logo
Democrats reach historic goal: A full slate in Virginia House races

Democrats reach historic goal: A full slate in Virginia House races

Yahoo07-05-2025

Rocco DeBellis, a 57-year-old chef and Bronx native (pictured here with his wife Lenore), has filed to run as a Democrat in House District 100. (Photo courtesy of Rocco DeBellis)
For the first time in recent memory, Virginia Democrats have candidates running in all 100 House of Delegates districts — a milestone party leaders and grassroots organizers say reflects rising momentum as President Donald Trump's second term continues to galvanize opposition.
Rocco DeBellis, a 57-year-old chef, Bronx native, and Cape Charles resident, filed this week to run in House District 100, making it the final district to be contested and completing the Democrats' full slate. DeBellis, who runs a catering business and serves as the private chef to TV personality Judith Sheindlin — better known as Judge Judy — is challenging Del. Rob Bloxom, R-Accomack, in a district that spans the Eastern Shore and parts of Virginia Beach.
'Nobody else had put their hat in the ring, so I said, it can't go uncontested,' DeBellis said. 'This guy has to have at least somebody playing a little defense against him. If nobody else is going to step up and do it, I will gladly.'
The decision by DeBellis — who calls himself a Bernie Sanders-style Democrat and critiques what he sees as the outsized influence of corporate power in politics — is emblematic of a broader push by Democrats to compete statewide, even in ruby-red territory.
Trump carried District 100 with 52% of the vote in 2024, and Bloxom defeated Democrat Charlena Jones 60-40% in 2023. The last time a Democrat won the district — three years before the Virginia Supreme Court redrew the maps — was in 2018, when U.S. Sen. Tim Kaine defeated Republican Corey Stewart with 53-47% of the vote.
And this year, some Democratic organizers say they're refusing to cede any ground.
The full-court press is led in part by Dr. Fergie Reid Jr., a retired physician and longtime political activist who has made it his mission to recruit candidates in every district, especially those overlooked by traditional party infrastructure.
The son of Dr. William Ferguson Reid, the first Black Virginian elected to the General Assembly since Reconstruction, Reid said this milestone holds special meaning in a year when his father, founder of the 90 for 90 Voter Registration Project, celebrated a milestone birthday.
'Dad turned 100 a few weeks ago. There are 100 districts in the state house,' Reid said. 'My goal is not to let what happened in 2021 happen again, especially on Dad's 100th year when he's watching. He's been calling me every night to make sure that we get in 100 districts.'
'A unique moment in the future of America'
Four years ago, Democrats had initially recruited candidates in all districts but only ended up fielding nominees in 93 after some dropped out. Reid blames the party for failing to retain them.
'This year, we got 100 districts. And the real reason to have this happen … is that Virginia is the first opportunity for really any state in the United States to answer back to what's going on in Washington right now,' he said. 'It's going to send a big loud message to the rest of the country and to the world that, yeah, not everybody in America is with Trump.'
Del. Dan Helmer, D-Fairfax, who chairs the House Democrats' campaign efforts, praised the recruitment effort and called it a reflection of the stakes facing the country in 2025.
'This is a unique moment in the future of America in which those who want to preserve our systems of government, our economy, and our freedoms, know they need to step forward,' Helmer said in a phone interview Wednesday.
'We are going to win seats this year. We're going to hold a majority. We're going to protect Virginians. We're going to make sure that we are the bulwark in the storm that is the Trump-Musk administration.'
The historic sweep could also pay off strategically, said Stephen Farnsworth, a political scientist at the University of Mary Washington.
'This is a big development from the perspective of turnout,' Farnsworth said. 'Even in districts where you're not going to win, you're going to help pump up the vote for your party, and that can help statewide candidates.'
After news of DeBellis' candidacy surfaced online, Loudoun County GOP Chairman Scott Pio voiced his frustration on social media — not at Democrats, but at his own party.
'Oh Look! Democrats competing in every single seat in Virginia. Yet, the Republicans are missing 30 seats,' Pio wrote on X, referencing data from the Virginia Public Access Project showing Republicans fielding candidates in only 70 House races.
Taking aim at GOP leadership, including Republican Party of Virginia Chair Mark Peake, Pio added: 'We are headed for disaster in November. It was a campaign promise of mine to contest every single seat in the House. We would have filled every single one of them!!! The RPV does not have their eyes on the prize. Rather just to become famous.'
Party leaders remain at odds with Reid
Despite his effort in putting Democrats ahead of Republicans, Reid's role hasn't been without controversy. This cycle alone, he claims credit for recruiting Democratic candidates in 23 Republican-leaning districts and hasn't hesitated to call out the Democratic Party of Virginia for what he sees as strategic failures. That has sometimes strained relations with party brass.
In a Feb. 8 email obtained by The Mercury, Tina Winkler, a top DPVA official, warned local party leaders to be cautious when dealing with Reid, accusing him of being 'harassing and intrusive' and urging that they were 'not obligated to take his calls.' She also expressed concerns that he was encouraging some candidates to skip the required petition process.
Reid, in response, refuted the latter as a 'flat-out lie,' and defended his efforts. 'They like to call it being pushy. I don't call it that,' he said. 'I might be a thorn in the side of folk, but that's because this exposes the fact that they're not doing their homework.'
UMW's Farnsworth, however, said Democrats should recognize Reid's value.
'Fergie Reid is doing a huge favor for the Democratic Party of Virginia, even if they don't want to recognize it as such,' he said. 'Persuading someone to run in a district that is overwhelmingly supportive of the other party takes some serious energy.'
Asked about Reid's contributions, Helmer was careful with his words but acknowledged the broader team effort.
'I'm grateful for all of the amazing partners we have, and thankful for all the people who have stepped forward to run,' he said. 'We, as a House Democratic caucus, have provided support to more candidates than ever in history, and will continue to do that in order to make sure that we deliver for the people.'
As for DeBellis, the chef-turned-candidate said he's not running with illusions of flipping the seat easily — but with the conviction that every voter deserves a choice. Raised by a single mother with disabilities, he said he saw firsthand how government aid could make the difference between dependency and independence.
'She got government assistance to get a van so she could go to work and not stay home on welfare,' he said of his mom, who is deceased. 'She was my idol, she was a fighter — and she was a Trump supporter for one issue — abortion.'
DeBellis said he doesn't know much about his opponent Bloxom personally but believes it's fair to ask what he's delivered for the district.
'He's been there for over a decade, and I'm curious as to what have the people gotten from it?' he said. 'I'm sure he's a wonderful man, but I'm just curious — what has he been doing?'
Bloxom notched several bipartisan legislative wins this year.
He sponsored bills to streamline permitting for marine construction projects, shift dredging grant oversight to the Marine Resources Commission, and eliminate redundant state licensing for produce dealers already covered by federal law.
Bloxom also broke with most Republicans in 2024 to support legislation safeguarding same-sex marriage in Virginia.
In a phone interview Wednesday, Bloxom said having a Democratic challenger this year means he'll need to kick his campaign into gear and begin fundraising.
While redistricting has altered the boundaries of House District 100, Bloxom said the core character of the district remains unchanged, particularly on the Eastern Shore, where local issues often outweigh party politics.
'My experience has been that some of the people who've moved here from off the Shore came to learn that we were always more concerned with the Eastern Shore, and it didn't really matter if you were a Republican or Democrat,' Bloxom said.
'(Former delegate) Lynwood Lewis carried the area for 10 years before me, and he was a Democrat, and my father had it before Lyn, and he was Republican. But some of the people that have moved here in recent years are just so die hard. I mean, you can't even talk to them.'
DeBellis and his wife Lenore now live full-time in Cape Charles, where she owns a café and he sometimes teaches boxing at the local YMCA. As campaign season heats up, DeBellis said he's ready to lace up the gloves — politically speaking.
'I think corporate America is greedy,' he said. 'They have put us in a position now that we're in with all these oligarchs running around, and Trump is a disaster for any sense of this. He's a disaster just as a human being, forget the presidency.'
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Homeland Security seeks weapons, drones for LA immigration crackdown
Homeland Security seeks weapons, drones for LA immigration crackdown

Yahoo

time12 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Homeland Security seeks weapons, drones for LA immigration crackdown

WASHINGTON —The Department of Homeland Security has asked the Pentagon for help in transporting weapons from Fort Benning in Georgia and another site in Wyoming to Los Angeles, where its immigration crackdown has become increasingly militarized. The request came Monday after President Donald Trump and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth ordered thousands of National Guard troops and 700 active-duty Marines to Los Angeles over the objection of California Gov. Gavin Newsom. Trump and Hegseth said the troops are needed to restore order, protect federal buildings and law enforcement officials arresting and deporting migrants in the United States illegally. The request from Homeland Security, confirmed by a Defense official, also seeks 'drone surveillance support,' direction to troops on detaining or arresting 'lawbreakers,' and graduates from an organization like the Marines' School of Advanced Warfighting School for setting up a joint operation center. It's unclear what type of weapons Homeland Security officials are seeking for their immigration crackdown in California. Also unclear: who would use them and who they would be used against. Pentagon officials are reviewing the request, according to the official who was not authorized to speak publicly. The Department of Homeland Security did not immediately respond to a request for comment on its request. On Wednesday, Sen. Jack Reed, D-Rhode Island, asked Hegseth if he would authorize drones and the use of 'military forces to detain or arrest American citizens.' Reed is a member of the Senate Defense Approprations subcommittee and the top Democrat on the Armed Services Committee. Hegseth did not answer directly, saying, 'Senator, every authorization we've provided, the National Guard, and the Marines in Los Angeles is under the authority of the president of the United States. Is lawful and constitutional.' Active-duty troops are generally barred by federal law from participating in law enforcement operations, based on century's old tradition separating the military from domestic policing. There is an exception under the Insurrection Act that allows the president to use the military to put down an internal rebellion. National Guard troops have fewer restrictions. Immigration and Customs Enforcement officials are carrying out a directive from Trump to find immigrants living in the United States without legal status. Protests have sprung up against the sweeps the agency is carrying out in various neighborhoods. News that Homeland Security officials want ammunition, drones and combat expertise follows another request it made of the Pentagon. That one seeks for the first time more than 20,000 National Guard troops for their 'support of interior immigration enforcement operations.' That could put Guardsmen far from the southern border -- where they have supported enforcement operations for years -- and thrust them into center of the administration's crackdown on illegal immigration in American cities. "DHS requested 20,000 National Guard members to help carry out the president's mandate from the American people to arrest and deport criminal illegal aliens," DHS assistant secretary Tricia McLaughlin said in a statement. "The Department of Homeland Security will use every tool and resource available to get criminal illegal aliens including gang members, murderers, pedophiles, and other violent criminals out of our country. The safety of American citizens comes first.' More: Trump wants 20,000 troops to hunt, transport immigrants. Cost estimate: $3.6 billion It's not a given that these requests will be granted in part or in full. Pentagon officials review the proposals and decide what the military can spare without compromising its mission. This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Homeland Security seeks weapons, drones for LA immigration crackdown

Texas Gov. Greg Abbott orders National Guard to immigration protests
Texas Gov. Greg Abbott orders National Guard to immigration protests

Yahoo

time12 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Texas Gov. Greg Abbott orders National Guard to immigration protests

Texas is following President Donald Trump's lead, and will deploy the National Guard in preparation for planned protests in the state as demonstrations against immigration raids spread throughout the country in solidarity with Los Angeles. Gov. Greg Abbott, a Republican and ally of Trump, said the evening of June 10 he would send the Guard members to locations across the state to "ensure peace & order." "Peaceful protest is legal. Harming a person or property is illegal & will lead to arrest," he said in a post to X. "@TexasGuard will use every tool & strategy to help law enforcement maintain order." Immigration and Customs Enforcement is carrying out a directive from Trump to find immigrants living in the United States without legal status. Protests have sprung up against the sweeps the agency is carrying out in various neighborhoods. In Los Angeles, where protests continued for the last five days, Trump sent National Guard members and U.S. Marines despite the objections of Gov. Gavin Newsom, sparking a showdown between the federal government and state authorities. Abbott's decision comes after protesters in Austin clashed with police on June 9. Police fired less-lethal munitions and detained several people accused of throwing rocks at officers and graffitiing a federal building, Austin Police Chief Lisa Davis said at a news conference. One person was arrested in Dallas after police declared a demonstration unlawful and a firework exploded near police, according to CBS News Texas. Demonstrators in Austin earlier this week began marching peacefully, but police intervened and made eight arrests after some of the protesters graffitied state and federal buildings and others threw "very large rocks" at officers, Davis said. Officers used pepper balls – projectiles that contain a chemical akin to pepper spray – and tear gas to quell the crowd, she said. Two of the people arrested face criminal mischief charges for spray painting the buildings, she said. Other charges include harassment of a public servant and failure to obey a lawful order to disperse. Those arrested ranged in age from 21 to 37. "Don't mess with Texas law enforcement," Abbott said on social media in response to the arrests. Davis said four officers were injured in the scuffle and were treated and released from hospitals. Three were injured by rocks thrown by protesters and one sustained a shoulder injury during an arrest, during which a protester also spit in his eye, Davis said. "These were very large rocks, these were no small pebbles," she said. Davis said officers are preparing for additional demonstrations in Austin, including on June 14. Demonstrations against ICE raids and in solidarity with Los Angeles protesters have sprung up in major cities all around the United States in recent days. Local news outlets and police have reported protests in San Francisco, New York, Washington, Boston, Dallas, Chicago, Atlanta and more. The protests have remained largely peaceful but in some cases turned into clashes with police and led to arrests. In New York City, 86 people were taken into custody on June 10 as hundreds rallied near the city's main immigration court, the New York Police Department said. The day before, more than 30 were arrested ABC 7 reported. Among those were about two dozen arrested from the lobby of Trump Tower, the outlet reported. Some of the nationwide protests were launched by union members in response to the arrest of David Huerta, president of the Service Employees International Union California (SEIU), in Los Angeles on June 6. More than 200 union members and supporters in Boston gathered outside City Hall on June 9, NPR affiliate WBUR reported. In Washington, D.C., hundreds gathered outside the Department of Justice and FBI buildings and marched through the city protesting both ICE raids and Huerta's arrest, according to WUSA9. While the anti-ICE protests continue, "No Kings Day" protests are planned nationwide on June 14, the day Trump will hold a military parade in Washington, D.C., and also celebrate his 79th birthday. Contributing: Christopher Cann, USA TODAY This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Greg Abbott orders National Guard to Texas immigration protests

Opinion - Thomas Massie and Warren Davidson: Two Republican profiles in courage
Opinion - Thomas Massie and Warren Davidson: Two Republican profiles in courage

Yahoo

time15 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Opinion - Thomas Massie and Warren Davidson: Two Republican profiles in courage

The passage of the budget reconciliation bill by the House of Representatives in the early hours of May 22 demonstrated once again President Trump's ability to win the votes of Republican members of Congress. But there were two noteworthy exceptions. Reps. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.) and Warren Davidson (R-Ohio) were the only Republicans to resist Trump's pressure and vote against his so-called 'big, beautiful bill.' Both men deserve the country's gratitude, even from those on the political left who would struggle to find much in common with these far-right conservatives. Both men are comfortable with Trump's MAGA-world and both have voting records that put them at odds with Democrats. But in voting to oppose the tax bill, they demonstrated that their convictions are real and lived up to the ideal of an independent legislative branch capable of acting without a president's direction. Alongside a Republican party unwilling to balance the power of the presidency, Democrats have demonstrated an equally unproductive tendency to place loyalty to a party leader above their constituents and the country. The aggressive efforts to downplay, dismiss and cover up former President Joe Biden's declining faculties in 2024 offers a prime example of this type of misplaced loyalty. Maryland Gov. Wes Moore (D) went so far as to explain his support for Biden after the June 2024 presidential debate by saying simply, 'I don't do disloyalty.' This sentiment was indicative of a Democratic Party wholly unwilling to call out the obvious — whose leaders and members chose instead to misinform the American people. With their votes in favor of Trump's tax bill, too many Republican members of Congress have done something similar. Rep. Andy Harris (R-Md.) took a middle path, voting 'present' rather than for or against the bill. But the effect of that meek decision pales in comparison to the clarity offered by Massie and Davidson. Both opposed the bill because they know it massively increases the size of the federal government's annual deficit and relies on future members of Congress to address a problem that needs to be resolved now. Their unwillingness to kick the can further down the road is in keeping with the character it takes to stand up to a president who is willing to threaten the political future of Republicans who oppose his will. Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska) was courageous enough to admit publicly what most Republicans understand in private: 'We are all afraid.' Republican politicians are intimidated by Trump and his allies. Murkowski has consistently demonstrated uncommon fortitude by her principled opposition to Trump when she disagrees with him or believes his policies will harm her constituents. Massie and Davidson have earned their place as the most principled Republicans in the House by sticking with their beliefs when faced with political consequences. They exemplify the idea that it is better to lose with your principles intact than to win after sacrificing them to political pressure and conformity. In recent decades, both Democrats and Republicans in Congress have abdicated their proper constitutional role in favor of powerful chief executives from their respective parties. At the same time, the judiciary has replaced Congress as the primary check on presidential power — a development that perhaps encourages courts to overstep their intended role. The rebalancing of power in the federal government will start only when members of Congress are willing to assert their independence. A more confident legislative branch would take pressure off the courts and allow them to return to a less activist role. Neither Massie nor Davidson is likely to earn plaudits from Democrats, who have demonstrated their own willingness to put party loyalty over country and are quick to dismiss the value of political independence. They showed this by their shoddy treatment of Rep. Dean Phillips (D-Minn.) after he challenged Biden for the nomination in 2024, and by their growing criticism of Sen. John Fetterman (D-Pa.) for deviating slightly from the ideology of the far left. Democrats have done and are doing exactly what they now accuse Republicans of doing by mindlessly supporting the president's tax bill. Massie and Davidson showed us something better. We might make real progress if more of their colleagues were willing to follow. Colin Pascal is a retired Army lieutenant colonel, a registered Democrat and a graduate student in the School of Public Affairs at American University in Washington, D.C. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store