succeed term-limited Democratic Gov. Phil Murphy. The Associated Press projects that Jack Ciattarelli, a former GOP state lawmaker who is making his third bid for New Jersey governor, will capture the Republican nomination, topping four rivals in Tuesday's primary in a race that for months had been a battle for Trump's support. Among those Cittarelli defeated were former businessman and popular conservative talk radio host Bill Spadea and state Sen. Jon Bramnick, a lawyer who served for a decade as state Assembly GOP leader. Ciattarelli and Spadea spent months trading fire over which of them was a bigger Trump supporter. But last month the president endorsed Cittarelli, who ran unsuccessfully for the GOP nomination in 2017, but four years later he captured the nomination and overperformed in the general election, coming close to ousting Murphy. "I'm asking you to get out and vote for a true champion for the people of your state – Jack Ciattarelli. He's been a friend of mine, and he's been a real success story," Trump told supporters a week ago, as he dialed into a tele-rally on the eve of the kick-off of early voting in New Jersey. Trump's grip over the GOP is stronger than ever following his convincing White House re-election victory last November, and Cittarrelli, in a Fox News Digtal interview last week, said the president's endorsement was "a really big deal" and added "the president's doing very, very well in New Jersey." Spadea said that not landing Trump's endorsement "was certainly disappointing." "I mean, we made no bones about this. We absolutely wanted the president's endorsement. Unfortunately, the president endorsed a poll and not a plan," Spadea told Fox News Digital last week. "I have been a supporter of President Trump since he came down the escalator," as he referenced Trump's announcement in 2015 of his first presidential campaign. "There is no question that I am the common-sense conservative. I am the actual Republican in this primary," Spadea claimed. And Spadea questioned Ciattarelli's support for Trump, arguing that his rival "has disrespected him [Trump] for the better part of the last eight years…We thought that that endorsement would have been better served with me." Four years ago, after he won the GOP gubernatorial nomination, Ciattarelli, when asked if he was seeking the then-former president's endorsement, told Fox News Digital "there's only one endorsement I seek, and that's the endorsement of the voters of New Jersey. That's the only one that matters." Fast-forward to 2025, and Ciattarelli emphasized that "people really appreciate what he [Trump] is doing for New Jerseyans. He's put a temporary hold on the wind farms off the Jersey Shore. He's beating up on the New York Democrats over congestion pricing. He supports a quadrupling of the SALT [state and local tax] deduction on our federal tax returns. Those are big deals to New Jersey, and that's why he's got so much great support here. And I'm honored to have his endorsement." Asked why Trump endorsed him rather than Spadea, Ciattarelli said that "the president wants to win. He knows that I provide the best opportunity to win in November." "He knows we're going to raise the necessary money. We've raised more money than the other five Republican gubernatorial candidates combined," added Ciattarelli, a certified public accountant who started a medical publishing company before getting into politics. Ciattarelli's fundraising allowed him to dominate the GOP primary ad wars. The Democratic Governors Association, pointing to the rush to embrace Trump by the top two candidates, long described the 2025 Republican showdown as a "MAGA battle" and argued that there's "extremism in the GOP primary." While New Jersey has long leaned toward the Democrats, Republicans have had success in gubernatorial elections. "It's not a blue state when it comes to governor races, Republicans have won six of the last 11. That's better than 50%," Ciattarelli said. Trump, who for years has spent summer weekends at his golf club in Bedminster, New Jersey, held a very large campaign rally last year in Wildwood, N.J. And he improved from a 16-point loss in the state in the 2020 election to a 6-point deficit last November. Ciattarelli, looking ahead to the general election campaign, said he's "really looking forward" to Trump's "active participation…I think New Jerseyans are anxious to have him on the campaign trail with me and help deliver a win for us in November."