
Hip surgery at the heart of audit explained
The release of an independent audit of bone surgeries carried out on children with hip dysplasia between January 2021 to December 2023 was much anticipated, not least by the parents of children who had had these surgeries in that time.
The audit was looking at the basis on which decisions were made to perform a pelvic osteotomy or bone surgery on a child. Or, to put it more bluntly, whether it was necessary for the surgery to be carried out.
To understand the concern around all of this, it is first important to look at what these surgeries are used to treat, and just what the surgery in question involves.
The condition is called developmental dysplasia of the hips, or DDH, and it occurs when the "ball and socket" joint in the hip does not form properly in babies and young children.
"It's a very common condition that we see, and in its simplest form it is a mismatch between the shapes that make up the component of the hip joint," Dr Pablo Castañeda, Medical Director of the International Hip Dysplasia Institute explained.
There are a number of treatments, including non-operative and surgical interventions.
An osteotomy or bone surgery is arguably the most extreme. This is a bone surgery undertaken to "correct" or "reshape" the hip joint.
"When we talk about doing a pelvic osteotomy it is a cut of the bone, that's what the word osteotomy means, a cut of the bone, so we cut the pelvic bone to essentially make that socket deeper and match the ball in a better way," Dr Castañeda said.
According to information published by Children's Health Ireland (CHI), there are two possible options: to reshape or reposition the thigh bone or femur, called a femoral osteotomy, or to deepen the hip socket, and this is a pelvic osteotomy.
It was decisions to perform the later, pelvic osteotomies, that were examined in this audit.
As previously mentioned this procedure involves cutting the bone, and it usually involves the use of bone grafts and pins.
After a pelvic osteotomy "most children are treated in a hip abduction brace or a cast after pelvic osteotomy," according to CHI literature.
A foam hip abduction brace immobilises both legs, a hinged hip abduction brace immobilises the operated side only, and a hip spica cast.
Hip spica casts can be on for 12 to 16 weeks, with plaster changes under anaesthetic every six to eight weeks.
If pins are used, they may be dissolvable or the child may need a second surgery to remove them eight weeks later.
Children will need also need a special car seat which is compatible with the brace or the cast.
Parents are also warned that a child "may be limp for weeks after their osteotomy".
Archie 'had to learn how to walk again'
Áine Gladney-Knox's son Archie had the surgery on both hip joints in 2022 when he was aged three.
An already difficult procedure was made even more so when Archie suffered complications and needed to be re-admitted to CHI Crumlin where he spent almost two weeks recovering.
When he got home, Ms Gladney Knox described how Archie had lost a lot of muscle density in his legs.
"He had to learn how to walk again," she said, adding: "They don't recommend physiotherapy, but children are resilient."
She described how Archie's hip spica cast needed to be cut off due to the swelling when he experienced complications, and afterwards he wore a "brace".
"There's a lot to it, its very very intense and it has a big impact on a family," she said.
"This is a tough tough surgery for any child to go through, and surgery is always going to be the last option," Ms Gladney-Knox said.
Dr Castañeda said that a pelvic osteotomy "is not a procedure which is done all too commonly because fortunately we have very good non-operative means to improve the congruency of the joint, as long as hip dysplasia in infants is detected in a timely way, which typically is done by screening of neonates (a baby who is four weeks old or younger), then hip dysplasia, in the vast majority of cases can be treated non-operatively".
As for some of the alternatives, babies diagnosed early with DDH are usually treated with a fabric splint called a pavlik harness.
Children can also wear hip abduction brace, which is a bit sturdier.
And then there are reduction procedures, where the "ball" is manipulated back into a "socket", and these can be closed (under anaesthetic but without surgery) or open (surgical).
Both of these procedures also require a child to wear a hip spica cast.
Ms Gladney-Knox, who is a member of Sinn Féin and was a general election candidate last year, was among the parents contacted by CHI Crumlin in March about the audit.
We now know that it found a number of the surgeries carried out in CHI Temple Street and the National Orthopeadic Hospital Cappagh were unnecessary, but that similar issues were not identified in CHI Crumlin where Archie's surgery were carried out.
Ms Gladney-Knox said that while she was "relieved" she still had questions.
"Definitely I will be ringing the helpline and I will be looking to see was (Archie) reviewed in that audit," she said.
She also expressed concern for the parents whose children were did undergo the procedure in CHI Temple Street and NOHC, who she believed were now "under a cloud of anxiety and worry and stress and... anger".
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Irish Independent
a day ago
- Irish Independent
Public hospitals asked to account for funding allocated towards waiting lists in wake of CHI funding scandal
It follows the temporary pausing of funding due to Children's Health Ireland for doing additional clinics and procedures with additional money. It followed recent revelations in an internal CHI report from 2021 which found the selection of patients for these extra clinics was was not done fairly by one consultant who earned over €34,000 for the additional work. The NTPF has €230m this year to distribute among public hospitals to either do additional in-house work to reduce waiting lists or send patients to paid-for private hospital care. The NTPF said today that it is 'completely unacceptable that there would be any misuse of public money and that children would wait longer for surgery when the whole purpose of the NTPF is to ensure faster access to treatment for public patients'. "The NTPF will fully reserve its position in relation to any proven misuse of public money and explore all options for restitution while ensuring public patients get the treatment they deserve. 'Following initial reports, the NTPF immediately placed a temporary pause on all insourcing work with CHI while it initiated a review of this work to gather the necessary assurances regarding compliance, value for money and appropriate use of NTPF funding mechanisms.' The statement said that this work is 'ongoing at the highest level with CHI to obtain and review these assurances'. "It is important to stress that all pre-planned insourcing work has continued with CHI and the intention is that the temporary pause will be lifted as soon as the NTPF is satisfied with the assurances given by CHI in this review so as to minimise any disruption to children and their families. 'Fears that thousands of children will face surgery delays are not correct and NTPF-funded insourcing accounts for a very small proportion of total work undertaken by CHI,' it said. In the year to date, the NTPF was funding an average of approximately four surgeries (inpatient or day-case) per week and an average of 115 outpatient consultations-initial appointments with a consultant-per week through insourcing with CHI, it said . 'Every appointment is extremely important though and the NTPF wishes to be in a position to safely and confidently lift the pause as quickly as possible.'


Irish Times
a day ago
- Irish Times
Children's Health Ireland funding from NTPF will resume imminently, says Department of Health
Funding aimed at tackling waiting lists at hospitals operated by Children's Health Ireland (CHI) provided by the National Treatment Purchase Fund (NTPF) will recommence imminently, the Department of Health has said. The NTPF suspended payments for what is known as insourcing arrangements at CHI on foot of an internal report that suggested irregularities about the operation of the scheme. Insourcing is where the NTPF buys care services to treat patients on waiting lists. This is provided in public hospitals outside core working hours or at weekends, and by staff in their own time. Staff and hospitals are paid additional money for providing these services. The NTPF on Friday said that up to May it had paid for 115 children per week to be seen at special outpatient clinics at CHI hospitals. It said at the same time three children per week had been treated as an inpatient or day case under arrangements it had funded. READ MORE Until mid May this year it is understood that the NTPF paid €375,000 as part of insourcing arrangements at CHI. It denied reports that 480 children per week had been funded each week for treatment at CHI until the suspension was put in place last week. A spokeswoman for the Department of Health said: 'The numbers mentioned reflect the insourcing initiatives approved to CHI, to reduce waiting lists through this mechanism. 'It does not, however, accurately reflect the actual level of insourcing activity that has so far taken place in 2025. 'Information from the NTPF is that only 64 inpatient and day case procedures (from a total of 2,700 approved for the year) have been progressed to date. 'In the case of outpatient department appointments, National Treatment Purchase Fund has advised that there are approximately 115 appointments per week being delivered in this way.' The Department of Health said any patient already scheduled before the temporary suspension was put in place would be treated as planned. 'We anticipate that the funding of insourcing by the National Treatment Purchase Fund at CHI will recommence imminently', the Department of Health said.


Irish Times
2 days ago
- Irish Times
The Irish Times view on the future of CHI: finding the right way forward
The Government is grappling with the question of what to do about Children's Health Ireland (CHI) after a string of controversies. There is no single ' right' answer to this dilemma, with the various possible routes forward all having pluses and minuses. But it is clear that doing nothing is not an option for the Minister for Health, Jennifer Carroll MacNeill, who has already appointed a number of new members to the CHI board. In moving forward, it will be important to keep a forensic focus on a few key issues which have emerged. This is a multi-faceted problem and there is no single, or easy, solution. And this was underlined by recent reports of a toxic culture in one CHI hospital, with multiple complaints about certain consultants. An obvious issue is that the CHI governance structure has not operated properly, failing to spot problems and also not providing adequate information to the HSE and the Government. One option to tackle this is to bring CHI fully under the aegis of the HSE which, of course, has had its own problems. Whatever exact structure is chosen, it is essential that CHI is operated in a way that reflects its reliance on taxpayer funds. A weakness of the voluntary hospital system, of which CHI is a part, is a lack of clarity about lines of accountability. This may even suit politicians and the HSE to some extent, as there is always someone else to blame. But it cannot continue. READ MORE Whatever new structure emerges must deal with this. And it needs to recognise that appointees to board such as the CHI need to be adequately remunerated for the responsibilities they take on. Public service has driven many who have taken on such posts. But proper professional structures are important. The controversies also raise questions about clinical governance in CHI, under new structures set up in 2008. This process is meant to ensure patient safety. Clearly, in the case of the use of unauthorised implants in spinal surgery and unnecessary hip operations, there were serious failures. A separate clinical issue has emerged about one consultant's use of the National Treatment Purchase Fund (NTPF). It is essential that, whatever checks are needed , this must not result in undue further delays in appointments and operations for children. No doubt these separate incidents will also lead the Minister to reflect on the wider failure of the healthcare system to deliver an adequate return for increased spending, raising issues about productivity and also the overall system of clinical management. There have been improvements in the healthcare system , but also areas where services are well below where they should be . And the recent string of disturbing scandals further underlines the need for reform.