Former Army Chief Reacts To Pahalgam Attack, Calls For Stern Message To Pakistan: 'Only One Action Will Not...'
Former Indian Army chief VP Malik said Pakistan won't learn from one just operation and therefore, a message has to be sent to the neighbouring country again and again.
Twenty-six people were killed and many others were injured as multiple terrorists descended on Baisaran Valley and opened fire at the tourists on Tuesday. Responding to the attack, General VP Malik (Retd), Former Indian army chief, spoke to CNN-News18 and called for a 'loud and stern message to Pakistan". He stated that Pakistan won't learn from one just operation and therefore, a message has to be sent to the neighbouring country again and again.
'Many local sleeper cells are supporting the terrorists. We will have to look into counter-infiltration measures. When we decide to take any army action, the escalation control part of it needs to be looked into," General VP Malik (Retd) said, adding that the Jihadis camps should be attacked.
'Message needs to be sent over and over again when such attacks take place on Indian soil…only one operation will not give Pakistan a stern message." he added.
Terrorists Identified
Three terrorists who carried out a barbaric attack in J&K's Pahalgam on Tuesday have been identified, with agencies saying the group had been active in the area for the last one month. The sources added that the men in the photo match the sketches released of the Pahalgam attackers.
According to officials, the names of three terrorists involved in the attack are Asif Fauji, Suleman Shah and Abu Talha. Notably, all of them are linked to Lashkar-e-Taiba. As the nation remains in shock over the tragedy, security agencies are going all-out to track down the terrorists.
The Resistance Front (TRF), an offshoot of Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT) co-founded by Hafiz Saeed, has claimed responsibility for the attack. The TRF came into existence in 2019 as a proxy outfit of LeT in the aftermath of the abrogation of Article 370 and revocation of special status to J&K in August that year.
First Published:
April 23, 2025, 14:56 IST
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News18
17 minutes ago
- News18
Who Is Paul Kapur? Trump's Indian-Origin Pick As Key Diplomat For South Asian Affairs
Last Updated: Paul Kapur is a South Asia security expert and professor at the US Naval Postgraduate School, known for his work on nuclear policy and regional strategy. Paul Kapur, US President Donald Trump's nominee for South Asia, said India and the United States share common interests like a free and open Indo-Pacific, which is not dominated by China, along with expanding trade, tech sharing, and access to energy. Speaking at an event, Trump's Indian-origin nominee also said that he would 'pursue security cooperation where it is beneficial to the US interest, seeking opportunities for bilateral collaboration in trade and investment". 'We will promote long-standing security interests with India, Pakistan through the pursuit of peace and stability and fight against terrorism," Kapur said. WHO IS PAUL KAPUR? Security expert Paul Kapur was nominated by Trump as the Assistant Secretary of State for South Asian Affairs in February this year. If his nomination is confirmed, Kapur would succeed Donald Lu, who completed his term on January 17, 2025. Paul Kapur is known for his extensive research on South Asian security and nuclear policy, and works as a professor in the Department of National Security Affairs at the US Naval Postgraduate School. Additionally, Paul also played a key role in shaping US foreign policy on South and Central Asia. Kapur studied for his BA at Amherst College and did his PhD at the University of Chicago. According to some media reports, Kapur has authored multiple influential publications on South Asian security, nuclear policy, and international relations. His books include Jihad as Grand Strategy: Islamist Militancy, National Security, and the Pakistani State (Oxford University Press, 2016), Dangerous Deterrent: Nuclear Weapons Proliferation and Conflict in South Asia (Stanford University Press, 2007), India, Pakistan, and the Bomb: Debating Nuclear Stability in South Asia (Columbia University Press, 2010), and The Challenges of Nuclear Security: US and Indian Perspectives (Palgrave MacMillan, 2024). Get breaking news, in-depth analysis, and expert perspectives on everything from geopolitics to diplomacy and global trends. Stay informed with the latest world news only on News18. Download the News18 App to stay updated!
Time of India
18 minutes ago
- Time of India
India needs better regulatory framework to attract investments: Swiss diplomat
Switzerland's State Secretary for Economic Affairs Helene Budliger Artieda has said a good regulatory framework and cut in red tape in India is important to attract Swiss investments. She said businesses here have raised concerns about bureaucratic hurdles. India and the four European nation bloc EFTA has signed a free trade agreement on March 10, 2024, which is expected to come into force from October 1. Under the pact, India has received an investment commitment of USD 100 billion in 15 years from the grouping while allowing several products such as Swiss watches, chocolates, and cut and polished diamonds at lower or zero duties. Also Read: India is a preferred place for Swiss businesses: State Secretary for Economic Affairs Live Events The European Free Trade Association (EFTA) members are Iceland, Liechtenstein, Norway, and Switzerland. She said for USD 100 billion investments, "we need to have the best framework conditions and this was part of the business roundtable meeting in the presence of Minister Goyal". "That will be important that red tape will be cut as much as possible. Even in Switzerland, companies always complain that there is too much red tape. It will be very important that India creates a good framework for Swiss investments to come in," she told reporters here after meeting Goyal on June 10. The Indian minister was here on a two-day official visit to meet businesses to attract investments into India. On the issue of Swiss government suspending the most favoured nation (MFN) status clause in the Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement (DTAA) between India and Switzerland, Artieda said there has been some misunderstanding on this. "But it really has no connection whatsoever... I think it's important to know that both India and Switzerland share a double taxation treaty and that treaty is valid and that means there will not be any issue," she said. In a statement in December 2024, the Swiss government announced the suspension of the MFN clause in the DTAA between India and Switzerland, potentially impacting Swiss investments in India and leading to higher taxes on Indian companies operating in the European nation. She also said implementation of the trade agreement will help increase exports of Swiss watches and chocolates in India. Also Read: Govt may help MSMEs register products abroad: Piyush Goyal Swiss companies will have the advantage of preferred access to markets in India for both watches and chocolates due to this pact. Further she added that Switzerland is confident of achieving the USD 100 billion investment commitment in 15 years in India. "I am very confident we will achieve that," she said. India-EFTA two-way trade was USD 18.65 billion in 2022-23 (of this, USD 17.14 billion with Switzerland) compared to USD 27.23 billion in 2021-22. The trade deficit was USD 14.8 billion in the last fiscal year. In 2024-25, India's imports from EFTA bloc increased to USD 22.5 billion from USD 22 billion in 2023-24. Exports stood at USD 1.96 billion in the last fiscal year, up from USD 1.94 billion in 2023-24. Switzerland is the largest trading partner of India in the bloc, followed by Norway. EFTA countries are not part of the European Union (EU). It is an inter-governmental organisation for the promotion and intensification of free trade. It was founded as an alternative for states that did not wish to join the European community. India is negotiating a comprehensive free trade agreement separately with the EU -- the 27-nation bloc. India has received about USD 10.83 billion in foreign direct investments (FDI) from Switzerland between April 2000 and March 2025. It is the 12th largest investor in India. The FDI inflow was USD 931.88 million from Norway, USD 29.41 million from Iceland and USD 105.93 million from Liechtenstein during the period.
NDTV
20 minutes ago
- NDTV
Is America Still Worth It?
What do Sundar Pichai, Amartya Sen, Indra Nooyi, Raghuram Rajan and Arvind Krishna have in common? Apart from being global icons of Indian stock, they all polished their brains at top American universities. A PhD from MIT launched Raghuram Rajan into the upper echelons of global economic thinking, from the IMF to the RBI. Sundar Pichai's Stanford and Wharton degrees were stepping stones to becoming Google's boss. Indra Nooyi earned her MBA from Yale before reshaping PepsiCo. Arvind Krishna, who heads IBM, trained at the University of Illinois, while Nobel laureate Amartya Sen's ideas on justice and welfare economics were sharpened at Harvard. Each one is a testament to how American classrooms have shaped Indian minds that now influence the world. And it doesn't stop there. Walk through the halls of Harvard or UC San Diego, and you will find Indian names carved into the very architecture of academia. There's the Lakshmi Mittal South Asia Institute at Harvard, funding cutting-edge research on the subcontinent. Or the Narayana Murthy Fellowship at Wharton, encouraging the next generation of entrepreneurial leaders. And in sunny California, the Tata Institute for Genetics and Society is helping scientists rethink the future of human biology. Indian students and philanthropists aren't just attending US universities - they are investing in them, expanding them, and in many ways, helping define their future. But the question is what do aspiring Indian students do now in the face of American universities being under siege - not just by budget cuts or what some might call culture wars, but by a calculated political offensive? The Trump administration insists it is punishing campuses for alleged antisemitism (read pro-Gaza demonstrations) and so-called "anti-white racism" (a swipe at diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives). But at its core, this is an attack on academic freedom and free expression - two pillars of higher learning that have long defined American intellectual life, no matter which of the two main parties the previous presidents belonged to or which ideological belief they subscribed to. But Trump is being Trump. He isn't making history, he's reversing it. His actions are damaging the very institutions that have been central to America's global prestige: its diplomacy, its alliances, its prestigious campuses, its free press and its cultural and scientific soft power. He isn't rebuilding a fallen empire; he's dismantling the decades-old edifice of high learning. Indian Students To Suffer And nowhere is the collateral damage felt more acutely than in the homes of Indian families who once viewed a US degree as the surest ticket to global success. President Trump's strategy is clear. By targeting elite institutions like Harvard and Columbia - places symbolic of intellectual independence and academic brilliance - the administration is striking fear into the wider academic ecosystem. Going after big names guarantees headlines while sending a chilling message to smaller, less protected universities: fall in line or face the consequences. The effects of this political theatre are already being felt on the ground. In a move that seemed bureaucratic on the surface but has far deeper implications the Trump administration has quietly instructed US embassies worldwide - including in India - to halt all student visa interview appointments. Officially, the freeze is linked to enhanced social media vetting. Embassies are now required to comb through years of online activity before granting a visa. Applicants must submit their handles dating back to 2019, with the State Department stating it will 'use all available information' in its assessments. What kind of content might raise a red flag? No one knows. But in an age where political expression and youth activism are often lived online, the message is clear: be careful what you post or risk your academic future. For thousands of Indian students, many of whom spend lakhs of rupees preparing for admission exams, shortlisting universities and securing funding, the disruption is more than an inconvenience. It is a psychological blow. Indian families plan years in advance for these opportunities. When visa appointments disappear and bureaucratic fog descends, it isn't just a delay - it is a dream deferred. The Pivot Away From The US In 2023, Indian students overtook Chinese nationals to become the largest international student group in the US, with more than 3.3 lakh enrolments. They are widely seen, even by US officials, as a pillar of the international student community: academically rigorous, culturally adaptable and socially responsible. And they are not just participants; they are contributors. International students often pay higher tuition fees, making up a crucial slice of universities' operating budgets. They are also overrepresented in science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) disciplines, often staying on to fuel the US innovation economy. And yet, their value is being dangerously overlooked. Harvard, in particular, has become a lightning rod. The Trump administration's attempt to block it from enrolling international students - now temporarily halted by court order - has caused widespread alarm. In Indian living rooms and WhatsApp groups, parents and students alike are beginning to ask the unthinkable: is the US still worth it? Many are already pivoting. A recent analysis in the Indian media estimated a 28% drop in Indian enrolments in the US for 2025, with students increasingly turning to the UK, Europe, Australia, and Canada. These countries may not offer the same cultural dominance or depth of alumni networks, but at least for now, they don't appear to be waging war on their own universities. Understand The Nuance What makes this all the more worrying is the broader ignorance outside the US about what's really happening within its academic institutions. International policymakers and even journalists often fail to grasp the nuance of the crisis. Few have sought the views of the faculty themselves - the professors and researchers who navigate complex institutional politics, face differing levels of protection based on gender, race or visa status and are now working under a cloud of fear and uncertainty. Trump's assault on higher education is not just a domestic issue. It's a global disruption. By weaponising immigration policy and framing liberal education as a threat to national identity, the US risks alienating the very people who once upheld its intellectual dominance. It is no longer just about visas and protests - it is about whether the American classroom remains a space for free thinking and global talent. And if it isn't, others are ready to fill the void. China, for all its surveillance and control, is investing heavily in its research universities. The UK is relaxing visa rules to court more Indian and African students. Even countries like Germany and the Netherlands are angling to offer English-language programmes and attract top talent from Asia. America's loss may well be their gain. The Shift Is Already Underway In the years to come, the world may see fewer Sundar Pichais, Indra Nooyis, Raghuram Rajans and Arvind Krishnas emerging from America's famed campuses. But perhaps we will see more Dr. Manmohan Singhs, Shashi Tharoors, and Rahul Bajajs - exceptional minds shaped by the equally esteemed institutions of the UK. Ultimately, Donald Trump's most lasting legacy may not be a law or a border wall, but the slow, silent exodus of brilliant young talent - students who once saw America as the ultimate destination, and are now looking elsewhere. That shift is already underway. An Opportunity For India As elite American universities come under political siege, India should seize the moment at home. With US campuses facing clampdowns on academic freedom, student expression and international mobility, India has a chance to position itself as a credible alternative. By investing heavily in research ecosystems, innovative education models and globally competitive institutions, India can attract not only its own aspiring scholars but also foreign talent disillusioned with the West's shifting academic climate. This isn't a far-fetched dream. India already boasts an expanding network of top-tier institutions - from the IITs and IIMs to the Indian Institute of Science and Ashoka University - and a vast pool of English-speaking faculty and students. What's needed now is visionary policy, generous research funding and a reimagining of education as a pillar of soft power. If the US is seen as closing its gates to ideas and talent, India can be the country that opens them, not just for Indians, but for the world.
