logo
Trump-appointed judges warn of threats, criticize calls to impeach judges

Trump-appointed judges warn of threats, criticize calls to impeach judges

Reuters8 hours ago

June 24 (Reuters) - Two U.S. appeals court judges appointed by President Donald Trump told lawmakers on Tuesday that they viewed calls to impeach judges over their rulings as inappropriate and that the judiciary needed more resources to bolster security for members of the bench.
U.S. Circuit Judges Amy St. Eve and Michael Scudder appeared before a subcommittee of the U.S. House of Representatives' Judiciary Committee on behalf of the U.S. Judicial Conference for a hearing examining the courts' finances and cybersecurity.
But lawmakers on both sides of the aisle used the rare appearance before Congress by two sitting members of the judiciary to prod them about the fallout from a wave of court rulings blocking Trump's immigration and cost-cutting agenda.
Trump and his allies have called judges who have ruled against his administration as "activists," "crooked," "conflicted" and "rogue." Many of the judges have been subjected to threats, and conservative lawmakers in the Republican-led House have even moved to impeach six of the judges.
St. Eve, who chairs the Judicial Conference's budget committee, at the hearing renewed the judiciary's request that Congress boost security spending for the courts in 2026 to $892 million, up 19% from the current fiscal year, "to address a complex and evolving threat environment."
Democratic Representative Zoe Lofgren of California pressed St. Eve on whether the Judicial Conference, the judiciary's top policymaking body, had many referrals recommending any of the judges who ruled against Trump be impeached.
"To my knowledge, no, that's outside of the scope of the budget, what I'm prepared to testify to today," St. Eve said. "But I know that we do strongly disagree with calls for impeachment based solely on a judge's rulings."
She echoed comments U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts made in a statement in March that the appellate process, not impeachment, was the way parties should address rulings they disagree with.
Roberts' comments came after Trump called for impeaching U.S. District Judge James Boasberg in Washington, who had blocked the president from using wartime powers to deport Venezuelan migrants.
Scudder, who like St. Eve sits on the Chicago-based 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, concurred and told lawmakers that judges should never "rule in a way that is designed to please a public official as opposed to enforce the meaning of the law."
Republican Representative Darrell Issa, who chairs the Judiciary Committee's panel on courts, stressed that none of the impeachment articles referred to the committee for its review were under active consideration.
Republican Representative Jim Jordan, the Judiciary Committee's chair, said lawmakers are "comfortable with making sure there's security," but not with boosting spending on everything else within the court system, "particularly with some of the decisions you've seen."
Republican Representative Russell Fry of South Carolina described the judiciary as "politically compromised, prompting Democratic Representative Joe Neguse of Colorado to ask the judges if they agreed it was.
"I don't," Scudder said. He said judges "look at the facts and the law to try to get it right, recognizing that there's an appellate process in place if the losing party disagrees or the ruling can be challenged."
Read more:
Conservative US appeals court judge knocks calls to impeach jurists
Republicans seek impeachment of 2 more judges who stymied Trump
US Chief Justice Roberts rebukes Trump's attack on judge
US judiciary warns of threats amid 'concerning' calls to impeach judges

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Kilmar Abrego Garcia is expected to be released from jail only to be taken into immigration custody
Kilmar Abrego Garcia is expected to be released from jail only to be taken into immigration custody

The Independent

time30 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Kilmar Abrego Garcia is expected to be released from jail only to be taken into immigration custody

Kilmar Abrego Garcia is expected to be released from jail in Tennessee on Wednesday, only to be taken into immigration custody. The Salvadoran national whose mistaken deportation became a flashpoint in the fight over President Donald Trump's immigration policies has been in jail since he was returned to the U.S. on June 7, facing two counts of human smuggling. On Sunday, U.S. Magistrate Judge Barbara Holmes ruled that Abrego Garcia does not have to remain in jail ahead of that trial. On Wednesday afternoon, she will set his conditions of release and allow him to go, according to her order. However, both his defense attorneys and prosecutors have said they expect him to be taken into custody by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement as soon as he is released on the criminal charges. In addition, federal prosecutors are appealing Holmes' release order. Among other things, they expressed concern in a motion filed on Sunday that Abrego Garcia could be deported before he faces trial. Holmes has said previously that she won't step between the Department of Justice and the Department of Homeland Security. It is up to them to decide whether they want to deport Abrego Garcia or prosecute him. Abrego Garcia pleaded not guilty on June 13 to smuggling charges that his attorneys have characterized as an attempt to justify his mistaken deportation in March to a notorious prison in El Salvador. Those charges stem from a 2022 traffic stop for speeding in Tennessee during which Abrego Garcia was driving a vehicle with nine passengers. At his detention hearing, Homeland Security Special Agent Peter Joseph testified that he did not begin investigating Abrego Garcia until April of this year. Holmes said in her Sunday ruling that federal prosecutors failed to show that Abrego Garcia was a flight risk or a danger to the community. He has lived for more than a decade in Maryland, where he and his American wife are raising three children. However, Holmes referred to her own ruling as 'little more than an academic exercise,' noting that ICE plans to detain him. It is less clear what will happen after that. Although he can't be deported to El Salvador — where an immigration judge found he faces a credible threat from gangs — he is still deportable to a third country as long as that country agrees to not send him to El Salvador.

Zohran Mamdani: Socialist wins New York City's Democratic mayoral primary in shock result
Zohran Mamdani: Socialist wins New York City's Democratic mayoral primary in shock result

Sky News

time35 minutes ago

  • Sky News

Zohran Mamdani: Socialist wins New York City's Democratic mayoral primary in shock result

A self-described socialist has won New York City's Democratic mayoral primary. Zohran Mamdani is a 33-year-old state lawmaker - and ran a campaign that was laser-focused on the high cost of living. Slickly produced social media videos set out his vision of free buses, free childcare, new apartments and a higher minimum wage - paid for by new taxes on the rich. If elected when voters head to the polls in November, he would be the city's first Muslim and Indian mayor. The primary result is a blow for former New York governor Andrew Cuomo, who was attempting to make a political comeback from a sexual harassment scandal. He had been a firm favourite throughout the race because of his deep experience, but Mr Mamdani had won the support of the party's progressive wing. Current mayor Eric Adams is set to run as an independent following an uproar over his indictment on corruption charges. Mr Cuomo confirmed he has conceded to his Democratic rival, adding: "We are going to take a look and make some tough decisions. Tonight is his night." Votes are still being counted - and the outcome of this race could indicate the type of leader Democrats are looking for during Donald Trump's second term. Mr Mamdani attracted endorsements from prominent progressives including Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Senator Bernie Sanders. But critics have argued that he lacks the experience to handle crises, with Mr Cuomo claiming he was unqualified during the campaign.

Do Israel and Iran know 'what the f***' they're doing now?
Do Israel and Iran know 'what the f***' they're doing now?

Sky News

time35 minutes ago

  • Sky News

Do Israel and Iran know 'what the f***' they're doing now?

👉Listen to The World with Richard Engel and Yalda Hakim on your podcast app👈 In this episode, Richard and Yalda react to US President Donald Trump's "they don't know what the f*** they're doing'' comment on the White House lawn as the shaky Israel-Iran ceasefire comes into effect. Yalda gives Richard her inside scoop on the phone call Trump had with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to stop him from bombing Iran and further violating the ceasefire. They also ask each other what could come next and answer a question on what regime change would entail in Iran. This episode contains language some will find offensive.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store