logo
National Trust members angry as family handed back Tudor house after £3m repairs

National Trust members angry as family handed back Tudor house after £3m repairs

Independent25-02-2025

National Trust members have been left disappointed by the decision to hand back management of a popular Tudor House to the residing family after a £3.3m conservation project.
An agreement has been reached between the charity and the Throckmorton family, who have lived at the stately home since 1409, for the family to take over and resume the day-to-day management of Coughton Court in 2026.
The Tudor home in Warwickshire has been the home of the family for 21 generations over six centuries and plays a part in important English historical events such as the Gunpowder Plot and family connections to the royals.
Aside from being a family home, Coughton nowadays opens its doors to visitors to explore the house, gardens and parkland, with shops and an onsite cafe also found on the grounds.
The Throckmortons want Coughton to become an 'independent family run' attraction, however, some visitors have voiced their criticism over changing management not long after charity- and donation-funded renovations are due to be completed on the house.
Coughton is currently undergoing a £3.3m large-scale building conservation project, repairing the building's facade and roof, that is to be completed this summer.
A former Coughton Court volunteer guide, Philip Roberts, 74, told The Times he was 'dismayed' that the property will no longer be included in the National Trust portfolio.
He said he was 'appalled' that the family were 'now going to reap the benefits' of the redevelopment and that members, who had partly paid for the work, would not be able to visit the property for free.
In a year's time, Coughton Court will no longer be part of the National Trust member offer, with opening times and admission charges managed by the Throckmorton family.
'I for one will not be paying to visit once the family take over,' Mr Roberts added.
Others took to Coughton's Facebook page to say they would not be visiting again due to the management change.
'Why have you spent a fortune on restoration work, when the building is about to return to private management so we will no longer be able to visit?' one user wrote.
The National Trust has managed visitor operations at Coughton Court under a 15-year arrangement with the family since 2005 which was extended, but the family has now decided to resume managing the property, which they will do from February 2025 onwards.
While the management will change, the National Trust said they will remain in ownership of the property, meaning that care and maintenance will still be supported by them.
A National Trust spokesperson told The Independent that as owner, it has a responsibility for upkeep and maintenance of the property, from which an endowment was provided by the Throckmorton family at the time of the original agreement.
'With our ongoing responsibility for major repairs, the Trust had to replace the roof at Coughton in order to safeguard the property,' the spokesperson said. 'This work was needed regardless of whether the Trust or the Throckmorton family were managing the property, and work began in 2023.'
The endowment is still used to support repairs and other works, but any large maintenance or renovation projects, such as replacing the roof 'are considered alongside other major projects across the Trust and prioritised accordingly for which central funds would also be allocated.
'The roof project at Coughton was also supported by an external grant from the Wolfson Foundation,' the National Trust added, with its website also adding that 'kind donations' from National Trust members and supporters contributed too.
In a statement to The Independent, Magnus Birch Throckmorton said: 'It has always been my family's intention to take back the day-to-day running of Coughton and the National Trust has been aware of our ambitions.
'With the drive and enthusiasm to restore its legacy, it was decided that the time is right for my wife and I to return the management to family hands.
'We mutually agreed with the National Trust that the management transfer would take place on completion of the roof repairs so that while the works are taking place, there is a single entity coordinating both the repairs and the visitor experience.
'No money has been exchanged – the annual management agreement has simply not been renewed.
'The National Trust will continue to own Coughton Court and will be responsible for the ongoing upkeep and maintenance of the property, he added. 'As a family, we will be responsible for the day-to-day running costs, including care of the collection.'
The family's history with Coughton dates back to when the estate was acquired by John de Throckmorton, the Under Treasurer of England to Henry VI, in the early 15th century through his marriage to Eleanor de Spiney, heiress to Coughton.
The house was then rebuilt by the Throckmorton family and has stayed in the lineage for 600 years, with members of the family still residing there.
Mr Birch Throckmorton, his wife, Imogen and his family have managed the gardens while the National Trust has overseen visitor operations.
The Throckmorton family transferred ownership of the property to the National Trust in 1946, while a 300-year hereditary lease was put in place which granted the family the right to live at Coughton Court.
Mr Birch Throckmorton added in a statement on their website: 'We're incredibly excited to bring a family touch to the visitor experience and work with our brilliant team to deliver a vibrant next chapter that will stand out in Coughton's history in another 300 years.
'The Throckmortons have a legacy of hands-on management - my mother and grandmother designed and created the gardens that thousands of visitors enjoy today.
'We are extremely grateful to the National Trust for the restoration and preservation work that has been undertaken to date.
'Coughton Court has always been well cared for but we feel the time is right to bring its management back into family hands and celebrate its uniqueness.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Six dead in San Diego plane crash as Cessna slams into ocean after pilot made haunting final call to air traffic control
Six dead in San Diego plane crash as Cessna slams into ocean after pilot made haunting final call to air traffic control

Scottish Sun

time3 hours ago

  • Scottish Sun

Six dead in San Diego plane crash as Cessna slams into ocean after pilot made haunting final call to air traffic control

Crews struggled to find the wreckage after the plane went down CRASH HORROR Six dead in San Diego plane crash as Cessna slams into ocean after pilot made haunting final call to air traffic control Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) SIX people have died after a plane slammed into the ocean off the coast of San Diego. The aircraft went down in 200 feet of water after taking off on Sunday afternoon. 1 Six people have died after a plane slammed into the ocean in San Diego The horror crash occurred near Point Loma, a peninsula in San Diego that juts into the Pacific. Officials with the Federal Aviation Administration confirmed the plane was a twin-engine Cessna 414 carrying six people. The FAA said the plane took off from San Diego and was heading back to Phoenix, Arizona. The aircraft had reportedly flown to California just a day earlier. It went down around 12:30 pm on Sunday, according to officials. Search crews discovered a debris field about five miles offshore later that same day but continued to search for survivors. The FAA confirmed on Monday that no one survived the crash. So far, none of the six victims have been publicly identified. The pilot made a haunting final call to air traffic controllers before the crash. He said he was struggling to maintain his heading and climb as the aircraft turned toward the shore twice before going back out to sea. The plane was just 1,000 feet above the water when the controller urged the pilot to climb to 4,000 feet, KTAR reported. The water in that area is roughly 200 feet deep, the Coast Guard said. FAA records list the owner as Optimal Health Systems, a supplement company based in Pima, Arizona. But the company said it sold the plane to private buyers last year. The FAA database could be out of date, the company said in a statement. Doug Grant, the company's founder, said he personally knew several of the passengers on board. 'Our sincerest condolences are offered to those affected by the tragedy,' Grant said. More to follow... For the latest news on this story, keep checking back at The U.S. Sun, your go-to destination for the best celebrity news, sports news, real-life stories, jaw-dropping pictures, and must-see videos. Like us on Facebook at TheSunUS and follow us on X at @TheUSSun

Minding our language on the use of Americanisms
Minding our language on the use of Americanisms

The Guardian

time7 hours ago

  • The Guardian

Minding our language on the use of Americanisms

The continual expansion of the English language is inevitable and welcome. But while Elisabeth Ribbans is right that 'it would be a mistake to regard language as a fortress', it is not unreasonable to lament the effect of some invasive species whose proliferation is so rapid that native alternatives face possible extinction (How the use of a word in the Guardian has gotten some readers upset, 4 June). 'Gotten' may be an innocuous, if inelegant, English word making a return journey from the US, but some other US variants are more problematic. For example, the phrase 'Can I get …?' is suffocating more polite ways of making a request, such as 'May I/can I have …?' or simply 'I'd like …'. It is also annoyingly inaccurate, since in most cases the person asking has no intention of helping themselves and wouldn't be allowed to, even if they wanted to. But wholesale adoption not only leads to neglect of alternatives, it can also produce banality. So when both a sandwich and a sunset might today be described as 'awesome', it is reasonable to imagine that even as eclectic a wordsmith as Shakespeare might consider modern English borrowings as diminishing the language through having gotten McGilchristCromer, Norfolk Thank you, Elisabeth Ribbans, for your article on the cosmopolitan and evolving use of words in the English language. I am always stung by the snobbery I encounter among my British peers regarding American words or spellings. Criticism of American accents more so. My country of origin provokes pride and shame in increasingly equal measure, but to be cowed because of my voice, both written and spoken, leaves a foul taste. Once we've gotten past this distasteful persnicketiness, we can actually appreciate the meaning of the words being used, not just their Amy FultonOxton, Scottish Borders I grew up in the old West Riding, only a few miles from the county border with Lancashire. In the early 1950s, we regularly used the word 'gotten'. It was frowned on by teachers and others addicted to standard English. I believe the use of the word was common in other districts of Yorkshire. It is an English and not an American word, which has sadly passed out of use. Language evolves!Roderick WilsonAmpleforth, North Yorkshire When I worked at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in Cambridge, US, in the 1980s, my friendly editor had more appreciation of British irony than spelling. She once wrote on a draft paper: 'Richard. Please pick one spelling of 'practice' and stick to it.'Richard LammingShaldon, Devon Am I alone in finding 'shined' for 'shone' less than illuminating? Incidentally, like, who introduced 'like' like?Bill WintripDorchester, Dorset So not an ill-gotten 'gotten' then. Now where do we stand on 'snuck'?Tony RimmerLytham St Anne's, Lancashire Never mind 'faucet' and 'gotten' (Letters, 29 May), I've been racking my brain: in what play did Shakespeare use 'worser'? (Colon used free gratis.)Iain FentonLancaster Have an opinion on anything you've read in the Guardian today? Please email us your letter and it will be considered for publication in our letters section.

English and Scottish exhibitors barred from Royal Welsh Show
English and Scottish exhibitors barred from Royal Welsh Show

Powys County Times

time8 hours ago

  • Powys County Times

English and Scottish exhibitors barred from Royal Welsh Show

English and Scottish livestock exhibitors will not be allowed to compete in this year's Royal Welsh Show due to the Bluetounge virus. The Royal Welsh Agricultural Society have said they have taken the taken the decision due to veterinary advice about the 'unique risks' of the show. The Bluetongue virus is a highly infectious disease spread amongst sheep and cattle by infected midges It is listed by the UK government as a notifiable disease and the last year has seen multiple outbreaks in England. This has culminated with a recent change being announced by DEFRA which will see 'the restricted zone for bluetongue extended to cover all of England' from July 1 – 'this means that from this date you will be able to move animals within England without a bluetongue licence or test'. As a result, the show which will be held on the week of July 21 had to asses the situation. In a statement, a spokesperson for the Royal Welsh Agricultural Society said: 'While supporting the unrestricted movement of animals is important to us, our primary focus has been on developing a showing policy for this year's Royal Welsh Show that protects our exhibitors and the integrity of the event. 'The Show presents unique risks – it is a large-scale gathering of susceptible animals sharing close airspace over five to six days, and it takes place during the peak vector season. This is distinctly different form one-day livestock markets or direct farm-to-farm movements. Help support trusted local news Sign up for a digital subscription now: As a digital subscriber you will get Unlimited access to the County Times website Advert-light access Reader rewards Full access to our app 'For this reason we have adopted a precautionary approach and will not be accepting livestock entries from any exhibitors based within an BTV Restriction Zone nor from those who need to travel through an RZ to reach the show. "This includes all entries from England and Scotland." The Society added that the decision 'relates to this year's Royal Welsh Show and the Show alone'. They added: 'This has not been an easy decision for us We have explored all available options including pre-movement testing and unrestricted entries. Each had its pros and cons, but ultimately, none provided the level of risk mitigation we require or proved practically workable.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store