Mitchell puts pressure on New Zealand and maintains England's World Cup focus
'New Zealand have more pressure on them to win the upcoming Rugby World Cup than us because they are on for the three-peat,' the England head coach, John Mitchell, said as his focus turns from celebrating Six Nations success to the looming global tournament.
The Black Ferns have won the past two Rugby World Cups, beating England in the 2017 and 2022 finals. But they have done a four-peat in the competition as they won the trophy from 1998-2010.
The Red Roses, who won their seventh consecutive Women's Six Nations title on Saturday with a 43‑42 victory against France, have not won the Rugby World Cup since 2014 despite dominating the sport in all other competitions in the past few years: in their past 62 games they have lost only one, that coming in the World Cup final three years ago.
Mitchell was asked if he and his coaches are keeping an eye on New Zealand pre-World Cup, particularly now that the Rugby World Cup all‑time try-scorer Portia Woodman‑Wickliffe has come out of retirement to compete in it.
'We are focusing more on the USA, Samoa and Australia [England's pool opponents],' Mitchell said. 'Then Wales, Scotland and France again in a semi‑final. If all things go to plan they [New Zealand] will be on the other side. We will deal with that if we earn the right but I think New Zealand are on for a three-peat in World Cups so there is probably more pressure on them to win a World Cup than us.'
The Rugby World Cup is being held in England and will start in August. Every team will have a squad of 32 and Mitchell said he does not know why the women's competition does not have 33-player squads like the men's Rugby World Cup.
Squads of 33 players for the men's competition were introduced for the 2023 tournament, an increase from 31, but it has not been brought in by World Rugby for the women's event. The women's squad number was initially increased to 30 from 28 but was upped to 32 for the tournament three years ago because of the pandemic.
Mitchell, who confirmed he would take 18 forwards and 14 backs to the tournament this year, said: 'It seems strange that the men's World Cup is 33 and we're only 32 and the teams have to come all this way.
'I think World Rugby will probably need to consider it going forward because otherwise you are going to have to wait for players to be flown from overseas. I think you have to wait until the 24-hours flight rule or whatever it is because the overseas teams would have to wait to bring their players in. I think 33 seems to be the right number, like [in] the men's game.'
It is understood the discrepancy in squad sizes is because the men's competition has more fixtures and the decision to remain at 32 players for the women's event this year was also taken in line with unions. But it is also thought that if unions wanted World Rugby to look into an increase in squad numbers for the next women's tournament in 2029, the governing body would be open to considering it.
Sign up to The Breakdown
The latest rugby union news and analysis, plus all the week's action reviewed
after newsletter promotion
The grand slam-winning match against France was England's final game until they compete in warm-up matches, which Mitchell confirmed were happening. The dates of the games have not been confirmed but the head coach said of his team's preparations: 'We take on Spain in a warm-up in Leicester and we have this mob again [France] somewhere in the south-west.'
The players will have five weeks off before almost three months of pre-season preparation for the tournament. The centre Meg Jones, who won the grand slam on Saturday, said the upcoming competition may be the highlight of many of the squad's careers.
'We want to make sure that we have had sufficient rest which we are going to get and then we are going to go into a home World Cup which is probably going to be the pinnacle of our careers,' Jones said. 'It is going to be amazing. We just want to relish that opportunity as much as we can and not take it for granted. A home World Cup, it doesn't come around often. The last one was 2010.'
England's Rugby World Cup campaign gets under way on 22 August against USA in Sunderland.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
34 minutes ago
- The Independent
2026 World Cup Odds: Latest World Cup Betting Odds
The countdown is on to the 2026 World Cup and betting sites have priced up the world's top international sides as they get set to contend for the biggest prize in football. The USA, Canada, and Mexico will combine to host the 23rd and biggest edition of the tournament, which will involve 48 nations. The 2026 World Cup odds suggest it will be a tight tournament with Spain, France, Brazil, England, current holders Argentina and Germany all 11/1 or shorter in the World Cup outright market. This page will detail the latest World Cup betting odds for the next tournament. We use the latest World Cup odds from the best football betting sites to offer readers optimum value on wagering on the 2026 edition of the competition. Readers will find not only the top value on World Cup winner odds but also markets for match and group betting as soon as they become available. All football betting odds come from our recommended betting sites, all of which are licensed by the UK Gambling Commission. The 2026 World Cup betting odds are dominated by the usual contenders with Spain and France on course to kick-off as the top two in the market. Spain are the reigning European champions and have one of the deepest squads in world football. But France, who have been involved in the last two World Cup finals, also have a vast talent pool with Kylian Mbappe, Ousmane Dembele and Desire Doue just some of the attacking options at their disposal. Argentina kicked-off the last World Cup second in the betting, but there have been previous winners from further down the list of contenders with France (7/1) fourth in the market in 2018 and Germany (6/1) third in 2014. It's worth keeping in mind that Italy in 1982 were the last double-figure winner of the World Cup having entered that tournament as 18/1 shots. Since then, all the winners have started at World Cup odds of 8/1 or less. Year Winner Host nation World Cup Odds 2022 Argentina Qatar 11/2 2018 France Russia 7/1 2014 Germany Brazil 6/1 2010 Spain South Africa 7/2 2006 Italy Germany 8/1 World Cup Betting Odds: Match betting Other than the hosts, only seven more countries have qualified for the competition so far, and the draw for the group stages will likely be in December 2025. Argentina, Japan and New Zealand are among those to have qualified, with the full fixtures for the group stages likely to be released a few months before June 2026. Be sure to check back when the teams and groups have been announced. World Cup Odds Explained Our recommended betting sites are licensed by the UK Gambling Commission, ensuring that users have a safe and fair betting experience. All World Cup odds and markets change to reflect matters on and off the field, so check regularly to find the best odds for your World Cup bets. Bettors can also take advantage of free bets provided by the UK betting sites for wagering on the World Cup and more. The World Cup is one of the biggest sporting events on the planet and bookmakers are usually generous when it comes to free bet offers, price boosts, money back bonuses and more. Responsible gambling When having a bet, it's vital to practice responsible gambling. When using gambling sites be aware that sports betting can be addictive. Please take steps to remain in control of your time and budget. The same applies whether you're using new betting sites, slot sites, casino sites, casino apps, betting apps, or any other gambling medium. Even the most knowledgeable punter can lose a bet, so always stick to a budget and never chase your losses. It's particularly important not to get carried away by any free bets or casino offers you might receive, both of which are available in abundance on gambling sites, but must be approached with caution. You can stay in control by making use of the responsible gambling tools offered, such as deposit limits, loss limits, self-exclusion and time-outs. You may also want to visit the following free organisations to discuss any issues with gambling you might be having:
North Wales Chronicle
42 minutes ago
- North Wales Chronicle
Northern Ireland talking points ahead of Iceland friendly
After back-to-back defeats away to Sweden and Denmark, Michael O'Neill's men will be looking forward to the home comforts of Windsor Park. Here, the PA news agency looks at the key talking points ahead of the game. Ahead of Iceland tomorrow, the press get an update from the boss and Isaac Price 🎙️ #GAWA — Northern Ireland (@NorthernIreland) June 9, 2025 O'Neill said at the start of the year he was happy Northern Ireland were drawn in a four-nation World Cup qualifying group as no competitive games before September gave him more time to prepare a young squad. But that time is now largely up with this the last run out before Northern Ireland travel to Luxembourg and then Germany for their opening Group A fixtures in September. Following two difficult away trips in the last two games, O'Neill will be looking for a confidence-boosting win before the campaign begins. O'Neill plans to freshen up his side for Tuesday's game, mindful that his players are at the end of a long season and many are at different places in terms of their fitness. Ali McCann started against Denmark despite not playing for Preston since March through injury, while Daniel Ballard has also seen limited action for Sunderland after an injury-impacted campaign. However, O'Neill pointed out that Northern Ireland do not have the depth to be making sweeping changes and still field a competitive side. Ronan Hale is still waiting for his Northern Ireland debut after first being called into the squad in March following a long wait for his switch of allegiance from the Republic of Ireland to come through. There had been an expectation in some quarters that the Ross County forward, who scored 18 goals in County's unsuccessful fight against relegation, might have got some minutes in Copenhagen but instead he was left on the bench again. O'Neill has warned that some players will come out of this camp without playing any minutes but, as Northern Ireland remain without an undisputed first-choice striker, Hale will be desperate to show what he can do. Pierce Charles seems likely to start again in goal after coming off the bench to replace an injured Conor Hazard at half-time in Saturday's 2-1 defeat in Copenhagen. If he does, the 19-year-old will be making his eighth appearance for Northern Ireland and fourth at Windsor Park, where he has won two and drawn one of his three previous games, keeping two clean sheets. Hazard has returned home following the injury, with 20-year-old Stephen McMullan called in as cover. Iceland manager Arnar Gunnlaugsson will be a familiar face to followers of English football, having played for Bolton, Leicester and Stoke during his playing career. The former forward is still getting his feet under the table as Iceland boss, having only taken over in January, with this to be his fourth game in charge. But Iceland travel to Belfast riding high on the back of an impressive 3-1 win over Scotland at Hampden Park, with Gunnlaugsson's aggressive pressing style delivering encouraging early results.
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
When will a team from North America, Asia or Africa win the men's World Cup?
We're now a year-ish from the World Cup. The tournament is still dominated by European and South American teams. But which continent without a winner (Asia, Africa, Central and North America and, I guess, Oceania) has the best chance of lifting the trophy first? – Stacey This is a fascinating question and one that brings a wide range of factors into play. To start, what difference will the expansion of the tournament make? On one hand, extending the tournament so the winner will have to get through eight games rather than seven probably makes shocks less likely, but on the other hand an extra knockout round adds another layer of randomness. Even with four knockout rounds, most champions usually had at least one game of significant jeopardy – a win on penalties, or an edgy one-goal victory after extra-time. Winning all five knockout games in 90 minutes, I suspect, will prove extremely rare but the likelihood is still that the winner will be one of the major European powers – France, Spain, Germany, England, Portugal, Italy and the Netherlands – or one of the big two from South America – Argentina and Brazil. On a similar note, weight of numbers should help the other confederations: 15 of the 32 qualifiers in 2022 were from outside Uefa and Conmebol; in 2026 either 25 or 26 of 48 will be. That should increase the chance of a side hitting a run of exceptional form at the right time. But this isn't just about confederations. Between 2006 and 2018, 13 of 16 semi-finalists in the World Cup were European. There was a clear sense within the game that the major western European nations had in effect industrialised youth production – to the extent that the majority of, say, Morocco's squad in 2022, had been trained in France. Add a wealthy league in which the best of a nation's youth can gain an exceptional and immediate education and the advantage enjoyed by western Europe is clear. Argentina bucked that trend in 2022, in part because of the brilliance of Lionel Messi, and in part because of its remarkable reserves of coaching talent (seven of the 10 Conmebol nations are managed by Argentinians, and that's without counting Óscar Ibáñez, who was born in Argentina but played for and now manages Peru). But to return to the specifics of the question: money helps, so the USA, Mexico and Canada have at least a slim chance of success. Africa has the talent but its football – and this is obviously a generalisation – is beset by poverty and corruption. Morocco showed their capacity in Qatar, and if, say, Nigeria or Senegal managed to find an enlightened coach who could bypass all the political issues at the same time they had a gifted generation, there's no reason there couldn't be an African winner – although it doesn't feel imminent. Asia, perhaps, is most likely, although we're probably only talking about three countries at the moment. Japan and South Korea have been regular World Cup qualifiers, their level has improved dramatically, there is money to invest, a deep-rooted passion for the game, and their players are increasingly gaining experience at the best clubs. Or there's Saudi Arabia, a traditional power in the Asian game, and hosts in 2034. We're yet to see what impact all the Saudi PIF's investment in football will have, but money, a political will to succeed, an improving league must give them at least an outside chance with home advantage in eight years. As an American, I defy anyone to argue the 1994 World Cup jersey is not the best in soccer history. Do you have any personal favorites? – Matt I confess I find the fetishisation of shirts a little odd. I hate over-fussy shirts, and I wish Sunderland would go back to black socks, but I'm not sure there are any shirts I really love. I was talking to a friend about this on the way to the Championship play-off final, looking at the masses of red-and-white all around while we were both wearing very neutral check shirts. We wondered whether it's because in our formative years of going to games, away games especially, in the late 80s and early 90s, it was useful to be able to blend into the background if any violence kicked off. But I suppose if pressed, I always quite liked the simple Adidas, early 80s, plain colour with three stripes along the sleeves – the pale-blue West Germany goalkeeper's top in particular. It's probably my age – I've watched football for nearly 70 years – but I really miss old-fashioned wingers, playing on the 'correct' wing, beating their defender on the outside and providing crosses for their fellow attackers. The case for inverted wingers seems to be that coming 'inside' on to their stronger foot increases their chances of shooting and scoring. It's now de rigueur for wingers to be inverted. Does the likelihood of inverted wingers scoring goals by coming inside really compensate for the fewer effective crosses they make for their fellow attackers? – Derek I agree that there remains something aesthetically very pleasing about a centre-forward meeting an outswinging cross with a header – Alexander Isak's goal from Anthony Gordon's cross for Newcastle against Arsenal last season, for instance – but I suspect that ship has sailed. Herbert Chapman was arguing that a focus on wingers crossing for forwards was inefficient 100 years ago, and most modern theory seems to agree with him. The preference now is either for wide players cutting infield – Peter Taylor was a pioneer in England, but Dennis Tueart and others did it as well – or to work the ball to the goalline for a low cutback – the classic Manchester City goal of a couple of seasons ago. Sign up to Soccer with Jonathan Wilson Jonathan Wilson brings expert analysis on the biggest stories from European soccer after newsletter promotion One of the reasons wide forwards now cut inside is the explosion in attacking full-backs, who now provide most of the width. A full-back could go inside, as say Trent Alexander-Arnold or João Cancelo do, but that is relatively rare and if the full-back is going on the outside, the wide forward has go inside to create space for him. I think there's also a recognition that forwards cutting in, often against the defender's weaker foot, is very hard to combat – hence the rise in the sort of goal Lamine Yamal seems to score every week, whipping the ball into the far corner. Kevin Keegan was perhaps the first English player, certainly in the postwar years, to make a success of a move to a European giant. He left Liverpool in 1977 for Hamburg, where he won the league in 1978-79 and was twice named European Footballer of the Year. He also marketed himself with an eagerness unusual in English players of the time, becoming a bona fide celebrity. And, on 9 June 1979, he released his second, but by some distance his most successful single, Head Over Heels in Love. His first single, It Ain't Easy, had been released in 1972, just a year after he'd moved to Liverpool from Scunthorpe and made very little impression. But Head Over Heels reached No 31 in the UK charts, and No 10 in Germany. And this is where those of a nervous disposition should look away. Keegan gave a preview of the song on Das Aktuelle Sport-Studio. His German seems very good, but that thought soon fades as he gets to the performance … This is an extract from Soccer with Jonathan Wilson, a weekly look from the Guardian US at the game in Europe and beyond. Subscribe for free here. Have a question for Jonathan? Email soccerwithjw@ and he'll answer the best in a future edition.
