UK ranked among the lowest in the ‘Global Flourishing Study'; know which country tops the list
Source: Harvard University
A recent global study has shown that Britain ranks among the lowest nations when it comes to "human flourishing". This ranking, which raises concerns about the country's overall well-being, especially among young people, highlights several major factors that impact the quality of life.
The research, or the Global Flourishing Study, was conducted in 22 countries across six continents. It sought to measure a variety of human well-being factors, such as happiness, health, economic security, relationships, and meaning in life. The UK placed 20th using a scale that aggregated all these factors, which is an indication of a key concern regarding the flourishing of the country.
This large-scale survey used nationally representative samples to give a reflection of the experiences of close to half of the world's population. Initiated in 2022, the five-year project aims to collect data from more than 200,000 participants each year, creating an overall picture of what promotes or prevents human flourishing.
UK's low flourishing rank unveils crisis in youth well-being
Perhaps one of the more alarming discoveries of the study was the especially low well-being scores for young people in nations such as the UK, the US, and Australia. This result is counter to previous studies, which indicated that well-being is U-shaped across the life course, with the youngest and oldest age groups typically reporting higher satisfaction than middle-aged individuals.
In the UK, 18- to 24-year-olds, for instance, reported relatively low levels of life satisfaction compared to the 25- to 29-year-olds, who in turn scored less than those above the age of 80. "The very youngest in the UK do seem to be particularly struggling," agrees Dr. Tim Lomas, a psychologist in the study, indicating the immediate need for greater focus on the welfare of this age group.
Findings that defines the countries flourishing score
The researchers set up a list of questions aimed at knowing about individuals' happiness, from youth and family bonds to education, religious observances, and being married. Then these data were evaluated to have the possible predictors of flourishing with the end product of a global score per nation. One of the most surprising findings was the ordering of the countries in terms of flourishing. Indonesia topped the list, followed by Israel, the Philippines, and Mexico. On the other hand, the UK, along with Turkey and Japan, occupied the lowest positions.
The results of the Global Flourishing Study are in sharp contrast to the World Happiness Report, which annually puts the Nordic countries at the top. The UK would usually rank in the top quarter of the 100 nations covered in that report. This gap, as per Prof. Tyler VanderWeele, an epidemiologist at Harvard University and one of the driving forces behind the study, may be due to more affluent, developed countries excelling in domains such as financial security and life satisfaction but lagging behind in relations and meaning in life. The study found that in richer countries, especially with higher GDPs, people tend to report lower levels of meaning in life.
List of countries that flourishes more
Rank
Country
Flourishing Score
1
Indonesia
8.3
2
Israel
7.87
3
Philippines
7.71
4
Mexico
7.64
5
Poland
7.55
6
Brazil
7.52
7
Australia
7.47
8
South Africa
7.42
9
Argentina
7.35
10
Costa Rica
7.27
11
Colombia
7.22
12
United States
7.12
13
Canada
7.05
14
France
6.97
15
Italy
6.91
16
Spain
6.9
17
India
6.87
18
Turkey
6.32
19
Japan
5.89
20
United Kingdom
6.79
21
South Korea
6.77
22
Japan
5.89
Source: Harvard University
Monitoring personal flourishing and global trends over time
As data continues to be gathered in the study, researchers hope to see how human flourishing changes over time as a result of world events. Prof. VanderWeele encouraged people to use the 12-question survey about flourishing to review their own lives at intervals. Monitoring changes in their own life might provide useful information on what in life is getting better or worse.
Though the findings are dramatic, Prof. Kate Pickett, an epidemiologist at the University of York, sounded a note of caution about the findings. She noted that self-report measures of well-being don't always match more objective measures of a country's health. For example, though Japan scores lowest on the flourishing scale, it has the highest life expectancy and lowest infant mortality rates among all the countries surveyed.
Pickett also highlighted the potential pandemic effect on the data. 'I'm very surprised there's not a single mention of the Covid pandemic,' she said. The disruptions caused by the pandemic—such as lockdowns, social anxiety, and educational interruptions—could have had a particularly negative impact on the flourishing of young people, especially in the years leading up to the survey.
Need for early support and tackling inequality to build thriving societies
In response to the findings, Pickett referenced established literature highlighting the imperative of securing a good start in life for children, ensuring secure livelihoods, and addressing economic inequality as crucial factors in achieving thriving societies. Preventing worse and reducing inequality can improve populations' overall well-being, especially that of young people.
The Global Flourishing Study highlights the imperative to give attention to the welfare of people in the UK and other developed countries, particularly young people. While economic success and life rating scores can be good in these countries, the survey indicates that human flourishing is far more nuanced, with meaning in life, relationships, and mental health being priority areas that need to improve dramatically.
What is Global Flourishing score
The main focus of the Global Flourishing Study is human flourishing, a concept with multiple dimensions. The study features 12 survey questions that assess six areas of flourishing, as identified in earlier research:
Happiness and life satisfaction
Physical and mental health
Meaning and purpose
Character and virtue
Close social relationships
Financial and material stability
Participants' self-reported answers are used to calculate an index score ranging from zero to 10, where zero indicates no flourishing and 10 represents complete flourishing. A higher flourishing score indicates a greater level of overall well-being and life satisfaction across multiple domains. The score reflects a person's sense of happiness, physical and mental health, purpose, character, relationships, and financial stability.
Conversely, a lower score (closer to 0) suggests that a person may be struggling with one or more of these dimensions, leading to a lower overall sense of flourishing.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
2 days ago
- Business Standard
For better workout, body balance, and joint relief, walk with hiking poles
Ashley Hawke was originally a skeptic of trekking poles. But after twisting an ankle on a tree root while descending a hill during a 2015 backpacking trip, she tried a pair. 'I couldn't believe how much easier hiking felt, especially while wearing a 40-pound pack,' Ms. Hawke, now 30, said. 'I used to think they were just for older people. Now I tell everyone I know to use them.' As a Ph.D. candidate in integrative physiology, Ms. Hawke did a meta-analysis, scouring 40 years of research into hiking poles. There weren't many papers, but the ones she found showed that using them often improved balance, took weight off the legs, made hiking feel easier and led to fewer sore muscles. Other small studies suggest poles can make hiking gentler on your joints and can boost the cardiovascular benefit of walking. In other words, you don't need to be a long-distance backpacker — or a senior — to benefit from using trekking poles. Why use walking poles? Put simply, poles can help you walk easier, faster and farther. One small study found that walking with poles increased the amount of oxygen and calories subjects used by more than 20 per cent. This is one big reason Aaron Baggish, a cardiologist with the University of Lausanne in Switzerland, often recommends them to patients of all ages, especially those with limited mobility. 'Poles will allow you to get fitter, faster, because it's a full body workout,' he said. If you regularly head outdoors onto dirt trails, poles can also help pull yourself uphill and protect your joints going downhill. Sharon Caputo, 55, who lives in Syracuse, N.Y., has climbed all 46 of the high peaks in the Adirondack Mountains, and used poles during each climb. Ms. Caputo also finds the poles helpful for balance when walking through water, in deep mud or when moving from one rock to another. Pick your pole Consider whether you'll use your poles for Nordic walking or hiking. Nordic poles are better on flatter, smoother surfaces and involve a single piece with more elaborate straps attached at the grip, which keeps the poles close to your hands. This allows you to more easily push yourself forward. For hikes on undulating dirt trails or up mountains, lightweight, collapsible trekking poles are better, because they're easier to pack, said Maggie Peikon, manager of communications at the American Hiking Society. Look for easy adjustability so that you can change lengths on the fly. Also decide which type of grip you like: foam, rubber or cork, which tends to be grippier, even when it's wet. Ms. Caputo varies the length of her poles on every hike. 'On the way down, I like them a little longer to help with bigger drop-offs,' she said. 'On the way up, if I need to use my hands to scramble, I fold them down.' Also consider the pole's tip — on dry, paved trails or sidewalks, a rubber tip is best. If you're heading onto a dirt path, or if there's snow or ice, a metal tip provides greater stability (though the metal can sometimes damage rocks). You'll want to learn how to adjust and use your wrist straps, too. Grip the handle and make sure the strap is resting snugly but comfortably around the back of your wrist. If not, play around with the adjustments until you find your sweet spot. You can also bring your poles to a physical therapist to find the setup that works for your body, Dr. Baggish said. Find your technique The classic position for any pole — Nordic or trekking — is straight down, so that your arms are parallel with the ground and your elbows are bent at a 90-degree angle. In this position, your arms can help to power your movement. Don't let the poles alter how you walk or hike. 'The poles shouldn't change your natural walking rhythm,' Ms. Peikon said. 'It should feel intuitive to use them, not a hindrance to your natural cadence.' Try to consciously engage your arms and shoulders. Focus on pushing down to propel yourself forward. Hiking downhill won't be as much of a push motion, but rather a stabilising plant, Ms. Peikon said. Do your best to maintain an upright posture, never hunching over your poles. 'It may feel awkward to use them at first,' said Ms. Peikon, 'which is why practicing with them on flat, level terrain is best.' You can also play around with using one pole or two. Ms. Peikon prefers one: 'If I have a misstep, I like having a hand free to catch myself,' she said. In the end, how you use them comes down to preference — don't overthink it and don't overspend, Ms. Hawke said. 'Sometimes, the random hiking stick you find on the side of the trail works just fine, too.'
Time of India
03-06-2025
- Time of India
Harvard seeks end to US funding cuts, says national security, public health research in peril
Wilmington, Delaware -Harvard University asked a federal judge on Monday to issue a summary judgment ruling to unfreeze $2.5 billion in funding blocked by President Donald Trump's administration, which Harvard said was illegal. Harvard's filing in the U.S. District Court in Boston said that it had received 957 orders since April 14 to freeze funding for research pertaining to national security threats, cancer and infectious diseases and more since the country's oldest and wealthiest school rejected a White House list of demands. Trump has said he is trying to force change at Harvard - and other top-level universities across the U.S. - because in his view they have been captured by leftist "woke" thought and become bastions of antisemitism. The Trump administration did not immediately respond to a request for comment. U.S. District Judge Allison Burroughs has set arguments for July 21 on Harvard's motion for summary judgment, which is a request for a judge to decide a dispute without a trial to determine material facts. Harvard sued the Trump administration in April, alleging the funding freeze violated the school's right to free speech and was arbitrary and capricious. In Monday's court filing, Harvard detailed the terminated grants, including $88 million for research into pediatric HIV, $12 million for increasing Defense Department awareness of emerging biological threats and $8 million to better understand dark energy. The school said ending the funding would destroy ongoing research into cancer treatments, infectious disease and Parkinson's. The Trump administration has opened numerous investigations into Harvard. Some are looking at threats against Jewish students and faculty after pro-Palestinian protests broke out following the Oct. 7, 2023 Hamas attack on Israel and subsequent Israeli military actions in Gaza. Other investigations are probing whether Harvard discriminates based on sex and gender, along with the school's ties to foreign governments and international students. The Trump administration revoked Harvard's ability to enroll international students last month, which a judge temporarily blocked after Harvard sued in a separate case. Harvard and other universities say Trump's attacks are threats to freedom of speech and freedom of academics, as well as threats to the schools' very existence.
Time of India
03-06-2025
- Time of India
Harvard battles $2.5 Billion US funding cut, cites risks to national security, public health research
Harvard University on Monday asked a federal judge to issue a summary judgment ordering the unfreezing of $2.5 billion in federal research funding that has been halted by the Trump administration, which Harvard says is illegal. The university contends that the freeze jeopardizes over 950 critical research projects, including those related to national security and public health. In a filing with the US district court in Boston, Harvard argues that the funding suspension is both unlawful and politically motivated. The university asserts that the freeze violates its rights to free speech and due process and undermines academic independence. Trump has been attempting to force change at Harvard and other top American universities, because of his view that these have been captured by the left-wing woke and has led to the rise of antisemitism. The Trump administration has not yet responded to this latest move by the university. US district judge Allison Burroughs has set July 21 for the arguments on the Harvard case seeking summary judgement, which refers to a request to the judge to decide a dispute without a trial to determine material facts. Impact on vital research The funding freeze affects a wide array of research initiatives, including studies on cancer, infectious diseases, and biological threat awareness for the department of defence. A defence advanced research projects agency (DARPA) official highlighted in court documents that canceling a $12 million grant for biological threat research at Harvard could pose "grave and immediate harm to national security." Additionally, the freeze threatens research in areas such as pediatric HIV and dark energy, potentially hindering advancements in both medical and scientific fields. Political tensions and retaliation claims Harvard's legal challenge comes amid escalating tensions with the Trump administration. The university alleges that the funding freeze is a retaliatory measure following its refusal to comply with a list of demands from the White House, which included changes to hiring practices and student discipline regulations. Besides, multiple other investigations have been opened into Harvard, including some looking into threats against Jewish students and faculty after pro-Palestine protests broke out following the October 7, 2023 Hamas attack on Israel. Further escalating the situation, the administration attempted to revoke Harvard's certification under the student and exchange visitor program, effectively barring the university from enrolling international students. This move was temporarily halted by a federal judge, but it has added to the university's concerns about political interference in academic affairs.
