logo
Israel claims it has gained control of airspace over Tehran

Israel claims it has gained control of airspace over Tehran

The Guardian10 hours ago

Israel has claimed to have gained control of the skies over the Iranian capital and warned that 'Tehran will burn' if more missiles are fired at its territory, but the Iranian leadership remained defiant, vowing a 'more severe and powerful response' and threatened to widen the war by striking ships and bases of Israeli allies.
The mutual threats reflected the risks of a dramatic escalation in the conflict, as US-Iranian negotiations planned before the war in Oman were abandoned after Tehran said they would be 'meaningless', and Israel appeared to target Iran's gas industry. Israeli rhetoric reflected its leaders' growing confidence that they have gained the upper hand, and raised questions over whether Israeli war aims could go beyond the stated objective of crippling Iran's nuclear programme.
The threat to destroy Tehran was delivered by Israel's defence minister, Israel Katz, after Iran responded to the surprise Israeli attack on Friday morning with a barrage of several hundred ballistic missiles and drones, a small percentage of which succeeded in penetrating Israeli defences and killed three people in Tel Aviv and Rishon LeZion.
Katz, whose forces have already razed large parts of Gaza, held Iran's supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, responsible for Tehran's fate.
'The Iranian dictator is taking the citizens of Iran hostage, bringing about a reality in which they, and especially Tehran's residents, will pay a heavy price for the flagrant harm inflicted upon Israel's citizens,' Katz said. 'If Khamenei continues to fire missiles at the Israeli home front, Tehran will burn.'
The Israel Defense Forces (IDF) targeted the air defences around the capital city on Saturday morning and became increasingly confident they had achieved complete air superiority and freedom of action.
'The aerial roadTehran is effectively open,' an IDF official said. Later in the day, Benjamin Netanyahu said: 'In the very near future, you will see Israeli air force jets over the skies of Tehran.'
Air force warplanes, the Israeli prime minister said, would target 'any site and any target of the Ayatollah regime', after dealing a 'real blow' to Iran's nuclear programme.
A few hours later, Iranian media reported a 'massive explosion' at a refinery in the port city of Kangan, linked to the South Pars gas field, the world's largest. The media reports said it had been struck by an Israeli drone, which would be the first attack on Iran's oil and gas industry, a development with potentially huge economic and environmental consequences. The IDF did not immediately comment on the attack, and Iran's oil ministry said the resulting fire had been extinguished by late evening.
Iranian leaders maintained a defiant front. The president, Masoud Pezeshkian, pledged that continued Israeli attacks would produce a 'more severe and powerful response', the new Revolutionary Guards commander vowed his forces would 'open the gates of hell' on Israel, and Iranian state media quoted officials as warning the US, UK and France that their military bases and ships will be targeted if they helped shoot down Iran's missiles and drones.
The US and France have already stated their readiness to defend Israel, and American media reports have suggested that US forces have already been in action. The UK government has said its forces had not provided any military assistance to Israel and the prime minister, Keir Starmer, has emphasised the need for de-escalation.
Following through on the threat would be an enormous gamble for Iran, drawing western forces further into the conflict when it is already reeling under the force of sustained Israeli bombing.
Speaking at a session of the UN security council on Friday, the US diplomat McCoy Pitt warned: 'No government proxy or independent actor should target American citizens, American bases or other American infrastructure in the region. The consequences for Iran would be dire.'
At the same time, Israel's air defences have shown themselves capable of minimising the danger posed by Iranian missiles and drones. The IDF said Iran had so far fired about 200 ballistic missiles at Israel and launched more than that number of drones but claimed the overwhelming majority had been intercepted.
The Iranian response has also been further blunted by Israel's targeted killing of Tehran's senior generals, almost completely wiping out the top echelons of the chain of the command. On Saturday, the IDF claimed to have killed two more: the head of intelligence for the armed forces, Gholam-Reza Marhabi, and the commander of the Revolutionary Guards' ballistic missile arm, Mohammad Hossein Bagheri.
In total since the start of the war, the IDF said Israeli warplanes had attacked 150 targets inside Iran with hundreds of munitions.
Iranian state media said that a fighter jet hangar at Tehran's Mehrabad airport had also been targeted. Iran's state TV said about 60 people, including 20 children, had been killed in an attack on a housing complex in Tehran.
Iran's envoy to the UN security council, Amir Saeid Iravani, said on Friday that 78 people had been killed in the Israeli attacks, and that more than 320 were injured, most of them civilians. Alongside Iran's top generals there were nine nuclear scientists among the dead, as Tehran was caught unawares by the Israeli assault.
An IDF official described the targeted scientists as the 'people who were main sources of knowledge, the main forces advancing the nuclear programme'.
The Iranian government also said there was limited damage at its uranium enrichment plant at Fordow, its second enrichment facility but Israel denied having bombed it. . On Friday, the IDF claimed to have inflicted 'significant damage' at the plant at Natanz. The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) confirmed the above-ground part of the Natanz plant had been destroyed but noted no apparent damage to its underground chambers.
An IAEA report said that attacks caused radiological and chemical contamination in the Natanz facility, but that it was manageable and there was no sign of higher radiation in the area around the plant. Iran also said there had been attacks on its nuclear site in Isfahan, which houses a uranium conversion plant, a fuel production unit and other facilities.
The IAEA reminded Israel that attacks on nuclear sites were illegal and contrary to the UN charter, with a potential to cause 'radioactive releases with grave consequences'.
Israel's justification for its attack on Iran was that the country was getting unacceptably close to acquiring a nuclear weapon, and specifically that it was working on weaponisation, the assembly of components into a warhead. That is a claim not found in US intelligence assessments or in IAEA reports.
An IDF official on Saturday gave more details of Israel's allegation, claiming that Iranian technicians had been working on an explosive trigger mechanism for a nuclear bomb, and that part of that work was being done in Isfahan.
'We have seen clear intelligence indicating that they are taking steps forward rapidly, that cannot be understood in any other way than for a nuclear bomb,' the official said.
Israelis in Tel Aviv and other cities spent the dawn hours on Saturday in shelters as a new barrage of Iranian missiles headed towards them, while the IDF said it had intercepted incoming drones in the skies above the Dead Sea. Later in the morning, sirens went off in the West Bank and in northern Israel, near the Sea of Galilee.
The worst casualties from the incoming missiles were in the West Bank, where five Palestinians, including three children, were killed, according to the Palestinian Red Crescent, reportedly by a projectile fired by Houthi forces in Yemen, who are Iranian allies.
Over the first 24 hours of the conflict, three Israelis were also killed, two in Rishon LeZion and one in nearby Tel Aviv, with dozens injured and extensive damage to buildings.
There were reports from Gaza of Israeli shooting of large numbers of Palestinians trying to reach food distribution points, but details were hard to confirm on the third day of a communications blackout after the severing of a critical cable by Israeli forces.
The few missiles that pierced Israel's defences caused significant damage but few fatalities. In Tel Aviv on Friday night, smoke from one impact site rose up in columns so thick they obscured the city skyline.
Israel's ambulance service said 34 people were injured on Friday night in the Tel Aviv area, most with minor injuries. Police later said one person had died. Another two people were confirmed killed in a direct missile strike on central Israel on Saturday morning.
The Israeli leadership and the IDF have insisted that its offensive against Iran, called Rising Lion, would continue until Tehran's nuclear programme – which Netanyahu said was on the brink of producing weapons – was comprehensively destroyed.
Addressing the UN security council, the IAEA director-general, Rafael Grossi, warned of the potentially disastrous consequences of such attacks.
The US role in the Israeli operation remained murky. In the run-up to the Israeli 200-plane attack, Donald Trump had publicly urged Israel to give diplomacy more of a chance before US-Iranian talks that were planned for Sunday. On Friday, the US president insisted he had been well informed of Israel's plans and described the Israeli attack as 'excellent'.
ABC quoted a 'source familiar with the intelligence' as saying the US had provided 'exquisite' intelligence and would help defend Israel as needed.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

‘We know Iran is a threat': Australia backs Israel's ‘right to self-defence' but won't play a military role in conflict
‘We know Iran is a threat': Australia backs Israel's ‘right to self-defence' but won't play a military role in conflict

The Guardian

time43 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

‘We know Iran is a threat': Australia backs Israel's ‘right to self-defence' but won't play a military role in conflict

Australia has backed Israel's right to self-defence after strikes on Iranian nuclear operations and military leaders that have sparked a barrage of retaliatory fire. Iran and Israel have targeted each other with missile and airstrikes after the latter launched its biggest-ever air offensive against its long-time foe. The Australian foreign affairs minister, Penny Wong, said the situation in the Middle East was a 'very perilous, risky' situation. 'Israel has a right to self-defence,' she told ABC's Insiders program on Sunday. 'We know Iran is a threat. We know that its nuclear program poses a threat to international peace and obviously to Israel.' Wong confirmed she had spoken with her Iranian counterpart and urged his country to 'return to diplomacy and dialogue'. 'Continuing to escalate this has consequences for all peoples of the region,' she said. 'That is a position that so many countries in the world are putting to, not only the Iranians, but also to the Israelis.' Sign up for Guardian Australia's breaking news email Australia on Wednesday announced sanctions would be imposed on two Israeli government ministers over their stance on illegal West Bank settlements, a move done in conjunction with other nations including Canada and the United Kingdom. But it has widened the nation's rift with the US over Israel after the secretary of state, Marco Rubio, condemned the measure. Wong said the decision to break away from the US and sanction senior Netanyahu government ministers wasn't taken lightly. Asked if Australia had weakened its influence with both Israel and the US on a two-state solution as a result of the split, the foreign affairs minister said extremist settler violence wasn't consistent with the aspiration of Palestinian statehood. 'We're so far from that right now [two-states] but that is why the international community is trying to work together to build this pathway,' she said. The prime minister, Anthony Albanese, urged Australians in the region to leave amid the escalating conflict. 'It's obviously a very volatile situation,' he told reporters in Seattle on Saturday local time. Sign up to Breaking News Australia Get the most important news as it breaks after newsletter promotion Albanese said officials were monitoring the situation but there had been no request for defence involvement. 'Australia does not play a role in this military conflict,' he said. 'I wouldn't expect that there would be a request for Australia to play a military role, but we will continue to play a role in terms of looking after Australian citizens.' The Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade is providing assistance to Australians on the ground. The US was notified about the Israeli strikes in advance but Washington officials have been quick to point out it played no part in the attacks, warning Iran not to target its personnel or interests. Albanese landed in the US on his way to the G7 summit in Canada on Sunday. He is expected to meet with a range of global leaders, including the US president Donald Trump, who had been working with Iran on a nuclear deal. Tariff discussions are expected to take the spotlight but defence talks could also feature after the US urged Australia to increase defence spending to 3.5% of GDP. Australia is already forecast to grow military spending to 2.3% of GDP and Albanese insisted his government would give 'whatever capability Australia needs to defend our national interest'.

Trump's Iran remarks let him still play 'good cop' to Netanyahu's 'bad cop'
Trump's Iran remarks let him still play 'good cop' to Netanyahu's 'bad cop'

Sky News

timean hour ago

  • Sky News

Trump's Iran remarks let him still play 'good cop' to Netanyahu's 'bad cop'

Why you can trust Sky News Reading between the lines of President Trump's social media posts is an art, not a science. But whether by intention or not, there is always insight in his posts. His Truth Social words reacting to the Israeli attack on Iran are intentionally ambiguous. When was he told by Israel that they would strike Iran? Did he give them a green light, or was it more amber? Israel-Iran live: Missile from Iran and Yemen 'hitting Israel' Was his insistence, as recently as 48 hours ago, that a strike would "blow" the chances of a deal with Iran actually just a ruse to afford Israel the element of surprise? That's what the Israelis are claiming. Clearly, President Trump does not want to give the impression that his 'don't strike' advice was ignored by Netanyahu. His social posts are filled with enough ambiguity to allow him to maintain his good cop stance alongside Netanyahu, the bad cop: "I gave Iran chance after chance to make a deal. I told them, in the strongest of words, to 'just do it'..." Trump's 'art of the deal', whether it be in real estate or nuclear weapon negotiations, requires unpredictability and ambiguity. Both of those, as it happens, are useful to hide ineptitude too. The line between diplomatic masterstroke and disastrous diplomacy is thin. The president is claiming that the Israeli attacks make a deal more, not less, likely because of the pressure Iran will now be under. Maybe, but many regional watchers are very unconvinced. An alternative path to negotiations for Iran would be to go fully down the North Korea route, comforted in the knowledge that China - as a big Iranian oil customer - and Russia - as a weapons customer - will be on side. Trump may think that the pressure of bombardment will force Iran to heel. But the other pressure the Iranian supreme leader is under is the pressure of survival. Self-preservation necessitates the Iranian response that we're now seeing before any prospect of renewed negotiations can come. 2:33 The Israelis and the Americans are calculating that Iran and its proxies are now sufficiently degraded, and so the response will be limp and containable. They might be right in terms of conventional attacks, but asymmetrical operations are another fear - against Israeli targets or more broadly, softer Western targets in the region or beyond. Step back from the chaos of the past 24 hours. The broader picture here is regime change. Netanyahu said as much in his Friday speech, calling for an internal uprising. He ignored history - which suggests people tend to rally round their flag - but more than that, that foreign air strikes alone don't work. Look at Libya in 1986, Iraq in 1991, or Yugoslavia in 1999. Netanyahu wants to go further. Will he take out the supreme leader? Trump does not want another full-scale conflict in the Middle East. Of all the things he is accused of being, a hawkish warmonger he is not. But there are plenty of politicians on Capitol Hill - on both sides of the divide - who support regime change in Iran. I was at an event in Congress in December organised by Iranian exiled opposition leaders. I was struck by the cross-party support for regime change in one form or another. Israel this weekend announced that its military had achieved total air superiority from western Iran to the capital Tehran. That's remarkable. Could Trump be persuaded to pursue regime change? Peace, eventually, through strength? His motto adapted.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store