Large crowds gather across the US against Trump, in both joyful and anxious atmosphere: 'We needed to know there were others like us'
The contrast could not have been more striking. While Abrams tanks rolled through downtown Washington on Saturday, June 14, as part of the military parade so eagerly desired by Donald Trump for his 79 th birthday, car horns blared in hundreds of locations in protest against the same president. On this day of national protest under the slogan "No Kings," nearly 2,000 rallies were organized across the country, from the largest cities to more remote towns, along highways and on bridges, in front of government buildings and in parks. Organizers claimed millions of participants nationwide.
The map of protest activity, compiled by the organization Indivisible, reflected growing anger and apprehension, with a particular concentration in the major cities along both coasts, just as on April 5, the day of similar demonstrations. One detail stood out: More and more American citizens, mobilized to defend values as broadly shared as democracy and the rule of law, were afraid to give their names to journalists, even to foreign ones. They were afraid of being photographed. They were afraid of the consequences of their civic engagement.
Leaving behind the area around the White House, the vast Connecticut Avenue already stretched into Maryland, where, approaching a major intersection, several hundred people lined both sides of the sidewalk. Some had hastily made signs out of delivery boxes. One man had turned a paint can into a drum, beating rhythmically with sticks. Many lived in the nearby neighborhoods, full of well-kept houses nestled in greenery and carefully maintained by gardeners from Latin America. Others had come from more remote parts of the state.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
LeMonde
41 minutes ago
- LeMonde
Was the Trump phenomenon a historical accident? Reinterpreting the history of the American right
The United States is changing its face, increasingly veering toward illiberalis. And "you haven't seen anything yet," Donald Trump promised on April 29, celebrating the first hundred days of his administration. The ongoing counter-revolution breaks with what was believed to be the foundation of American modernity. Already in 2016, the billionaire's first presidential election unsettled some certainties about the country's evolution, which particularly caught the attention of historians. They regretted not having identified what made such a presidency possible. Rick Perlstein, an independent historian and journalist, became the main spokesperson for this sentiment in an op-ed for The New York Times published in April 2017: "The professional guardians of America's past, in short, had made a mistake. We advanced a narrative of the American right that was far too constricted to anticipate the rise of a man like Trump." A sense of urgency gripped the profession; books written after 2016 are now appearing in bookstores. These historians do not merely revisit the trajectory followed by the right in the 20 th century; they also question the destiny of the US as a whole. Certain preconceived ideas about what the country thought it had become are being challenged. Franklin D. Roosevelt's New Deal, the Civil Rights movement, advances in feminism, openness to the world, the defense of liberty – all of these developments appear much more fragile in light of these new works. They debunk a persistent myth, which was the source of an initial error in how the history of the right was written: that of the liberal consensus, or even the American consensus.
Fashion Network
an hour ago
- Fashion Network
US, Vietnam near trade framework as tariff deadline approaches
The US and Vietnam are closing in on a framework trade agreement, despite ongoing concerns about Chinese goods being rerouted through the Southeast Asian nation to avoid tariffs, according to people familiar with the talks. Negotiations have progressed, with Vietnam seeking to secure tariffs in the range of 20% to 25%, said the people, who asked not to be identified as the discussions are private and nothing is finalized. The agreement would also include a series of US demands, such as stricter enforcement against the transshipment of Chinese products and the removal of non-tariff barriers, the people said. While the final details are unclear, Vietnam had earlier offered to remove all tariffs, as well as to step up trade enforcement and boost purchases of American goods. The final contours of the framework are still being fleshed out in ways needed to secure President Donald Trump 's sign-off, said people familiar with the matter who asked for anonymity to speak candidly about the discussions. More meetings are expected Friday in Washington to address some technical details, they said. Vietnam's foreign affairs ministry did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The White House had no immediate comment. Trump has struggled to reach trade accords by a July 9 deadline for higher tariffs to kick back in. The US has reached one framework plan — with the UK — and a tariff truce with China. Trump on Wednesday said he intended to send letters to trading partners setting unilateral tariff levels — effectively 'take it or leave it' offers — within one to two weeks. Vietnam poses a particular challenge for the Trump administration, as some in Washington consider it a strategic partner in efforts to counter China in Asia, while its exports of consumer goods from clothes to smartphones have become staples for American consumers. But its trade connections with China have inflamed relations with Washington. During Trump's economic battle with Beijing in his first term, manufacturers shifted to Vietnam, building the kind of massive trade surplus that has drawn the ire of Trump and his top advisers. US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer nodded to the progress of talks on Thursday, telling Fox News that he 'just came from a meeting with the Vietnamese that was very helpful, and we'll see if we're able to land something with them.' Greer described a range of options on the table since Trump's April 2 announcement of higher tariffs on dozens of economies, which were put on hold to allow time for negotiations. Nations have presented plans to 'give us more market access, they change some of their harmful policies, and they could qualify for a type of modified tariff depending on how our president feels and how their leaders feel,' he said on Fox. For Trump, Vietnam offered the promise of a quick solution — and it's still a test case for the administration's ability to ink deals with Southeast Asian nations. Vietnam raced to launch trade talks with the US and was singled out by Trump for showing a willingness to negotiate. Still, the talks have been complicated by Trump's zeal to shrink trade deficits with China — and ongoing negotiations with Beijing that could further lower rates. Some US officials want to calibrate tariffs for Vietnam and others in Southeast Asia to ensure they're sufficiently lower than what's imposed on China to encourage production to leave the country, according to people familiar with the matter. Yet if they're too low, the rates may only exacerbate Vietnam's high trade surplus with the US and encourage further shipment of Chinese goods though the country, the people said. Trump said Wednesday the US is maintaining a total of 55% tariffs on Chinese imports after talks in London, but his aides have not said whether that number is a floor. Some of Trump's top trade officials also want to crack down on what they call transshipment — where Chinese goods are minimally finished or repackaged in other countries to avoid tariffs — yet it's unclear whether the US president sees the issue as a deal breaker. Hanoi has increased efforts to enforce country-of-origin standards in part to assuage US concerns. White House trade adviser Peter Navarro sees Vietnam as a particularly notable offender when it comes to transshipment, having called the country 'essentially a colony of communist China' during an April interview with Fox News. Chinese products are brought into Vietnam, he said at the time, and 'they slap a made-in-Vietnam label on it, and send it here to evade the tariffs.' US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick echoed that concern earlier this month at a Senate hearing. 'They buy $90 billion from China, then they mark it up and send it to us,' Lutnick said. 'So it's just a pathway of China to us.' Yet Trump has previously signaled a clear interest at cutting deals — even if they're imperfect or not fully fleshed out. And an initial framework agreement leaves the opportunity for further concessions later.
Euronews
3 hours ago
- Euronews
Israel-Iran conflict: diplomacy emerges
Almost 48 hours after the eruption of hostilities between Israel and Iran, concerted but limited diplomatic efforts appear to be underway to prevent the confilct from spiraling out of control and ultimately bring it to a resolution. US president Donald Trump declared on Sunday that 'we will have PEACE, soon, between Israel and Iran' and that the countries 'should make a deal and will make a deal'. 'Many calls and meetings now taking place. I do a lot, and never get credit for anything, but that's OK, the PEOPLE understand. MAKE THE MIDDLE EAST GREAT AGAIN!', the US president said in a post on his social media on Sunday. Meanwhile, as Israel has expanded its onslaught on Iran, Tehran has reached out to Qatar and Oman through diplomatic channels asking for regional mediators to intervene in relaunching negotiations, multiple Israeli media outlets reported on Sunday citing Israeli government sources. According to the same Israeli sources, Iran is asking Qatar and Oman to act as intermediaries to inform the United States of its willingness to negotiate a ceasefire or for Washington to urge Israel to stop its offensive, while Saudi Arabia may also be pursuing discreet diplomatic efforts to enable a de-escalation of the hostilities between Iran and Israel. These diplomatic manoeuvres were echoed by Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Aragchi on Sunday when he said that Iran remains open to negotiating a nuclear deal, as a possible response to US president Donald Trump's calls for Iran to return to the negotiating table and make a deal on its nuclear activities. 'We are prepared for any agreement aimed at ensuring Iran does not pursue nuclear weapons,' Aragchi told foreign diplomats in Tehran. However, the Iranian foreign minister still chose to add a defiant tone to his statement by saying that Iran would not accept any deal that 'deprives Iran of its nuclear rights' and that continuing talks with the United States in the current circumstances would be 'unjustifiable'. Meanwhile Israel has pressed on with its operations on Sunday, warning Iran to evacuate the nuclear sites. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu visited the attack site in Bat Yam, where he declared: "Iran will pay a very heavy price for the murder of civilians, women, and children that they committed intentionally." Netanyahu added: "We are here because we are in an existential battle—something that is now clear to every Israeli citizen. Just imagine what would happen if Iran possessed nuclear weapons to launch against Israeli cities." Israel remains skeptical that Iran would respect any future deal and instead asked the Trump administration to join its efforts to destroy Iran's nuclear programmes, according to Israeli officials. Washington however refuses to get involved directly. Meanwhile, European leaders have been calling for a diplomatic solution to avoid an all-out war that could spiral across the Middle East and beyond, but security expert Claude Moniquet told Euronews that Europe has been left 'sitting on the sidelines'. Those talks may now be in doubt, but 'the Europeans were excluded' from them anyway, Moniquet pointed out. 'Europeans have been pretty much excluded from all major diplomatic manoeuvres around the war in Gaza or the war in Lebanon,' the former French intelligence officer and author said. In Aksaray, two hot air balloons which took off from Ihlara Valley for touristic flights on Sunday crashed near Gözlukuyu village. It was reported that one pilot lost his life and 19 Indonesian tourists were injured in the accident. Aksaray Governor Mehmet Ali Kumbuzoğlu stated that the pilot fell out of the basket due to his feet getting tangled up in the rope and said, "Unfortunately, our pilot lost his life by being trapped under the basket. Our tourists are in good condition, we took them to hospital by ambulances, their examinations are continuing." In the apparently unrelated other accident, it was reported that the hot air balloon made a hard landing near Belisırma village of Güzelyurt district. 12 tourists from India were slightly injured and were transferred to hospital.
