logo
Don't mention the local elections: Keir and Kemi sign non-aggression pact at PMQs

Don't mention the local elections: Keir and Kemi sign non-aggression pact at PMQs

The Guardian07-05-2025

Y ou'd have thought it might have been a moment for contrition. Or failing that, a veneer of humility. At the very least a nano-second's pause for self reflection. An admission from Keir Starmer and Kemi Badenoch that voters had turned their backs on both of them at last week's local elections. A potential kiss of death for this country's traditional two-party system.
Not a bit of it. Come prime minister's questions and neither Keir nor Kemi was in the mood to give an inch. Everything was exactly as it should be. The locals – what locals? – had never happened. No one does amnesia better than politicians with their backs to the wall. It was almost as though they had signed a non-aggression pact. Just don't mention the war. Snafu. Situation Normal All Fucked Up.
Starmer at least had the grace – the clarity, even – to seem somewhat flustered. This wasn't him at the top of his game. He seemed edgy, stumbling over his words from time to time. As though he too was aware that there was something vaguely surreal about the whole performance. That there was a truth-shaped hole in his soul. Even the Labour backbenchers were unusually silent. They are increasingly desperate to find a reason to believe.
What left is there to say bout Kemi? KemiKaze is going to KemiKaze. Perhaps she's secretly thrilled to be leading her party towards the threat of extinction. Going head to head with the manspreading Chris Philp to be the last Tory to be found in captivity. No greater reward. Or maybe Kemi just has no shame. Finds it easy to block out her nose-diving approval ratings. Just let go of inconvenient facts and substitute her own reality. One where what the leader of the opposition says counts for something.
Keir began by expressing dismay at the outbreak of hostilities between India and Pakistan, before seamlessly segueing in to praising his new trade deal with India. One that was conveniently signed moments before Modi fired missiles into Pakistan. I guess we don't have to look far to see which side the UK will be on. Still, you can't blame Starmer for being over-excited. This is the biggest trade deal the UK has done since leaving the EU. Even if it is one that will only add 0.1% to our GDP by 2040. But hey, a win is a win. You can't ignore those Brexit bonuses when they come.
I had vaguely imagined that Kemi would use her slot at PMQs to give Labour a hard time over the India deal. After all, she had spent most of the previous day rubbishing it. It would let in loads of immigrants, she had said. None of whom would be paying their taxes, she had said. Yet another example of Two-Tier Kier. She would never have done that when she was trade secretary. That was why the Tories had failed to reach a deal when they had been in office.
It just goes to show Kemi shouldn't believe everything she reads on X. Which is where she gets most of her information. For it turned out that a contra-tax arrangement was standard in almost every other trade deal Britain had done. Maybe she was just unhappy about brown people getting the benefit. Obviously it's fine when it's the French or the Germans.
Nor should Kemi necessarily trust her own memory. Far from blocking the deal due to tax arrangements when business secretary, as she had claimed, the Indians were keen to let the world know she had actually inserted those arrangements into the trade deal framework. And had still been unable to get it across the line.
Better still, she started drawing attention to the Indian claims by reposting them on social media. 'IT'S NOT TRUE,' she insisted. Except no one believed her. Sometimes it's a mystery what goes on in Kemi's head. Maybe nothing. As Sherlock Holmes observed, when you've eliminated all that is impossible, the improbable must be the truth. Perhaps she's secretly a sleeper agent for Reform.
For half an hour, though, Kemi's wranglers had managed to steer her away from highlighting damaging stories about herself. There was to be no mention of The India Deal and My Part in its Downfall. Keir was devastated. The deal was the best thing that had happened to him in weeks. Months. He was desperate to talk about it. No one could shut him up. Time and again he raised it. 'THIS IS MY TRADE DEAL WHICH IS MINE.' But no one was that bothered. Even the business secretary, Jonathan Reynolds, looked underwhelmed.
Instead KemiKaze just decided to waste everyone's time. Including her own. Her capacity for self-destruction is limitless. First she wondered whether Labour would be reinstating a universal Winter Fuel Allowance for pensioners. Thereby forgetting that she had been all in favour of means testing when the Tories had been in government. And that she still hadn't got around to thinking of how she proposed to fill the deficit were the WFA to be reintroduced. It's come to something when Starmer's waffle can win the argument.
Halfway through, Badenoch got bored and started a new line of questioning. One that seemed to belong to last week's PMQs, after the Day Before Yesterday's man, Tony Blair, had failed to take his medication and had talked nonsense about net zero. Keir couldn't believe his luck because he had all his answers lined up from the previous week, which he hadn't been able to use as Kemi had forgotten to ask about it. Maybe this is the way it's going to roll from now on. Everyone in a seven-day timewarp. It's now odds on she'll raise the India deal next week.
Er … Kemi was a climate defeatist, said Starmer. Before digging out quotes from her when she had been in government in which she had said renewables were the energy of the future. Never change, Kemi.
It took Ed Davey to remind the chamber that the local elections had taken place the previous week. Keir and Kemi looked blank. Some mistake there. That had never happened. In the end, Davey gave up and resorted to his specialist subject: Donald Trump. What to do about Agent Orange's latest threat to impose a 100% tariff on foreign films. Or as The Donald put it: 'The greatest announcement in the history of announcements.' Time for the Paddington death stare.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

'We feel utterly abandoned': Families of British Air India crash victims criticise UK government's response
'We feel utterly abandoned': Families of British Air India crash victims criticise UK government's response

Sky News

time28 minutes ago

  • Sky News

'We feel utterly abandoned': Families of British Air India crash victims criticise UK government's response

The families of three of the British victims of last week's Air India crash in Ahmedabad have criticised the UK government's response to the disaster, saying they "feel utterly abandoned". It comes after an Air India Dreamliner crashed shortly after take-off from Ahmedabad airport in western India, killing 229 passengers and 12 crew. Among the passengers and crew on the Gatwick-bound aircraft were 169 Indian nationals, 53 Britons, seven Portuguese nationals and one Canadian national. In a statement, the families of three British citizens who lost their lives said they were calling on the UK government to "immediately step up its presence and response on the ground in Ahmedabad". The families say they rushed to India to be by their loved ones' sides, "only to find a disjointed, inadequate, and painfully slow government reaction". "There is no UK leadership here, no medical team, no crisis professionals stationed at the hospital," said a family spokesperson. "We are forced to make appointments to see consular staff based 20 minutes away in a hotel, while our loved ones lie unidentified in an overstretched and under-resourced hospital. "We're not asking for miracles - we're asking for presence, for compassion, for action," another family member said. "Right now, we feel utterly abandoned." Please refresh the page for the latest version.

Brits braced for tax rises as two thirds fear Rachel Reeves will need to hammer the public and firms or up borrowing to pay for Spending Review
Brits braced for tax rises as two thirds fear Rachel Reeves will need to hammer the public and firms or up borrowing to pay for Spending Review

Daily Mail​

time36 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Brits braced for tax rises as two thirds fear Rachel Reeves will need to hammer the public and firms or up borrowing to pay for Spending Review

Britons are bracing themselves for tax rises later this year as they fear Rachel Reeves ' Spending Review cash splash is otherwise unaffordable, anew poll suggests. Two thirds of voters (67 per cent) believe that the Chancellor's plans set out last week mean she will either hit them in the pocket or increase borrowing. And the YouGov poll shows that fewer than one-in-eight (12 per cent) believe that the plans, which will see billions more thrown at the NHS and nuclear power, are affordable with things as they are. The Treasury is already said to be drawing up tax rise options for the Autumn as economists warn Ms Reeves' plans no longer add up. Dividends and bank profits are among the areas being mooted for drumming up revenue to balance the books. The Chancellor declined to rule out tax rises again yesterday, amid fears that the Israel-Iran conflict could deal another hammer blow to the prospects for growth. The poll found that almost half of voters (49 per cent) believe Ms Reeves is doing a bad job. However her rating has improved from -41 to -33 compared to after the Spring Statement in March. The proportion of voters who feel that the economy will get worse over the next year also fell from 65 per cent to 54 per cent. Voters backed more money for the NHS, school building repairs and building more social housing. But in a blow to Ed Miliband only half say nuclear power is a priority, and fewer want money spend on AI, science and technology or building more railways. Ms Reeves insists her spending plans for the next three years are 'fully' funded. But critics have claimed the stalling economy, together with pressures on defence and a Labour revolt on benefits mean she is writing cheques with 'fantasy' money. The issues could crystalise at the Budget in the Autumn, when many believe the independent OBR will downgrade growth forecasts. GDP shrank by 0.3 per cent in April, although it has grown over the past quarter. The IFS think-tank has warned that tax rises look 'almost inevitable', ridiculing the government's claim to have identified billions of pounds in 'efficiencies' during a 'zero-based' overhaul of costs. According to the Sunday Times, a list of potential tax increases drawn up in the Treasury includes raising the bank surcharge. That is a levy on profits on top of the 25 per cent corporation tax rate. It was cut from 8 per cent to 3 per cent under the Tories, with suggestions it could return to 5 or 6 per cent. Another apparent option is increasing tax on dividends, often taken by company directors instead of wages. Currently the highest rate stands at 39 per cent - lower than the 45 per cent top rate of income tax. Removing a tax-free £500 dividend allowance would bring in hundreds of millions of pounds for the Treasury, but could punish small investors. Challenged on the BBC's Sunday with Laura Kuenssberg that 'lots of experts' were already saying she would need to put taxes up, Ms Reeves said: 'Well we're a strong economy with strong foundations and we have weathered other shocks... 'We are still the only country to have secured a deal with the United States, and in addition we've got trade deals with India and the EU, so we are working hard as a government to strengthen our economy, to grow our economy in a way that creates good jobs here in Britain, paying decent wages, to put more money in peoples' pockets.' Options are always drawn up within the Treasury ahead of fiscal events, and not necessarily implemented.

MI6 appoints first female chief in 116-year history
MI6 appoints first female chief in 116-year history

BBC News

timean hour ago

  • BBC News

MI6 appoints first female chief in 116-year history

The organisation she will be running faces unprecedented and multiple challenges. Geographically, these emanate primarily from Russia, China, Iran and North Korea, as the four nations co-operate ever more closely to undermine UK and Western interests across the globe. But there are technical challenges too. MI6's role is to recruit human agents to steal secrets from Britain's adversaries, which include both hostile nations and non-state groups like al-Qaeda. In an age of rapid digital innovation, MI6 is having to pedal ever faster to stay ahead of its enemies and to remain relevant, when so much intelligence is now gathered online and from space. Last September, outgoing chief Sir Richard - alongside then-CIA chief William Burns - warned that the international world was "under threat in a way we haven't seen since the Cold War". Writing in the Financial Times, the pair said that beyond the war in Ukraine, the two foreign intelligence services were continuing to "work together to disrupt the reckless campaign of sabotage across Europe being waged by Russian intelligence". Sir Richard and Mr Burns added that they saw the rise of China as the main intelligence and geopolitical challenge of the century. They also said they had pushed "hard" for restraint and de-escalation in the Middle East. On Sunday, Sir Richard, who will step down in the autumn after five years in the role, said he was "absolutely delighted" with the "historic appointment" of his colleague. "Blaise is a highly accomplished intelligence officer and leader, and one of our foremost thinkers on technology," he said. "I am excited to welcome her as the first female head of MI6." Foreign Secretary David Lammy, to whom Ms Metreweli will be accountable as MI6's new chief, said she was the "ideal" candidate and would ensure the UK was able to tackle the challenges of "global instability and emerging security threats". "I would also like to pay tribute to Sir Richard Moore for his service and leadership," he said. "I have worked closely with him over the past year and thank him for his valuable contribution enhancing our national security and protecting the British public." Sir Keir also thanked Sir Richard for his "dedicated service". "I know Blaise will continue to provide the excellent leadership needed to defend our county and keep our people safe," he added. Additional reporting by Hollie Cole

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store