Kent County skips landfill, moves forward with new method of waste management
GRAND RAPIDS, Mich. (WOOD) — A project in Kent County that has been on hold for more than a year is moving forward with the goal of finding a better way to manage waste.
The Sustainable Business Park, which is planned for the property adjacent to the South Kent Landfill, came to a standstill when the county cut ties with the anchor tenant, , over financial concerns.
Inside woodtv.com: A Greener Mitten
The county issued the request for proposals for the project in 2020, during the pandemic. Director of Public Works Darwin Baas said it took about six months to go through the review process, which included a financial review.
'We were always looking at a public-private approach to doing this work because it is costly. And having the long-term stability of the county along with some of the best thinking in the private sector, we always thought that was the best approach,' Baas explained. 'So that's why we pumped the brakes. It was a pricey project. It was not inexpensive, but knowing that there could have been some financial problems, we thought it would be best to take a step back, even though that meant we had to slow the process down a little bit.'
Now, he said, the county is ready to move forward with building the infrastructure for the park as part of a three-step process. After the infrastructure is in place, ask the Board of Public Works for permission to build a new South Kent Transfer Station on the property to sort through the waste.
Baas said the design phase for the infrastructure should wrap up this year and construction should begin in the spring of 2026. It will take about a year to complete.
'While we're constructing the business park, we'll go into design and permitting for the transfer station so that can start almost at the same time and be ready to be installed as soon as the business park is built,' he said.
Kalamazoo refill store aims to cut down on plastic waste
The South Kent Landfill will be ready to close in the next five years, so it's crucial for the county to have another method of waste removal in place before then. Baas said the goal is still to find a company to run a biodigester and other companies to attach to the new transfer station and take in the materials that are sorted there, like rubbers and construction materials. The organic matter that is sorted would go into the biodigester and become renewable natural gas, which the county could sell.
'When we look at the amount of food waste and organics that are in the trash, one of the major challenges we have is, how do you process it when you there's forks and plastics and all the other materials that get mixed in?' Baas said. 'Once you pull out the organics, traditional composting doesn't work, and that's where anaerobic digestion we think is the better solution. So we'll be looking for mixed-waste processing, because you have to sort everything out first, and then you take that organic or food waste piece and send that over to (the digester) for future processing, and that's where you can generate the renewable natural gas.'
West Michigan dairy farm turns manure into profit
Artificial intelligence should help the county move forward with a more sustainable waste management system. The county is already using AI robots in the recycling center to pick out plastics and metals and plans to utilize the same technology at the future transfer station.
'There's nearly a million tons of trash generated a year in Kent County, which is significant. About 600,000 tons can be processed as mixed municipal solid waste. We can handle about 200,000 tons at the waste-to-energy facility. That leaves about 400,000 tons that could be processed. And the only way you can begin to pull the commodities out and recycle those is you have to be able to sort them out,' Baas said.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Jackson City Council passes water and sewage rate hike
LANSING, Mich. (WLNS) — The Jackson City Council approved a hike in the city's water and sewage rates for the next two fiscal years at a meeting Tuesday night. On average, Jackson residents will see a $5 increase to water and a $6 increase to sewage each month, for a total of $33 per quarter, according to a memo to City Manager Jonathan Greene from Mike Osborn, the city's Director of Public Works. This would come out to $132 a year on average, though the exact amount on your bill would come down to your water usage. These rates were Option #1 of three rate hikes presented to the City Council. Option #1 was the steepest hike of the three, raising the average homeowner's bill by $33 a quarter in comparison to Option #2, raising it by $27, and Option #3 by $21. Osborn's memo says the rate increases would help the city invest and improve its aging water systems, including treatment facilities and collection and distribution infrastructure, and ensure the city complies with the Lead and Copper Rule. The Council also discussed the possibility of switching from quarterly billing to monthly billing, with Ward 3 Councilmember Angelita Gunn and Ward 4 Councilmember Conner Wood saying they spoke with constituents who brought that to their attention as a possibility. Wood said one of his constituents told him monthly billing would make the rate increases 'more tolerable.' Greene says the city has been inching toward monthly billing for the past five years. He says the city has been buying and installing meter parts that allow for remote reading to make the switch, but the process is ongoing. When Gunn asked if there was a specific reason the rate hikes were over 2 years, Greene said that the City has 'gotten into the habit' of two-year rates, as they assist with planning long-term projects. Jackson Mayor Daniel Mahoney brought up the possibility of creating a flexible long-term plan, alternating between rate increases and decreases per year, depending on the funding needs of the city, which would avoid large rate hikes. Ward 6 Councilmember Will Forgrave said that one of the things that made him more comfortable in supporting the rate increases was that, even with the proposed rate increases, the city would still be far below the state average. In the end, Option #1 of the three increases was approved by the city 4-3 by the council. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
East Grand Forks considers first increase in trash fees since 2015
Jun. 10—EAST GRAND FORKS — The East Grand Forks City Council on Tuesday considered the first increases to residential trash fees in more than a decade. The need to increase the fees is quite pressing, East Grand Forks Public Works Director Jason Stordahl told the council during Tuesday's work session, as the city's refuse fund is nearing unsustainable low levels. "City Council has kept rates for services very low in the last few years," Stordahl said. "The reason that we're bringing this before you tonight is that our refuse enterprise (fund) balance is shrinking and we need to raise the rates." The last rate increase was in 2015. Since then, landfill fees have increased by 22% and fees for refuse and recycling have increased by 61%. Raising the rates would eventually close the gap between what the city is charged and what the city charges residents for trash collection. Currently, a 35-gallon container with recycling services costs a resident $13. The city is charged $15.45 for that from Countrywide Sanitation, the company with which the city contracts for residential curbside pickup. Per the contract City Council agreed to last year, that rate will increase to $16.07 on July 1 and 4% each year after. That $2.45 gap is covered from the reserve balance in the refuse enterprise fund. After doing this for a decade, the fund has been depleted. To bring the fees back up to what it actually costs to pick up trash, Public Works has proposed incremental increases to the rates over the next year. Under the proposed structure, a 35-gallon container with recycling services would increase to $16.33 in July, $19.67 in January 2026, and finally to $23 in July 2026. At that point, the fees would then be reviewed on an annual basis. "It's going to take a while (to build up reserves again)," Mayor Mark Olstad said. "That's something we have to be cognizant of, trying to make sure that by statutory reasons, we get that backup." Public Works also will be bringing forward a review of commercial rates in the near future. Unlike residential services, the city collects the trash from commercial buildings and doesn't contract that service out. Potentially having the city also go into residential collection is something to consider as a potential cost savings, City Council member Don Casmey said. Additionally, revamping how Greensite fees work is being discussed. Rather than having a separate, additional fee, it's being proposed that everyone is charged a fee. That would also mean that all residents could use the site instead of only those who pay a fee to use it. Often, access to the site is broken or troublesome with "never-ending" issues for Public Works and actually policing who is and is not using the site is difficult under the current system. In other news, the council: * Received updates about the Safe Streets for All Safety Action Plan. Public comment on a final draft of the plan will open June 16 and both the Grand Forks City Council and East Grand Forks City Council are proposing to have a joint meeting in July to provide comment as a group. * Discussed authorizing the creation of designs for the renovation of Fire Station No. 2. Located at 243 Fifth Ave. SE in the South Point area, the last renovations occurred to repair damage after the Flood of 1997, but it hasn't seen any other work since it was built in 1977. Structurally, the building is fine, but the mechanicals are reaching end of life and it has accessibility issues . Council President Brian Larson said staff should also look into material remediation to see if there's asbestos in the building. * Reviewed plans to drill soil borings near the Point Bridge in preparation for a rehabilitation project. An in-depth study of issues with settling and sliding has not been done in some time, City Engineer Steve Emery said, and doing these borings will allow the city to figure out the best way to eliminate the dip the road takes.
Forbes
19 hours ago
- Forbes
The Next Fintech Unicorns Will Be Built On Invisible Infrastructure
Serge Beck, the founder and CEO of Omniwire, is driven by his belief that people deserve robust and secure financial services. For the past decade, most fintech success stories have appeared similar from the outside: intuitive mobile apps, sleek interfaces and rapidly growing user bases. However, something has changed. Today's important innovations in fintech are no longer visible to the end user. They are happening in the infrastructure layer that makes modern financial services possible. Quietly, these systems are becoming the foundation for the next generation of fintech unicorns. Founders are no longer trying to compete solely on the interface. Investors are no longer rewarding shallow growth. Users are no longer impressed by a clean dashboard if the service behind it is slow, limited or unreliable. According to CB Insights, the Fintech 100 cohort has raised nearly $22 billion in equity funding across 381 deals since 2019. Among the winners in 2023 were core banking and infrastructure platforms. Invisible infrastructure refers to the core technologies that support financial products behind the scenes without being seen by the end user. From payments and identity verification to compliance and core banking, this infrastructure forms the backbone of every fintech offering. Key infrastructure categories include: Banking-As-A-Service (BaaS): Enables nonbanks to offer regulated financial services such as accounts, payments and lending under their brand. Payment Processing Systems: Facilitate fast, secure payment initiation, routing and settlement. The global digital payments market is projected to reach $19.89 trillion by 2026. Card Issuing Technology: Powers creating and managing physical and virtual payment cards at scale. Compliance And Risk Engines: Automate critical functions like anti-money laundering checks, transaction monitoring and identity verification. In practice, here's how it looks: When a fintech app lets a user open an account, send a payment or issue a debit card, that front-end interaction is powered by an invisible stack of infrastructure services. Several companies have emerged to lead this shift: • Unit offers embedded banking platforms that allow startups to offer accounts, cards and payments by integrating directly with banking rails. • Alloy helps fintech automate identity verification and risk decisions, enabling faster onboarding while staying compliant with global regulations. These infrastructure players do not market to consumers or need brand recognition among end users. Instead, they focus on delivering reliability, scalability and compliance to the companies building consumer-facing products. According to Boston Consulting Group, the global fintech market is expected to reach $1.5 trillion annually by 2030. Much of that growth will be driven not by flashy apps but by the infrastructure quietly powering them. Here are the key reasons driving this trend: Launching a financial product used to take months of engineering work. Infrastructure providers now allow companies to go live in weeks. APIs replace the need to build core systems from scratch, which means startups can focus on customer experience rather than back-end development. Infrastructure platforms handle payments, KYC, fraud detection and ledger management so companies do not have to. That means fewer internal resources are needed to build and maintain core functions. Regulations in fintech change often and vary by region. Infrastructure providers are designed to keep up with these shifts. They build compliance into their systems, reducing the chance of mistakes and delays. While invisible infrastructure has become a foundational part of how fintech is built today, it is not without its challenges. One of the first challenges is platform dependency. When a company integrates deeply with an infrastructure provider, switching costs rise quickly and migrating away is rarely simple. Regulatory responsibility is another key consideration. While many infrastructure providers offer built-in compliance features, the ultimate responsibility for compliance often still rests with the company offering the financial product. Security and data handling can also become more complex. Even when providers are compliant, any breach or downtime from the third-party infrastructure affects not just one company, but potentially dozens of customers relying on the same infrastructure. Lastly, the long-term economics of building on infrastructure should be carefully evaluated. While upfront costs are lower, and speed to market is faster, the cumulative fees from usage-based pricing can grow significantly at scale. What looks like operational efficiency in the early stages can turn into a margin challenge as the business matures. This doesn't mean the model is flawed. However, it does require careful forecasting to keep unit economics healthy over time. As this infrastructure becomes the default way to build in fintech, what success looks like for operators and those backing them is changing. Startups succeed by moving fast and focusing on their edge. For fintech founders, that edge is rarely in building internal compliance systems, managing bank integrations or handling payments infrastructure from the ground up. Instead, founders should direct their energy toward what sets their product apart. Everything else, like payments, identity verification, card issuance and account creation, can and should be handed off to trusted infrastructure providers. For investors, this shift changes how they should evaluate early-stage fintech opportunities. Consumer-facing products will always have appeal, but the more durable value often sits in the companies that enable those products. Infrastructure companies benefit from: High retention, because once integrated, they are hard to replace. Recurring revenue is important since they typically charge per user, per transaction or via platform fees. Scale without exposure because they support many customers without taking on direct regulatory or reputational risk from end users. These traits make infrastructure businesses highly attractive, especially in uncertain or highly competitive markets. They also grow and benefit from the ecosystem's success rather than just their own. For investors, the takeaway is clear: Backing the right infrastructure company means betting not just on one business model but an entire generation of fintech builders who depend on it. Forbes Technology Council is an invitation-only community for world-class CIOs, CTOs and technology executives. Do I qualify?
