Fans of Irish band Kneecap surround a London court as a band member faces a terror-related charge
Fans of the Irish-language hip-hop group Kneecap mobbed sidewalks outside a London court Wednesday as a member of the trio faced a terror-related charge in what he says is a politically motivated effort to silence the band's support for Palestinians before its appearance at the Glastonbury Festival.
Rapper Mo Chara, whose real name is Liam Óg Ó hAnnaidh, was released on unconditional bail after the hearing at Westminster Magistrates' Court. His next court appearance is scheduled for Aug. 20.
Chara is charged with one count of supporting a banned terrorist organization after he allegedly waved a Hezbollah flag during a Nov. 21 concert in north London. The case was filed after counterterrorism police were alerted to video of the incident posted online, London's Metropolitan Police Service said.
Prosecutor Michael Bisgrove told the court that support for the Palestinians and criticism of Israel were not the reasons for the charge filed against Chara.
'He's well within his rights to voice his opinions and solidarity, as is anybody else,'' Bisgrove said. 'The allegation in this case is a wholly different thing and deals with a video recording showing that, in November of last year, Mr. O hAnnaidh wore and displayed the flag of Hezbollah, a proscribed terrorist organization, while saying 'up Hamas, up Hezbollah.'''
Kneecap, which raps about drugs, working-class life and the reunification of Ireland, has supported the Palestinian cause throughout the war in Gaza. The band has been the center of controversy in Britain since last year, when the previous government sought to block an arts grant for the band, citing its anti-British politics. That decision was overturned after the Labour Party won last year's parliamentary election and Prime Minister Keir Starmer took office.
The trio is scheduled to perform at Glastonbury on Saturday, alongside performers including Neil Young and Olivia Rodrigo. The internationally watched music festival is a five-day event that attracts about 200,000 people to a farm outside the small town in western England every summer.
As they entered the courthouse, the members of Kneecap, all of whom hail from Northern Ireland, gave the thumbs up sign to hundreds of supporters who had gathered outside waving signs reading: 'Free Mo Chara' and 'Defend Kneecap.'
Before the hearing, the band posted billboards around London bearing the slogan 'More Blacks, More Dogs, More Irish, Mo Chara.' The message echoes the signs landlords placed in the windows of some London boarding houses in the 1950s, stating 'No Blacks, No Dogs, No Irish.'
'British courts have long charged people from the North of Ireland with 'terrorism' for crimes never committed,' Kneecap said in a statement posted on social media. 'We will fight them. We will win.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
13 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Green Party accused of silencing gender critical voices
A former Green Party spokesman who was expelled for raising concerns about transgender ideology has accused the party of silencing gender critical voices. Dr Pallavi Devulapalli learnt earlier this month that she had been removed from the party following an investigation into comments she made at a hustings event a year ago. It comes after the party was found to have discriminated against Dr Shahrar Ali, its former deputy leader, over his belief that 'biology is real and immutable'. Campaigners in the party told The Telegraph that the decision to expel the spokesman exposed an 'authoritarian rot' at the heart of the Greens. Speaking at an event in June 2024, Dr Devulapalli showed support for sex-based rights and questioned whether trans activists were behaving 'mischievously' in the debate. The King's Lynn and West Norfolk councillor, who now sits as an independent, was subsequently suspended after also showing her support for the Cass report into self-identification. 'Purge' against gender critical politicians In an interview with the Guardian, Dr Devulapalli accused her party of launching a 'purge' against gender critical politicians and members. She said: 'They don't like my stance on trans self-ID and the trans women policy. They didn't come out and say that so they expelled me on a technicality.' Dr Devulapalli added: 'We've seen the Greens veer away from its original founding culture towards a much more Left-wing authoritarian culture. 'If you say or think the wrong thing, then you're out – that's really worrying.' She has joined 24 fellow former party members in the new Greens in Exile group, who have been suspended or removed from the party largely because of their gender critical views. In its ruling expelling Dr Devulapalli, the party said she was being removed to 'avoid or reduce the likelihood of further harm to the party'. Dr Devulapalli said in response that she was 'disappointed and infuriated' by the decision. It comes after Dr Ali was awarded more than £9,000 in damages in February 2024 after a judge ruled that the Green Party discriminated against him and that he had been improperly dismissed. In remarks after his court victory, Dr Ali called for the Equality and Human Rights Commission to investigate the Green Party over how it handles trans rights debates. The Mayor's and City County Court had ruled that Dr Ali's removal was 'procedurally unfair' because the Green Party identified no code breaches at his dismissal. In papers submitted to the court, lawyers acting for Dr Ali claimed that officials in the Green Party 'collaborated' to remove him from his post because of his beliefs about gender, which include the view that 'biology is real and immutable'. 'Kafkaesque charges' Speaking to The Telegraph on Wednesday, Dr Ali said: 'The Green Party is using weaponised disciplinary complaints processes to continue to persecute, exclude and betray sex realist members who have built the party up for over a generation. 'Not content to lose a gender critical discrimination case against me in a landmark protected belief case last year, at an estimated total cost to them of £450,000, they have now expelled our health spokesperson on Kafkaesque charges. 'As a medical practitioner, Pallavi well understood the importance of Cass for protecting children and youth from unsafe 'gender affirming' medical malpractice. 'True Greens are not ones to stand idly by and abide by unlawful discrimination against themselves, when they have been fighting all their lives to end discrimination against others. We have been seeking remedy through the courts to expose the authoritarian rot and will continue to do so.' A Green Party spokesman said: 'We don't comment on individual cases.'
Telegraph
13 minutes ago
- Telegraph
The £1bn cost of the National Insurance raid that Reeves ignored
Rachel Reeves's National Insurance tax grab has left councils facing a seven-figure shortfall with more at risk of bankruptcy, MPs have warned. The Chancellor raised employer contributions to 15pc during her Budget, but a Public Accounts Committee (PAC) report on Wednesday said ministers had failed to properly assess another £1.1bn of potential costs. MPs said the Government had not carried out an assessment of the true costs, and demanded it review the short- and long-term impact on providing services. Councils are now facing the risk of private providers passing on their increased costs and handing back social care contracts they can no longer afford to deliver, it said. The report added that local government finance was in a 'perilous state', with budget deficits putting many councils at risk of effectively going bankrupt. The Local Government Association (LGA), which represents councils, has already warned that more than half of councils are on course for insolvency next year. The National Insurance contribution rate for employers rose from 13.8pc to 15pc in April following changes in October's Budget. The salary threshold also dropped from £9,100 to £5,000, as the Government tried to raise tax for public spending. Ministers set aside £4.7bn to support the public sector, including £502m for councils to cover increases in their direct employment costs. However, the LGA calculated the actual cost to be £637m. It also warned of £1.1bn in extra costs for councils passed on by service providers they had commissioned. The PAC report said: 'Some local authorities may be able to provide financial support to service providers for these increases in costs, but it is unacceptable that the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government and HM Treasury have not assessed how much impact this could have on local authorities.' It added: 'Spending on special educational needs and disabilities (Send) has outstripped the money available from the Department for Education to pay for it. Local authority deficits from these overspends are expected to be between £2.9bn and £3.9bn a year by the end of 2027–28. 'The mechanism which allows local authorities to keep these deficits off their books is due to run out in March 2026, and without it, many local authorities are at risk of effectively going bankrupt.' The charity, Mencap, which supports more than 4,000 people with learning difficulties, also told the committee it could be forced to hand back social care contracts after a potential £18m annual increase in costs due to National Insurance and national living wage rises. It comes as council tax is expected to rise again to fund major commitments announced earlier this month in Ms Reeves's first spending review. Rates are already at record levels, with nine in 10 areas across England enduring the maximum 4.99pc council tax rise this year, and parts of Scotland and Wales slapped with even higher increases. A spokesman for the County Councils Network, which represents local authorities, said the Government's compensation covered less than half of the increased costs in National Insurance. He said: 'This year, county and unitary councils are having to make an unprecedented £1.2bn in savings due to rising demand for services, compounded by recent government decisions. One of those was the decision to raise employers' National Insurance contributions, which has adversely impacted on councils. 'Our recent survey found that the Government's compensation covered just 40pc of the costs of this policy for county and unitary councils this year, meaning they will have to make up the shortfall through service reductions and other efficiencies.' Councillor Louise Gittins, chairman of the LGA, said the spending review had left councils under continued financial pressure. She said: 'Many will continue to have to increase council tax bills to try and protect services, but still need to make further cutbacks. While the Government faced tough choices, future funding for adult social care is good news but a lack of significant extra government money needed to meet immediate pressures is worrying.' Jim McMahon, of the Ministry of Housing, said the PAC's claims were not supported by the evidence. He said: 'The spending review provided over £5bn of new grant funding for local services, and that's on top of the £69bn we have already injected this year to boost council finances. 'The results speak for themselves. Over 95pc of audited accounts were submitted for the deadline we set, no S114 were issued by councils as a result of financial distress, and claims against Exceptional Financial Support were £1bn less than the previous year.'
Telegraph
13 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Feminists threaten to sue SNP for ‘ignoring' Supreme Court trans ruling
SNP ministers have been threatened with legal action for failing to comply with the Supreme Court ruling that banned biological men from women's toilets and changing rooms. Human rights charity Sex Matters has given the Scottish Government two weeks to introduce new policies and guidance or face further court action. In a formal 'letter before action' sent to ministers, the charity demanded that they issue a statement that policies allowing trans people to access women-only spaces be 'suspended with immediate effect'. 'Updated and lawful guidance' should be issued 'at the earliest opportunity', the letter said, with public bodies ordered 'to take immediate action to provide single-sex facilities on the basis of biological sex '. Ruling is 'the law now' First Minister John Swinney has said Scotland's public sector should await guidance on implementing the ruling from the Equalities and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) before acting. But Sex Matters said April's Supreme Court ruling was 'the law now' and it had not been 'suspended in any way' pending the EHRC guidance, which is expected to be published later this summer. The EHRC has previously told the Scottish Government it did not need to delay, noting that the law was already set out in the Supreme Court's 'very readable' ruling and this was 'effective immediately'. Interim guidance has also been issued by the equalities watchdog stating that access to single-sex facilities in workplaces and public services should be based on biological sex. The Tories said Sex Matters had been left with 'no choice' but to threaten legal action to force SNP ministers to comply, 'leaving taxpayers on the hook for costly payouts'. Sturgeon's self-ID When Nicola Sturgeon was in government she proposed allowing trans people to self-identify – meaning they could change gender by signing a declaration without a medical diagnosis. However, after it was passed by MSPs, the controversial Gender Recognition Reform Bill was vetoed by the UK Government over concerns it undermined safety in single-sex spaces. But swathes of Scotland's public sector adopted self-ID, allowing trans people access to female toilets and changing rooms. On April 16, feminist campaign group For Women Scotland won against the Scottish Government in the Supreme Court, which ruled that the definition of woman was based on biological sex. Maya Forstater, chief executive of Sex Matters, said the ruling 'made the law absolutely clear' about who could access women's toilets, changing rooms and refuges but 'the Scottish Government is dragging its feet'. She told BBC Radio's Good Morning Scotland programme: 'It hasn't changed its policies. It still has a policy in schools of saying that schools should allow a child who identifies as transgender to use opposite sex toilets and changing rooms and for its employees in government buildings. 'That exposes women and girls, in particular, to harassment because of their sex. Allowing a man or a boy into a women's toilet creates a hostile environment for women and girls, and that's unlawful.' Ms Forstater said the charity had held a meeting two weeks ago with Scottish Government officials but argued that they were 'passing the buck' by claiming they had to wait for the EHRC guidance. Although she acknowledged that small businesses without access to legal advice may rely on the EHRC, she said this did not apply to SNP ministers. She added: 'They do understand the law, they have legal advisers on tap and they should act now.' She said there was 'no reason to wait' and noted that any woman forced to share a female-only safe space with a biological man could take legal action against the Scottish Government. Asked about the charity's next move, she said: 'They have 14 days to reply. What we've asked them to do is something quite simple. They have the facilities already. 'They have male toilets, female toilets and unisex and all we're asking them to do is put a simple statement on their website that says that their facilities are separated by sex and that they also provide unisex facilities, so that everyone's included.' The letter, which was signed by Ms Forstater, also told SNP ministers that their guidance in a document called 'Supporting transgender pupils in schools' is 'wrong and must be withdrawn with immediate effect'. If the Scottish Government fails to comply within 14 days, she warned 'we may commence proceedings without further warning'. Ms Forstater added: 'For the avoidance of any doubt, we have already consulted with solicitors and counsel in relation to the matters set out in this letter and are prepared to litigate in relation to them.' 'Reckless pandering' Tess White, the Scottish Tories' equalities minister, said: 'The Supreme Court's judgment was crystal clear, but John Swinney still refuses to follow it. 'Sex Matters shouldn't have to threaten legal action, but the SNP government is leaving them no choice by clinging to unlawful guidance on single-sex spaces. 'This reckless pandering to gender ideologues is putting women and girls at risk – and leaving taxpayers on the hook for costly payouts.' Shirley-Anne Somerville, the SNP's Social Justice Secretary, said the Scottish Government accepted the court's decision and was 'moving forward right across government with work on this issue'. She said: 'That's exactly why we have the short-life working group that brings together the civil servants from right across government to ensure that we're delivering at pace and we're delivering consistently.' A Scottish Government spokesman said: ''We are reviewing policies, guidance and legislation potentially impacted by the judgment. 'This will prepare us to take all necessary steps when the regulator of the Equality Act 2010, the Equality and Human Rights Commission, publishes its revised statutory code of practice and associated guidance for services, public functions and associations. 'The EHRC is currently consulting on this revised code of practice. We will respond to any letter received in due course.'
