logo
Why India must aim to win information wars

Why India must aim to win information wars

Hindustan Times2 days ago

Disinformation dominated the recent India–Pakistan conflict. India won the physical fight; we have not yet won the information war. Until it does, New Delhi will struggle to de-hyphenate India and Pakistan globally — an essential strand of our foreign policy.
Once the printing press transformed knowledge distribution, propaganda became a core component of war. Both World Wars saw the use of newspapers, posters, radio and film for mass persuasion. Our challenge now is to craft an information war strategy that accounts for the media landscape, from Artificial Intelligence (AI) and social media to the still powerful legacy medium of broadcast television.
India's private sector already excels in natural language processing (NLP), which is a dual-use capability in the context of information warfare. Indian AI models can easily train on a spectrum of languages, dialects and socio-cultural cues — Urdu and Punjabi variants across the border, regimental slang within the Pakistan army, even the memes that circulate in closed loop apps. Put simply, NLP could be used to speak inside the adversary's head, fracturing morale and redirecting attention long before any kinetic move is made.
Synthetic video is just as dual-use. A well-known 2022 deepfake of President Volodymyr Zelensky urging Ukrainian troops to surrender went viral before Kyiv debunked it. Pakistan tried using low-grade gaming footage of fighter jets being shot out of the sky against us, yet unsuspecting users still amplified it. India's democratic fabric is a force multiplier: Journalists, fact-checkers and civic technologists can inoculate the public against synthetic videos even as the security establishment perfects its own offensive repertoire. Parallelly, New Delhi should rally around like-minded capitals to draft a military code of conduct — setting red lines for deepfake use during peacetime. Autonomous chatbots can also infiltrate adversary networks and poison their information space, while real-time AI-enabled dashboards track public sentiment. Building these capabilities is vital, but so is shielding citizens from misuse.
India's current response — Press Information Bureau fact-checks, official military handles and the blocking of more than 8,000 X.com accounts — works, but only up to a point. The government and platforms should plan in peacetime to create trusted information repositories, much as they did during Covid-19. Platform-originated feeds carrying verified advisories would have quelled the conflict time rumours that briefly sparked panic.
Disinformation hops quickly from open networks to closed, encrypted apps. Public-private cooperation must therefore run deep and span multiple platforms, replicating the signal-sharing model now taking shape against online frauds and scams. After the Zelensky deepfake, X announced it would keep the clip online when shared to debunk disinformation, but remove it when shared to deceive — an approach that balances transparency with harm reduction. Meanwhile, large-scale media literacy drives should flip India's instinctive 'trust, then verify' mindset to 'verify, then trust', especially among users who see digital content as inherently authoritative.
Winning the narrative is futile if the channels that deliver it can be jammed, spoofed, or severed. Information warfare thus unfolds on two inseparable fronts: The stories we tell, and the networks — satellites, cables — that carry those stories to friend and foe alike. Protecting and hardening this plumbing is as critical as shaping the content.
Unauthorised Starlink terminals have already surfaced with militant groups in Manipur during an internet shutdown and with smugglers on the high seas. Recent Indian rules sensibly require low earth orbit satellite operators to demonstrate lawful interception capability, set up gateways in India, share terminal data with security agencies and prevent unverified foreign devices or offshore data decryption.
Another front is physical resilience. India hosts just 17 sub-sea cables — Singapore has 26 — despite our 11,098 km coastline and Indo-Pacific location. Quad leaders' May 20, 2023 statement backed 'high-quality underwater cable networks' across the region. With India set to host the next summit, accelerating that initiative should be a priority.
Domestic news channels repeatedly aired unverified 'exclusives' until government advisories intervened. Beyond restraining sensationalism on prime-time news, India needs a global voice. Attempts to expand Doordarshan (DD)'s international reach have stalled under thin finances, a legacy workforce, and dated production quality. Al Jazeera and Russia Today (RT) illustrate what focused investment can achieve for countries with far less soft power. If fixing DD requires a mission-mode effort, so be it. Credible, high-quality Indian perspectives must be available worldwide.
India's information war doctrine must marry cutting-edge technology and robust public infrastructure with a society trained — beginning in school — to question, verify and act on reliable information. We have secured victory on the ground; the contest for minds and screens is still underway.
Vivan Sharan is partner, Koan Advisory Group. The views expressed are personal.
Get 360° coverage—from daily headlines to 100 year archives.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

India opposes ADB's $800mn loan to Pakistan
India opposes ADB's $800mn loan to Pakistan

Hindustan Times

time26 minutes ago

  • Hindustan Times

India opposes ADB's $800mn loan to Pakistan

India opposed a move by the Asian Development Bank (ADB) to grant a $800 million loan to Pakistan citing evidence of Islamabad diverting development funds for military use, and cautioned the bank about impending credit risks, two officials familiar with the matter said. India shared deep concerns regarding the potential misuse of ADB resources, particularly in light of Pakistan's increasing defence expenditure, its declining tax-to-GDP ratio, and the lack of demonstrable progress on key macroeconomic reforms, they added, requesting anonymity. India's strong opposition to ADB's financial aid to Pakistan came almost a month after New Delhi protested the International Monetary Fund's decision to provide a $2.3 billion bailout package to Islamabad, which saw IMF imposing about a dozen stringent conditions attached with the credit facility, making diversion of funds almost impossible. The IMF loan to Pakistan came in the midst of Operation Sindoor, India's direct military response to the April 22 terror strike at Pahalgam in Kashmir that killed 26 civilians in what was the worst attack on civilians since the 26/11 Mumbai strikes. India launched the operation in the early hours of May 7, bombing nine terror camps in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir (PoK). The pre-dawn strikes --- which killed at least 100 terrorists --- sparked four days of strikes and counterstrikes with fighter jets, missiles, drones, long-range weapons and heavy artillery. Between the launch of the operation in the early hours of May 7 and the ceasefire on the evening of May 10, Indian forces bombed nine terror camps in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir, and the IAF struck targets at 13 Pakistani air bases and military installations. According to a PTI report from Islamabad on Tuesday, ADB approved a $800 million loan to Pakistan for strengthening its fiscal sustainability and improving its public financial management. The credit package included a $300 million policy-based loan (PBL) and a $500 million programme-based guarantee (PBG), the report said. Reacting to this, New Delhi 'vehemently' opposed the move and shared deep concerns regarding the potential misuse of ADB resources, the officials cited above said. The linkage between Pakistan's increase in expenditure on its military, as opposed to on development, cannot be fully explained solely in terms of its domestic resource mobilization, they said. India highlighted that Pakistan's tax collection as a share of GDP declined from 13% in FY18 to 9.2% in FY23 and continues to remain way lower than the Asia and Pacific average of about 19%. However, there has been a significant increase in defence spending in the same period. This points to the possibility of diversion of funds made available to the country by external agencies, the officials explained. 'India expects the ADB management to adequately ring-fence the ADB financing, to prevent any such misuse,' one of them said. New Delhi questioned the management's argument that improvements were noticed in certain areas of reforms in Pakistan, and said that had the previous programs, funded both from ADB and the IMF, succeeded in putting in place a sound macroeconomic policy environment, the country would not have approached the IMF for the 24th bail-out program, this person added. 'Such a track record calls into question both the effectiveness of the program designs, their monitoring and their implementation by the authorities,' he said. Pakistan's poor track record of implementation stems from the military's deeply entrenched interference in economic affairs, posing risks of policy slippages and reversal of reforms as has been witnessed in the past, he added. Even when a civilian government is in power now, the army continues to play an outsized role in domestic politics and extends its tentacles deep into the economy. The situation has not changed for the better; rather the Pakistan Army now plays a leading role in the Special Investment Facilitation Council of Pakistan, he said. 'In fact, India expressed strong reservations about Pakistan's existing governance system, which poses a continuing severe threat to regional peace and security. The country's policy of cross-border terrorism has led to a worsening of the security situation in the region and has significantly escalated macroeconomic risks for Pakistan, which also heightens the enterprise risks for the ADB.' India expects the ADB to closely monitor the implementation of the policy matrix to achieve the intended outcomes, this official said. Pakistan's continued reliance on external debt raises concerns about the long-term sustainability of future exposures, especially in view of the high debt-to-GDP ratio and poor credit rating of the country, he added.

Conflicting words: Bengalureans opine on actor Kamal Haasan's language remark
Conflicting words: Bengalureans opine on actor Kamal Haasan's language remark

New Indian Express

time34 minutes ago

  • New Indian Express

Conflicting words: Bengalureans opine on actor Kamal Haasan's language remark

This controversy seems more like a politically-motivated stunt orchestrated by certain parties in Karnataka. Kamal Haasan has made immense contributions to Indian cinema – not just to Tamil cinema, he has seen himself as an Indian artiste. In fact, Mani Ratnam's first film was in Kannada, Pallavi Anu Pallavi (1983) and both he and Haasan have consistently expressed their love and respect for the Kannada language and its people. This controversy appears to be a deliberate attempt by some politicians to create unnecessary division. He absolutely does not need to apologise for a misunderstanding. Haasan has already clarified his intention and statement — an apology is unnecessary. Yes, there may be financial losses in crores, but he has taken a principled stance, and that's a risk he is willing to take. This controversy is likely to backfire — it's a significant loss for the Karnataka theatre associations. Moreover, it could strain the relationship between the Tamil and Kannada film industries.

Belgium says man behind posters on Netanyahu is linked to its embassy
Belgium says man behind posters on Netanyahu is linked to its embassy

Indian Express

timean hour ago

  • Indian Express

Belgium says man behind posters on Netanyahu is linked to its embassy

Belgium on Wednesday confirmed that the foreign citizen who allegedly put up posters carrying a photograph of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu alongside the word 'Wanted' in Chanakyapuri area of the national capital was a staffer of a government export and investment agency linked to its embassy. On Tuesday, The Indian Express had reported that the Delhi Police have approached the Union Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) on the issue. Responding to questions from The Indian Express, the Belgian Foreign Ministry spokesperson said on Wednesday, 'The Belgian Ministry of Foreign Affairs is aware of the incident.' The spokesperson said the 'person works for the Wallonia Export & Investment Agency (AWEX)'. Wallonia is one of the three regions of Belgium — the other two being Brussels and Flanders — and has some companies which are world leaders in armaments, glass production, lime and limestone production, and aviation parts. AWEX is the region's government agency in charge of foreign trade promotion and foreign investment attraction. 'For the time being, (neither) the Belgian Ministry of Foreign Affairs nor the Embassy of Belgium in New Delhi have received requests from the Indian authorities on this matter,' the spokesperson said. The Indian Express had reported that the matter came to light around 7.30 am on May 29 when personnel from the Chanakyapuri police station spotted two such posters on electricity poles – one near the Carmel Convent School in Malcha Marg and another near the American Embassy School. 'They informed their seniors and were asked to remove the posters,' a Delhi Police officer had said. 'After scanning footage from around 50 CCTV cameras, police personnel found that a man wearing a blue shirt and black trousers came on a bicycle at around 5.30 am and put up one of the posters on an electricity pole. After scanning multiple CCTV cameras, it has been revealed that he left from one of the flats in Sardar Patel Marg,' the officer had said. A team from the Chanakyapuri police station then reached his residence and identified the occupant. Since it involves a foreign national working for an agency associated with the Belgium Embassy, the Indian officials are cautious on how to proceed. It is a sensitive matter pertaining to certain immunities granted to embassy staffers. Although the person concerned is not a diplomat and therefore doesn't enjoy full diplomatic immunity, it is a grey area and Delhi is treading the issue with some degree of caution.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store