logo
Mexico's first judicial elections stir controversy and confusion among voters

Mexico's first judicial elections stir controversy and confusion among voters

MEXICO CITY (AP) — Mexico is holding its first ever judicial elections on Sunday, stirring controversy and sowing confusion among voters still struggling to understand a process set to transform the country's court system.
Mexico's ruling party, Morena, overhauled the court system late last year, fueling protests and criticism that the reform is an attempt by those in power to seize on their political popularity to gain control of the branch of government until now out of their reach.
'It's an effort to control the court system, which has been a sort of thorn in the side' of those in power, said Laurence Patin, director of the legal organization Juicio Justo in Mexico. 'But it's a counter-balance, which exists in every healthy democracy.'
Now, instead of judges being appointed on a system of merit and experience, Mexican voters will choose between some 7,700 candidates vying for more than 2,600 judicial positions.
Mexico President Claudia Sheinbaum and party allies have said the elections are a way to purge the court system of corruption in a country that has long faced high levels of impunity. Critics say the vote could damage democracy and open the judicial system up further to organized crime and other corrupt actors hoping to get a grip on power.
That process has only grown more chaotic in the run-up to the vote.
Civil society organizations like Defensorxs have raised red flags about a range of candidates running for election, including lawyers who represented some of Mexico's most feared cartel leaders and local officials who were forced to resign from their positions due to corruption scandals.
Also among those putting themselves forward are ex-convicts imprisoned for years for drug-trafficking to the United States and a slate of candidates with ties to a religious group whose spiritual leader is behind bars in California after pleading guilty to sexually abusing minors.
At the same time, voters have been plagued by confusion over a voting process that Patin warned has been hastily thrown together. Voters often have to choose from sometimes more than a hundred candidates who are not permitted to clearly voice their party affiliation or carry out widespread campaigning.
As a result, many Mexicans say they're going into the vote blind. Mexico's electoral authority has investigated voter guides being handed out across the country, in what critics say is a blatant move by political parties to stack the vote in their favor.
'Political parties weren't just going to sit with their arms crossed,' Patin said.
Miguel Garcia, a 78-year-old former construction worker, stood in front of the country's Supreme Court on Friday peering at a set of posters, voter guides with the faces and numbers of candidates.
He was fiercely scribbling down their names on a small scrap of paper and said that he had traveled across Mexico City to try to inform himself ahead of the vote, but he couldn't find any information other than outside the courthouse.
'In the neighborhood where I live, there's no information for us,' he said. 'I'm confused, because they're telling us to go out and vote but we don't know who to vote for.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Fentanyl trafficking from Mexico to US has dropped 40%, Mexico's Sheinbaum says
Fentanyl trafficking from Mexico to US has dropped 40%, Mexico's Sheinbaum says

Yahoo

time3 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Fentanyl trafficking from Mexico to US has dropped 40%, Mexico's Sheinbaum says

MEXICO CITY (Reuters) -Fentanyl trafficking from Mexico to the United States has fallen around 40% since U.S. President Donald Trump took office in January, Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum said on Friday. Trump has cited fentanyl trafficking as a factor in his decision to put tariffs on Mexico, though many shipments are not affected, as they enter the country under a trilateral trade agreement.

Human rights committee blames Guatemala for forcing girl who was raped to carry out her pregnancy
Human rights committee blames Guatemala for forcing girl who was raped to carry out her pregnancy

Associated Press

time16 hours ago

  • Associated Press

Human rights committee blames Guatemala for forcing girl who was raped to carry out her pregnancy

GUATEMALA CITY (AP) — A panel of independent experts who make up the United Nations Human Rights Committee said Thursday they found that Guatemala violated the rights of a 14-year-old girl who was raped and forced to continue her pregnancy. A former director of a government-run daycare facility she had attended as a child raped her on multiple occasions beginning in 2009 when she was 13 and no longer attended the center, but she was denied access to abortion, forced to carry out the birth and care for the child, treatment the committee compared to torture. 'No girl should be forced to carry the child of her rapist. Doing so robs her of her dignity, her future, and her most basic rights,' Committee member Hélène Tigroudja said in a statement, adding that 'This is not just a violation of reproductive autonomy — it is a profound act of cruelty.' The committee monitors countries' adherence to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. When the girl's mother found out about the abuse she reported it to authorities. The man and his wife tried to bribe and threaten the girl's family into withdrawing the report. The case wound on in Guatemala's justice system for nine years, but the man was never punished. 'Guatemala did not properly investigate the rape, nor did it take effective action to prosecute the perpetrator,' the committee said. 'Guatemala is one of the Latin American countries with the highest rates of both forced motherhood and systematic impunity for sexual violence,' the committee's statement said. 'Although the Guatemalan Criminal Code allows abortion in specific situations to avoid a threat to the life of the mother, access to legal abortion is almost impossible in practice.' The committee called on Guatemala to establish a system to record and monitor such cases. In the case of the girl, it said the state should support her to complete higher education and attain her goals. Catalina Martínez, vice president for Latin America and the Caribbean for the Center of Reproductive Rights, one of the groups that brought the girl's case forward, said there is agreement in society that the protection of girls is a priority. 'But that promise is broken when we don't provide access to all health services, including abortion, and we obligate them to assume motherhood that they don't want and for which they are not prepared,' she said.

Supreme Court Kills Mexico's $10 Billion Lawsuit Against U.S. Gun Manufacturers
Supreme Court Kills Mexico's $10 Billion Lawsuit Against U.S. Gun Manufacturers

Forbes

timea day ago

  • Forbes

Supreme Court Kills Mexico's $10 Billion Lawsuit Against U.S. Gun Manufacturers

The Supreme Court ended Mexico's ongoing lawsuit against U.S. gun manufacturers, ruling Thursday the country can't legally sue the firearm companies and dealing a blow to gun control advocates who argue the lawsuit is necessary to hold manufacturers accountable for gun violence. FILE - Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum attends a press conference at the National Palace in ... More Mexico City on April 2. The Supreme Court was asked to determine the future of Mexico's lawsuit against U.S. firearm manufacturers, in which the country's government asked the companies to pay $10 billion in damages for allegedly 'deliberately aid[ing] and abett[ing] the unlawful sale of firearms' to Mexico's drug cartels. Gun manufacturers asked justices to throw out a lower court's ruling allowing the lawsuit to move forward, and the court agreed with them unanimously, ending the lawsuit. This story is breaking and will be updated. Mexico's lawsuit alleges U.S. firearm manufacturers know full well their products are being sold to drug cartels in Mexico, despite the companies claiming otherwise. The government alleges gun companies have taken steps that help their products be sold to cartels, such as intentionally selling to dealers known to work with the criminal organizations. Manufacturers also market firearms that intentionally cater to the cartels, the Mexican government claims, like Mexico-themed pistols engraved with a quote the government notes is a 'particular favorite' of the cartels. The firearm manufacturers oppose those allegations, claiming Mexico is just taking aim at 'how the American firearms industry has openly operated in broad daylight for years' and is using the lawsuit to try and force harsher gun control restrictions than what U.S. law requires. The Mexican government 'faults the defendants for producing common firearms like the AR-15; for allowing their products to hold more than ten rounds; [and] for failing to restrict the purchase of firearms by regular citizens,' the companies alleged to the Supreme Court, claiming, 'In Mexico's eyes, continuing these lawful practices amounts to aiding and abetting the cartels.' The PLCAA was passed in 2005 and broadly prohibits manufacturers of firearms or firearm components from facing any civil lawsuits that stem from the 'criminal or unlawful misuse' of their products. In addition to the clause allowing lawsuits if companies 'knowingly' help aid and abet crimes, the law also states companies can still be sued for breach of contract, if anyone dies or gets injured due to a defect in the product's manufacturing or design, or if the company commits negligence by supplying their product to someone whom the company knows 'is likely to, and does, use the [firearm] The Mexico case was one of two major gun cases the Supreme Court took up this term, with justices ruling in March to uphold Biden-era restrictions on 'ghost guns' that can be purchased as a kit and assembled at home, making them harder to trace. The 6-3 conservative court has faced widespread scrutiny for its handling of gun issues in recent years: Justices broadly weakened gun restrictions in a 2022 case over New York's concealed carry law, which led to gun laws being rolled back nationwide. During its term last year, the court upheld restrictions on domestic abusers owning guns, but also struck down the federal ban on 'bump stocks' that allow firearms to function like automatic weapons.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store