logo
Erin Patterson trial: Accused triple murderer's Facebook rants, body image issued and mushroom obsession

Erin Patterson trial: Accused triple murderer's Facebook rants, body image issued and mushroom obsession

West Australian2 days ago

Accused triple murderer Erin Patterson has revealed her love for wild mushrooms in a second day of explosive evidence as she was questioned over a fatal lunch that killed three of her relatives.
The trial took a surprise turn on Monday when Ms Patterson's defence team called the accused to the stand to give evidence, which continued for a full day in the Supreme Court of Victoria on Tuesday.
Ms Patterson is accused of killing her in-laws Don and Gail Patterson, as well as Gail's sister Heather Wilkinson, by feeding them beef Wellington that contained poisonous death cap mushrooms during a lunch on her Leongatha home on July 29, 2023.
On Tuesday, as members of the public queued in lines that extended outside the court building to get in to the public gallery, the court heard evidence on how the accused received a sizeable inheritance that allowed she and Mr Patterson to purchase a home, lend money to family and for the accused to start a 'second-hand book store'.
It was a business that only lasted around a year, but was something that perhaps foreshadowed Ms Patterson's interest in rummaging and collecting.
She explained how she would go to book markets, picking finds for her store's collection.
Ms Patterson and her husband Simon moved from WA to Victoria before the birth of their second child so their son, and eventually any future children they had, could be closer to 'nana and papa' — two of the three people that died from death cap mushroom poisoning after a lunch cooked by Ms Patterson.
After the couple's return to Victoria and the birth of their second child, Ms Patterson told the court about her 'formal separation' from Mr Patterson.
Despite parting ways, Ms Patterson said her in-laws 'continued to love me', becoming emotional in the Morwell courtroom in regional Victoria.
The accused triple murderer explained she stayed close with her ex-partner and their family, not just for the children, but also because she 'always thought that we would bring the family back together', adding that in 2019 she 'saw a future' for her and Mr Patterson.
But hopes for a relationship rekindling appear to not have been shared by Mr Patterson, who in November 2022 told Ms Patterson he had listed his relationship status as 'single' on a tax form.
Although Ms Patterson said her reaction to this was 'good' as it meant she could then potentially claim family tax benefits, it was the beginning of 'conflict' between the accused, her ex-partner and her in-laws.
Ms Patterson told the court she was 'very hurt' when she realised she had not been invited to Gail Patterson's 70th birthday lunch, something she admitted to shouting at her ex-partner about. Although later deemed an 'oversight' by Don Patterson, Ms Patterson said the 'hurt', which led to her outburst, highlighted the need for improved communication between the two.
Shortly after, Ms Patterson revealed a 'conflict over money' with her ex-partner, something she said had not occurred before.
As tension was rife between Ms Patterson, her ex and her in-laws, the accused admitted to taking to a Facebook group to 'vent' in a 'desperate' move that she said she now regrets.
'This family, I swear to f..king god,' Ms Patterson posted in what she felt was a 'private' space.
She accused her in-laws of only wanting to 'pray' for her children and not help resolve ongoing issues.
'I'm sick of this s..t,' Ms Patterson wrote in a later post, adding she wanted 'nothing to do' with Mr Patterson's family.
Discussing her 'venting' messages about her in-laws, whom she is accused of murdering, Ms Patterson broke down, saying 'they didn't deserve it', adding she wished 'never sent' the messages.
Despite wishing her words were not posted, Ms Patterson said she felt 'heard' by her online community of supportive women.
Ms Patterson confirmed to the court that she told her Facebook community she 'loved mushrooms' and even shared images with them of a food dehydrator that she had purchased, with the photos showing the dehydrator in use with shelves filled with mushrooms.
She admitted that after her fascination with mushrooms begin around the time of the first COVID lockdown in Victoria, she 'was experimenting with different ways' to get the 'best result' of dehydrating them.
Ms Patterson explained she liked 'exotic' mushrooms, claiming to find they had 'more flavour', and enjoyed eating a variety of types because 'they taste good and they are very healthy'.
The accused mentioned an instance on her property when she saw her dog eating mushrooms growing on her property. She said she picked these so that she could try and identify the mushroom type, admitting she later learnt that was hard to do.
After that instance, Ms Patterson's confidence grew, as she later picked wild mushrooms from her property that she thought were safe.
'I cut a bit off one of the mushrooms, fried it up with some butter, ate it, and then saw what happened,' she told the court. 'They tasted good and I didn't get sick.'
Ms Patterson said she 'put them in meals we all ate', speaking about meals for her and her children.
'I chopped them up very, very small, so they couldn't pick them out.'
It was at that point that the prosecution raised an objection that kept Ms Patterson from giving evidence for much of the afternoon.
When her evidence resumed, Ms Patterson was asked if she accepted that death cap mushrooms were in the fatal lunch that left three people dead.
'Yes, I do,' Ms Patterson said, adding that the majority of mushrooms in the lunch came from 'the local Woolworths in Leongatha,' and that 'there were some' from an Asian grocer in Melbourne.
The Asian grocer mushrooms were purchased in April 2023, Ms Patterson told the court, adding that they had a 'pungent' smell.
She said she intended to use those mushrooms on the day of purchase, but chose against it due to the odour.
Ms Patterson went on to confirm that those 'pungent' mushrooms ended up in the cupboard alongside other dehydrated mushrooms ahead of the fatal lunch.
She said she would add mushrooms that she had dehydrated into containers she 'already had going' with other dehydrated mushrooms.
Ms Patterson earlier told Justice Christopher Beale and the jury she 'didn't trust' the healthcare system
The mother-of-three told the court about how her daughter had digestive issues and her son had issues with his knees, becoming emotional at multiple points.
However, Ms Patterson's own health concerns were also detailed, with the accused revealing her struggles with an eating disorder stemming from her childhood and her tendency to consult 'Dr Google' due to her lack of trust in doctors.
'I didn't love hospitals,' Ms Patterson said.
'I didn't trust that these people knew what they were doing.'
Her Google search results for information on ovarian cancer and brain tumours were discussed, with Ms Patterson admitting she often 'self-diagnosed', later realising 'every headache is not a brain tumour'.
She also revealed that as a child, her mother would weigh her to ensure she was not 'putting on too much weight'.
Ms Patterson said this behaviour led to years of struggles, including phases of 'not eating' and 'bingeing'.
She also told the court that since her 20s she had bulimic tendencies, something daily at its worst, something monthly when doing better.
She cried as she explained she had tried to keep the eating disorder private.
The trial continues.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Mushroom cook opens up on lies to police, in-laws
Mushroom cook opens up on lies to police, in-laws

The Advertiser

time6 hours ago

  • The Advertiser

Mushroom cook opens up on lies to police, in-laws

An accused triple murderer has opened up about lying to police after cooking a deadly mushroom lunch and fibbing to two of her alleged victims about having cancer tests done. But Erin Patterson denies she deliberately foraged for death cap mushrooms and she knew they were inside toxic beef Wellingtons when she served them to her former in-laws. The 50-year-old faced a fourth day in the Supreme Court witness box on Thursday, when she was cross-examined by the prosecution on several lies. Patterson has denied deliberately poisoning her estranged husband's parents, aunt and uncle by serving them death cap mushroom-laced beef Wellingtons in July 2023 at her home in regional Victoria. She has been charged with three murders over the deaths of Don and Gail Patterson, 70, and Heather Wilkinson, 66, and attempted murder over Heather's husband Ian Wilkinson, the only surviving lunch guest. Her defence finished examination of Patterson on Thursday morning, asking about her lies to police after the meal. Patterson admitted she lied during her police interview about foraging for mushrooms, owning a dehydrator and using it to dehydrate food. She said it was a "stupid knee-jerk reaction to just dig deeper and keep lying" in response to being told two of her lunch guests had died. Defence barrister Colin Mandy SC asked if she had ever "intentionally picked death cap mushrooms" to which she said "no". She denied intentionally including the toxic fungi in the beef Wellingtons. The prosecution honed in on Patterson's fibs during cross-examination, accusing her of lying about dehydrating mushrooms because she knew telling police the truth could implicate her in the toxic lunch. "I agree that I lied because I was afraid I would be held responsible," Patterson said. Prosecutor Nanette Rogers SC suggested Patterson disposed of a food dehydrator because she had used it to dehydrate death cap mushrooms, which she denied. Dr Rogers also suggested Patterson had weighed death cap mushrooms to "calculate" the amount needed for "a fatal dose for one person", but Patterson disagreed. The prosecutor asked if she had intended to serve beef Wellington to her estranged husband Simon, who pulled out of the lunch the night before. "If he'd come I would have given him a beef Wellington too, yes, but not one with death cap mushrooms in it intentionally," Patterson said. Dr Rogers asked Patterson about lies she told Don and Gail Patterson, regarding tests on a lump in her arm in the weeks before the lunch. Patterson accepted she did not have a lump and did not have an appointment at hospital, despite telling Gail she did. "I suggest that you told Gail Patterson that you had a lump in your elbow and had to go to St Vincent's Hospital to plant the seed of you having a serious health issue," Dr Rogers said. "I don't think that's right, no," Patterson said. Patterson said she initially thought she had a lump in her elbow and had pain for a number of weeks and felt embarrassed she "probably whinged a bit too much to Don and Gail about it". "They made me feel loved and cared for in the way that they were asking about my health and I didn't want that to stop, so I just kept going," she said. Patterson denied she told her lunch guests she had been diagnosed with cancer and needed advice on how to break this news to her children. "I can't remember the precise words, but I do know what I was trying to communicate was … that I was undergoing investigations around ovarian cancer and might need treatment in that regard in the future," she said. As the trial nears the end of week six, Justice Christopher Beale told the jury he could not put a figure on how much longer it would go for but they should make arrangements. Patterson may continue in the witness box until next week, followed by legal discussions without the jury, and then potentially more evidence before closing addresses which could take two days each. The judge may then take another couple of days to give the jury his directions before they're sent away to deliberate on a verdict. The trial continues. An accused triple murderer has opened up about lying to police after cooking a deadly mushroom lunch and fibbing to two of her alleged victims about having cancer tests done. But Erin Patterson denies she deliberately foraged for death cap mushrooms and she knew they were inside toxic beef Wellingtons when she served them to her former in-laws. The 50-year-old faced a fourth day in the Supreme Court witness box on Thursday, when she was cross-examined by the prosecution on several lies. Patterson has denied deliberately poisoning her estranged husband's parents, aunt and uncle by serving them death cap mushroom-laced beef Wellingtons in July 2023 at her home in regional Victoria. She has been charged with three murders over the deaths of Don and Gail Patterson, 70, and Heather Wilkinson, 66, and attempted murder over Heather's husband Ian Wilkinson, the only surviving lunch guest. Her defence finished examination of Patterson on Thursday morning, asking about her lies to police after the meal. Patterson admitted she lied during her police interview about foraging for mushrooms, owning a dehydrator and using it to dehydrate food. She said it was a "stupid knee-jerk reaction to just dig deeper and keep lying" in response to being told two of her lunch guests had died. Defence barrister Colin Mandy SC asked if she had ever "intentionally picked death cap mushrooms" to which she said "no". She denied intentionally including the toxic fungi in the beef Wellingtons. The prosecution honed in on Patterson's fibs during cross-examination, accusing her of lying about dehydrating mushrooms because she knew telling police the truth could implicate her in the toxic lunch. "I agree that I lied because I was afraid I would be held responsible," Patterson said. Prosecutor Nanette Rogers SC suggested Patterson disposed of a food dehydrator because she had used it to dehydrate death cap mushrooms, which she denied. Dr Rogers also suggested Patterson had weighed death cap mushrooms to "calculate" the amount needed for "a fatal dose for one person", but Patterson disagreed. The prosecutor asked if she had intended to serve beef Wellington to her estranged husband Simon, who pulled out of the lunch the night before. "If he'd come I would have given him a beef Wellington too, yes, but not one with death cap mushrooms in it intentionally," Patterson said. Dr Rogers asked Patterson about lies she told Don and Gail Patterson, regarding tests on a lump in her arm in the weeks before the lunch. Patterson accepted she did not have a lump and did not have an appointment at hospital, despite telling Gail she did. "I suggest that you told Gail Patterson that you had a lump in your elbow and had to go to St Vincent's Hospital to plant the seed of you having a serious health issue," Dr Rogers said. "I don't think that's right, no," Patterson said. Patterson said she initially thought she had a lump in her elbow and had pain for a number of weeks and felt embarrassed she "probably whinged a bit too much to Don and Gail about it". "They made me feel loved and cared for in the way that they were asking about my health and I didn't want that to stop, so I just kept going," she said. Patterson denied she told her lunch guests she had been diagnosed with cancer and needed advice on how to break this news to her children. "I can't remember the precise words, but I do know what I was trying to communicate was … that I was undergoing investigations around ovarian cancer and might need treatment in that regard in the future," she said. As the trial nears the end of week six, Justice Christopher Beale told the jury he could not put a figure on how much longer it would go for but they should make arrangements. Patterson may continue in the witness box until next week, followed by legal discussions without the jury, and then potentially more evidence before closing addresses which could take two days each. The judge may then take another couple of days to give the jury his directions before they're sent away to deliberate on a verdict. The trial continues. An accused triple murderer has opened up about lying to police after cooking a deadly mushroom lunch and fibbing to two of her alleged victims about having cancer tests done. But Erin Patterson denies she deliberately foraged for death cap mushrooms and she knew they were inside toxic beef Wellingtons when she served them to her former in-laws. The 50-year-old faced a fourth day in the Supreme Court witness box on Thursday, when she was cross-examined by the prosecution on several lies. Patterson has denied deliberately poisoning her estranged husband's parents, aunt and uncle by serving them death cap mushroom-laced beef Wellingtons in July 2023 at her home in regional Victoria. She has been charged with three murders over the deaths of Don and Gail Patterson, 70, and Heather Wilkinson, 66, and attempted murder over Heather's husband Ian Wilkinson, the only surviving lunch guest. Her defence finished examination of Patterson on Thursday morning, asking about her lies to police after the meal. Patterson admitted she lied during her police interview about foraging for mushrooms, owning a dehydrator and using it to dehydrate food. She said it was a "stupid knee-jerk reaction to just dig deeper and keep lying" in response to being told two of her lunch guests had died. Defence barrister Colin Mandy SC asked if she had ever "intentionally picked death cap mushrooms" to which she said "no". She denied intentionally including the toxic fungi in the beef Wellingtons. The prosecution honed in on Patterson's fibs during cross-examination, accusing her of lying about dehydrating mushrooms because she knew telling police the truth could implicate her in the toxic lunch. "I agree that I lied because I was afraid I would be held responsible," Patterson said. Prosecutor Nanette Rogers SC suggested Patterson disposed of a food dehydrator because she had used it to dehydrate death cap mushrooms, which she denied. Dr Rogers also suggested Patterson had weighed death cap mushrooms to "calculate" the amount needed for "a fatal dose for one person", but Patterson disagreed. The prosecutor asked if she had intended to serve beef Wellington to her estranged husband Simon, who pulled out of the lunch the night before. "If he'd come I would have given him a beef Wellington too, yes, but not one with death cap mushrooms in it intentionally," Patterson said. Dr Rogers asked Patterson about lies she told Don and Gail Patterson, regarding tests on a lump in her arm in the weeks before the lunch. Patterson accepted she did not have a lump and did not have an appointment at hospital, despite telling Gail she did. "I suggest that you told Gail Patterson that you had a lump in your elbow and had to go to St Vincent's Hospital to plant the seed of you having a serious health issue," Dr Rogers said. "I don't think that's right, no," Patterson said. Patterson said she initially thought she had a lump in her elbow and had pain for a number of weeks and felt embarrassed she "probably whinged a bit too much to Don and Gail about it". "They made me feel loved and cared for in the way that they were asking about my health and I didn't want that to stop, so I just kept going," she said. Patterson denied she told her lunch guests she had been diagnosed with cancer and needed advice on how to break this news to her children. "I can't remember the precise words, but I do know what I was trying to communicate was … that I was undergoing investigations around ovarian cancer and might need treatment in that regard in the future," she said. As the trial nears the end of week six, Justice Christopher Beale told the jury he could not put a figure on how much longer it would go for but they should make arrangements. Patterson may continue in the witness box until next week, followed by legal discussions without the jury, and then potentially more evidence before closing addresses which could take two days each. The judge may then take another couple of days to give the jury his directions before they're sent away to deliberate on a verdict. The trial continues. An accused triple murderer has opened up about lying to police after cooking a deadly mushroom lunch and fibbing to two of her alleged victims about having cancer tests done. But Erin Patterson denies she deliberately foraged for death cap mushrooms and she knew they were inside toxic beef Wellingtons when she served them to her former in-laws. The 50-year-old faced a fourth day in the Supreme Court witness box on Thursday, when she was cross-examined by the prosecution on several lies. Patterson has denied deliberately poisoning her estranged husband's parents, aunt and uncle by serving them death cap mushroom-laced beef Wellingtons in July 2023 at her home in regional Victoria. She has been charged with three murders over the deaths of Don and Gail Patterson, 70, and Heather Wilkinson, 66, and attempted murder over Heather's husband Ian Wilkinson, the only surviving lunch guest. Her defence finished examination of Patterson on Thursday morning, asking about her lies to police after the meal. Patterson admitted she lied during her police interview about foraging for mushrooms, owning a dehydrator and using it to dehydrate food. She said it was a "stupid knee-jerk reaction to just dig deeper and keep lying" in response to being told two of her lunch guests had died. Defence barrister Colin Mandy SC asked if she had ever "intentionally picked death cap mushrooms" to which she said "no". She denied intentionally including the toxic fungi in the beef Wellingtons. The prosecution honed in on Patterson's fibs during cross-examination, accusing her of lying about dehydrating mushrooms because she knew telling police the truth could implicate her in the toxic lunch. "I agree that I lied because I was afraid I would be held responsible," Patterson said. Prosecutor Nanette Rogers SC suggested Patterson disposed of a food dehydrator because she had used it to dehydrate death cap mushrooms, which she denied. Dr Rogers also suggested Patterson had weighed death cap mushrooms to "calculate" the amount needed for "a fatal dose for one person", but Patterson disagreed. The prosecutor asked if she had intended to serve beef Wellington to her estranged husband Simon, who pulled out of the lunch the night before. "If he'd come I would have given him a beef Wellington too, yes, but not one with death cap mushrooms in it intentionally," Patterson said. Dr Rogers asked Patterson about lies she told Don and Gail Patterson, regarding tests on a lump in her arm in the weeks before the lunch. Patterson accepted she did not have a lump and did not have an appointment at hospital, despite telling Gail she did. "I suggest that you told Gail Patterson that you had a lump in your elbow and had to go to St Vincent's Hospital to plant the seed of you having a serious health issue," Dr Rogers said. "I don't think that's right, no," Patterson said. Patterson said she initially thought she had a lump in her elbow and had pain for a number of weeks and felt embarrassed she "probably whinged a bit too much to Don and Gail about it". "They made me feel loved and cared for in the way that they were asking about my health and I didn't want that to stop, so I just kept going," she said. Patterson denied she told her lunch guests she had been diagnosed with cancer and needed advice on how to break this news to her children. "I can't remember the precise words, but I do know what I was trying to communicate was … that I was undergoing investigations around ovarian cancer and might need treatment in that regard in the future," she said. As the trial nears the end of week six, Justice Christopher Beale told the jury he could not put a figure on how much longer it would go for but they should make arrangements. Patterson may continue in the witness box until next week, followed by legal discussions without the jury, and then potentially more evidence before closing addresses which could take two days each. The judge may then take another couple of days to give the jury his directions before they're sent away to deliberate on a verdict. The trial continues.

'No, that's not true': accused mushroom killer denies deliberate poisoning
'No, that's not true': accused mushroom killer denies deliberate poisoning

The Advertiser

time8 hours ago

  • The Advertiser

'No, that's not true': accused mushroom killer denies deliberate poisoning

Accused death cap killer Erin Patterson has denied that she deliberately poisoned a beef Wellington served to her in-laws as she gives evidence in her fourth day on the stand. Ms Patterson, 50, is facing three counts of murder and one count of attempted murder after she allegedly hosted a fatal lunch for her estranged husband's family in July 2023. Ms Patterson has pleaded not guilty to the charges and has always maintained her innocence. She was questioned for three days by her barrister, Colin Mandy SC, before prosecutor Nanette Rogers SC started her cross-examination on June 5. The prosecutor asked Ms Patterson if she had told Facebook friends that she was an atheist. Ms Patterson said she had not. Dr Rogers turned her line of questioning towards emoji selection in a message sent by Ms Patterson. The message was sent to some of Ms Patterson's Facebook friends after prayer was suggested by Don Patterson in response to her marital and family problems. The prosecutor and Ms Patterson went back and forth over the meaning of an emoji that had a straight line for a mouth. Dr Rogers suggested that the emoji represented an 'eyeroll' that was meant to mock the use of Christian prayer in Patterson family disputes. "I wasn't mocking, I was frustrated," Ms Patterson said. The court was shown images, which were described as screenshots with information about brain and ovarian cancer. Ms Patterson said she could not be sure if she had taken the photos, but generally agreed that she had made the internet searches. "I suggest that you accessed these images of information about cancer in May 2023," Dr Rogers said. "I don't think I did," Ms Patterson said. Ms Patterson told the court that she had been "quite worried" about her health in late 2021 and early 2022, but not in 2023. Dr Rogers suggested that Ms Patterson had taken the screenshots to bolster her claims that she had cancer. "I suggest this information from the internet would allow you to tell a more convincing lie about having cancer," Dr Rogers said. "I mean, theoretically that's true, but it's not what I did," Ms Patterson said. Dr Rogers and Ms Patterson went back and forth about false cancer claims allegedly made by the accused. "I suggest that you said at the lunch that you had tests and they found ovarian cancer," Dr Rogers said. "I don't think I put it that precisely...I don't remember saying I had a diagnosis," Ms Patterson said. "You dispute that you said they found ovarian cancer?" Dr Rogers said. "Yeah, I do, I do," Ms Patterson said. The 50-year-old said that she didn't say anything "that specific". Dr Rogers asked about a dehydrator found at Koonwarra Landfill and Transfer Station that had Ms Patterson's fingerprints on it. A manual and an invoice for the dehydrator, bought on April 28, 2023, further suggested that the appliance belonged to Ms Patterson, Dr Rogers said. Dr Rogers suggested to Ms Patterson that she lied to police about buying, using and disposing of the dehydrator because she had used it to dehydrate death cap mushrooms. "You lied about dehydrating food and mushrooms because you knew that if you told police the truth, then that would implicate you in the poisoned lunch. Agree or disagree?" Dr Rogers said. "I agree that I lied because I was afraid I would be held responsible," Ms Patterson said. Dr Rogers also asked if Ms Patterson had intentionally dehydrated poisonous mushrooms at her home. "You knew that they were death cap mushrooms that you'd been dehydrating, correct?" Dr Rogers said. "No, I didn't know that," Ms Patterson said. Dr Rogers continued her rapid questioning. "You were very keen to dispose of any evidence that might connect you with the possession of death cap mushrooms, correct?" Dr Rogers said. "No, I didn't," Ms Patterson said. The prosecutor also asked Ms Patterson if she had attempted to dehydrate other foods in the appliance that was found at Koonwarra Landfill. She said that she had also experimented with apples, bananas and other fruit. "And did you take photos of them?" Dr Rogers said. "I don't remember, I might've, I don't remember," Ms Patterson said. Ms Patterson told the court that she picked mushrooms from a number of local sites after she bought the dehydrator on April 28, 2023. "On or after 28 April, 2023, and before the lunch, did you pick wild mushrooms?" Dr Rogers said. "I did," Ms Patterson said. She said she picked mushrooms in Korumburra Botanic Gardens, a nearby rail trail and at her Leongatha home. Dr Rogers turned the line of questioning to a conversation about foraged or wild mushrooms that Ms Patterson had with a doctor at Monash Hospital. The doctor previously told the court that Ms Patterson had denied using foraged or wild mushrooms in the fatal lunch, Dr Rogers said. Ms Patterson confirmed that the doctor "did say that" but that she hadn't believed the statement "was a lie at the time". Dr Rogers asked Ms Patterson if she had intended to serve the same meal to her estranged husband if he had attended the lunch. "You intended to serve one of those beef Wellingtons to Simon Patterson, had he turned up at the lunch?" Dr Rogers said. "If he'd come, I would have given him a beef Wellington too. But not one with death cap mushrooms intentionally," Ms Patterson said. The trial is continuing. Accused death cap killer Erin Patterson has denied that she deliberately poisoned a beef Wellington served to her in-laws as she gives evidence in her fourth day on the stand. Ms Patterson, 50, is facing three counts of murder and one count of attempted murder after she allegedly hosted a fatal lunch for her estranged husband's family in July 2023. Ms Patterson has pleaded not guilty to the charges and has always maintained her innocence. She was questioned for three days by her barrister, Colin Mandy SC, before prosecutor Nanette Rogers SC started her cross-examination on June 5. The prosecutor asked Ms Patterson if she had told Facebook friends that she was an atheist. Ms Patterson said she had not. Dr Rogers turned her line of questioning towards emoji selection in a message sent by Ms Patterson. The message was sent to some of Ms Patterson's Facebook friends after prayer was suggested by Don Patterson in response to her marital and family problems. The prosecutor and Ms Patterson went back and forth over the meaning of an emoji that had a straight line for a mouth. Dr Rogers suggested that the emoji represented an 'eyeroll' that was meant to mock the use of Christian prayer in Patterson family disputes. "I wasn't mocking, I was frustrated," Ms Patterson said. The court was shown images, which were described as screenshots with information about brain and ovarian cancer. Ms Patterson said she could not be sure if she had taken the photos, but generally agreed that she had made the internet searches. "I suggest that you accessed these images of information about cancer in May 2023," Dr Rogers said. "I don't think I did," Ms Patterson said. Ms Patterson told the court that she had been "quite worried" about her health in late 2021 and early 2022, but not in 2023. Dr Rogers suggested that Ms Patterson had taken the screenshots to bolster her claims that she had cancer. "I suggest this information from the internet would allow you to tell a more convincing lie about having cancer," Dr Rogers said. "I mean, theoretically that's true, but it's not what I did," Ms Patterson said. Dr Rogers and Ms Patterson went back and forth about false cancer claims allegedly made by the accused. "I suggest that you said at the lunch that you had tests and they found ovarian cancer," Dr Rogers said. "I don't think I put it that precisely...I don't remember saying I had a diagnosis," Ms Patterson said. "You dispute that you said they found ovarian cancer?" Dr Rogers said. "Yeah, I do, I do," Ms Patterson said. The 50-year-old said that she didn't say anything "that specific". Dr Rogers asked about a dehydrator found at Koonwarra Landfill and Transfer Station that had Ms Patterson's fingerprints on it. A manual and an invoice for the dehydrator, bought on April 28, 2023, further suggested that the appliance belonged to Ms Patterson, Dr Rogers said. Dr Rogers suggested to Ms Patterson that she lied to police about buying, using and disposing of the dehydrator because she had used it to dehydrate death cap mushrooms. "You lied about dehydrating food and mushrooms because you knew that if you told police the truth, then that would implicate you in the poisoned lunch. Agree or disagree?" Dr Rogers said. "I agree that I lied because I was afraid I would be held responsible," Ms Patterson said. Dr Rogers also asked if Ms Patterson had intentionally dehydrated poisonous mushrooms at her home. "You knew that they were death cap mushrooms that you'd been dehydrating, correct?" Dr Rogers said. "No, I didn't know that," Ms Patterson said. Dr Rogers continued her rapid questioning. "You were very keen to dispose of any evidence that might connect you with the possession of death cap mushrooms, correct?" Dr Rogers said. "No, I didn't," Ms Patterson said. The prosecutor also asked Ms Patterson if she had attempted to dehydrate other foods in the appliance that was found at Koonwarra Landfill. She said that she had also experimented with apples, bananas and other fruit. "And did you take photos of them?" Dr Rogers said. "I don't remember, I might've, I don't remember," Ms Patterson said. Ms Patterson told the court that she picked mushrooms from a number of local sites after she bought the dehydrator on April 28, 2023. "On or after 28 April, 2023, and before the lunch, did you pick wild mushrooms?" Dr Rogers said. "I did," Ms Patterson said. She said she picked mushrooms in Korumburra Botanic Gardens, a nearby rail trail and at her Leongatha home. Dr Rogers turned the line of questioning to a conversation about foraged or wild mushrooms that Ms Patterson had with a doctor at Monash Hospital. The doctor previously told the court that Ms Patterson had denied using foraged or wild mushrooms in the fatal lunch, Dr Rogers said. Ms Patterson confirmed that the doctor "did say that" but that she hadn't believed the statement "was a lie at the time". Dr Rogers asked Ms Patterson if she had intended to serve the same meal to her estranged husband if he had attended the lunch. "You intended to serve one of those beef Wellingtons to Simon Patterson, had he turned up at the lunch?" Dr Rogers said. "If he'd come, I would have given him a beef Wellington too. But not one with death cap mushrooms intentionally," Ms Patterson said. The trial is continuing. Accused death cap killer Erin Patterson has denied that she deliberately poisoned a beef Wellington served to her in-laws as she gives evidence in her fourth day on the stand. Ms Patterson, 50, is facing three counts of murder and one count of attempted murder after she allegedly hosted a fatal lunch for her estranged husband's family in July 2023. Ms Patterson has pleaded not guilty to the charges and has always maintained her innocence. She was questioned for three days by her barrister, Colin Mandy SC, before prosecutor Nanette Rogers SC started her cross-examination on June 5. The prosecutor asked Ms Patterson if she had told Facebook friends that she was an atheist. Ms Patterson said she had not. Dr Rogers turned her line of questioning towards emoji selection in a message sent by Ms Patterson. The message was sent to some of Ms Patterson's Facebook friends after prayer was suggested by Don Patterson in response to her marital and family problems. The prosecutor and Ms Patterson went back and forth over the meaning of an emoji that had a straight line for a mouth. Dr Rogers suggested that the emoji represented an 'eyeroll' that was meant to mock the use of Christian prayer in Patterson family disputes. "I wasn't mocking, I was frustrated," Ms Patterson said. The court was shown images, which were described as screenshots with information about brain and ovarian cancer. Ms Patterson said she could not be sure if she had taken the photos, but generally agreed that she had made the internet searches. "I suggest that you accessed these images of information about cancer in May 2023," Dr Rogers said. "I don't think I did," Ms Patterson said. Ms Patterson told the court that she had been "quite worried" about her health in late 2021 and early 2022, but not in 2023. Dr Rogers suggested that Ms Patterson had taken the screenshots to bolster her claims that she had cancer. "I suggest this information from the internet would allow you to tell a more convincing lie about having cancer," Dr Rogers said. "I mean, theoretically that's true, but it's not what I did," Ms Patterson said. Dr Rogers and Ms Patterson went back and forth about false cancer claims allegedly made by the accused. "I suggest that you said at the lunch that you had tests and they found ovarian cancer," Dr Rogers said. "I don't think I put it that precisely...I don't remember saying I had a diagnosis," Ms Patterson said. "You dispute that you said they found ovarian cancer?" Dr Rogers said. "Yeah, I do, I do," Ms Patterson said. The 50-year-old said that she didn't say anything "that specific". Dr Rogers asked about a dehydrator found at Koonwarra Landfill and Transfer Station that had Ms Patterson's fingerprints on it. A manual and an invoice for the dehydrator, bought on April 28, 2023, further suggested that the appliance belonged to Ms Patterson, Dr Rogers said. Dr Rogers suggested to Ms Patterson that she lied to police about buying, using and disposing of the dehydrator because she had used it to dehydrate death cap mushrooms. "You lied about dehydrating food and mushrooms because you knew that if you told police the truth, then that would implicate you in the poisoned lunch. Agree or disagree?" Dr Rogers said. "I agree that I lied because I was afraid I would be held responsible," Ms Patterson said. Dr Rogers also asked if Ms Patterson had intentionally dehydrated poisonous mushrooms at her home. "You knew that they were death cap mushrooms that you'd been dehydrating, correct?" Dr Rogers said. "No, I didn't know that," Ms Patterson said. Dr Rogers continued her rapid questioning. "You were very keen to dispose of any evidence that might connect you with the possession of death cap mushrooms, correct?" Dr Rogers said. "No, I didn't," Ms Patterson said. The prosecutor also asked Ms Patterson if she had attempted to dehydrate other foods in the appliance that was found at Koonwarra Landfill. She said that she had also experimented with apples, bananas and other fruit. "And did you take photos of them?" Dr Rogers said. "I don't remember, I might've, I don't remember," Ms Patterson said. Ms Patterson told the court that she picked mushrooms from a number of local sites after she bought the dehydrator on April 28, 2023. "On or after 28 April, 2023, and before the lunch, did you pick wild mushrooms?" Dr Rogers said. "I did," Ms Patterson said. She said she picked mushrooms in Korumburra Botanic Gardens, a nearby rail trail and at her Leongatha home. Dr Rogers turned the line of questioning to a conversation about foraged or wild mushrooms that Ms Patterson had with a doctor at Monash Hospital. The doctor previously told the court that Ms Patterson had denied using foraged or wild mushrooms in the fatal lunch, Dr Rogers said. Ms Patterson confirmed that the doctor "did say that" but that she hadn't believed the statement "was a lie at the time". Dr Rogers asked Ms Patterson if she had intended to serve the same meal to her estranged husband if he had attended the lunch. "You intended to serve one of those beef Wellingtons to Simon Patterson, had he turned up at the lunch?" Dr Rogers said. "If he'd come, I would have given him a beef Wellington too. But not one with death cap mushrooms intentionally," Ms Patterson said. The trial is continuing. Accused death cap killer Erin Patterson has denied that she deliberately poisoned a beef Wellington served to her in-laws as she gives evidence in her fourth day on the stand. Ms Patterson, 50, is facing three counts of murder and one count of attempted murder after she allegedly hosted a fatal lunch for her estranged husband's family in July 2023. Ms Patterson has pleaded not guilty to the charges and has always maintained her innocence. She was questioned for three days by her barrister, Colin Mandy SC, before prosecutor Nanette Rogers SC started her cross-examination on June 5. The prosecutor asked Ms Patterson if she had told Facebook friends that she was an atheist. Ms Patterson said she had not. Dr Rogers turned her line of questioning towards emoji selection in a message sent by Ms Patterson. The message was sent to some of Ms Patterson's Facebook friends after prayer was suggested by Don Patterson in response to her marital and family problems. The prosecutor and Ms Patterson went back and forth over the meaning of an emoji that had a straight line for a mouth. Dr Rogers suggested that the emoji represented an 'eyeroll' that was meant to mock the use of Christian prayer in Patterson family disputes. "I wasn't mocking, I was frustrated," Ms Patterson said. The court was shown images, which were described as screenshots with information about brain and ovarian cancer. Ms Patterson said she could not be sure if she had taken the photos, but generally agreed that she had made the internet searches. "I suggest that you accessed these images of information about cancer in May 2023," Dr Rogers said. "I don't think I did," Ms Patterson said. Ms Patterson told the court that she had been "quite worried" about her health in late 2021 and early 2022, but not in 2023. Dr Rogers suggested that Ms Patterson had taken the screenshots to bolster her claims that she had cancer. "I suggest this information from the internet would allow you to tell a more convincing lie about having cancer," Dr Rogers said. "I mean, theoretically that's true, but it's not what I did," Ms Patterson said. Dr Rogers and Ms Patterson went back and forth about false cancer claims allegedly made by the accused. "I suggest that you said at the lunch that you had tests and they found ovarian cancer," Dr Rogers said. "I don't think I put it that precisely...I don't remember saying I had a diagnosis," Ms Patterson said. "You dispute that you said they found ovarian cancer?" Dr Rogers said. "Yeah, I do, I do," Ms Patterson said. The 50-year-old said that she didn't say anything "that specific". Dr Rogers asked about a dehydrator found at Koonwarra Landfill and Transfer Station that had Ms Patterson's fingerprints on it. A manual and an invoice for the dehydrator, bought on April 28, 2023, further suggested that the appliance belonged to Ms Patterson, Dr Rogers said. Dr Rogers suggested to Ms Patterson that she lied to police about buying, using and disposing of the dehydrator because she had used it to dehydrate death cap mushrooms. "You lied about dehydrating food and mushrooms because you knew that if you told police the truth, then that would implicate you in the poisoned lunch. Agree or disagree?" Dr Rogers said. "I agree that I lied because I was afraid I would be held responsible," Ms Patterson said. Dr Rogers also asked if Ms Patterson had intentionally dehydrated poisonous mushrooms at her home. "You knew that they were death cap mushrooms that you'd been dehydrating, correct?" Dr Rogers said. "No, I didn't know that," Ms Patterson said. Dr Rogers continued her rapid questioning. "You were very keen to dispose of any evidence that might connect you with the possession of death cap mushrooms, correct?" Dr Rogers said. "No, I didn't," Ms Patterson said. The prosecutor also asked Ms Patterson if she had attempted to dehydrate other foods in the appliance that was found at Koonwarra Landfill. She said that she had also experimented with apples, bananas and other fruit. "And did you take photos of them?" Dr Rogers said. "I don't remember, I might've, I don't remember," Ms Patterson said. Ms Patterson told the court that she picked mushrooms from a number of local sites after she bought the dehydrator on April 28, 2023. "On or after 28 April, 2023, and before the lunch, did you pick wild mushrooms?" Dr Rogers said. "I did," Ms Patterson said. She said she picked mushrooms in Korumburra Botanic Gardens, a nearby rail trail and at her Leongatha home. Dr Rogers turned the line of questioning to a conversation about foraged or wild mushrooms that Ms Patterson had with a doctor at Monash Hospital. The doctor previously told the court that Ms Patterson had denied using foraged or wild mushrooms in the fatal lunch, Dr Rogers said. Ms Patterson confirmed that the doctor "did say that" but that she hadn't believed the statement "was a lie at the time". Dr Rogers asked Ms Patterson if she had intended to serve the same meal to her estranged husband if he had attended the lunch. "You intended to serve one of those beef Wellingtons to Simon Patterson, had he turned up at the lunch?" Dr Rogers said. "If he'd come, I would have given him a beef Wellington too. But not one with death cap mushrooms intentionally," Ms Patterson said. The trial is continuing.

NRL star Joseph Tapine breaks down discussing gang member dad
NRL star Joseph Tapine breaks down discussing gang member dad

News.com.au

time11 hours ago

  • News.com.au

NRL star Joseph Tapine breaks down discussing gang member dad

Joseph Tapine's tears are for a man he isn't in touch with these days. They are for his dad. Tapine had a humble childhood in Wellington, New Zealand, with a hard-working mum and no family car; he didn't learn to drive until he met his wife, Kirsten. He and his big brother and sister walked themselves to school and footy training, or took the bus. They knew no better and were happy. His father was a gang member. 'He was in Black Power, which was one of the main gangs back home,' Tapine, one of rugby league's elite front-row enforcers, told Jake Duke on Fox League's Face to Face. 'We grew up around them. My uncles, his mates were in it as well. But I remember the good things – like we would have barbecues, we would have games of touch footy down at the park, and he'd have all his mates and all their kids play. 'I didn't … yeah, there was drinking and drugs around, which I don't remember much; I remember it's around, but it's not the main focus of my childhood when I was growing up. It was more, he'll get his mates and I'll play at the park until he was ready to go home. 'I think he maybe went to prison before me and my siblings were born. He drove us away from that life as well, he said he wanted better for us and not to follow him down that path.' Reflecting on those conversations, Tapine became emotional and whispered 'sorry' as tears came. 'We don't keep in touch. He's a good fella, but he's got some stuff to …' Tapine said, recalling how and why he moved to Australia. 'I wanted to get out of 'Wellies', I wanted to get out of New Zealand. I wanted to probably have a different life. And I had a thought, if I didn't crack league … I wanted to be a builder and they pay way better over here.' Tapine joined the Newcastle Knights in 2013, still in his teens. When not playing football, he worked in an Ingham's chicken factory and 'hated it'. His raw talent was obvious at the Knights, but so were some early demons. 'I loved the drink. I would get drunk and we would have captain's run the next day,' he said. 'So I was buzzing I was playing first grade, but I didn't realise what it meant.' Wayne Bennett gave Tapine his debut in 2014, despite one of his drinking sessions. Tapine had a big night for his 20th birthday and didn't front for training the following day … then froze when he saw Bennett's name pop up on his phone. 'He rang me and said, 'Hey mate, where are you?' And I said, 'Oh, am I in today?'' Tapine recalled with a laugh. 'And then he goes, 'Yeah mate, you're on debut this week – hope you're not too hungover from the party last night!' So they all knew.' Tapine played just 20 games for the Knights; which he now sees as a blessing in disguise, given that he's risen to stardom and the club captaincy in Canberra. But it took him time to grow into leadership; alcohol wasn't the only problem early in his career. 'Pokies was bad. I was blowing pay cheques on it,' he said. 'Because I came over, I didn't know money when I was growing up, we didn't have much and I didn't know how to organise it; didn't know you had to buy a house, didn't know all this investing, all that stuff. So I was getting money, young kid and I was, 'Oh, yeah. Drink and gamble, I'm gonna get paid next month, this will keep coming in'. 'I remember one time we, when you do pre-season, probably like just under 10 grand came into my account and that was probably gone in a week or two. 'I hate owing people money as well, that thing annoyed me. I was becoming that person and my wife gave me an ultimatum. 'I don't think I'd be where I am (without her) … I was spiralling a bit when I was at Newcastle. That was probably just when I met her, but then once we locked in and wanted to get serious, she put her foot down and said, 'We're not having that'. Which is what I needed at the time, I needed someone to tell me, 'Mate, you're not unbeatable'.' Tapine was also charged over a 2014 altercation while in Newcastle; the charges were dropped the following year. It became apparent to him that he needed a fresh start. 'I was in a bad spot but I didn't feel supported at the time as well,' he said. 'I was comfortable where I was living, I loved Newcastle as a place, had a lot of friends, but ultimately I needed to change what I was doing and change of environment's probably the best way to do that.' Tapine said then-Knights coach Nathan Brown made him train alone after he decided to join Canberra. The club said it would only agree on a release if he joined the Roosters, despite Tapine having agreed a deal with the Raiders; having found trouble in Newcastle, he didn't like his chances living in Sydney. Once he did make it to Canberra, things changed. He became a New Zealand Test player and his 100th NRL game was the 2019 grand final; a devastating loss to the Roosters, from which he still rues a lazy defensive play on the tryline that let opposition hooker Sam Verrills score. His 100th game for the Raiders also came against the Chooks and saw him score his favourite NRL try: a sensational solo effort at the SCG that destroyed the Tricolours' defence with footwork and power. A proud Maori man, Tapine continues a fine tradition of champion Kiwi props in Canberra, such as John Lomax and Quentin Pongia. He wears Pongia's Raiders player number on his training shirt, and it also adorns his locker; he fancies he'd have enjoyed a beer with the late icon. Another legendary prop, Raiders teammate Josh Papali'i, is a great mate. Yet wife Kirsten and daughter Ilua are Tapine's greatest rocks. Kirsten is forthright – as Raiders coach Ricky Stuart discovered after a 2021 game against South Sydney, when she posted an Instagram story criticising his coaching and treatment of her husband. The post went viral. 'You have an international player warming your bench for 50 minutes … Your interchanges are killing us!!!' she wrote on her story. 'Refs call count means jak (sic) when coaches are (rubbish bin emoji).' The fallout became so big there were suggestions Tapine, who was down on form at the time, may leave the club. Instead, it was a turning point in his relationship with Stuart, one where he put his ego to the side and matured. 'I thought after that I might be on my way. Thankfully not, I love this club and I'll probably play the rest of my footy here,' he said. 'But at the time I thought, yeah, maybe I'm not wanted and for me, that's a huge part … when I play, I want to play for someone that wants me. 'I think the thing with me and 'Stick', we're similar people. We just needed to sit down and have a chat man to man. 'We always had a good relationship, me and 'Stick', but that brutal honesty probably brought it forward a bit more. He can come to me now whenever he wants, text me, and say, 'I need this', or, 'I need you to do that'. 'And it's easy now, where before I was probably hard to coach. That ego thing, you know, some people don't want to be wrong and that's something I had to work on. I'm grateful it happened, even though it was in the media.' Tapine, 31, is now a Raiders great. He has been at the club almost a decade, was made captain for this season and just brought up his 200th NRL game, wearing lime green against Melbourne last month; which Kiwi teammates celebrated with a haka in the Raiders sheds. He is intent on winning that elusive premiership, the club's first since 1994 – though he says he'd be almost as proud if it arrived after his retirement, having laid the foundation just as he does every game for Canberra.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store