
SA's shameful hunger epidemic — we need to move beyond donation to legislation
In rural South Africa, women in their sixties are borrowing money from loan sharks to feed their families. Grown men are trying to last for entire days on a single meal from a neighbourhood community kitchen.
Children are arriving at school too food deprived to concentrate on their lessons – desperately holding on until lunchtime, when their free school meal provides their only regular source of nourishment.
These are the daily realities of a large number of South Africans. It's shameful, because it is an insult to our fellow citizens that they are forced to scratch around, humbling themselves to find food, in a country that produces more than enough to feed everyone every day.
An unjust reality
The Bill of Rights in the Constitution, in sections 27 (1) b and 28 (1) c, guarantees our people the right to adequate food and water.
It's a violation of these rights that so many of our people go hungry. Hunger reduces their ability to function as fully actualised human beings, to care for their families, learn, work, grow, live and love those around them. And this injustice happens at an enormous scale.
Springbok rugby captain Siya Kolisi, who grew up in a poor Eastern Cape community, describes the all-encompassing impact of hunger.
'Being hungry is easy and commonplace,' he writes. 'Hunger is different. It's all-consuming. It was all I could feel and all I could think about. My stomach seemed to twist in on itself, and the more I tried to ignore the pain there, the worse it got.'
The Unicef Child Food Poverty 2024 Report states that 23% of South African children live with just such a debilitating experience – severe food poverty. Fully 37% – more than a third – of our children suffer from 'moderate' food poverty.
As we mark World Hunger Day on 28 May, it is critical that we highlight the causes of this deeply unjust and offensive reality, which confronts vast numbers of our people daily.
Those causes are systemic. Because of food industry business models, distribution methods and restrictive legislation, one-third of all the food produced in South Africa – ten million tonnes – goes to waste each year. This is the equivalent of 40 billion meals, in a context where 20 billion meals are needed to provide all of South Africa's hungry people with three meals a day for a year.
Innovative solutions
FoodForward South Africa (FFSA) works closely with our food system partners to address this senseless waste. Our food banking model connects a world of excess to a world of need, by recovering quality edible surplus food from the consumer goods supply chain and distributing it to community organisations that provide life-saving services in underserved communities.
We have made significant progress. In the 2024/25 financial year we distributed 83 million meals through our food banking model, reaching 935,000 vulnerable people daily via a network of 2,500 vetted beneficiary organisations across South Africa. Thanks to support from our food and financial donors, our partners and volunteers, we have been able to achieve a cost per meal of only R0,50 – proving that this model is scalable.
We constantly develop new, innovative solutions, making a material difference in communities across the country. One such solution is our digital platform called FoodShare, which manages our Virtual Foodbanking (VFB) module. VFB connects our beneficiary organisations to local retail stores for the regular collection of surplus food. Woolworths, PnP, Spar and Food Lover's Market stores all use FoodShare to ensure their surplus food that is still edible but not selling goes to local communities, and thousands of tonnes of waste is avoided.
In the Eastern and Western Cape we launched the Mother and Child Nutrition Programme with the Philani Maternal, Child Health and Nutrition Trust and Grow Great, providing nutritious food parcels to pregnant women and children who have been identified as at risk or malnourished. FFSA provides nutritious food for the whole family, until the mother and/or child gains the necessary weight to live healthily.
Our Food Gardens Connect programme provides training to unemployed people in 10 underserved communities. We show people how to grow their own food and give them a starter kit and other inputs; like seedlings. We also offer a guaranteed buy-back of all the produce they grow, so they can earn an income. The programme provides skills, sustenance and new income streams for people in these communities.
Systemic causes
However, committed as we are to these programmes, the fact remains that food insecurity is a systemic injustice. For that reason, addressing it requires systemic change.
Our #RepurposeTheSurplus campaign is dedicated to introducing behavioural change across the food system, while lobbying the government for legislative change. Our goals include the finalisation of a South African Bureau of Standards (SABS) South African National Standard (SANS) for Food Donation – a first for South Africa and the continent. FFSA is on this working group, and we are close to finalising this standard, which food system actors can use to donate food safely.
Our second goal is to develop a Food Donations Bill that relaxes the often overstrict safety liability of food donors and redistribution organisations and clarifies the fact that donated food remains safe after the 'sell by' or 'best before' dates. These dates can be misleading and can affect the amount of food that is either wasted or donated by food producers and retailers.
The proposed Bill would revise labelling guidelines to encourage the donation of food beyond its 'best before' date and make food donation common practice.
In France, a similar law – the 2016 'Garot Law' – mandated that unsold food products from retail stores that are still safe for consumption must be donated, rather than discarded. The outcome has been hugely positive, with nearly 28% more food rescued in France within the first two years of the law being passed. Countries like Italy, Paraguay, Pakistan and the US are all moving towards donating food to reduce the impact of food loss and waste on the environment.
Integrated interventions
The FFSA model is strategic and scalable and has made a difference to the lives of millions of food-insecure South Africans. But ultimately, if we want this year's World Hunger Day to herald a seismic change, we need to rethink the entire approach to food donation.
We need systemic, integrated interventions that address the root causes. These will require:
Policy and legislative reforms that support food recovery and redistribution;
Collaborative partnerships between the government, the private sector and nonprofit organisations in creating sustainable food systems; and
Active involvement from individuals, businesses and organisations in supporting efforts to build a food-secure nation.
The need for action is urgent. Thanks to economic and geopolitical trends, inequalities are growing. Climate change is having severe impacts on our food system and we are not making sufficient progress towards meeting the Sustainable Development Goals.
We need to act decisively on a national, strategic level to create a sustainable food system where no South African must be less of a person because they must live with the debilitating pain of being food insecure. DM
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Maverick
an hour ago
- Daily Maverick
Judgment against Hlophe is an important step to protect the integrity of SA's legal system
You simply cannot keep Dr John Hlophe out of the news. This time he is at the receiving end of a judgment of a full bench of the Western Cape Division of the High Court which upheld applications by the Democratic Alliance, Freedom Under Law and Corruption Watch that the National Assembly had incorrectly appointed Hlophe as one of the six members of Parliament to serve on the Judicial Service Commission (JSC) in terms of section 178 (1) (h) of the Constitution. The judgment was penned by Judge Nobulawo Mbhele from the Free State, and judges Annali Basson and TP Mudau from the Gauteng Division of the High Court, all of whom were designated to hear this case given Hlophe's previous position as Judge President of the Western Cape Division of the High Court. The reader is reminded that after a 16-year protracted legal process costing the taxpayer approximately R10-million, the President removed Hlophe from office as a judge in terms of section 177 of the Constitution. The question, therefore, given his impeachment as a judge, arose as to whether the National Assembly (NA) could legally designate Hlophe as a member of the JSC. The first question of importance was whether the dispute was moot, as Hlophe had resigned from the JSC before this dispute was heard by the court. The court, however, held that the dispute remained live because 'any further designation process by the NA must take place with this court's guidance on whether the NA had a discretion to consider the fitness of the nominee for designation to the JSC in terms of s 178 (1) (h) of the Constitution' and whether it had acted lawfully when it designated Hlophe for appointment to the JSC. Hlophe had raised the argument, supported by the MK and EFF parties, that he was eminently qualified to serve on the JSC because he has a doctorate in law and had served as a judge and because the Constitution had not provided specific qualifications or criteria for a person designated to the JSC. The court accepted that section 178 (1) (h) of the Constitution does not specifically constrain the power of the National Assembly to designate a member to the JSC, other than to require that half of the designated members must be from opposition parties. However, that on its own did not suffice to give definitive content to the appointment process. As the court pointed out, the National Assembly must act rationally, meaning that its action must be rationally connected to the purpose for which a power is exercised. Further, section 165 (4) of the Constitution requires that the National Assembly must assist and protect the courts to ensure their independence and impartiality, dignity, accessibility and effectiveness. The judgment noted that public confidence in the judiciary's composition and its role in the administration of justice is vital. While the test of 'fit and proper' was not expressly included for appointing someone to the JSC, the court referred to a judgment by the Constitutional Court, Helen Suzman Foundation v the Judicial Service Commission (2018). In that judgment, the Constitutional Court placed considerable importance on ensuring that those entrusted with the responsibility of nominating and designating lawyers for membership of the judiciary must be suitably qualified to do so. The court warned that a rule that threatened the ability to appoint the best candidates for the judiciary 'would have serious consequences for the judiciary and consequently our constitutional democracy as a whole'. To have an impeached judge as a member of the JSC effectively means that the National Assembly had appointed someone who might have been formally eligible, but 'was not substantially suited for appointment to the JSC'. Improper exercise In appointing Hlophe to the JSC, the Western Cape Division of the High Court said, the National Assembly was 'required to consider whether [he was] suitable for appointment'. The NA did not exercise such discretion, and indeed mistakenly laboured under the impression that it did not even have such discretion. As a result, the designation of Hlophe without any proper consideration of his suitability was an improper exercise of a discretion possessed by the National Assembly to ensure that a designee to the JSC was 'fit and proper for the purpose of nominating judges'. What is also significant was the manner in which the full bench treated the reaction of Hlophe and his MK party to a previous order in which a full bench had granted an interim interdict restraining Hlophe from participating as a member of the JSC. The MK party had reacted by referring to the 'incompetent, irrational, absurd and blatantly political judgment of the Western Cape High Court, which is regrettable but not surprising'. Neither the MK party leader, Jacob Zuma, nor Hlophe, nor the MK party had publicly distanced themselves from the scandalising of the court. Accordingly, having found that the presence of an impeached judge prejudiced the JSC's ability to discharge its constitutional function, the full bench held that derogatory statements Hlophe made about the retired judge Azhar Cachalia, representing Freedom Under Law, justified a punitive cost order. Both Hlophe and the MK party were ordered to pay the applicants' costs on an attorney and client scale. The judgment is of extreme importance. It asserts the centrality of the JSC to the integrity and legitimacy of the judiciary and the need to ensure that members of the JSC are suitably qualified for purpose. The National Assembly is not there to act as a rubber stamp confirming a political party's wish. That an impeached judge could be held up as a person who could sit on the JSC and contribute to the appointment of judges only has to be stated to confirm the irrationality of the National Assembly's initial decision. The judgment also represents an important step by the judiciary to protect the integrity of the legal system against the kind of flagrant abuse which has characterised this sad Hlophe saga. Is it too much to hope that in the future, courts will protect the integrity and reputation of the judicial institution by ordering punitive costs when litigants or their legal representatives engage in flagrant contempt for the judiciary and its process? DM

TimesLIVE
6 hours ago
- TimesLIVE
Celebrity boxing match set to ignite the ring in July
The glitz and glam of South African entertainment will collide with the grit and intensity of boxing when the Lehlohonolo Ledwaba Memorial Celebrity Boxing Event takes centre stage on July 26 at Emperors Palace, Kempton Park. TLB Boxing Promotions hosted the official press conference for the much-anticipated event on Tuesday at the Birchwood Hotel in Boksburg. The event is not just about punches and showmanship; it's a tribute to the late boxing legend Lehlohonolo Ledwaba, whose impact on the sport continues to inspire athletes and fans alike. In attendance at the media briefing were some of the biggest names from entertainment and sports, including legendary boxer Cassius Baloyi, Siphiwe 'Picat' Sibeko from iconic kwaito group Alaska and celebrity boxing contenders NaakMusiQ, Phumlani Njilo and Chad Da Don. Notably absent was actor Abdul Khoza, who could not attend due to other commitments.


The South African
8 hours ago
- The South African
Full list: 10 signings linked with Kaizer Chiefs
Kaizer Chiefs coach Nasreddine Nabi flanked by the club's Sporting Director Kaizer Motaung Jr (left) and the Football Manager Bobby Motaung (right). Image: Goal Kaizer Chiefs are linked with an exciting list of players. The most popular names include Monnapule Saleng, Oswin Appollis and Fiston Mayele. Here's a list of nine players who have been mentioned in the same sentence as Kaizer Chiefs over the past seven days. Kaizer Chiefs bosses to sign two Sundowns superstars? According to various local reports, Amakhosi are linked with a host of attacking talent. Of the nine players mentioned this past week, only one of them is a defender: Fawaaz Basadien. The rest of the pack includes wingers, midfielders and of course strikers. Full List: Monnapule Saleng, 27, winger, Orlando Pirates. Feisal Salum, 28, midfielder, Azam FC Asanele Velebayi, 22, winger, Cape Town Spurs Sipho Mbule, 27, midfielder, Mamelodi Sundowns Rivaldo Coetzee Jean Charles Ahoua Etiosa Igodaro Fiston Mayele Fawaaz Basadien Oswin Appollis, 23, winger, Polokwane City. Zimbabwean attacker to Orlando Pirates? Spotted: Kaizer Chiefs coach Nabi in Africa Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1 Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X and Bluesky for the latest news.