Saudi Arabia and Iraq to strengthen security cooperation
RIYADH — Saudi Minister of Interior Prince Abdulaziz bin Saud bin Naif received Iraqi Minister of Interior Lt. Gen. Abdulamir Al-Shammari in Riyadh on Monday.
During the meeting, they reviewed ways to strengthen the existing security cooperation between the two countries. The two sides also discussed several issues of common interest.
© Copyright 2022 The Saudi Gazette. All Rights Reserved. Provided by SyndiGate Media Inc. (Syndigate.info).
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Middle East Eye
2 days ago
- Middle East Eye
Iranian press review: Conservative media demand rejection of US proposal
Critics say US proposal not worth answering The new US proposal for a nuclear deal with Iran has drawn sharp criticism from Iranian conservative media, with some urging Iranian diplomats to halt the negotiations. The Jame Jam daily, run by the country's only state broadcaster, last Tuesday dedicated all of its main content to the issue. Its main front-page story addressed Iran's foreign minister directly, with the headline: 'Mr Araghchi! America's new damn nonsense is not worth a response.' It read: 'America's history of making excessive demands and the topics they have raised show that Washington's proposal does not deserve a reply.' The article was in response to recent remarks by Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi, who said Iran would soon issue a written response to the US proposal. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters Jame Jam also criticised the Massoud Pezeshkian administration's handling of talks with the US. In a column by conservative media analyst Sepehr Khalaji, the daily urged the government to 'learn a lesson' from previous negotiations that had failed to produce results. Another conservative analyst, Morad Anadi, contrasted the international pressure on Iran's nuclear programme with the silence surrounding Israel's. 'In this unfair system, which is called nuclear apartheid, the Zionist regime has more than 200 nuclear warheads, is not a member of the NPT, and has never allowed inspections of its nuclear sites,' he said. Rare unity as politicians slam cleric arrested in Saudi Arabia The arrest of Gholamreza Ghasemian, an extremist Iranian cleric, in Saudi Arabia has sparked rare unity in Iranian domestic politics, with all political factions, including from principlists and reformists, condemning the controversial figure. Ghasemian, who in recent years had gained strong support from conservative and hard-line groups in Iran, criticised Saudi Arabia's rulers in a video he posted online while in the country for the Hajj pilgrimage. What is stopping Israel from bombing Iran's nuclear sites? Read More » Following his arrest and deportation by Saudi authorities, the conservative Iranian daily Quds criticised his remarks, writing: 'An incident like this, at a time when the Iranian diplomatic team is rebuilding regional relations, creates a negative impact. It also sows division in the Islamic world; exactly what the United States and the Zionist regime want.' The reformist newspaper Arman Melli welcomed the principlists' condemnation of Ghasemian, calling it a sign of the government's efforts to avoid extremist policies. Abdolreza Davari, a reformist political activist, wrote in an opinion piece for Arman Melli, titled: 'The political climate in the Islamic Republic is changing." He wrote: 'Radical behaviour and speech no longer have a place at the highest levels of governance. A clear example of this shift is the cold response from both the government and public opinion to Qasemian's recent remarks in Medina.' Jalal Rashidi Kochi, a former member of the Iranian parliament, also posted on X: 'Mr Ghasemian, you are not serving religion or the revolution. You are deliberately causing harm to the country, the people, and the establishment. This action is not courage, and it is not stupidity. It is treason.' IRGC criticised for 'hell' attraction in northern city The Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) has come under fire for building a 'hell' attraction in the northern city of Fuman, based on Shia Islamic beliefs. After facing backlash, the IRGC announced plans to build a 'paradise' site as well, a move that has only added to the criticism. In a video shared on social media, visitors are shown walking across a metal bridge suspended just above real flames. In the background, actors perform scenes meant to represent torture in hell, including flogging. Ayatollah Seyyed Mohammad Ali Ayazi, a renowned religious scholar, strongly reacted to the project. 'People are already suffering from economic hardship, poverty, poor management, electricity and gas shortages, water issues, and many other problems,' he said. 'Why would you want to add to their suffering?' Political activist Abdolreza Davari also criticised the project, pointing to the country's winter gas shortages. He estimated the gas consumption of the attraction: 'If the Fuman hell uses 150 burners for four hours a day, and each burner uses 20 cubic metres of gas per hour, then it burns 12,000 cubic meters of gas every day. That is equal to the daily gas use of 480 homes in winter and costs about $2,400 per day.' China planes-for-oil deal sparks outcry The arrival of two used Airbus A330 planes from China to Iran has triggered criticism over the exploitative nature of the economic deals between the two countries. Saudi Arabian and Omani officials propose nuclear facilities for Iran on Gulf island: Report Read More » Local media reported that the planes were sold at nearly four times their actual value, raising concerns about exploitation under international sanctions. The story was first reported by the Iranian Labour News Agency (ILNA), which claimed that "the Chinese sold $30m worth of planes for $116m". According to ILNA, Haokun Energy, a Chinese company, took advantage of Iran's limited access to global oil markets and banking systems, caused by international sanctions. The planes were reportedly delivered in exchange for Iranian oil. This is not the first time Chinese companies have been accused of benefiting from US sanctions against Iran. However, it is one of the highest sums publicly mentioned in this context. ILNA also highlighted other issues related to Haokun Energy, noting that the company still owes substantial amounts of money to Iran. Under the previous government, the Chinese company signed a $2.5bn development project for Imam Khomeini Airport, again in exchange for Iranian oil. Experts at the time said the project's fees were extremely high. * Iranian press review is a digest of news reports not independently verified as accurate by Middle East Eye.
Middle East Eye
3 days ago
- Middle East Eye
Mohammed bin Salman condemns Israel's war on Gaza in Eid message
Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman has used his Eid al-Adha address to denounce Israel's war on Gaza and renew calls for a peaceful resolution for the Palestinian people. 'Eid al-Adha comes this year while the suffering of our brothers in Palestine continues as a result of the Israeli aggression,' he said during his remarks. He urged the international community to act, saying it must 'end the disastrous repercussions of this aggression, protect civilians and innocents, and create a new reality in which Palestine enjoys peace.'
Middle East Eye
04-06-2025
- Middle East Eye
Tiran and Sanafir: Red Sea islands are now a chokehold over Egypt's security
The Egyptian news website Mada Masr recently reported that Saudi Arabia was pushing to establish a US military base on the islands of Tiran and Sanafir, reigniting one of the most dangerous files in Egypt's abandonment of its sovereignty. While the Egyptian regime issued unofficial denials via its media mouthpieces, the government has not formally responded. This crisis reopens a wound that never fully healed: for the first time in modern Egyptian history, its president in 2017 openly ceded part of the country's territory, even claiming it was never Egyptian, while persecuting and jailing anyone who dared to oppose the move. Egyptian President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi's declaration that Tiran and Sanafir were Saudi islands ignored historical, geographical and legal facts. It overlooked the fact that the islands were explicitly mentioned in the Camp David peace accords, raising a crucial question: if they were Saudi territory, why wasn't Saudi Arabia a party to that agreement? Beyond the legal debate, the heart of the issue lies in the islands' strategic location. Tiran and Sanafir are not merely isolated patches of land in the Red Sea; they are natural fortresses controlling the Strait of Tiran, the only maritime artery to the Gulf of Aqaba, directly linking Egypt's southern Sinai ports with Israel's Eilat and Jordan's Aqaba. Whoever controls these islands essentially holds Sinai's maritime lifeline by the throat. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters Losing them represents not just a loss of land, but the collapse of Egypt's first line of defence in southern Sinai, creating a strategic isolation that weakens Egypt's ability to manoeuvre in any conflict. More profoundly, this step did not occur in a vacuum. The handover was part of a broader regional reconfiguration that redrew spheres of influence to serve a central goal: ensuring Israel's dominance over the region's land and sea, while sidelining Egypt as a central player in favour of a rising Gulf role in the Israeli-American security framework. Key maritime chokepoint Since the Abraham Accords were signed, Israel has entered a new phase of geopolitical empowerment. Granting Saudi Arabia sovereignty over Tiran and Sanafir, a deal approved by Israel in 2022, further shifted the regional centre of gravity from Egypt to the Gulf, placing Israel's hand on a key strategic maritime chokepoint now governed by open or implicit normalisation deals. Crucially, these arrangements limit Egypt's ability to play any significant role in the Palestinian file, especially with regards to major crises like the war on Gaza. Israel, backed by the US and the Gulf, now holds the keys to vital sea crossings. Any Egyptian move to support Gaza is thus tightly controlled and precisely calculated. Tiran and Sanafir are not just neglected islands; they are the gateway to Sinai's security and the key to Israel's dominance over the Red Sea For years, Israel has sought to build its strategic economic and military depth through the corridor connecting Eilat to the Mediterranean, in direct competition with the Suez Canal. The Red Sea - from Bab el-Mandeb to Tiran and Sanafir - has thus become a de facto Israeli sphere of influence, strangling Gaza, pressuring Egypt, and tying the Gulf to Israel with inseparable security bonds. Iran and Turkey also play key roles in this landscape. Iran, through its support of the Houthis in Yemen, aims to keep pressure on Israel and the US in the south, turning the Red Sea into a theatre of indirect confrontation with the West. The Bab el-Mandeb Strait has become a pressure point in the hands of the Houthis, who have not hesitated to threaten Israeli and western shipping. Turkey, meanwhile, aims to solidify its military and economic foothold in the Red Sea and East Africa, especially after strengthening its presence in Sudan and building soft military alliances in the Horn of Africa. Ankara views the Red Sea as part of its broader project to rebuild contemporary Ottoman influence, balancing competition with the Israeli-Gulf axis on one hand and rivalry with Iran on the other. Thus, the Tiran and Sanafir crisis cannot be viewed in isolation. Control over the islands gives Israel and its allies an edge in countering Iranian influence in the Red Sea, and blocks any Turkish attempt to expand its influence in Africa northwards. It also serves as an additional pressure point on Egypt, which now finds itself caught between regional powers clashing over an increasingly volatile Red Sea. Disastrous consequences Indeed, Tiran and Sanafir are no longer merely an Egyptian-Saudi issue. They are a central node in a complex security and economic network, deftly managed by Israel through normalisation, economic plans and military projects, as Turkey and Iran carefully attempt to counterbalance or challenge this hegemony. Keeping the Strait of Tiran permanently open under American and Israeli guarantees gives Tel Aviv an unobstructed gateway to the Red Sea and the Indian Ocean, completing its regional dominance project that economically suffocates Egypt, militarily hampers its movements in Sinai, and politically sidelines it from the Palestinian issue. Tiran and Sanafir: Why are the Red Sea Islands strategic for Egypt, Saudi Arabia, and Israel? Read More » Even domestically within Egypt, the consequences are disastrous. The Strait of Tiran is a lifeline for tourism and trade in southern Sinai. Any threat to it directly hits Nuweiba Port, and could choke tourism investments and undermine maritime trade, deepening Egypt's economic crisis. In this context, Tiran and Sanafir are not just neglected islands; they are the gateway to Sinai's security and the key to Israel's dominance over the Red Sea. Losing them, or having them used against Egypt's interests, could suffocate the south and isolate it strategically, keeping Egypt in a perpetual defensive posture. I vividly remember the day I went to the library in Berlin, researching the islands' history through maps and documents. I met the head of the library's maps department, an elderly man on the verge of retirement, who sat with me for a long time to discuss the islands. He told me something I'll never forget: 'Anyone who doesn't understand the geography of Tiran and Sanafir doesn't understand how this region is controlled.' Today, that statement is clearer than ever. We are witnessing a scenario where geography intersects with geopolitics, Israel's hegemony is fully manifested by land and sea, and the roles of Egypt, Sudan and Yemen are shrinking amid a growing Iranian-Turkish competition on an ever-more complex chessboard. This is all happening under the watchful eyes of Washington and Tel Aviv, with calculated Gulf approval. The views expressed in this article belong to the author and do not necessarily reflect the editorial policy of Middle East Eye.
