Water industry: Commission finds five areas where 'fundamental change' is needed
"Interlocking failures" in the water sector across England and Wales can be fixed through fundamental reform in five key areas, according to a major interim report.
The Independent Water Commission, established last year and led by a former deputy governor of the Bank of England, was scathing of government and regulatory oversight of the industry - long blighted by criticism over performance, particularly over sewage spills, shareholder payouts and bonuses for bosses.
Money latest:
Sir Jon Cunliffe said: "There is no simple, single change, no matter how radical, that will deliver the fundamental reset that is needed for the water sector.
"We have heard of deep-rooted, systemic and interlocking failures over the years - failure in government's strategy and planning for the future, failure in regulation to protect both the billpayer and the environment and failure by some water companies and their owners to act in the public, as well as their private, interest.
Read more:
"My view is that all of these issues need to be tackled to rebuild public trust and make the system fit for the future. We anticipate that this will require new legislation."
The commission, which is due to make its final recommendations later in the summer, failed to rule out the creation of a super regulator to bring oversight into alignment.
The five areas under scrutiny:• Long term direction from government, including through the planning process.• The creation of a simplified legislative framework, which could include new objectives around public health.• Regulation but "a fundamental strengthening and rebalancing of Ofwat's regulation is needed", it is argued.• Transparency and accountability within private water firms.• The management of water industry assets, including pipework.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CNN
an hour ago
- CNN
US vetoes UN Security Council resolution demanding Gaza ceasefire
The United States on Wednesday vetoed a UN Security Council resolution calling for an 'immediate, unconditional and permanent' ceasefire between Israel and the militant group Hamas in Gaza. The US was the only nation to oppose the resolution. Fourteen others, including the United Kingdom, voted in favor. There were no abstentions. Dorothy Camille Shea, the United States ambassador to the UN, said the US opposed the resolution because it did not call for Hamas to disarm and leave Gaza. '(The resolution) is unacceptable for what it does say, it is unacceptable for what it does not say, and it is unacceptable for the manner in which it has been advanced,' she said in comments before the vote took place. The US 'has taken the very clear position since this conflict began that Israel has a right to defend itself, which includes defeating Hamas and ensuring they are never again in a position to threaten Israel. In this regard, any product that undermines our close ally Israel's security is a nonstarter,' she added. This is not the first time the US has vetoed a UN Security Council draft resolution on Gaza. In November 2024, it vetoed one calling for an immediate, unconditional and permanent ceasefire, on the grounds it would not have secured the release of hostages. The United Kingdom said it 'regrets' that the latest resolution 'was unable to reach a consensus.' 'The United Kingdom voted in favor of this resolution today because of the intolerable situation in Gaza,' the UK's Permanent Representative to the United Nations in New York Barbara Woodward said following the vote. 'We are determined to see an end to this war, secure the release of the hostages held by Hamas and alleviate the catastrophic humanitarian situation for Palestinians in Gaza,' she added. Woodward described Israel's expansion of its military operations in Gaza and its severe restrictions on aid as 'unjustifiable, disproportionate, and counterproductive.' Israel in mid May launched a major new offensive in Gaza it says is aimed at destroying Hamas and freeing hostages, sparking condemnation from the United Nations and aid organizations who warn civilians are bearing the brunt of the expanded assault. The ambassador also said the UK condemned Hamas' October 7, 2023, attack on Israel and demanded the militant group release all the hostages 'immediately and unconditionally,' saying 'Hamas can have no role in the future governance of Gaza.' The ambassador also restated the UK's position that 'a two-state solution is the only way to bring the long-lasting peace, stability and security that both Israelis and Palestinians deserve.' Meanwhile, Israel's Foreign Minister Gideon Sa'ar thanked US President Donald Trump and the US administration 'for standing shoulder to shoulder with Israel and vetoing this one-sided resolution in the UN Security Council.' 'The proposed resolution only strengthens Hamas and undermines American efforts to achieve a hostage deal,' he added in a post on X shortly after the voting. The draft text had demanded 'an immediate, unconditional and permanent ceasefire in Gaza respected by all parties' and the 'immediate and unconditional lifting of all restrictions on the entry of humanitarian aid into Gaza and its safe and unhindered distribution at scale.' It also demanded 'the immediate and unconditional release of all hostages held by Hamas and other groups.' Israel launched the war in Gaza after Hamas and other Palestinian armed groups carried out a surprise attack on southern Israel on October 7, 2023, killing 1,200 people, mostly civilians, and taking 251 hostages. It was the deadliest terror attack in Israel's history. The Palestinian Ministry of Health in Gaza said the number of people killed by Israel's offensive in Gaza in the wake of the October 7 attacks now exceeds 54,000, most of whom are women and children.


CNN
an hour ago
- CNN
US vetoes UN Security Council resolution demanding Gaza ceasefire
The United States on Wednesday vetoed a UN Security Council resolution calling for an 'immediate, unconditional and permanent' ceasefire between Israel and the militant group Hamas in Gaza. The US was the only nation to oppose the resolution. Fourteen others, including the United Kingdom, voted in favor. There were no abstentions. Dorothy Camille Shea, the United States ambassador to the UN, said the US opposed the resolution because it did not call for Hamas to disarm and leave Gaza. '(The resolution) is unacceptable for what it does say, it is unacceptable for what it does not say, and it is unacceptable for the manner in which it has been advanced,' she said in comments before the vote took place. The US 'has taken the very clear position since this conflict began that Israel has a right to defend itself, which includes defeating Hamas and ensuring they are never again in a position to threaten Israel. In this regard, any product that undermines our close ally Israel's security is a nonstarter,' she added. This is not the first time the US has vetoed a UN Security Council draft resolution on Gaza. In November 2024, it vetoed one calling for an immediate, unconditional and permanent ceasefire, on the grounds it would not have secured the release of hostages. The United Kingdom said it 'regrets' that the latest resolution 'was unable to reach a consensus.' 'The United Kingdom voted in favor of this resolution today because of the intolerable situation in Gaza,' the UK's Permanent Representative to the United Nations in New York Barbara Woodward said following the vote. 'We are determined to see an end to this war, secure the release of the hostages held by Hamas and alleviate the catastrophic humanitarian situation for Palestinians in Gaza,' she added. Woodward described Israel's expansion of its military operations in Gaza and its severe restrictions on aid as 'unjustifiable, disproportionate, and counterproductive.' Israel in mid May launched a major new offensive in Gaza it says is aimed at destroying Hamas and freeing hostages, sparking condemnation from the United Nations and aid organizations who warn civilians are bearing the brunt of the expanded assault. The ambassador also said the UK condemned Hamas' October 7, 2023, attack on Israel and demanded the militant group release all the hostages 'immediately and unconditionally,' saying 'Hamas can have no role in the future governance of Gaza.' The ambassador also restated the UK's position that 'a two-state solution is the only way to bring the long-lasting peace, stability and security that both Israelis and Palestinians deserve.' Meanwhile, Israel's Foreign Minister Gideon Sa'ar thanked US President Donald Trump and the US administration 'for standing shoulder to shoulder with Israel and vetoing this one-sided resolution in the UN Security Council.' 'The proposed resolution only strengthens Hamas and undermines American efforts to achieve a hostage deal,' he added in a post on X shortly after the voting. The draft text had demanded 'an immediate, unconditional and permanent ceasefire in Gaza respected by all parties' and the 'immediate and unconditional lifting of all restrictions on the entry of humanitarian aid into Gaza and its safe and unhindered distribution at scale.' It also demanded 'the immediate and unconditional release of all hostages held by Hamas and other groups.' Israel launched the war in Gaza after Hamas and other Palestinian armed groups carried out a surprise attack on southern Israel on October 7, 2023, killing 1,200 people, mostly civilians, and taking 251 hostages. It was the deadliest terror attack in Israel's history. The Palestinian Ministry of Health in Gaza said the number of people killed by Israel's offensive in Gaza in the wake of the October 7 attacks now exceeds 54,000, most of whom are women and children.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Swinney urges Hamilton voters to reject ‘gutter politics' of Reform
First Minister John Swinney has urged voters in the Hamilton by-election to reject the 'gutter politics' of Reform UK as polls open. The vote sparked by the death of Scottish Government minister Christina McKelvie in March will take place on Thursday, with a result expected early on Friday. The SNP and Labour were initially seen as the frontrunners in the race, but Nigel Farage-led Reform UK has surged in the seat and hopes to push for second place. One of the major talking points of the campaign has been the criticism levelled at Reform after an attack advert published by the party claimed Scottish Labour leader Anas Sarwar prioritises people from Pakistan over those in Scotland. The ad showed a speech from the Labour MSP where he urged more people from a south Asian background to enter politics, and it was later denounced as racist by Reform's opponents. Speaking ahead of polls opening at 7am on Thursday, Mr Swinney again claimed the contest is between the SNP and Reform, saying: 'Today, people in Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse can reject the politics of Nigel Farage and elect a local champion by voting SNP. 'Farage doesn't care about Scotland – he wants to cut our budget, undermine our Parliament and introduce charges for the NHS. 'Labour have given up on the campaign and have barely even bothered to defend their record of scrapping the winter fuel payment and cutting support for disabled people. 'So this by-election is a two-horse race between the SNP and Farage. And today, people in Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse can unite behind the SNP and defeat the gutter politics of Nigel Farage by voting for Katy Loudon.' The by-election presents the first real test of both Scottish Labour and the SNP since last year's general election, where the former returned to being the biggest Westminster party in Scotland and the latter haemorrhaged MPs, falling to just nine. Ahead of the vote, Mr Sarwar said the choice facing voters is 'more failure with the SNP or a local champion' with Scottish Labour's Davy Russell, accusing the nationalists of talking up Reform to 'distract from their own failures'. He added: 'Time and time again, the SNP has failed Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse. 'From our overstretched NHS to our declining education system to our crisis-hit housing system, almost all of what is broken in Scotland is run by the SNP. 'They don't deserve to win, but only Scottish Labour can beat them. 'The SNP wants to talk up Reform to distract from their own failures, but Scots will see through the spin. 'This is a chance to put this failing Government on notice and chart a new direction for all of Scotland – let's seize that opportunity.'