ECB apologises for insensitive Pope Francis tweet
The England and Wales Cricket Board has apologised for a social media post joking that the Pope 'loves the Ashes' following an Ash Wednesday message from the critically ill 88-year-old.
The ECB told Telegraph Sport the apparent attempt at humour by the England cricket team's social media staff had been 'ill-judged' and that the post in question had been 'swiftly deleted'.
Pope Francis, who has been battling double pneumonia in the Gemelli Hospital in Rome for more than a fortnight, posted a message to his @Pontifex account on Tuesday evening to mark the start of the holy season of Lent.
He wrote: 'The #Ashes remind us of who we are, which does us good. It puts us in our place, smooths out the rough edges of our narcissism, brings us back to reality, and makes us more humble and open to one another. None of us is God; we are all on a journey. #Lent.'
The message was re-posted by the @englandcricket account on Wednesday along with the words: 'Even @Pontifex loves the Ashes.'
An ECB spokesman said: 'This was an ill-judged post and was swiftly deleted. We apologise for any offence.'
The gaffe followed a recent spate of sanctions that have been issued to cricketers over offensive social-media posts, including ones dating back many years.
Fears are mounting for the health of Pope Francis after he suffered two respiratory attacks on Monday, forcing doctors to intervene to extract a large build-up of mucus from his lungs.
'Today, the Holy Father experienced two episodes of acute respiratory failure, caused by a significant accumulation of endobronchial mucus and consequent bronchospasm,' the Vatican said in a statement released that evening.
The Pope, who has been in hospital since February 14, was put back on non-invasive mechanical ventilation, the Vatican said.
Despite the acute breathing difficulties, the Pope remained alert and co-operated fully with doctors, the Holy See said.
The latest respiratory crisis appeared to be another significant setback in the Pope's attempts to recover from bronchitis and pneumonia in both lungs.
He has not been seen in public since being admitted to hospital more than two weeks ago. Nor has the Vatican released any photographs or video of him.
Although he has been taken to hospital in the past, this is the longest absence from public life during his 12-year-long papacy and there is speculation that he might resign or that the end of his life is approaching.
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
30 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Reeves's public sector obsession will crush the economy
Rachel Reeves has cemented 'historic changes' to enlarge the British state, according to one of the nation's leading economists, with the battered private sector now looking at permanently higher taxes to support it. Paul Johnson, the head of the Institute for Fiscal Studies, says it is hard to overstate the scale of the shift taking place in the economy this decade, as government spending mounts on public services, welfare and debt interest – and taxes rise to match. 'These are historic changes in the size of the state and the size of taxation in this country,' says Johnson. 'Over all of my lifetime up until 2020, taxes hovered around 33pc of national income. By the end of this decade they will be 38pc of national income. I cannot see them coming down. 'In economic history terms I think this decade will be seen as the decade in which the British state grew.' An older and sicker population suggests the state will only get bigger. Analysis by the Resolution Foundation, a think tank, shows that Reeves has put health spending on course to gobble up half of all the money spent on day-to-day services by the end of the decade. This is up from a third in 2010 and roughly a quarter in 1999. 'That is a huge increase. Everything else pales a bit in significance,' says James Smith, an economist at the Resolution Foundation. 'We are becoming ever more a health state.' The proportion may rise even more after Labour publishes its 10-year plan for the NHS later this year. Previous proposals outlined by the Tories suggested that making the health service fit for the future would require a 50pc rise in the number of staff to 2.4m by 2037. Such an increase would mean one in 11 workers in England would be employed by the NHS, compared with one in 17 in 2021, according to the IFS. Ruth Curtice, the Resolution Foundation chief executive, said the clear shift towards higher health spending constituted a 'major reshaping of the state'. Labour is using its gigantic parliamentary majority to push through such seismic change. Yet at the same time the economy is weakening, undermining Reeves's ability to pay for her grand spending plans. GDP dropped by 0.3pc between April and March, suggesting the strong growth seen during the first three months of the year was not the start of a sustained recovery. The Chancellor has blamed Donald Trump's trade war for knocking Britain off course, and it undoubtedly had an effect. However, there is no sense that Reeves has adapted her plans to cope with Trump's crusade, which has been known about for months. Furthermore, April's GDP numbers also show clear signs that it was Reeves, not Trump, who was to blame for the slowdown. The services sector performed particularly poorly, with retail struggling amid the sharp rise in employers' National Insurance contributions, the tax bosses pay on workers' wages, and the minimum wage. Unemployment is up and the number of people in work is down, another sign that this 'jobs tax' is weighing on hiring. Worryingly, Britain is relying more and more on public spending to keep the economy afloat. Recent analysis by the Bank of England shows that activity has essentially been driven by the public sector over the past two years. That's not a sustainable model for growth, particularly given the dire productivity in the public sector. Businesses are increasingly frustrated. Simony Emeny, the chief executive of pub group Fuller's, argues the private sector is being forced to work far harder than the public sector. 'Because of what the Chancellor announced last year, we have had to work really hard to make our businesses as efficient as possible and use technology well and to make sure that we are in a position where we can absorb some of these cost increases,' he says. 'If I look at the Government, I don't see that same drive to improve efficiency coming through.' He cited the rise in the number of civil servants, which has soared from below 420,000 in 2016 to 550,000 today. 'The [hospitality] sector is having to be forensic about costs just to navigate the challenges we face and I'm not seeing that same scrutiny from the Government. [They] need to be consistent about this,' says Emeny. 'They're putting a lot of pressure on business with extra costs. We're having to absorb that this year, and so is everybody else.' Fuller's and other businesses may have to absorb even more costs later this year. With pressure to spend yet more on healthcare and benefits, and amid scepticism that many of the plans set out in the spending review are realistic, economists believe more tax rises await in the autumn. Johnson, at the IFS, suspects the long freeze on income tax thresholds will be extended – a classic stealth tax, as workers end up paying more tax even if their pay only rises in line with inflation – meaning they become worse off over time. But that alone may not be enough. Andy King, a former senior official at the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR), the Government's spending watchdog, says it is almost certain to slash its growth forecasts at the Budget in the autumn, in part because of Reeves's own policies. 'The immigration policy looks net negative for growth, employment rights need to be scored, the employer NICs and national living wage rises look to have done much more damage to employment than was allowed for,' he says. 'The writing seems to be on the wall for another fiscal hole in the autumn.' That points to yet another tax raid, despite the record-breaking £40bn of tax increases in the Budget last October, which was supposed to put the finances back on an even keel for the rest of this parliament. King suspects the Chancellor will have to ramp up the big taxes she has promised not to touch: VAT, National Insurance or income tax. 'Now that the spending plans have been inked in, it leaves fewer levers for restoring fiscal headroom. So it looks like a rock and a hard place for the autumn. Something important may have to give if there is a material fiscal hole to fill,' he says. 'That means either loosening the fiscal targets, which look very risky given the way the bond market is viewing the UK relative to its peers. Or it means breaking manifesto tax commitments which looks, as Sir Humphrey might say, brave, bordering on courageous.' Whatever form tax rises end up taking, it will extend what has become a well-established pattern under Labour: raid the private sector to pay for ever higher state spending. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Yahoo
38 minutes ago
- Yahoo
The misuse of ADHD drugs – and what they really do to your body and brain
Be more alert; improve your focus; do better at work: these are the reasons why high-flyers, from surgeons to lawyers and bankers, take 'brain-doping' ADHD drugs despite not having the condition. Now, increasing numbers of elite athletes are joining them, looking for something extra to give them the competitive edge. But taking ADHD drugs when you don't need them will certainly do more harm than good, with many takers becoming more irritable, experiencing sleep disruption and, in the most serious cases, causing heart problems, anxiety and are barred by the World Anti-Doping Agency from taking ADHD medications such as Ritalin and Adderall before competing, but those who have been diagnosed with ADHD are exempt, on the grounds that they need the drugs to function. Such exemptions have tripled in the last five years, so suspicion has turned to the 'subjective assessments' by doctors to diagnose athletes with ADHD in adulthood, John Brewer, a former UK Anti Doping board member told The Telegraph last month. There has been a known black market for ADHD drugs ever since they became available to buy online, with packets of Ritalin, the drug most commonly prescribed to people with ADHD in Britain, selling for less than £20 on the websites of unscrupulous online pharmacies. It's more common, however, for stressed students and professionals alike to acquire spare pills from friends and family. In fact parents, who believe they have ADHD but have never been diagnosed, have been known 'to take stimulants that have been prescribed for their children because they think it helps them to perform better', says Katya Rubia, professor of cognitive neuroscience at King's College London. In Britain, the drug most commonly prescribed for ADHD is Ritalin, the brand name for the drug methylphenidate – a type of stimulant drug. Adderall, another stimulant drug, is typically prescribed in America, and sometimes finds its way into the hands of British students (or professionals) illegally. There is an important distinction between 'misuse' of ADHD drugs – taking them in their prescribed doses when you don't have ADHD – and 'abuse', which means taking large amounts of Adderall or Ritalin for a high, says Prof Rubia. ADHD drugs are considered to be 'very safe' in the small doses prescribed to treat the condition, adds Prof Rubia, but abusing the drugs can cause heart palpitations, stomach aches and can be 'neurotoxic'. 'They actually change your brain's dopamine system, producing effects like anxiety and depression, as well as inattention and difficulties with memory,' she adds. In other words, abusing ADHD drugs can leave you with a set of symptoms that look a lot like ADHD. Prof Rubia also strongly advises against misusing ADHD drugs because 'you shouldn't take ADHD drugs at all if you don't have ADHD; you're a healthy person and the side effects are unnecessary'. You might believe that taking ADHD drugs when you don't have ADHD would make you think more sharply, but that's far from the truth. ADHD drugs 'work on your brain's dopamine system, to increase the amount that your brain has available to use,' says Prof Rubia. People with ADHD 'don't have enough dopamine, so struggle with motivation, concentration and focus, as well as keeping time and controlling their own behaviour, especially in children'. Taken by people without ADHD, the drugs might improve alertness, but they have a negative impact on other functioning, due to the 'U-shaped' impact of the levels of dopamine in your brain: past a certain point, your attention, focus and motivation will suffer. 'If you don't have ADHD, you already have an optimal amount of dopamine in your system, so increasing it will make you perform worse,' Prof Rubia says. One study, published in 2023, gave three groups a common 'smart drug' (Adderall, Ritalin or Modafinil, which is prescribed for narcolepsy in Britain) and observed how it affected their performance in a problem-solving task. 'When taking any of the drugs, the participants tried harder, but performed less well,' says Peter Bossaerts, professor of neuroeconomics at the University of Cambridge, who led the study. Those who performed best without the drugs 'performed below the mean when they were on them,' he adds. 'So they aren't really smart drugs. They make you dumber, but more busy and more motivated.'Another study, using a similar task to assess cognitive performance, found again that 'people who took 'smart drugs' performed worse despite trying harder,' Prof Bossaerts says. Here, worsened memory seemed to be behind the decline in ability. 'Dopamine doesn't only affect motivation, but also your memory, and drugs like Ritalin work on the dopamine receptors in your prefrontal cortex' – the part of your brain that manages your working memory and lets you retrieve memories from the past, Prof Bossaerts points effects of taking so-called 'smart drugs' (also known as 'study drugs') are also short-lived. 'Students who take them might feel a bit down and sluggish for a few days after their exams, but they'll quickly pick up again in most cases,' says Prof Bossaerts. Abuse, or taking large amounts of Adderall or Ritalin for a high, is another matter. This means that the drugs have a 'high potential for abuse', even if you start out taking them occasionally to pull an all-nighter or meet an important deadline, Prof Rubia believes. 'As your body gets used to them, you need more and more to feel the same effects.' The way in which ADHD drugs are prescribed for people who require them is vital. 'Over months or years you will see their effects decline over time' explains Prof Rubia. 'ADHD drugs are the best kind of psychiatric medicine we have available, because in small doses they are so safe and the side effects are so minimal. But they do quickly decrease in efficacy over time as the brain gets used to them. To counter this in people with ADHD, we give people 'holidays' where they stop taking their prescription for a while or slowly increase the dose over time.' The huge climb in athletes diagnosed with ADHD in adulthood is no coincidence, says Prof Rubia, as use of the drugs has long been commonplace in sports. That said, a significant proportion of athletes who have been diagnosed with ADHD as adults may well have the condition. A Taekwondo black belt or football star probably has a higher likelihood of having the condition than the average person, Prof Rubia believes. 'People with ADHD are very often good at sports,' she explains. 'They have more energy than the average person, and where academics might have been a struggle at school, they might have realised their talent for sports and pursued that instead.' Intense sports practice can also be an effective tool for managing ADHD symptoms. Prof Rubia recalls meeting an Olympic karate fighter who had 'managed to overcome his ADHD without medication by training in a very focused way'.A sportsperson who takes ADHD drugs without having ADHD, however, might be in for a shock. Though the drugs might improve performance in the short term by making athletes 'feel less tired and more alert, as if they've had a lot of coffee,' Prof Rubia says people misusing the drugs over weeks or months might find themselves feeling less motivated and alert than they were before. 'Even within a day, they'll feel more low by the evening than they otherwise would.'Whether you're an athlete or not, taking stimulant ADHD drugs when you don't have the condition 'will affect your body in very similar ways these drugs affect the bodies of people with ADHD who take them,' says Prof Rubia. Stimulants increase your heart rate and blood pressure and can also reduce your appetite, while making you feel more awake and alert. People who take Ritalin also report some personality changes, like being more irritable and on edge, as well as worsened sleep, but both can also be symptoms of ADHD itself. Some research has indicated, however, that long-term use of ADHD medications (in people with and without the condition) may lead to an increased risk of cardiovascular disease. Weight loss and headaches are common, as are gut problems, though side effects like these are usually mild. In children who take ADHD medication, 'there's some evidence that it stunts growth slightly compared to how tall a child's parents are,' Prof Rubia in all, to better understand how these drugs affect our bodies 'we need more studies that observe the effects of ADHD drugs on both the healthy population and on people who have ADHD,' says Prof Rubia. Anecdotally, though, the physical impact of taking ADHD drugs when you don't need them is clear, Prof Bossaerts says with a sigh: 'I remember a student once passing out in front of me because he'd taken 'study drugs' over his final exams and had been awake for three days in a row at that point.' At best, it's counterproductive but, at worst, taking so-called 'smart drugs' can be a real danger to your health – not such a smart move after all. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Britain's FSA warns Jolly Rancher products 'unsafe to eat'
June 12 (UPI) -- British consumers and businesses are cautioned against buying sweets from US brand Hershey as they are "unsafe to eat," according to the Food Standards Agency. On Wednesday, the FSA listed Jolly Rancher products as a safety risk. They contain chemical compounds -- mineral oil aromatic hydrocarbons, or MOAH, and mineral oil saturated hydrocarbon or MOSH. "MOAH can cause damage to DNA and has the potential to increase the risk of cancer, particularly if consumed in high quantities over a prolonged period of time. MOAH is a genotoxic carcinogen; therefore no exposure is without risk to human health", the FSA said. The sweets that the FSA is warning about include Jolly Rancher Hard Candy, Misfits Gummies, and Berry Gummies. "Food businesses selling these products in the UK are advised to immediately stop sales, undertake product withdrawals and where there have been retail sales, to undertake product recalls," the FSA said "This is because the products are unsafe and do not meet UK market legal requirements. The Hershey Company, who is the brand owner, has taken action to remove these products from the UK market". The agency recommended that anyone in possession of the products not eat them and throw them away.
