UN General Assembly calls for Gaza ceasefire, pressure on Israel
UNITED NATIONS, UNITED STATES: The UN General Assembly on Thursday adopted a resolution demanding an immediate ceasefire in Gaza and urging nations to take 'all measures necessary' to place pressure on Israel.
Following the United States' veto of a similar push in the Security Council last week, the General Assembly adopted the non-binding resolution by a vote of 149-12, with 19 abstentions.
The text demands 'an immediate, unconditional and permanent ceasefire' in Gaza, as well as 'the immediate and unconditional release of all hostages' seized during the unprecedented Hamas attack inside Israel on October 7, 2023 that sparked the war.
However it goes further than the US-vetoed text, taking direct aim at Israel over its impeding aid deliveries into the Gaza Strip.
It 'demands that Israel, the occupying Power, immediately end the blockade... and ensure that aid reaches the Palestinian civilian population throughout the Gaza Strip,' which after more than 20 months of war is facing a catastrophic humanitarian situation.
It also calls on all UN members to 'individually and collectively take all measures necessary, in line with international law... to ensure compliance by Israel with its obligations.'
Israel's envoy Danny Danon slammed the resolution in remarks to the press ahead of the vote, saying it is 'a farce, is a moral failure, is a political stunt.'
Palestinian Ambassador Riyad Mansour meanwhile called on all nations to turn their votes 'into resolute action.'
'No arms, no money, no trade to oppress Palestinians,' he urged.
- 'Accountability' -
Israel is facing mounting pressure to allow more humanitarian aid into Gaza, where the entire population is at risk of famine, according to the UN.
The resolution adopted on Thursday 'strongly (condemns) any use of starvation of civilians as a method of warfare and the unlawful denial of humanitarian access.'
Israel recently ended a total blockade to allow some deliveries to resume through the newly formed, US-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) distribution centers.
The United Nations, which until now has sought to coordinate aid deliveries throughout Gaza, refuses to work with the GHF, citing concerns over its practices and neutrality.
Dozens of people have been killed near GHF distribution points since late May, according to Gaza's civil defense agency. It said Israeli forces killed another 21 people waiting for aid on Thursday.
GHF meanwhile blamed the Palestinian militant group Hamas for the deaths of at least eight of its staff in Gaza late Wednesday.
- 'Mad march' -
In the absence of Security Council action, Mansour had called last week for all countries to take 'immediate and real measures' to force Israel 'to stop the mad march it is embarked on.'
With the vote taking place just days before an international conference at the UN on the Palestinian issue, the text also reiterates the Assembly's 'unwavering commitment to the two-State solution... where two democratic States, Israel and Palestine, live side by side in peace and security.'
It was a UN General Assembly resolution in 1947 that divided British-ruled Palestine into two states -- one Arab and one Jewish.
But only the creation of Israel was proclaimed on May 14, 1948. This triggered a war between Israel and its Arab neighbors.
Over the decades, the UN body has expressed its strong support for the Palestinians in the face of the continuing Israeli occupation.
Israel has meanwhile relied on strong support from its veto-holding US ally, which has only deepened under President Donald Trump.
The resolution 'does nothing to free the hostages, improve the lives of civilians in Gaza or bring us closer to a ceasefire,' US acting ambassador Dorothy Shea told the Assembly.
Instead, she charged it was 'yet another performative action that erodes the credibility of this body.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Star
2 hours ago
- The Star
Italy urges Israel, Iran to avoid conflict escalation, return to talks
ROME, June 13 (Xinhua) -- Italian Deputy Prime Minister and Foreign Minister Antonio Tajani on Friday urged Israel and the Islamic Republic of Iran to avoid further conflict escalation and return to negotiations. Tajani's appeal followed a series of Israeli airstrikes overnight targeting multiple sites in Iran, including a nuclear facility, military installations, and senior military officials. In a morning phone call with Israeli Foreign Minister Gideon Sa'ar, Tajani "reiterated the need for an immediate return to negotiations," according to a statement from his office. He also reaffirmed the Italian government's stance that halting Israel's military operations in Gaza is "an absolute priority, given the unacceptable toll being inflicted on the Palestinian civilian population." In a subsequent conversation with Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi, Tajani urged Tehran to exercise restraint and avoid military escalation, warning that any further deterioration could threaten the stability of the entire Middle East. "We must urgently return to negotiations and to the path of diplomacy," Tajani said. The Italian minister added that he would remain in close contact with officials from the United States, Oman, and Israel in an effort to "keep diplomatic channels open for the exchange of messages." According to the Israeli Defense Forces (IDF), the airstrikes were a "preemptive, precise, and combined" operation targeting dozens of military facilities across Iran, including sites linked to its nuclear program. Iranian authorities condemned the strikes as a "blatant act of aggression." Supreme leader Ali Khamenei described the attack as a crime against Iran and "a declaration of war," vowing that it would be met with severe retaliation.
New Straits Times
3 hours ago
- New Straits Times
Attacking Iran, Israel again calls bluff of 'man of peace' Trump
WHEN US President Donald Trump publicly implored Israel not to attack Iran, he declared, once again, that his goal was to be a peacemaker. Hours later on Thursday, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu – one of Trump's closest international allies – unleashed a major military campaign described as a "preemptive" strike against Iran's nuclear programme. The attack marks the latest setback for Trump's lofty goal set out at the start of his second term of being a "man of peace." Russian President Vladimir Putin, with whom Trump has also boasted a warm relationship, has rebuffed his overtures for a ceasefire with Ukraine. And Israel resumed another massive offensive in Gaza after talks bogged down on extending a ceasefire with Hamas reached with Trump's support at the end of his predecessor Joe Biden's term. Trump's friend and roving envoy Steve Witkoff – who has negotiated in all three crises – had been set to meet Iranian officials again Sunday in Oman. Trump later was careful not to distance himself from Israel, where some sources sought to suggest that the public US statements were meant to catch Iran off guard. In successive social media posts, Trump said that Iran had failed to accept his terms and that the attack came one day after a 60-day deadline he had issued, although that did not explain why Witkoff had still scheduled talks with Iran. Trump separately has repeatedly hailed US diplomacy that helped reach a ceasefire last month between India and Pakistan as a triumph, saying he averted nuclear war. Before Israel launched its operation, Trump said: "I don't want them going in, because I think it would blow it." Netanyahu has described Iran's cleric-run government, which backs Hamas, as an existential threat and already last year ordered strikes that knocked out its air defences. "We've clearly seen a fork in the road in the American and Israeli approaches to this problem set," said Dana Stroul, a former senior Pentagon official who is a senior fellow at the Washington Institute for Near East Policy. "These strikes are going to disrupt and delay and degrade Iran's nuclear program. The question, I think, is whether or not the United States and Israel in the future are going to work together on what to do to maximise the time that's put back on the clock," she said. Stroul noted that rifts had been building between Israel and Trump, who last month agreed to remove sanctions on Syria after former Islamist guerrilla Ahmed al-Sharaa swept into power. Trump embraced the new Syrian leader after appeals on a tour of Gulf Arab monarchies – which have also backed diplomacy on Iran. In Qatar last month, Trump said after meeting the emir that he believed a deal was in sight with Iran and that there would be no "nuclear dust" over the region. Despite growing disagreements, Israel enjoys robust support in Trump's right-wing base. The Trump administration in recent days has again taken lonely positions to back Israel, with the United States casting one of the only votes at the UN General Assembly against a Gaza ceasefire resolution and criticising top allies, including Britain, for imposing sanctions on far-right Israeli ministers. Justin Logan, director of defence and foreign policy at the libertarian Cato Institute, said the Israeli attack will "destroy US diplomatic efforts" on Iran and called for Trump to reject any US military role in protecting Israel from retaliation. "Israel has the right to choose its own foreign policy. At the same time, it has the responsibility to bear the costs of that policy," he said. But lawmakers in Trump's Republican Party quickly rallied behind Israel. Senator Tom Cotton said that the United States should "back Israel to the hilt, all the way," and topple Iran's Islamic Republic if it targets US troops. Trump's Democratic rivals, who mostly backed his diplomacy on Iran, were aghast at Israel's action ahead of new US-Iran talks. "Israel's alarming decision to launch airstrikes on Iran is a reckless escalation that risks igniting regional violence," said Jack Reed, the top Democrat on the Senate Armed Forces Committee.
New Straits Times
4 hours ago
- New Straits Times
'Unacceptable': Iranians seethe after Israeli onslaught
IRANIANS called for revenge on Friday demanding a swift response to a dizzying wave of strikes by Israel, as some took to the streets in protest, while others sheltered inside, unsure what would happen next. The aerial onslaught killed several of the military's top brass, targeted an array of leading scientists and struck military and nuclear sites across Iran in an unprecedented attack that left many seething with anger. "How much longer are we going to live in fear?" asked Ahmad Moadi, a 62-year-old retiree. "As an Iranian, I believe there must be an overwhelming response, a scathing response." The raids appeared to push the longtime enemies into full-blown conflict following years of fighting a shadow war mostly conducted through proxies. Iran regularly arrests individuals it accuses of spying for Israel amid a flurry of targeted assassinations and acts of sabotage targeting its nuclear programme in recent years. At least six scientists involved in Iran's nuclear programme were killed in Friday's strikes. "They've killed so many university professors and researchers, and now they want to negotiate?" Moadi exclaimed, referring to calls for Iran to go ahead with nuclear talks with Israel's US ally planned for this weekend. As Iran continued to assess the damage, some residents rallied in the streets of Tehran chanting: "Death to Israel, death to America," while waving Iranian flags and portraits of supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. State television said similar demonstrations were held in cities across the country. The Israeli strikes followed repeated threats from Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who appeared to finally cap a years-long quest to strike Iran's nuclear programme. "We can't let this bastard continue, or we'll end up like Gaza," Abbas Ahmadi, a 52-year-old Tehran resident, told AFP from behind the wheel of his car. "Iran must destroy him, it must do something." Friday's attacks came after more than a year of soaring tensions as Israel took on Iran's regional allies Hamas in Gaza, Hizbollah in Lebanon and the Huthis in Yemen. Amid the tensions, Israel and Iran exchanged aerial barrages on two separate occasions last year. while stopping short of a full-scale war. But following Friday's attack, all bets were off over what would come next, with Khamenei warning Israel faced a "bitter and painful" fate, while the Iranian military said there would be "no limits" to its response. Apart from scattered protests, Tehran's streets were largely deserted, except for queues at petrol stations, a familiar sight in times of crisis. Air traffic was halted at Tehran's Imam Khomeini International Airport amid disruption across the region. In the upscale district of Nobonyad in north Tehran, rescuers continued to comb through the rubble of two apartment blocks targeted in Israeli strikes. Families with tear-streaked faces gathered nearby. "They want to deprive us of our nuclear capability - that's unacceptable," said Ahmad Razaghi, 56, calmly echoing the official line. For Farnoush Rezaei, a 45-year-old nurse wearing a colourful hijab, Friday's attacks represented a final act by Israel – a country "on its last breath."
