A Chinese hotel's WiFi caused a man to break up with his girlfriend. Here's how
In a bizarre case of technology causing trouble in a relationship, a young woman in China was dumped by her boyfriend after her phone automatically connected to a hotel's WiFi - a place she claimed she had never visited before.The woman, surnamed Li, had gone to a hotel in Chongqing with her boyfriend during the May Day holiday.While checking in, Li realised that she had forgotten her physical ID, after which she tried to retrieve her digital identity card. That is when her phone instantly connected to the hotel's WiFi network, South China Morning Post reports, citing Chongqing TV.advertisement
As Li's boyfriend noticed this, he became rather suspicious. How could her phone recognise a network at a hotel they were supposedly visiting for the first time together? When asked, Li insisted she had never been there before and had no idea why her phone connected on its own. Her explanation, however, didn't convince him, as a result of which he decided to end their relationship.Upset over her boyfriend's behaviour, Li was determined to understand what had happened. As she dug deeper, she eventually figured out the reason. At one point of time, Li used to work in another hotel in Chongqing which offered WiFi with the same username and password.Li immediately contacted her ex-boyfriend to explain, but he had already blocked her. Hence, she reached out to Chongqing TV to publicly clarify what had happened - not to win him back but to clear her name.advertisementThus, a Chongqing TV reporter visited both locations to verify Li's story. Their phone, once connected at Li's former workplace, also auto-connected at the hotel, thereby confirming her explanation.Speaking to Chongqing TV, cybersecurity expert Liu said that it's entirely possible for phones to connect to different networks sharing the same name and password, as the device assumes it's the same trusted connection.Hence, Liu advised people to disable the auto-connect feature to avoid confusion and potential security risks.Trending Reel
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
10 hours ago
- Time of India
Elon Musk's Tesla sues ex-employee over robot secrets, claims his startup ‘achieved in months what took Tesla years'
Tesla has filed a federal lawsuit accusing a former employee of stealing trade secrets related to its humanoid robot project, Optimus, and using them to start a competing company. The lawsuit was filed on Wednesday, June 11 in San Francisco. The case is Tesla Inc v. Proception Inc , U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, No. 5:25-cv-04963. It claims that Zhongjie "Jay" Li — who worked on robotic hand sensors at Tesla from August 2022 to September 2024 — downloaded confidential files shortly before resigning. Just days after leaving, he allegedly founded a new startup, Proception Inc. Tesla accuses former engineer of misusing confidential information Tesla says that within five months, Proception unveiled robotic hands that closely resemble the ones Li helped develop at Tesla. The lawsuit names both Li and Proception as defendants, accusing them of misusing Tesla's confidential information. "Through Li's pilfering, Defendant Proception purportedly achieved in a matter of months what it has taken Tesla over four years, hundreds of employees, and billions of dollars to achieve," the complaint said. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Many Are Watching Tariffs - Few Are Watching What Nvidia Just Launched Seeking Alpha Read Now Undo According to Tesla, Li worked on the robot's sensor team between 2022 and 2024. Even though he had stopped working on the robot's hands, Tesla claims he downloaded confidential files about their movement shortly before quitting in 2024. Six days after leaving, Li started a new company called Proception. Just five months later, the startup showed off robotic hands that Tesla says look very similar to its own designs, the lawsuit alleges. Tesla is asking the court to stop Li and his company from using any of its trade secrets and is also seeking financial compensation. When Elon Musk called Tesla's robotic hand 'the most sophisticated ever made Tesla CEO Elon Musk has previously called Tesla's robotic hand 'the most sophisticated ever made,' and believes the Optimus robot could become the company's most valuable product. He has said that robots like Optimus could impact national economies in as little as four to five years and learn tasks by watching online videos. India's New AC Rule: Cooling Between 20°C–28°C Explained AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now
India Today
12 hours ago
- India Today
Air India crash videos suggest errors in cockpit take-off drills
On June 12, 2025, Air India Flight AI171, a Boeing 787-8 Dreamliner (VT-ANB), crashed in Ahmedabad's Meghaninagar at 1:38 PM IST, shortly after takeoff from Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel International Airport. The aircraft, bound for London Gatwick, reached only 600–650 feet before issuing a MAYDAY call and crashing into a residential analysis explores the probable causes of the catastrophic crash, focusing on the aircraft's low altitude, low speed, and landing gear configuration, based on preliminary evidence and crash videos. The aircraft reached only 600–650 feet before issuing a MAYDAY call and crashing into a residential area advertisementCrash ContextAircraft: Boeing 787-8 Dreamliner, a modern twin-engine jet with advanced fly-by-wire systems and GE Aerospace GEnx engines, heavily fueled for a 4,200-mile flight. Conditions: Clear weather, 43C, near-sea-level airport (180 feet elevation), high-density altitude reducing lift and Captain Sumeet Sabharwal and First Officer Clive Indicators: Low altitude (600–650 feet), low speed, and landing gear down, suggesting failure to climb Causes1. Configuration ErrorA configuration error during takeoff involves incorrect settings or actions that prevent the aircraft from achieving the necessary performance (lift, thrust, or climb rate). Common errors include wrong flap settings, insufficient thrust, premature rotation (lifting off too early), or failure to retract landing gear, all of which can reduce climb capability and lead to a stall or loss of control, especially at low altitudes. A configuration error during takeoff means incorrect settings that hinder performance advertisementWhy Configuration Errors Matter?Takeoff is a critical phase with tight performance margins. The 787 requires precise settings for flaps, thrust, and rotation speed (Vr) to achieve lift-off and climb, especially in hot conditions. Errors in these settings, combined with low altitude and speed, leave little time for recovery, as seen in the rapid descent after the MAYDAY Happens: Flaps increase lift and drag during takeoff, allowing the aircraft to fly at lower speeds. The 787 typically uses Flaps 5 or 15 for takeoff, depending on weight, runway length, and flaps too low (eg, Flaps 0) reduces lift, requiring higher speeds to take off, while excessive flaps (eg, Flaps 20) increase drag, hindering climb. Flaps increase lift and drag during takeoff, allowing the aircraft to fly at lower speeds Ahmedabad Context: At 43C, the reduced air density lowered lift, requiring precise flap settings. If the pilots selected insufficient flaps (eg, Flaps 0 instead of 5), the aircraft may have struggled to generate lift, leading to the observed low Factors: Distraction (eg, responding to ATC or a cockpit alert, like engine failure) or miscommunication during pre-takeoff checks could lead to incorrect flap 787's electronic checklist should flag this, but manual override or rushed procedures could bypass Spanair Flight 5022 (2008, MD-82) crashed in Madrid due to zero flaps during takeoff, causing insufficient lift and a stall, despite clear weather. If pilots selected reduced thrust or miscalculated required power, the aircraft could fail to climb 2. Insufficient ThrustThe 787's GEnx engines require specific thrust settings based on weight, runway length, and temperature. At 43C, high-density altitude reduced engine efficiency, necessitating higher thrust. If pilots used reduced thrust (derated takeoff) or miscalculated power via the flight management system (FMS), the heavily fuelled aircraft (near 227 tons) could fail to climb, explaining the low altitude and speed. Pilots typically retract gear after a positive climb rate advertisement3. Failure to Retract Landing GearCrash videos show the landing gear down, increasing drag and reducing climb performance. Pilots typically retract gear after a positive climb rate. Leaving it down suggests:Oversight: Distraction from a stall warning or engine Choice: Anticipating an emergency landing, though the MAYDAY call and rapid descent suggest insufficient time to return.4. Engine Failure (Including Bird Strike)The lack of engine noise in videos and the MAYDAY call suggest possible thrust loss. Potential causes include:Bird Strike: Ahmedabad's known risk could affect one or both engines, though dual-engine failure is rare (<1 in 1 million flights).Fuel Contamination or Mechanical Failure: Less likely given the GEnx engines' reliability, but Engine failure alone doesn't explain the landing gear configuration, making it a secondary factor compared to configuration errors.5. High-Temperature Performance Issues Distraction or miscommunication during pre-takeoff checks could lead to incorrect flap settings At 43C, reduced air density lowered lift and thrust, requiring precise configuration. While the 787's FMS accounts for temperature, a miscalculation of rotation speed (Vr) or thrust, or an intersection takeoff, could exacerbate issues. This is likely a contributing factor rather than the primary Structural Failure The 787's GEnx engines require specific thrust settings based on weight, runway length, and temperature A failure in flight controls or structure is unlikely given the 787's redundant systems and perfect safety record. The gear-down and low-speed evidence points to pilot error over a sudden mechanical issue.7. Sabotage or TerrorismNo evidence supports sabotage, and the MAYDAY call indicates crew awareness of an issue, not a sudden explosion. Security measures further reduce this low altitude, low speed, and landing gear down strongly suggest a configuration error—likely incorrect flap settings, insufficient thrust, premature rotation, or failure to retract gear—as the primary cause of the Air India Flight AI171 crash. Engine failure (possibly from a bird strike or fuel issue) and high-temperature performance challenges are secondary contributors. The 787's advanced systems should mitigate such errors, but human factors, such as a cockpit emergency, distraction or miscommunication, likely played a critical role in this tragedy.(Images by Vani Gupta and Ayushi Srivastava) Must Watch
India Today
13 hours ago
- India Today
Tesla sues ex-engineer for stealing Optimus robot secrets to launch rival startup
Tesla has filed a lawsuit against a former employee, accusing him of stealing confidential information related to its humanoid robotics project, Optimus, and using it to establish a competing startup. The lawsuit, filed on Wednesday and first reported by Bloomberg, targets Zhongjie 'Jay' Li, who was employed at Tesla between August 2022 and September 2024. Tesla alleges that Li misappropriated trade secrets involving the development of its advanced robotic hand sensors, and later used this proprietary knowledge to launch his own venture, Proception — a startup backed by Y Combinator, which specialises in humanoid robotic to the legal complaint, Li downloaded sensitive Optimus project data onto two personal smartphones during his tenure at Tesla. In addition to accessing confidential files, the lawsuit claims that, in the months leading up to his departure, Li used Tesla's internal systems to conduct research on humanoid robotic hand design and explored topics related to venture capital and startup funding, suggesting premeditated intentions to establish a competing business.'Less than a week after he left Tesla, Proception was incorporated,' the complaint reads. 'And within just five months, Proception publicly claimed to have 'successfully built' advanced humanoid robotic hands—hands that bear a striking resemblance to the designs Li worked on at Tesla.' Proception's website describes its mission as seeking to "revolutionise human-robot interaction by building the world's most advanced humanoid hands." The similarities between Proception's designs and Tesla's proprietary work have prompted Tesla to take legal action to protect its intellectual humanoid robotics journey has faced several hurdles since it was first unveiled in 2021, when CEO Elon Musk introduced the Tesla Bot concept — later branded as Optimus. Initially, the company indicated that the humanoid robot would debut alongside other products in 2023. However, progress has been slower than expected, with the Optimus robot still in July 2024, Musk provided an updated timeline, stating that Tesla hoped to begin commercial sales of the Optimus robot by 2026. However, by October 2024, at Tesla's 'We, Robot' event, the showcased Optimus robots were still largely operated by humans remotely, highlighting that the technology remains a work in maintains that Li's alleged theft of intellectual property could jeopardise years of internal research and development invested in Optimus. The lawsuit underscores the high stakes involved in the race to develop advanced robotics, particularly as companies like Tesla seek to lead the emerging market for humanoid robots capable of performing complex, human-like Tesla has faced technical setbacks in bringing Optimus to market, the ongoing development of robotic hands is seen as a critical component in making the humanoid robot fully functional. The advanced hand sensors Li allegedly accessed are believed to play a pivotal role in enabling robots to replicate precise, human-like dexterity, a key milestone that could set Tesla apart from competitors in the has not yet publicly responded to the lawsuit, and the legal proceedings are now In
