
Israeli military operations in Gaza ‘well over the top', ex CIA chief tells Dublin event
Israeli
military operations in Gaza
have been 'well over the top', a former director of the US
Central Intelligence Agency
has said.
John Brennan said he 'very much' admires the Irish Government's position on
Gaza
but is 'disappointed' by the positions taken by the Trump administration and the Biden administration before it.
As the US 'provides most of the military capabilities to Israel', he believed it was obliged and 'should have done everything possible to prevent Israel carrying out what I think were too aggressive military operations', he told The Irish Times in Dublin on Friday.
In his view, Israeli military operations in Gaza 'have been well over the top' and the number of women, children and non-combatants killed was 'unnecessary'. Asked would he describe it as a genocide, he said that was 'for lawyers to decide'.
READ MORE
'The deaths of 70,000 Palestinians, a lot of those deaths obviously were intentionally done by the Israelis. They are not targeting civilians but I think they have allowed disproportionate civilian casualties when they have gone after Hamas operatives.'
In the context of continuing debate about Ireland's military neutrality, Mr Brennan said Ireland's neutrality 'is much respected and needed' but it does not mean Ireland 'is not impenetrable by foreign adversaries, particularly given the digital realm and how much we are interconnected as a global community'.
It 'makes sense' for Ireland to evaluate its security, defence and intelligence needs, he said.
Ireland has taken 'some very principled stands', including on Gaza, he said. If Ireland opted to join the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation (Nato), there is a question whether or not that would limit Ireland's ability to continue to pursue independent policies and positions, he said.
Joining Nato is, and should be, a matter for the Irish people to decide, he said. 'Nato has been evolving, its European members recognise they need to do more on their own and cannot continue to rely continually on the US, so I think it's a worthwhile question for the Irish people to ask.'
Mr Brennan, whose father Owen Brennan emigrated to the US from Co Roscommon in 1948, was in Dublin to address the inaugural summer school of the Law Society's Centre for Justice and Law Reform, which explored the theme Defending Democracy: Legal Responses to Emerging Threats.
Other speakers included EU Justice Commissioner Michael McGrath, Attorney General Rossa Fanning, Online Safety Commissioner Niamh Hodnett and UK commissioner for countering extremism Robin Simcox.
Mr Brennan was a CIA officer for 25 years from 1980 before serving under president Barack Obama as his chief counterterrorism adviser. He was director of the CIA from 2013 to early 2017.
Asked how Ireland might combat extremism, he said all governments have to set a 'delicate balance' in allowing free speech while not allowing hate speech and incitement to violence.
This is something the Irish people need to look at and to 'weigh in on' with their politicians. The Law Society and other objective actors have important roles to help ensure that truthful, factual information is 'pushed out into the communications bloodstream'.
During his career, he was mainly focused on countering terrorism by groups such as Islamic State and al-Qaeda but in more recent years, he is concerned about the growth of domestic extremism and violence in the US, epitomised by the assault on the US Capitol on January 6th, 2021, he said.
He has been personally targeted by extremists, including with a pipe bomb, Mr Brennan said.
He is concerned some domestic extremism was 'fuelled' by commentary from public officials and said government officials have a 'special responsibility' to try to clamp down extremist sentiment and be more uniting, less divisive, of people.
Some of president Donald Trump's rhetoric is 'rather combative' and there is 'an increasing coarseness' in the public discourse, especially in the way Mr Trump and others make reference to their opponents, he said.
'I served for six presidents and none of them would publicly refer to their political opponents as scum and Donald Trump does that. I think that's beneath the dignity of the office of the presidency.'
Even if public officials do not intend matters to then 'take it to the next level', it has that effect, he said. This sometimes happens on both sides and it is important to bring down that level of tension, animosity, anger and hatred and to try and find 'more civil ways of discourse'.
He is concerned about the US administration's commitment to the rule of law, including efforts to use the US Department of Justice 'to go after political opponents', and to try and 'get around' some judicial rulings.
Democracy and the rule of law cannot be taken for granted and a lot of people see the US as 'sliding towards authoritarianism', he said.
In the CIA, he saw some countries use the democratic process to put authoritarian leaders in place. 'The playbook is very similar, you crack down on opponents, use your instruments of government, whether they be the intelligence and security services, the courts, you crack down on the media.'
Asked about Mr Trump's recent authorisation of a US military attack on Iran's nuclear sites, Mr Brennan said he shares the concerns about Iran's nuclear programme but believed the US attack was 'unnecessary' and had not addressed the problem.
It seemed, from press reports, there did not appear to be a change in the intelligence community's assessment that Iran has not restarted its nuclear weapons programme, he said.
Now the issues include whether Iran will move, perhaps in a 'more clandestine' fashion, to try and reconstitute its programme and even move towards a nuclear weapon.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Irish Times
4 hours ago
- Irish Times
The Irish Times view on trade and tax: the rules-based system is breaking down
As a small country, Ireland is best served by a stable international economic backdrop and a rules-based system governing areas such as trade and taxation. Unfortunately, the key institutions overseeing the international economic system are now under heavy pressure, as Donald Trump pursues his nationalistic economic agenda. The most recent demonstration of this came in recent days as the other G7 countries acceded to a US demand to rewrite a part of the global corporate tax deal that took years to put together under the aegis of the Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD). The entire deal is now weakened and may even crumble completely. The issue for the US was a part of the agreement which would have allowed other countries, including Ireland, to collect top-up tax from American multinationals who were judged not to have paid the minimum rate of 15 per cent elsewhere. Washington saw this as an infringement of US tax sovereignty. The same issue lies behind new trade tensions between the US and Canada, What is notable is that the G7 countries agreed to unpick the agreement to meet the US demands, as was announced on social media by US treasury secretary, Scott Bessent. The other 140 plus countries who negotiated and signed the agreement are yet to be consulted. The big players are calling the shots. READ MORE In return, the US administration is asking Congress to withdraw a part of the new budget bill which would have given the US the power to levy punitive taxes on investors and companies from countries who were judged to be treating US firms unfairly. As in the field of trade, US threats are being met by significant concessions. The OECD's status as a mediator of the corporate tax deal has been undermined and the future of the whole agreement is now in serious doubt. In the same way, the World Trade Organisation looks on powerlessly as the rules of international trade are torn up. In this context, the suggestion last week from Ursula von der Leyen, the European Commission president, that the EU investigates a new regime with a group of Asian countries who are part of a trade bloc – which the UK has also joined – was ill-judged to say the least. This new dominance by the big players and the tearing up of existing rules is worrying for Ireland. The previous government had hoped that by signing up to the OECD tax deal the controversy over the Irish system would be put to bed and there would be no further demands for change. Now this is all back in the melting pot. Meanwhile, Ireland has thrived under the rules-based trade system which brings certainty to those exporting from this country, whether multinationals or domestic businesses. Ireland needs to stick close to the EU to make it case and hope that Europe can find its voice on these issues more effectively than it has to date.


Irish Times
7 hours ago
- Irish Times
Nato's new defence spending commitment aims to reverse decades of military decline
In cash terms, The Hague Defence Commitment, as it's to be known, agreed last week , will add roughly $1 trillion a year to the common defence of the Nato military alliance, according to US president Donald Trump . But cash alone is never enough. As critical in military terms are the new capability targets the deal will activate, triggering increased cross-border standardisation, improved technical co-operation and more operational integration, aimed at readying the West for war with Russia within five years. On Trump's insistence, the European alliance members plus Canada agreed to increase their defence budgets from the current 2 per cent to 5 per cent of GDP by 2035 – 3.5 per cent on 'hard military spending' and another 1.5 per cent on related civil costs such as infrastructure and cybersecurity. That's why, as the 32 leaders who comprise Nato's decision-making North Atlantic Council were doing their best not to fall out with Trump over the spike in cost, behind the scenes the military planners who assess risk were calculating what strategic difference the extra trillion will make. READ MORE With military efficiency, a 10-page briefing, ' Future-proofing Nato's industrial capacity: how the decisions at the summit will strengthen the allied defence industry ', was circulated in the summit's closing hours, underpinning the imperative to reverse '60 years of progressive decline' in spending. Although the alliance was set up in 1949 as a post-second World War collective security network, it's worth remembering that with the end of the cold war, however, many of the allies switched their spending away from defence to modernising their societies, in what became known as 'the peace dividend'. [ Hostile actions 'are real and accelerating': is Russia already at war with the West? Opens in new window ] Consequently, faced with rapidly diminishing activity, defence companies on both sides of the Atlantic underwent a series of mergers and acquisitions, leading to consolidation in the defence sector. The 51 significant defence manufacturers that remained at the end of the cold war merged into 'the big five' – Lockheed Martin, Boeing, General Dynamics, RTX and Northrop Grumman. Here, European multinationals such as Airbus and missile systems developer, MBDA, emerged. Everything changed, however, in February 2022 with Russia's 'full-scale and brutal invasion of Ukraine', which reminded the allies that 'although the Euro-Atlantic area is not at war, it is not at peace either'. The reality, maintains Germany's chief of defence, Gen Carsten Breuer, is that a full-scale attack on a Nato member is not as far-fetched as it may seem. Moscow, he says, has been producing at least 1,500 battle tanks a year, with a significant build-up of missiles, artillery shells and drones as well, not all of which are earmarked for the war in Ukraine . His assessment, shared by other military experts in the region, goes as far as to conclude that the 'most vulnerable' area for an attack would be the Suwalki Gap, a largely unpopulated corridor in northeast Poland where Poland meets Lithuania, Belarus and Russia. The military experts' briefings to their political leaders have been uncompromising. 'Individually, all of them understand the urgency of the threat that is approaching Nato', says Gen Breuer, who adds he believes Russia could attack by 2029. [ If Russia is indeed planning an attack against a Nato state, distance and neutrality will provide no defence Opens in new window ] Given that threat, Nato's new capability targets involve co-investment, co-development and co-production to make the alliance 'more lethal' as secretary general Mark Rutte put it. And that collaboration will by global – reaching far beyond its 32 member states. Nato's four Indo-Pacific partners – Australia, New Zealand, Japan and South Korea, known as the IP4 – will be critical to that 'enhanced co-operation'. So too will its partnership with the EU, where the political and cultural links are already close and often overlapping. The aim overall is achieving a 'new coherence' in dealing with a familiar enemy. [ The Irish Times view on international politics: law of the jungle taking hold Opens in new window ]


Irish Times
8 hours ago
- Irish Times
Report on Coalition plan to restrict social housing for migrants dismissed by campaigners
Campaigners have dismissed a report about a Government plan to clamp down on the provision of social housing to migrants, saying it is an attempt to solve a problem 'that does not exist'. The Sunday Times reported this weekend that the Coalition wants to limit access to social housing to people with strong and long-term connections to the Republic, with restrictions also coming in for emergency homeless accommodation. Focus Ireland director of advocacy and research Mike Allen said previous legislative forays into this area had been 'exposed as a poorly drafted response to a problem that does not exist'. 'Nobody believed that social housing should be allocated to people with no right to live in Ireland, but the Government was unable to give any evidence that it was happening and needed complex legislation to stop it,' he said. READ MORE Sunday's report outlined that after extensive legal advice, the Coalition was preparing to revisit proposals first made in a law early last year, but which were later dropped. Citing plans due to go to Cabinet in the next fortnight, the report suggested Ministers would be told the law is needed to eliminate ambiguity over existing rules for non-Irish nationals who want to apply for social housing. It said similar rules were planned for accessing emergency accommodation, with local authorities not required to assess households unless they are legally and habitually resident in the State. Mr Allen said the proposals to restrict the capacity of local authorities to provide emergency shelter on a short-term humanitarian basis would result in more people being forced to sleep on the streets. He said there will be 'inevitable consequences' for people's health and for public areas if such a condition were imposed. The Opposition also criticised the proposals, with Sinn Féin housing spokesman Eoin Ó Broin calling it a 'deeply disingenuous and dangerous briefing'. He said it sought to shift blame for the housing and homelessness crises on to migrant communities. The Dublin Mid-West TD said residency rules are already applied to social housing applications and when accessing emergency accommodation. He said his understanding was that the mooted Bill intends to put existing practice into primary legislation. He accused Minister for Housing James Browne of 'wasting his officials' time drafting a Bill that is not needed'. In a reply to a recent parliamentary question put down by Mr Ó Broin, Mr Browne outlined the conditions applied by local authorities when determining a 'local connection' as part of a social housing application. These include having lived in the area for five years at any time, being employed in the area or within 15km of it, being in full-time education or receiving specialist medical care there, or having a relative living in the area for two years or longer.