Nigeria's Tinubu touts economy amid cost-of-living anger
Nigerian President Bola Tinubu defended a series of economic reforms enacted by his government in an address on Thursday.
'Our economic reforms are working. We are on course to building a greater, more economically stable nation,' Tinubu said in the remarks marking his second anniversary in office.
After coming into power, Tinubu's administration has twice devalued the country currency, the naira, and slashed electricity and petrol price subsidies. Nigeria is Africa's largest crude oil producer.
'We have made undeniable progress'
'Despite the bump in the cost of living, we have made undeniable progress,' Tinubu said.
'We have stabilised our economy and are now better positioned for growth and prepared to withstand global shocks.'
Although the World Bank has warned that Nigeria continues to face high inflation, the Washington-based financial institution recently said Nigeria witnessed its highest economic growth in 10 years amid Tinubu's reforms.
Since Tinubu introduced the economic reforms, inflation in Nigeria has soared to rates of over 23%. High fuel prices, food inflation and rising electricity costs have frustrated working Nigerians and sparked a cost-of-living crisis.
The fury over high consumer prices has led Nigerians to take to the streets across the country this and last year.
Some protests have even turned violent as demonstrators clash with security forces, leaving people dead. The Nigerian government has arrested protesters and charged some of them with treason, a crime that can come with the death penalty.
In his second anniversary address, Tinubu also claimed that security has improved in Nigeria, saying military forces are deterring threats from armed groups.
Nigeria has witnessed attacks and kidnappings not only from jihadi groups such as Boko Haram but also bandits who sack villages.
Tinubu's statement comes after human rights watchdog Amnesty International said at least 10 217 people have been killed in Nigeria by jihadis and armed groups in the two years since he has taken office.
Tinubu critics denounce government 'failure'
Nigerian politician and journalist Omoyele Sowore criticised Tinubu's second anniversary address, accusing Tinubu on X of ending the 'petrol subsidy for people with low incomes' while subsidising 'corrupt government officials and lawmakers'.
Today marks Asiwaju Bola Ahmed Tinubu's second year in office as 'President.'
A man who took two years to construct only 30 kilometers of highway on his signature 700 km Lagos-Calabar highway project is FAILURE.
A man who met the other exchange rate at N400 and pushed it to… pic.twitter.com/Y1GtuTjjjk
— Omoyele Sowore (@YeleSowore) May 29, 2025
Sowore also said Tinubu's government let the Boko Haram jihadi group move from Nigeria's northeastern states of Borno and Yobe down south into the north-central state of Kogi.
'A man who met Boko Haram in Borno and Yobe but let them move down south to Kogi is a failure,' Sowore, who ran as a presidential candidate in the 2023 Nigerian election, said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News24
18 minutes ago
- News24
IFP MP ‘assassinated' in Gauteng attack, party says
Khethamabala Sithole/Facebook Be among those who shape the future with knowledge. Uncover exclusive stories that captivate your mind and heart with our FREE 14-day subscription trial. Dive into a world of inspiration, learning, and empowerment. You can only trial once. Start your FREE trial now
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Who is Julius Malema, the South African politician behind 'kill the farmer' chant?
JOHANNESBURG - Julius Malema, the South African politician who President Donald Trump wants arrested for repeatedly chanting "kill the farmer," is reportedly a Rolex watch-wearing Gucci revolutionary, often seen in snazzy, expensive clothes, who champions the poor from a luxury mansion in what is said to be South Africa's richest street. He has also called for the further arming of the terror group Hamas and has been accused of stealing millions of dollars from the very pensioners he is trying to get to vote for him. Trump confronted South African President Cyril Ramaphosa with a video of Malema shouting "Shoot to kill, Kill the Boer (the Afrikaner), kill the farmer," when the South African president, a neighbor of Malema's in Johannesburg, visited the Oval Office earlier this month. South Africa's President Pushes Back On Trump's Demand To Arrest Politician Who Chanted 'Kill The Farmer' Trump has offered Afrikaner farmers, descendants of mostly Dutch settlers, refuge in the U.S., citing controversial and disputed claims that they are facing White genocide and forced land seizures. The self-styled commander in chief of the Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF) Party, Malema, a Marxist-Leninist, was the head of the Youth League of South Africa's biggest party, the African National Congress (ANC), but he was kicked out for bad-mouthing its leadership. Read On The Fox News App In last year's election, votes for the EFF slumped to under 10%, and both of Malema's sidekicks, party co-founders and men he described as "brothers," left him and joined a competing party. So it did not come as a surprise to many that, allegedly to spite President Trump, Malema just days later jumped up, literally, onto the stage at the very next rally he was due to appear at to yell "Kill the farmer, I repeat kill the farmer." In 2022, South Africa's Constitutional Court, the equivalent of the U.S. Supreme Court, ruled the chant is not hate speech, declaring it is only the words of a song. Malema sits on the Judicial Services Commission, a body which appoints the Court's judges. To Malema, critics say, the chant may be more than just song lyrics. At least twice he told reporters here, "We have not called for the killing of White people – at least for now." On another occasion, he demanded, "We will cut the throat of Whiteness." Trump, South Africa In Growing Row Over Hotly Contested Land Law, Country's Deals With Us Foes Some say Malema is running two strategies - one which follows the mantra "There's no such thing as bad publicity," and the other to act like a small child that makes a lot of noise, hoping to be noticed, but with little real effect. Analyst J. Brooks Spector told Fox News Digital that Malema "has crafted a political reputation as the 'bad boy' of South African politics." Spector, a former U.S. diplomat who lives in Johannesburg and is associate editor of the Daily Maverick, continued. "In a country with a third of its workforce unemployed, and higher among young people, and poverty still a fact of life for many more, his (Malema's) populism initially drew significant support and enthusiasm among voters. However, his popularity as a political leader has faded somewhat." Malema openly supports the terror group Hamas, telling a rally in 2023, shortly after the October 7 attack on Israel, "when you are oppressed, you only have one option, shoot to kill. There is nothing wrong with what Hamas is doing. The EFF is going to arm Hamas." He also shouted he intended to shut down the Israeli Embassy in South Africa. "We are going to remove this embassy," he yelled to loud cheers. Allegations also suggest that Malema and his then right-hand man, Floyd Shivambu, benefitted from "dodgy" deals with the South African VBS bank, which subsequently collapsed, leading to people losing their pension savings. "In 2018, the VBS scandal exposed widespread looting by bank officials and politicians, including senior leaders of the EFF, Floyd Shivambu and Julius Malema," the Opposition Democratic Alliance's (DA) Baxolile Nodada stated last August. On Friday, the DA's federal executive member and national spokesperson, Willie Aucamp, told Fox News Digital the DA "isn't letting the VBS scandal fade into the background. Not when over R2 billion ($111 million) was looted from pensioners, struggling municipalities, and poor communities. The DA has been leading the charge to expose those behind this daylight robbery, including Julius Malema, leader of the EFF." He continued, "The DA laid criminal charges back in 2018, but six years later, not a single charge has been prosecuted by the National Prosecuting Authority (NPA). Justice for the victims of VBS is long overdue. The DA will continue pushing for the arrest and prosecution of every single person involved - Malema included." Speaking in Cape Town in July last year, Malema said "I will never be intimidated by VBS. No leader of the EFF received VBS money." But now that Malema is on Donald Trump's radar, the president might push back powerfully on Malema's links to Hamas and the VBS saga, Max Meizlish, senior research analyst at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies, told Fox News Digital. "Like the ANC that courts Iran and supports Hamas, Julius Malema would be wise to not provoke Donald Trump. After all, Malema was clearly implicated in the VBS scandal and has openly called to "arm Hamas." Malema could very well find himself the target of Global Magnitsky Act sanctions — a tool which President Trump can wield unilaterally and at a moment's notice," Meizlish article source: Who is Julius Malema, the South African politician behind 'kill the farmer' chant?
Boston Globe
2 hours ago
- Boston Globe
India and Pakistan's air battle is over. Their water war has begun.
India's targeting of water, however, is not just about combating terrorism, analysts say. The Indian government has been frustrated by the 65-year-old treaty, believing it has favored Pakistan from the start, and analysts say that India is hoping to force Pakistan to renegotiate it. That could allow India to better use its allotted waters to meet the needs of its immense population and adapt to climate change. Advertisement India's decision to put the agreement 'in abeyance' -- and the vague conditions it has imposed on Pakistan to reverse that -- has injected a note of uncertainty into the future of a treaty that has survived multiple wars and conflicts. A full breakdown would have serious consequences for both countries, especially Pakistan, an arid land with few other sources of water. Advertisement Rising temperatures and increased demand make South Asia's water systems among the world's most stressed. The hostile neighbors also share a need to address dangers like flash floods and glacial lake bursts unleashed by global warming. And if changes in river flows endanger Pakistani lives or employment, India could face international opprobrium. The treaty specifies how the waters of the Indus River basin -- around which one of the world's oldest civilizations, the Indus Valley civilization, flourished -- will be used by the two countries. The agreement, which became necessary after India and Pakistan became independent nations in 1947, took nine years to negotiate and was signed in 1960 in what its preamble called a 'spirit of goodwill,' and with the World Bank as a mediator. Pakistan has unrestricted use of three western rivers, and India has the same claim to three eastern rivers. India also has limited rights to the western rivers within its territory, including for irrigation, and the ability to build dams for power generation. The treaty's allotment of 80 percent of the waters in the Indus system to Pakistan was a 'remarkable act of generosity, driven by the hope of promoting subcontinental peace,' said Brahma Chellaney, a strategic analyst who has written about water and conflict. Scientists and officials say the treaty has held up because it is a sound legal document that provides for a permanent commission with representatives from each country who are expected to be in regular contact, as well as mechanisms for settling conflicts using neutral experts and arbitration. But it has been a trying process over the decades between deeply distrustful neighbors. Advertisement In 1992, when five days of heavy monsoon rains caused deadly flooding, Pakistani officials accused India of unannounced dam releases, while India maintained that the actions were necessary owing to the extreme rainfall and were in compliance with protocol. India currently has six dams on the western rivers, with plans to build more. Pakistan has raised objections to several of the dam designs and plans, including the Kishenganga hydroelectric project. Over the past decade, the treaty has encountered increasing geopolitical friction. After attacks on Indian troops in 2016 and 2019 in Indian-administered Kashmir, India announced plans to curtail water flows to Pakistan but did not follow through. The treaty can be altered by mutual consent. As India has formally sought to revise the treaty, Pakistan has rejected these efforts, according to Indian government records and experts. 'The obstructionist approach' continues to prevent the 'utilization of the legitimate rights by India,' Parvathaneni Harish, India's permanent representative to the United Nations, said at a forum last week on water and armed conflict. At the same meeting, Pakistan's deputy permanent representative, Usman Jadoon, said that India was using river waters as a political weapon, and that Islamabad would not allow New Delhi to turn water into a tool of coercion. India has little ability to substantially reduce the flow of water into Pakistan, and building the infrastructure to do so would take years, experts say. But Pakistan is unnerved by India's suspension of its participation in the treaty in part because India has stopped providing hydrological data, according to Indian government officials and experts. Because it is downstream, Pakistan relies heavily on India to share this data, which is crucial for Pakistani agriculture, a sector that accounts for nearly one-quarter of the country's economy and employs 37 percent of the labor force. Advertisement Information from India about glacier melt, the speed of floodwaters and precipitation levels, as well as timing decisions on opening sluice gates, is vital for Pakistan to determine its irrigation needs and flood management plans. Fazalullah Qureshi, a former senior Pakistani official, linked this data gap to Pakistan's inability to anticipate devastating floods in 2022, which killed over 1,700 people and affected 33 million of the country's 245 million people. During the coming monsoon season, Pakistani water managers will need to operate in a more uncertain environment, relying less on formal notifications and more on real-time observations and rapid-response systems, said Hassaan F. Khan, an assistant professor of environmental studies at Tufts University. Khan said that underscored the 'urgent need for Pakistan to invest in more nimble, adaptive water governance.' Qureshi said there was no immediate threat to the country's water supply, but a prolonged suspension of treaty mechanisms could severely affect agriculture and the broader economy. This article originally appeared in
