
How Australia's ‘unfair' dental system – and the way $1.3bn is spent – is driving inequality and leaving millions of people behind
Patients bear the brunt of dentist fees. But of the $1.3bn the federal government spends on the nation's teeth, more than half goes to subsidising the uptake of private health insurance.
The inequality of Australia's dental care system can be seen in the numbers, says Peter Breadon, the health program director at the Grattan Institute.
As people who cannot afford dental bills delay or skip treatment, untreated dental decay is on the rise and record numbers are turning up to hospitals for dental procedures, Breadon said.
'It is a big problem, and it's a growing problem as the impact of missing out on care builds up and as our population gets older.'
Of all areas of health, the share of the cost borne by the patient for dental care is far higher than the other services, and according to Breadon it's being driven by dental care sitting outside the Medicare system.
Breadon said, according to Grattan research, the share the patient pays for dental care is nine times higher than GP visits, five times higher than for medicines on the pharmaceutical benefits scheme 'and that is why over 2 million people say they delay or skip dental care'.
According to latest Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW) data, Australia spends more than $12bn on dental services. More than 61% of that cost falls to the individual, health insurance funds cover 19%, and the federal government 11% and state governments 8%.
'We've seen the consequences of that [system],' Breadon said, 'with record numbers of people – over 80,000 – turning up to hospitals last year for dental procedures, including getting teeth removed, many of which could have been avoided if people had good access to dental care.'
A 2023 Senate inquiry called for the government to put 'the mouth back in the body' by creating universal access to dental healthcare. That would mean expanding coverage under Medicare or a similar scheme.
This, the inquiry said, would address the nation's two-tiered dental system where 'around half of Australians have acceptable oral and dental health and adequate access to services, and the other half do not'.
Sign up for Guardian Australia's breaking news email
Of the $1.36bn the federal government spent on dental services in 2022-23, about $825m went to premium rebates.
Most Australians with private health insurance receive a private health insurance rebate – a contribution from government based on income, age and family status – to help pay the cost of their premiums.
Of the $2.35bn total expenditure from all levels of government – including $995m investment in the same period by state and local governments to run public dental services – premium rebates accounted for more than a third of spending.
Dr Ankur Singh, the chair of Lifespan Oral Health at the University of Sydney, said the insurance rebate exists to help relieve the public health system – but with dental it does not make a difference because so many low-income people cannot access public dental services.
Public dental services meet just one-fifth of the needs of already limited eligible groups, he said.
Insurance premium rebates only benefits those who can afford private health insurance, he said.
'People experiencing social disadvantage are punished twice,' he said.
Breadon agreed spending on premium rebates does not benefit the most disadvantaged, although he said some older people who may not be high-income earners have private health insurance.
The remainder of the federal government's $1.36bn spending on dental includes $90m for the Department of Veterans' Affairs' dental scheme and $446m for expenses, including the Child Dental Benefits Schedule (CDBS), and supporting state and territory public dental services.
The CDBS covers part or the full cost of some basic dental services for children whose parents receive some Centrelink payments.
In the 2023-24 financial year, a spokesperson for the Department of Health and Aged Care said more than 2.4 million children were eligible for the scheme, but only 39.2% used it. A 2023 review found usage much lower for rural children, First Nations children and children with disability.
'Work is under way to further promote the CDBS to eligible families to encourage increased take up of the scheme,' the spokesperson said.
Breadon said Australia needs to move towards a universal scheme for dental.
According to a Grattan report, the Greens' plan for universal dental, which cost more than $20bn a year once phased in, could be slashed to $7bn if it excluded cosmetic treatments and orthodontics, capped funding and targeted investment in underserved areas.
Breadon described current access to dental a 'very unfair system'.
'Skimping on dental care is a false economy,' he said. 'It does lead to these long-term costs that involve people going to hospital for expensive treatments that could have been avoided.'
A Department of Health and Aged Care spokesperson said work is underway to develop a new national oral health plan for 2025-34to improve oral health and reduce inequalities.
The government supports access to dental care through state and territory funding agreements for public hospitals and adult public dental services, the National Health Reform Agreement, and grants to the Royal Flying Doctors Services, they said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Reuters
a day ago
- Reuters
Vaccine actions and policy positions under US Health Secretary Kennedy
June 10 (Reuters) - U.S. Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., a long-time vaccine skeptic, has been making sweeping changes to reshape U.S. regulation of vaccines, food and medicine. The most far-reaching of his moves culminated in the layoff of all 17 members of a U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention panel of vaccine experts. Here are some of the policy moves under Kennedy's leadership in recent months, related to vaccines: FDA Recommendations for Influenza Vaccines Date of Announcement: March 13, 2025 Details: The FDA independently recommends virus strains for the 2025-2026 influenza vaccines, deviating from traditional advisory committee voting. This move assures no impact on the timing or availability of vaccines for the public. Environmental Toxin Studies Related to Autism Date of Announcement: April 16, 2025 Details: Kennedy plans studies on environmental contributors to autism, including vaccines, despite lacking scientific evidence. This approach aligns with his longstanding views on vaccines and environmental factors. Launch of US Autism Project Using Medicare and Medicaid Data Date of Announcement: May 7, 2025 Details: Federal agencies will create a database to research autism causes, focusing on Medicare and Medicaid data, as part of a broader effort to explore potential links between vaccines and autism. FDA Tightens Requirements for COVID Vaccine Date of Announcement: May 20, 2025 Details: The FDA plans new trials for annual COVID-19 boosters, limiting them to older adults and those at risk of severe illness. This change aligns with international perspectives on COVID vaccination strategies. US Drops COVID Vaccine Recommendation for Healthy Kids, Pregnant Women Date of Announcement: May 27, 2025 Details: The U.S. stops recommending routine COVID vaccinations for pregnant women and healthy children, bypassing the CDC's traditional advisory process. Cancellation of Moderna Bird Flu Vaccine Contract Date of Announcement: May 28, 2025 Details: The Trump administration cancels a contract with Moderna for the late-stage development of its bird flu vaccine, after determining it did not meet scientific standards. Moderna explores alternatives for its vaccine's development. Kennedy Guts Vaccine Advisory Committee Date of Announcement: June 9, 2025 Details: Kennedy fires all members of the CDC vaccine expert panel, which recommends how vaccines are used and by whom, promising to restore public trust in health agencies. Scientists and experts say the changes would undermine public confidence in health agencies.


The Guardian
3 days ago
- The Guardian
‘What if I just didn't drink this': the question that changed everything
For most of her 20s, Jamie* mastered the art of keeping things on the surface. She was the funny one, the party starter, the friend who never said no to another round of drinks. To friends and colleagues, she seemed effortlessly confident. But beneath the banter and bravado was a deep discomfort – with silence, with vulnerability, and most of all, with herself. 'I didn't even realise I was numbing anything,' she told me in one of our recent therapy sessions. 'I just thought I liked to have fun. But looking back, I was terrified of feeling anything real.' Jamie, now 39, is part of a growing number of Australians rethinking their relationship with alcohol. For her, drinking wasn't just a habit, it was a coping mechanism – although she was the last one to realise this. She was drinking to blur the edges. There wasn't a traumatic event that she could remember, but because feeling sad or lonely or anxious felt unbearable, alcohol helped her skip past that. It worked – until it didn't. Her 'bottom' wasn't dramatic; she told me in one session it was more like a slow hollowing, and she got tired of waking up feeling like a stranger to herself. The turning point came in the early months of the pandemic. Isolated from friends, stripped of distractions, she began to realise how often she reached for wine to fill the space. 'One night I was sitting alone with a glass of pinot, and I remember thinking – what would happen if I didn't drink this?' That question changed everything. Jamie decided to stop drinking 'just for a month'. But when the fog began to lift, she couldn't go back. She describes early sobriety as raw and revealing. She was suddenly face to face with everything she pushed away for years – grief, anxiety, even joy – and it became overwhelming. Alcohol addiction is often less about the substance itself, and more about what it helps a person avoid. From a clinical standpoint, we understand alcohol not just as a chemical dependency, but as an emotional anaesthetic – one that temporarily blunts the nervous system's distress signals. Many individuals who struggle with problematic drinking patterns may have started out chasing pleasure and to be social; but consistent reliance upon alcohol can result in using it to flee pain such as unprocessed grief, chronic stress, shame, anxiety or trauma. The neurobiology of addiction reveals that alcohol activates the brain's reward system while simultaneously suppressing the prefrontal cortex, impairing emotional regulation and decision-making. In this way, alcohol becomes a fast, accessible tool for short-term relief – even if it compounds emotional dysregulation in the long term. What makes this cycle so complex is that emotional numbing isn't always conscious. Clients often present in therapy describing 'overwhelm', 'flatness' or 'disconnection', without immediately recognising that these are signs of emotional avoidance – and that alcohol has become part of that equation. Therapy helps illuminate the underlying patterns: how early attachment dynamics, adverse childhood experiences or unresolved trauma may have shaped a person's tolerance for emotional discomfort. A trauma-informed approach encourages clients to build somatic awareness, develop emotional literacy and begin tolerating – rather than bypassing – their internal experience. Recovery, then, is not only about abstaining from alcohol; it's about being able to stay present with what's real and building a nervous system that can feel without needing to flee. In group therapy with professional guidance, Jamie started to see how she had numbed her emotions and buried the difficulties she had experienced in her life. 'I sat with just me,' she recalled. 'And I started crying and couldn't stop. It felt like every emotion I'd stored was finally being released.' I encouraged Jamie to begin journalling daily and start each entry with the question: 'What am I feeling today?' Sometimes she said it was anger. Sometimes relief. Sometimes nothing at all. Jamie finally allowed herself to feel – not with fear, but with curiosity. Our emotions can serve as signposts, gently pointing us toward the places where healing is needed: our blockages, our numbness and the parts of us that have gone quiet in the face of hopelessness. Recovery – from drinking, from disconnection, from self-avoidance – isn't linear, and Jamie is still in that process. But what's changed is her willingness to stay with herself, especially when things feel hard. Jamie is one of many emerging in what some call the 'sober curious' movement. But for her, it's not about labels or lifestyle – it's about presence. She's not interested in moralising alcohol use. It's not about judging drinking. It's about asking why. Why am I drinking? What am I avoiding? Can I support myself with awareness? And what might be possible if I stopped? In a culture where numbing is easy – scroll, sip, swipe – choosing to feel can feel too hard. It's important to take at least one quiet moment a day to ask yourself: What am I feeling? You might be surprised by the answer. * All clients discussed are fictional amalgams Diane Young is a trauma specialist and psychotherapist at South Pacific Private, a trauma, addiction and mental health treatment centre In Australia, support is available at Beyond Blue on 1300 22 4636, Lifeline on 13 11 14, and at MensLine on 1300 789 978. In the UK, the charity Mind is available on 0300 123 3393 and Childline on 0800 1111. In the US, call or text Mental Health America at 988 or chat


Reuters
6 days ago
- Reuters
Humana to back curbs to Medicare Advantage billing practices, WSJ reports
June 5 (Reuters) - Humana (HUM.N), opens new tab has told congressional staffers that it will support moves that would curtail billing practices worth billions in extra payments to the industry, the Wall Street Journal reported, citing staffers and a document viewed by it. The company is willing to back new limits on lucrative payments insurers can gain from diagnoses recorded by nurse practitioners who visit millions of enrollees in their homes, according to a one-page policy overview shared with the staffers, the WSJ reported on Thursday. Humana did not immediately respond to a Reuters request for comment. Nearly half of the 65 million people covered by Medicare, the U.S. program for people aged 65 and older or with disabilities, are enrolled in Medicare Advantage plans run by private insurers. Insurers are paid a set rate for each patient, but can be paid more for patients with multiple health conditions. Last fall, staff working for Senators Mike Crapo and Ron Wyden, the leaders of the Senate Finance Committee, contacted Medicare Advantage insurers for suggestions on legislative steps that would address the potential misuse of home visits described in Journal articles, the newspaper reported citing people familiar with the matter. The Journal reported in February that the U.S. Department of Justice was examining UnitedHealth's (UNH.N), opens new tab practices for recording diagnoses that trigger extra payments to its Medicare Advantage plans. The healthcare conglomerate had then said it was unaware of any new probe. The WSJ has run a series of stories over the last several months detailing how UnitedHealth profited from using Medicare billing rules to its favor.