Ellana Lee to take on expanded role as head of newly created CNN Global Productions team
May 15th, 2025
CNN's head of Asia Pacific, Ellana Lee, has been elevated to the newly created global role of Group Senior Vice President, General Manager APAC, and Global Head of Productions, overseeing a brand-new team at CNN that will handle all aspects of multi-platform sponsored content at the network alongside her existing editorial responsibilities.
In a CNN career spanning 25 years, most recently as SVP, Managing Editor Asia Pacific, & Global Head of Features Content, Lee has pioneered its highly successful approach to feature content, including major initiatives such as its award-winning Call to Earth.
Effective immediately, Lee's expanded role will see her guide a new Global Productions team, focused on developing and producing sponsored content across all platforms, and see the creation of new roles in the United States to strengthen and expand the existing Features team, currently based across Atlanta, Abu Dhabi, Hong Kong, and London.
Mike McCarthy, Managing Editor, CNN Worldwide, said: 'Under Ellana's leadership, our Features team has consistently innovated, delivering award-winning, multi-platform, editorially robust and engaging feature content that has attracted commercial partnerships with some of the world's most dynamic and successful brands. She will now bring that experience, creativity and skill to bear across the network, working in tandem with our digital, TV, product, programming, marketing, communications, and commercial teams globally.'
Lee, as the most senior executive outside the United States, will continue to be based at CNN's Asia Pacific headquarters in Hong Kong. As head of the Asia Pacific region, she will also continue to shape CNN's editorial output there, with overall responsibility for its slate of award-winning programming as well as its roster of correspondents and newsgathering teams across eight editorial operations.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
22 minutes ago
- Yahoo
'John Redcorn' Actor Jonathan Joss' Husband Issues Heartbreaking Statement
The husband of Jonathan Joss is opening up about the actor's shooting death in a heartbreaking statement. Joss was the voice of popular characters on two television series, King of the Hill and Parks and Recreation. He voiced the character of John Redcorn on the former show, and he played Chief Ken Hotate on the latter. San Antonio police confirmed to CNN that Joss was shot to death on June 1 in San Antonio, TX. According to KSAT-TV, the suspect, Sigfredo Ceja Alvarez, was booked into the jail and accused of murder. The television station reported that, according to neighbors, Joss "had an ongoing dispute with the man accused of killing him." Now, Joss's husband Tristan Kern de Gonzales has written a lengthy post on Joss's Facebook page. In it, Joss's husband made a series of accusations of how the shooting went down, including an allegation that the shooting was motivated by the couple's relationship. He also detailed his love for Joss. "My husband Jonathan Joss and I were involved in a shooting while checking the mail at the site of our former home. That home was burned down," he started the June 2 post. He wrote that the couple had reported "threats" they received "to law enforcement many times and nothing was done." Right before the shooting, he wrote, "When we returned to the site to check our mail we discovered the skull of one of our dogs and its harness placed in clear view. This caused both of us severe emotional distress. We began yelling and crying in response to the pain of what we saw." He wrote that Joss saved his life, alleging, "When the man fired Jonathan pushed me out of the way. He saved my life." "Jonathan is my husband. He gave me more love in our time together than most people ever get. We were newlyweds. We picked Valentines Day. We were in the process of looking for a trailer and planning our future,"' the post says. He added, "I was with him when he passed. I told him how much he was loved. To everyone who supported him, his fans, his friends, know that he valued you deeply. He saw you as family." Joss's husband continued: "My focus now is on protecting Jonathan's legacy and honoring the life we built together."'John Redcorn' Actor Jonathan Joss' Husband Issues Heartbreaking Statement first appeared on Men's Journal on Jun 3, 2025
Yahoo
30 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Not Going Out star Sally Bretton rushed to hospital while filming for BBC show
The latest series of Not Going Out was filled with laughter, but filming took a dramatic turn when Sally Bretton had to be rushed to hospital. In an era where television is dominated by polished dramas, thrillers and satires, comedian Lee Mack is on a mission to make us chuckle. He's doing it the old-school way, with a studio sitcom, a live audience and a barrage of jokes. As his BBC1 sitcom Not Going Out returns for another series, with yet another one already confirmed for next year, it's clear that the show isn't going anywhere. It has clocked up over 100 episodes and proudly holds the title of the longest-running UK sitcom currently on air. READ MORE: Emmerdale star 'so excited' as they confirm they're pregnant in sweet post READ MORE: Coronation Street Billy's exit storyline 'revealed' after soap axe and it's devastating "We'll never catch up with Last Of The Summer Wine," Lee jests. "Thank God. Our show is seen as very traditional, and some would say old fashioned, so therefore not risky, but it is a risk because it's the minority. The highs and lows are extreme. Love or hate the studio sitcom, there's no denying that they are really trying to go for the laugh. I'm not trying to write a line that makes people smile. "You don't get canned smiling. I used to aim for a joke on every page, but that's only every 30 seconds, it's not enough. We try for a laugh in every line." The 56 year old star, known for his appearances on Would I Lie To You? and as the host of game show The 1% Club, shines in the sitcom as 'Lee' with Sally Bretton playing his long-suffering wife Lucy. Since its inception in 2006, the series has charted their journey from awkward flatmates to a married couple with three kids, through a rollercoaster of 'will-they-won't they' tension. In the latest episodes, which Lee insisted on filming 'as live' to capture the essence of theatre, viewers are treated to a wild mix of scenarios including a robotic sex doll and a shambolic hotel stay, not to mention a rundown campervan, stints as TV extras, and a cheeky nod to the chaos of Oasis concert ticket sales. However, production faced a brief setback due to a health scare. Lee recalls a concerning moment during the Oasis-themed episode: "There was a moment in that Oasis episode when we were filming it, when Sally said to me - she looked a bit in pain, 'Do you know what appendicitis feels like? '"He recounts his initial disbelief: "I said, 'I have no idea but I can tell you now you haven't got appendicitis, otherwise you wouldn't be here filming'. The next day she had her appendix out. "Lee, who pens the show alongside Daniel Peak, affectionately pokes fun at Oasis in an episode where the couple's online ticket-buying turns into a blame game. He shares with a chuckle: "That is based in truth - I'm a massive Oasis fan, I did try to get tickets, I didn't get them and I'm livid. "He also reveals his attempt to involve one of the Gallagher brothers in the episode: "I thought, wouldn't it be great if I could get Liam or Noel to appear in that episode. My friend Rob Brydon had interviewed Noel, so I asked for his number. " The day after the ticket release, I sent a text to Noel saying, 'I know this isn't a good time, but I reckon everyone's asking for tickets and I'm probably the only one that isn't. Will you be in my sitcom?' He never got back to me." Lee shares: "My personal favourite episode is the one where I accidentally bring home a robot sex doll. Let me tell you, robotic sex dolls are very hard to get hold of. We initially had an actor, wearing a mask, but it just didn't work. We could see her breathing. So in the end, they had to create a robot. It was brilliant. It moved its head, its mouth, its eyes, and I found myself in a double act with a sex robot. " The forthcoming series has a time jump of several years, with Lee and Lucy now finding themselves as empty nesters. With plenty of time for each other, what could possibly go wrong? Quite a lot, as it turns out. The first episode follows their thwarted attempt to move house when they find their dream home, but Lee needs to use the loo, leading to the usual tension, mistaken identities and farce. There's also a touch of nostalgia, with a photo on the mantelpiece in their new home of Bobby Ball, who played Lee's dad and passed away in October 2020. "We all miss him a lot. He was like me, he wasn't from an acting background - so whatever I'm like in a studio, he was 50 times worse. The director would have to tell him not to keep looking at the audience every time he cracked a joke." A plethora of talented stars has made appearances on the show over the years, including Miranda Hart, Tim Vine, Katy Wix, Abigail Cruttenden, and Hugh Dennis. Interestingly, many fans have forgotten that Catherine Tate initially played the role of Lucy in the pilot, which was later taken over by Megan Dodds in the first series, before Sally, of Beyond Paradise fame, assumed the part. "When we look back, Sally and I do get a bit emotional," Lee says, "We've been in the show a long time and there are different eras of it, especially when you look at all the people from the past who have been in the show and come and gone. Sally's aged brilliantly, whereas I've got a big gray beard. It's been forever."
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
2 key findings on Democrats' brand problem from the new CNN poll
There's new evidence that the Democratic Party's reputation is in a bad place. That doesn't mean the party is doomed, electorally speaking. There's plenty of reason to doubt that, given lots of history and its performance in the 2025 elections thus far — but it is a complicating factor for the party's path forward. And a new CNN poll conducted by SSRS provides insights into the party's problems. It's worth a breakdown. The poll, which was released Sunday, asked a battery of questions about how people view both parties. Perhaps most striking was that people were more likely to view the Republicans than Democrats as the party with strong leaders (40% to 16%) and even the 'party of change' (32% to 25%). Neither party won close to a majority in either category. But the former is notable because there is such a gulf between the two parties. And the latter is notable because the party that's out of power is usually viewed as the party of change. Not this time. So what can we read into these findings? The 'strong leaders' question might be the most troublesome finding for Democrats. Only about 1 in 6 Americans said Democrats have stronger leaders than Republicans. As remarkably, only 39% of Democrats said that. We've seen hints of this in previous polls. A March CNN poll found about 3 in 10 Democrats and Democratic-leaning voters couldn't name a single leader who best reflected the party's core values. An AP-NORC poll last month showed just 35% of Democrats said they were at least 'somewhat' optimistic about the future of their party, compared with 55% of Republicans for their party. This might not seem too surprising. We just said goodbye to a Democratic president (Joe Biden) who was a diminished figure even when he was still in office. And the Democratic nominee who replaced him (Kamala Harris) wasn't exactly viewed as the future of the party when she took over the ticket in the 2024 race — and then lost. But there was a time when Democrats were at a somewhat similar crossroads, and the numbers weren't as dismal. A CNN/Opinion Research Corporation poll asked the same question in 2006 — after John Kerry's unsuccessful emergence as Democrats' 2004 presidential candidate — and found a smaller 14-point advantage for Republicans. Back then, 63% of Democrats said their party had stronger leaders than Republicans — 24 points higher than today. One reason for the difference is that the 2025 and 2006 polls asked the question in a slightly different way, partly because one was conducted entirely by phone and the other mostly online. Today's poll gave people an explicit 'neither' option, which the 2006 poll didn't (though some people volunteered that option back then). Nearly half of Democrats in the new poll (48%) chose that option. That's still a remarkable finding. Combined with the 13% of Democrats who said Republicans have the stronger leaders, that's 6 in 10 Democrats this year who don't think their side has stronger leaders than a party led by a president whom a huge majority of them revile. The other notable finding is on which party is the 'party of change.' Americans chose Republicans, 32% to 25%. That's not a big gap, but it is counterintuitive given Republicans swept the House, Senate and White House last fall. Historically speaking, it's almost always the party that's out of power that's viewed as the party of change. Before the 2006 election, the same CNN-ORC poll mentioned above showed Democrats had a huge, 56% to 29% lead on this measure. Then, as now, Democrats didn't hold the presidency or either chamber of Congress. But the numbers are very different today. Not only do Democrats trail on this measure, but only a slight majority of Democrats themselves — 51% — say their party is the party of change. And only 18% of independents say that. It's likely this is, in part, about Democrats' failure to position themselves as change agents, but also about what President Donald Trump is doing — and about people not necessarily seeing 'change' as a good thing. However you feel about the changes Trump is making, there is no question he is pushing lots of them. You see that in his and the Department of Government Efficiency's rapid overhaul of the federal government and in Trump's historic efforts to expand executive power — in ways that are often being halted by the courts because they go too far, too fast. It's possible that people just see Trump changing lots of things, whether for good or ill in their opinions, so the 'party of change' mantle doesn't mean what it usually does. We already saw during the 2024 campaign that people's definitions of 'change' were somewhat jumbled by unusual circumstances — i.e., Harris replacing Biden, and a former president running as the challenger. But it's also pretty clear that Democrats have failed to make themselves into a viable and attractive alternative to the party in power. The new CNN poll also asked which party people viewed as the 'party that can get things done.' Republicans led on this by a nearly 2-to-1 margin, 36% to 19%. Only 49% of Democrats and 11% of independents picked the Democratic Party as the more formidable one. There's also, of course, Republicans' big edge on the 'strong leaders' question. None of this means Democrats are sunk in the 2026 elections — or anything close to it. History shows the party that doesn't hold the White House almost always wins midterm elections, in large part because they're viewed as a check on the president. Democrats and liberal candidates have also been doing well in special elections and other races held since the 2024 election. In other words, being not-Trump could be good enough to at least reclaim a very closely split House. But if the Democratic Party wants to run up the score in 2026 and really chart a path for the 2028 election, it has some real work to do on its branding.
