logo
‘Concerned': Alarming note issued by Brisbane Council

‘Concerned': Alarming note issued by Brisbane Council

West Australian07-05-2025

Tents in a well established homeless encampment in inner city Brisbane have been slapped with eviction notices by the local council, while landscaping works occur around their dwellings.
The Brisbane City Council have plastered stickers on tents in Musgrave Park, located in South Brisbane, warning owners that if they were not collected by May 7, they may be confiscated or disposed of.
'If you need help with housing options, please contact the Safe Communities Team on (07) 3403 8888,' the notice said.
The park is currently undergoing works in preparation to host the Paniyiri Festival held from Saturday May 17 to Monday May 19.
Throughout the festival, the park will be temporarily fenced off to the public, and only those who have purchased a ticket will be allowed access.
A Brisbane City Council spokesperson said the move-on orders aligned with a new approach to homelessness in the city outlined in March, and were unrelated to the festival.
'Brisbane residents have grown increasingly concerned about the violence, drug use and anti-social behaviour occurring in tent encampments in parks,' they said.
'As a result, we're taking a calm, measured and considered approach with the Department of Housing, Police and Queensland Health to get people out of dangerous encampments and into safe accommodation.'
The homeless encampment at Musgrave Park has received widespread attention after multiple attempts to remove the tent city by Brisbane City Council failed.
In March this year, Brisbane Lord Mayor Adrian Schrinner
outlined a new policy
whereby in instances where people camping in parks refuse accommodation or assistance, they would be asked to move on within 24 hours.
At the time, Mr Schrinner said he believed most campers were 'homeless by choice'.
He said that the people in the homeless encampments refused assistance from the Council and other organisations during ex-Tropical Cyclone Alfred, and that accommodation was available to them.
Greens Councillor Tina Massey said the removal of vulnerable people from Musgrave Park ahead of this year's Paniyiri festival marked a 'harsh and regressive shift' from the inclusive planning of previous years.
'Dutton's vision for Australia continues right here in Brisbane under the cruel leadership of Lord Mayor Schrinner,' she said.
'I urge the Lord Mayor and Premier to stop criminalising homelessness and start investing in real solutions. We need more social and affordable housing, not more fines and forced relocations.'
Greens Senator Larissa Waters urged the Lord Mayor to reconsider his approach to tackling homelessness in Brisbane.
'It is appalling The Lord Mayor of Brisbane is striking vulnerable people sleeping rough with this heartless policy.
'Criminalising poverty is never a solution to poverty. What people without homes need are homes.
'We have the tools to really fix the crisis in this country and the Greens urge all levels of government to use them.'
A spokesperson from local charity Northwest Community Group said Brisbane City Council and event organisers for the Greek Food Festival have not adequately provided support to those who are being relocated for the events.
'The festival is an annual event, usually they have a special area put aside for people experiencing homelessness but this year they are just kicking everyone out,' they said.
The Northwest Community Group has organised a sit-in at the Park on Wednesday May 7, calling for event organisers to consider the needs of the homeless people who will be forced to relocate.
'People were left in the dark about what was going to happen and where they were meant to go,' a post to the group's social media said.
'The festival footprint maps were not finalised until the day the fences went up, and they were never shared.'
In October last year, Brisbane City Council cut the electricity to two homeless tent cities at Musgrave Park and Kurilpa Point Park, leaving them without access to power outlets or barbecues.
At the time, Greens Councillor Trina Massey said: 'This callous act denied people sleeping rough the ability to cook food on BBQs or charge their phones – possibly leading to missed calls with offers of housing from the Department of Housing.'
'The removal of power has already made our parks less safe for all community members. Rough sleepers are now resorting to potentially much more dangerous gas based equipment to enable them to cook meals, the most basic of human rights,' she said.
'I've already been told that a gas canister has exploded.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Dawson loses bid to overturn conviction
Dawson loses bid to overturn conviction

Perth Now

time3 days ago

  • Perth Now

Dawson loses bid to overturn conviction

Convicted wife killer Chris Dawson has lost his bid to quash a conviction over his unlawful sexual relationship with a teenage schoolgirl in the 1980s. Dawson was in 2023 found guilty of carnal knowledge of a girl, who can only be known as AB, when she was just 16 years old in 1980. He was sentenced to three years in prison with a two year non-parole period after Judge Sarah Huggett found him guilty of one count of carnal knowledge following a two-week District Court trial. Dawson launched an appeal against the conviction, with the primary argument being reasonable doubt about the timing of the first sexual encounter between Dawson and AB. Chris Dawson pictured as he arrives at the Supreme Court, Sydney CBD. Ex-Newtown Jets player and school teacher Chris Dawson was charged with murdering his wife Lynette in 1982. NCA NewsWire / Damian Shaw Credit: News Corp Australia Dawson's barrister, Stephen Rodgers SC, in March told the Court of Criminal Appeal there was doubt about whether it had taken place before December 1980, as AB was in Year 11 up until that month. AB said the first sexual intercourse occurred when she was 16 during the trial, however Dawson claimed the girl was 17. 'The central issue at the trial and on this appeal relates to timing – there was no dispute that sexual intercourse did ultimately take place between the appellant and the complainant, but the question was whether the prosecution proved whether it occurred prior to December 1980,' Mr Odgers told the court in March. Judge Sarah Huggett found Chris Dawson guilty of one count of carnal knowledge following a two-week District Court trial. NewsWire / pool / Dan Himbrechts Credit: NCA NewsWire Mr Odgers submitted there was a period in 1980 when Dawson engaged in 'romantic behaviour' with AB, including 'saying things indicating love, standing close'. 'There's a difference between being romantic and engaging in sexual intercourse and particularly when the sexual intercourse constitutes a serious offence,' Mr Odgers said. Mr Odgers in March put to the CCA there was doubt over whether the first sexual encounter occurred before the charged indictment period, citing doubt about when driving lessons occurred between Dawson and AB, which is where the 'first kiss' or sexual encounter took place. Crown prosecutor Helen Roberts SC said it was 'not necessary' for the Crown to establish whether AB did or did not hold a learner's permit at the time of the first sexual encounter. Justices Kristina Stern and Sarah McNaughton moved to dismiss the appeal on Friday, despite Justice Peter Hamill dissenting. The court was told Justice Hamill was to allow the appeal to quash the conviction and enter a not guilty verdict, with the judgement stating he was not satisfied beyond a reasonable doubt that the first sexual intercourse took place before December 1980. However, the decisions of Justices Stern and McNaughton were upheld. Sketch of Chris Dawson in 2023. NewsWire / Vincent de Gouw Credit: Supplied Mr Odgers had earlier raised questions in March over whether AB had attended fitness classes - led by Dawson and his brother - in 1980 or 1981, as AB testified the first sexual intercourse took place after she'd begun fitness classes with Dawson. He said there was a 'reasonable possibility' AB was mistaken and didn't attend the classes in 1980, which he argued would make the sexual intercourse having occurred in 1980 'inconsistent'. However, Ms Roberts said even if AB had only attended in 1981, this didn't 'necessarily give rise to reasonable doubt' as the agreed facts of the trial stated Dawson and his brother ran the classes in both years. She told the court there was only one 'really important' question, being whether the evidence as a whole was sufficient, credible and reliable to satisfy that the first act of sexual intercourse took place before December 1980. She said the trial had found AB to be a 'truthful witness' noting the passage of time, although some aspects were unreliable. Dawson was previously convicted of the murder of his wife, Lynette Simms, and was given a 24-year jail sentence with an 18-year non-parole period. While he unsuccessfully appealed the decision in the CCAl last year, Dawson's legal team filed an application for special leave to appeal to the High Court in February. The fresh application asks for the High Court to quash his conviction and order a fresh trial.

Albanese is riding high. Why did he take on a senator with so much baggage?
Albanese is riding high. Why did he take on a senator with so much baggage?

The Age

time5 days ago

  • The Age

Albanese is riding high. Why did he take on a senator with so much baggage?

Dorinda Cox's decision to leave the Greens is a bitter ending to one of the most difficult internal issues the minor party has ever wrestled with. Her joining Labor could be the beginning of a risky manoeuvre with seemingly little benefit for Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and the government. While Cox's defeat in the Greens' recent deputy leadership ballot may have been the final straw for the senator, her decision to defect has been months in the making as she grew increasingly disenchanted with the views of some of her colleagues. And then there was the fact that 20 staff had left Cox's office in about three years, revealed by this masthead last year, with several lodging formal complaints alleging a hostile culture where employees felt unsafe. Cox has consistently denied the claims and argued they lacked context, though she apologised for any distress felt by her staff. An inquiry by WA firm Modern Legal into the allegations was still under way, much to her frustration. That inquiry is now over. The WA senator's move to Labor is the first time a federal Greens MP has switched to another party, the second time in two years an Indigenous woman has quit the party, and comes after the party lost three lower house seats, including that of former leader Adam Bandt, at the recent election. Loading By any measure, it has been a disastrous couple of months for the Greens. But current and former Greens staff, though conceding the loss of a senator hurts, welcomed Cox's exit almost universally on Monday after having to defend her for months. The majority view within the Greens is that the party no longer has to play a straight bat to the allegations and deal with them internally. That is the silver lining. Already, additional allegations about Cox's conduct while still within the Greens have begun to leak out.

Albanese is riding high. Why did he take on a senator with so much baggage?
Albanese is riding high. Why did he take on a senator with so much baggage?

Sydney Morning Herald

time5 days ago

  • Sydney Morning Herald

Albanese is riding high. Why did he take on a senator with so much baggage?

Dorinda Cox's decision to leave the Greens is a bitter ending to one of the most difficult internal issues the minor party has ever wrestled with. Her joining Labor could be the beginning of a risky manoeuvre with seemingly little benefit for Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and the government. While Cox's defeat in the Greens' recent deputy leadership ballot may have been the final straw for the senator, her decision to defect has been months in the making as she grew increasingly disenchanted with the views of some of her colleagues. And then there was the fact that 20 staff had left Cox's office in about three years, revealed by this masthead last year, with several lodging formal complaints alleging a hostile culture where employees felt unsafe. Cox has consistently denied the claims and argued they lacked context, though she apologised for any distress felt by her staff. An inquiry by WA firm Modern Legal into the allegations was still under way, much to her frustration. That inquiry is now over. The WA senator's move to Labor is the first time a federal Greens MP has switched to another party, the second time in two years an Indigenous woman has quit the party, and comes after the party lost three lower house seats, including that of former leader Adam Bandt, at the recent election. Loading By any measure, it has been a disastrous couple of months for the Greens. But current and former Greens staff, though conceding the loss of a senator hurts, welcomed Cox's exit almost universally on Monday after having to defend her for months. The majority view within the Greens is that the party no longer has to play a straight bat to the allegations and deal with them internally. That is the silver lining. Already, additional allegations about Cox's conduct while still within the Greens have begun to leak out.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store