&w=3840&q=100)
If Donald Trump abandons Ukraine, can Europe help Kyiv fight Russia?
Trump has repeatedly lashed out at Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, accusing him of prolonging the killing field by pushing back on his demand that Ukraine hand over occupied Crimea to Moscow
AP London
President Donald Trump is pushing Ukraine to cede territory to Russia to end the war, threatening to walk away if a deal becomes too difficult and causing alarm bells in Europe about how to fill the gap.
Ukraine's European allies view the war as fundamental to the continent's security, and pressure is now mounting to find ways to support Kyiv militarily regardless of whether Trump pulls out.
Trump has repeatedly lashed out at Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, accusing him of prolonging the killing field by pushing back on his demand that Ukraine hand over occupied Crimea to Moscow.
Trump's land-for-peace plan would mark a significant shift in the post-World War II order, ripping up conventions that have long held that borders should not be redrawn by force.
It took a World War to roll back de jure annexations and 60 million people died, said Franois Heisbourg, special adviser at the Foundation for Strategic Research in Paris, referring to the pre-war annexation of Austria by Nazi Germany.
Europeans will not accept it" and Ukraine will not either, he said.
Can Ukraine fight without US support? Diplomats and experts described various scenarios if the US decides to walk. They range from the US ceasing direct aid to Ukraine but allowing European nations to pass on critical American intelligence and weapons to Kyiv to Trump banning transfers of any American technology, including components or software in European weapons.
Any withdrawal of US military aid to Ukraine could create serious difficulties for Europe, analysts and diplomats told The Associated Press. Kyiv's ability to keep fighting would depend on European political will to muster money and weapons and how quickly the gaps left by Washington can be filled.
If it were easy, Europe would already be doing things without America, said a European diplomat, who spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss the sensitive matter.
Where would the money come from? No new US aid package for Ukraine has been approved since Trump came into office, even as European nations have collectively provided Ukraine with more aid than Washington, according to the Keil Institute.
Europe has contributed around $157 billion, some $26 billion more than the US, although Washington slightly outpaces Europe when it comes to military aid, the Germany-based institute said.
It will be hard, but there are ways Europe can find cash to fund Ukraine including seizing frozen Russian assets but money isn't what you shoot bullets with, Heisbourg said.
Europe's "big mistake" was undertaking major military downsizing following the Cold War and thinking this war started in February 2022 and not in February 2014, when Moscow invaded and then annexed Crimea, said Thomas Gomart, director of IFRI, a French international affairs think tank.
Europeans are scrambling to acquire weapons for themselves and for Ukraine, while confronting constraints on production capacity, a fragmented defence industry and a decades-long reliance on the US.
Some extra production capacity could come from Ukraine, which has ramped up manufacturing of ammunition and drones since Russia's invasion. Much harder to replace, experts said, are advanced American weapons, including air defences.
Can US weapons systems be replaced? Russia has attacked Ukraine almost nightly since Putin's forces invaded in February 2022, flooding the skies with missiles and drones, including dummy attack drones to exhaust Ukraine's limited air defences. In April, at least 57 people were killed in multiple strikes.
The death toll from the Russian attacks would inevitably be higher without the American Patriot air-defence missile systems protecting Ukraine's skies, said Douglas Barrie, senior fellow for military aerospace at the International Institute for Strategic Studies in London.
The Patriots can track and intercept Russian missiles, including the hypersonic Kinzhal, which Putin has boasted was unstoppable. Kyiv uses them to protect critical infrastructure, including the country's energy grid.
Earlier this month, Zelenskyy asked to buy 10 Patriots, a request Trump dismissed. You don't start a war against someone 20 times your size and then hope that people give you some missiles," he said, a day after a Russian strike on the Ukrainian city of Sumy killed 35 people.
France and Italy have given Ukraine their Aster SAMP/T air-defence system but the issue is not quality, it's quantity, Barrie said, pointing to the larger US defence industrial base and greater US stockpiles.
Although Trump criticized Putin over the weekend for his missile strikes and suggested imposing more sanctions on Russia, for Europe it remains a wait-and-see game.
The whiplash of Trump's aggressive foreign policy means nothing is off the cards, experts said.
A worst-case scenario could see a ban on American weapons exports and transfers to Ukraine, which would bar European nations from buying US weapons to give to Kyiv or transferring weapons with American components or software, Barrie said.
That could mean countries, including Germany, that have already given American Patriots to Ukraine would be prohibited from doing so. Such a move would seriously hamper Europe's ability to support Kyiv and mark a fundamental shift in America's relationship with its allies.
It's one thing for the US to cease to be an ally, it is another for the US to be an enemy, Heisbourg said, noting that such a step could also damage the US defence sector if weapons purchases were perceived to be unusable on Trump's political order.
Filling the gap on intelligence sharing In March, the Trump administration suspended intelligence sharing with Ukraine in a bid to force Zelenskyy to accept a truce with Russia. The about weeklong suspension impacted Ukraine's ability to track and target Russian troops, tanks and ships.
There are certain capabilities, including higher-end surveillance and reconnaissance using satellites that only the United States can provide, said Matthew Kroenig, vice president of the Atlantic Council's Scowcroft Center for Strategy and Security in Washington.
While the extent of intelligence sharing between the US and Ukraine is not known, experts said it likely shows Kyiv near real-time buildup of Russian troop deployments and helps target long-range strikes.
Ukraine's allies do not have as much satellite capability as the US but could launch more, or Ukraine could use commercial systems if Trump cuts off intelligence again, experts said.
The latter would likely have to come from a European provider in March, the American satellite imagery company Maxar Technologies confirmed it temporarily suspended access to unclassified satellite images following the administration's decision to pull intelligence sharing.
Ukraine also needs an alternative to Elon Musk's satellite network Starlink, which is critical for Ukrainian defensive and civilian communications. European defense companies are discussing creating a satellite alliance but don't currently have an alternative on the same scale.
Would Ukraine collapse without US support? If Trump walks away, or if Kyiv rejects a deal and keeps fighting with European support, it won't necessarily mean "the collapse of Ukraine" although more people will almost certainly die if the US pulls its air defences and intelligence-sharing capabilities, Heisbourg said.
Trump has jolted European leaders into awareness that they need to take responsibility for their own defence, regardless of who occupies the White House, experts said.
That means European nations need to invest more in defense, work together to scale up military production and build trust to share intelligence.
This issue is not a question about the next two months or the next two years. This issue is about the next two decades, Gomart said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Business Standard
6 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Trump proceeds with maximalist immigration campaign in face of LA protests
Trump called up the California National Guard over Gov. Newsom's objections-the first time in 60 years a president has done so-and is sending active-duty troops to support them AP Washington Donald Trump made no secret of his willingness to exert a maximalist approach to enforcing immigration laws and keeping order as he campaigned to return to the White House. The fulfillment of that pledge is now on full display in Los Angeles. The president has put hundreds of National Guard troops on the streets to quell protests over his administration's immigration raids, a deployment that state and city officials say has only inflamed tensions. Trump called up the California National Guard over the objections of Democratic Governor Gavin Newsom the first time in 60 years a president has done so and is deploying active-duty troops to support the guard. By overriding Newsom, Trump is already going beyond what he did to respond to Black Lives Matter protests in 2020, when he warned he could send troops to contain demonstrations that turned violent if governors in the states did not act to do so themselves. Trump said in September of that year that he "can't call in the National Guard unless we're requested by a governor" and that "we have to go by the laws." But now, the past and current president is moving swiftly, with little internal restraint to test the bounds of his executive authority in order to deliver on his promise of mass deportations. What remains to be seen is whether Americans will stand by him once it's operationalised nationwide, as Trump looks to secure billions from Congress to dramatically expand the country's detention and deportation operations. For now, Trump is betting that they will. "If we didn't do the job, that place would be burning down," Trump told reporters Monday, speaking about California. "I feel we had no choice. ... I don't want to see what happened so many times in this country." A crisis of Trump's own making The protests began to unfold on Friday as federal authorities arrested immigrants in several locations throughout the sprawling city, including in the fashion district of Los Angeles and at a Home Depot. The anger over the administration's actions quickly spread, with protests in Chicago and Boston as demonstrations in the southern California city also continued on Monday. But Trump and other administration officials remained unbowed, capitalising on the images of burning cars, graffiti and Mexican flags which, while not dominant, started to become the defining images of the unrest to bolster their law-and-order cause. Leaders in the country's most populous state were similarly defiant. California officials moved on Monday to sue the Trump administration, with the state's attorney general, Rob Bonta, arguing that the deployment of troops "trampled" on the state's sovereignty and pushing for a restraining order. The initial deployment of 300 National Guard troops was expected to quickly expand to the full 2,000 that were authorised by Trump. The state's senior Democratic senator, Alex Padilla, said in an interview that "this is absolutely a crisis of Trump's own making." "There are a lot of people who are passionate about speaking up for fundamental rights and respecting due process, but the deployment of National Guard only serves to escalate tensions and the situation," Padilla told The Associated Press. "It's exactly what Donald Trump wanted to do." Padilla slammed the deployment as "counterproductive" and said the Los Angeles Sheriff's Department was not advised ahead of the federalisation of the National Guard. His office has also pushed the Pentagon for a justification on the deployment, and "as far as we're told, the Department of Defense isn't sure what the mission is here," Padilla added. Candidate Trump previewed immigration strategy during campaign Much of this was predictable. During his 2024 presidential campaign, Trump pledged to conduct the largest domestic deportation operation in American history to expel millions of immigrants in the country without legal status. He often praised President Dwight D Eisenhower's military-style immigration raids, and the candidate and his advisers suggested they would have broad power to deploy troops domestically to enact Trump's far-reaching immigration and public safety goals. Trump's speedy deployment in California of troops against those whom the president has alluded to as "insurrectionists" on social media is a sharp contrast to his decision to issue no order or formal request for National Guard troops during the insurrection at the US Capitol on January 6, 2021, despite his repeated and false assertions that he had made such an offer. Trump is now surrounded by officials who have no interest in constraining his power. In 2020, Trump's then-Pentagon chief publicly rebuked Trump's threat to send in troops using the Insurrection Act, an 1807 law that empowers the president to use the military within the US and against American citizens. Current Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth signalled support on his personal X account for deploying troops to California, writing, "The National Guard, and Marines if need be, stand with ICE," referring to the US Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency. The Defence Department said on Monday it is deploying about 700 active-duty Marines to Los Angeles to support National Guard troops already on the ground to respond to the protests. White House responds to an incompetent' governor Protesters over the weekend blocked off a major freeway and burned self-driving cars as police responded with tear gas, rubber bullets and flash-bang grenades in clashes that encompassed several downtown blocks in Los Angeles and led to several dozen arrests. Much of the city saw no violence. But the protests prompted Trump to issue the directive Saturday mobilising the California National Guard over Newsom's objections. The president and his top immigration aides accused the governor of mismanaging the protests, with border czar Tom Homan asserting in a Fox News interview on Monday that Newsom stoked anti-ICE sentiments and waited two days to declare unlawful assembly in the city. Trump told Newsom in a phone call on Friday evening to get the situation in Los Angeles under control, a White House official said. It was only when the administration felt Newsom was not restoring order in the city and after Trump watched the situation escalate for 24 hours and White House officials saw imagery of federal law enforcement officers with lacerations and other injuries that the president moved to deploy the Guard, according to the official, who was granted anonymity to discuss private deliberations. "He's an incompetent governor," Trump said on Monday. "Look at the job he's doing in California. He's destroying one of our great states." Local law enforcement officials said Los Angeles police responded as quickly as they could once the protests erupted, and Newsom repeatedly asserted that state and city authorities had the situation under control. "Los Angeles is no stranger to demonstrations and protests and rallies and marches," Padilla said. "Local law enforcement knows how to handle this and has a rapport with the community and community leaders to be able to allow for that." The aggressive moves prompted blowback from some of Trump's erstwhile allies. Ileana Garcia, a Florida state senator who in 2016 founded the group Latinas for Trump and was hired to direct Latino outreach, called the recent escalation "unacceptable and inhumane." "I understand the importance of deporting criminal aliens, but what we are witnessing are arbitrary measures to hunt down people who are complying with their immigration hearings in many cases, with credible fear of persecution claims all driven by a Miller-like desire to satisfy a self-fabricated deportation goal," said Garcia, referring to Stephen Miller, a White House deputy chief of staff and key architect of Trump's immigration crackdown. The tactics could be just a preview to what more could come from the Trump administration and the Republican-controlled Congress. GOP lawmakers are working to pass a massive tax-and-border package that includes billions to hire thousands of new officers for Border Patrol and for ICE. The goal, under the Trump-backed plan, is to remove 1 million immigrants without status annually and house 100,000 people in immigration detention centres.


Time of India
11 minutes ago
- Time of India
From red flags to American flags: Trump keeps Tesla, Musk keeps quiet; 'big, beautiful' feud over?
Elon Musk and Donald Trump (R) Just days after calling for US President Donald Trump 's impeachment, Elon Musk is now softening his stance, offering indirect praise and patriotic emojis for the administration, in a dramatic shift after what had been dubbed the 'big, beautiful breakup' between the two giants. The rapid shift in tone comes after a public and messy split between the tech mogul and the US president. Last week, Musk's social media posts took direct aim at Trump, accusing him, without evidence, of appearing in documents related to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, and demanding his removal from office. But by the weekend, many of those posts had vanished. As clashes between demonstrators and Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers escalated in LA, Musk threw his weight behind the administration's firm stance on immigration enforcement. He reposted Vice President JD Vance's message that the 'president will not tolerate rioting and violence,' adding a string of American flags. Musk has long voiced support for closed borders and stricter immigration controls, positions closely aligned with Trump's own policies. Tech billionaire also amplified a post from Trump on Truth Social demanding apologies from California governor Gavin Newsom and Los Angeles mayor Karen Bass over the chaos in the city. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Giao dịch vàng CFDs với mức chênh lệch giá thấp nhất IC Markets Đăng ký Undo 'They should apologize to the people of Los Angeles,' Trump wrote, as images of burning cars and violent confrontations flooded social media. In a gesture that signals a possible thaw in tensions, President Trump announced Monday that he would not sell the Tesla he purchased from Elon Musk—despite their recent public fallout. The car, acquired during friendlier times as a symbolic move to promote American-made electric vehicles, was reportedly intended for White House use rather than personal driving. Following the clash between the two, there had been speculation that Trump might sell or give away the vehicle. However, the President clarified he had no plans to part with it. 'I could move it around,' Trump said, 'but I won't sell the car.' He also confirmed he had no intention of cutting ties with Musk's Starlink satellite service, further suggesting that a complete break between the two may not be in the cards. In another surprising turn, Musk re-followed White House deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller, one of the architects of the administration's immigration policy -- after unfollowing him during last week's feud. The move stirred speculation, especially given that Miller's wife, Katie Miller, recently left her White House post to work with Musk full-time. The Millers had been regulars at Musk's social gatherings, and their proximity to both camps has made them the subject of White House gossip amid the falling out. Katie Miller declined to comment. Musk also moved to quash viral rumours that had fanned the flames of the feud. When his AI chatbot Grok seemingly confirmed a fake post showing Musk telling Miller 'Just like I took your wife,' Musk replied, 'No, it's fake ffs I never posted this.' Despite the apparent thaw, Musk has not fully abandoned criticism. Over the weekend, he took more subtle jabs at the president's sweeping domestic policy proposal, nicknamed the 'One, Big, Beautiful Bill'—which recently passed the House and is now under Senate review. Wall Street, however, seems to be welcoming the détente. Tesla's stock rebounded 4.6% on Monday, though it remains below levels seen before last week's dramatic fallout. 'While we do not expect Trump and Musk to be back to their Mar-a-Lago connected at the hip days, it would not be a surprise to see Trump and Musk slowly mend the fences (with the help of intermediaries behind closed doors) over the coming months,' wrote WedBush analyst Dan Ives. 'At the end of the day Trump needs Musk to stay close to the Republican party and Musk needs Trump for many reasons including a green light on a federal framework for autonomous [vehicles]. ' On Monday afternoon, Trump himself struck a more conciliatory tone when asked about Musk. 'We had a good relationship, I wish him well, very well,' the president told reporters at the White House. But when asked if he would answer Musk's call, Trump paused: 'I haven't really thought about it actually. I would imagine he wants to speak to me, I would think so.'

Time of India
14 minutes ago
- Time of India
Trump Defends US Troops In Los Angeles To Quell Riots
Errol Musk's Stunning Disclosure On Trump-Elon Public Spat | 'In Heat Of The Moment...' Elon Musk's father has revealed that there was intense stress on both sides for five months before the public spat between U.S. President Donald Trump and Tesla, SpaceX CEO billionaire. Errol Musk added that people say and do things in the heat of the moment but the feud will end soon and on a good note. He said the incident was a lesson for his son on people in politics and how he would have to deal with all kinds of people. Watch for more details. 339.0K views | 9 hours ago