Texas sends $8.5 billion school funding bill to Gov. Abbott: Here's what's in it
The Brief
The Texas Legislature passed a massive $8.5 billion school funding package, which has now been sent to Gov. Greg Abbott for approval.
Nearly half of the funding ($4.2 billion) is earmarked for teacher and staff pay raises.
While supporters praise the investment, critics have concerns about how funds are allocated.
AUSTIN - As schools were dismissed for the summer across the state, the Texas Legislature passed a massive $8.5 billion school funding package.
House Bill 2 was sent to Governor Abbott's office on Thursday night. The funding plan looks to provide much-needed dollars to a public school system that has struggled under previous funding formulas.
"Satisfying all of those needs is an incredible undertaking, and I believe that this version of House Bill 2 before you now meets that moment," said State Rep Brad Buckley (R) Salado who sponsored HB2.
By the numbers
About half of the money, according to Buckley, $4.2 billion goes to pay & retention. The money is to have a very specific pay out:
$2,500 for teachers with three to four years of experience.
$5,000 for teachers with five or more years of experience in districts with more than 5,000 students.
$4,000 for teachers for three to 4 years
$8,000 dollars for teachers with five more years of experience in districts with 5,000 or fewer students.
$500 Million will go for support staff pay raises. Those that qualify include entry-level teachers, counselors, librarians, nurses, custodians, bus drivers, and other support staff.
Harvey Kronberg with the Quorum Report says teacher was used as a political hostage by Governor Greg Abbott in the fight over school choice. Then it was used as leverage in the debate over banning unregulated THC products by Lt. Governor Dan Patrick. Final passage of HB2 may still bring political fallout.
"So, the philosophical difference is do you trust the local school boards, or do you trust the legislature? And I'll leave that to the public to decide," said Kronberg.
By the numbers
There are several funding carve-outs in HB2.
$677 million for early learning programs.
$430 million school safety.
$850 million increase for special education.
$200 million in charter facilities funding.
$300 million increase for rural schools.
$153 million for career and Vo-Technical
$135 million for teacher certification initiatives
There were also questions about how the legislation creates a new $1.3 billion allotment for basic costs. That, according to Buckley, is money for insurance premiums, TRS costs, utilities, transportation.
What they're saying
"I'll be voting for it. As I've said before, I would vote for a $1 increase to public education," said state Rep. James Talarico during Thursday's final discussion on HB2.
The Round Rock Democrat noted while HB2 is large, from him, it gets a failing grade for keeping pace with inflation. HB2 is a mixed bag for public education advocates like Heather Sheffield.
"It is great news, it's amazing. However, we just still have some concerns," said Heather Sheffield.
Sheffield, who is with the Association of Texas Professional Educators, spoke to FOX7 about those concerns.
"It really hamstrings the way that districts can spend the money because it was given in such a way that it must be spent in certain areas. And so it does complicate matters a little bit," said Sheffield.
The next step may still involve damage control on the local level.
"Unfortunately, we're going to see some things happening in the interim with districts having to cut their budgets and again, because 86% of most district budgets are staff. I think we're unfortunately going to see some staff reductions and more school closures around the state," said Sheffield.
A big unknown is how separate legislation dealing with property taxes will impact local school budgets.
"A lot of the allotments are also tied to a raise in property values, and if there is not a raise in property values we're going to have an issue there too. So again, this is great news in some aspects, but it is a cautionary tale because there is going to be more help needed in the future," said Sheffield.
The Source
Information in this article comes from House Bill 2, comments made on the House floor and analysis by Heather Sheffield with the Association of Texas Professional Educators and Harvey Kronberg with the Quorum Report.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
18 minutes ago
- Yahoo
D.C. Pauses Plans To Hike Minimum Wage for Tipped Workers
Washington, D.C. will pause the implementation of a measure that is set to eliminate the city's tipped wage system, as the yearslong debate over the law's adverse impacts continues to divide the District's left-leaning lawmakers. The D.C. Council on Tuesday voted 8–4 to pump the brakes on Initiative 82, the 2022 ballot referendum that mandated employers pay service workers the full minimum wage, as opposed to the traditional lower base pay that employees supplement with gratuities. (Employers were already required to make up the difference if an employee's take-home pay with tips did not equal the minimum wage.) Initiative 82 requires yearly increases to the city's tipped wage—which was previously $5.35 per hour—until it meets D.C.'s full minimum base pay—set to increase next month to $17.95 per hour—in 2027. July was supposed to see the tipped wage rise from $10 to $12. The Council's vote will delay that increase until October as Mayor Muriel Bowser, a Democrat, advocates for overturning the law entirely. This saga has been ongoing. D.C. voters weighed in on the issue in June 2018 when a majority approved Initiative 77, a ballot referendum that also abolished the tipped wage. But the Council countermanded that in October of that same year by a vote of 8–5, leading to a public outcry from some who said the government was undoing the will of the people. Indeed, the issue has long polarized a city that is dominated by liberal and progressive politics and politicians, some of whom have confronted that good intentions do not equal good outcomes. Restaurants often operate on thin profit margins; many simply cannot afford an explosive increase in labor costs. And a great deal of service workers themselves—who are in an industry that is not exactly known for being conservative politically—opposed the abolition of the tipped wage, knowing it could lead to a drop-off in job opportunities, hours, take-home pay, and viable restaurants. That was the general message Bowser sought to convey in a press conference last month when she announced her FY26 budget would push to overturn Initiative 82. "DC restaurants are facing a perfect storm—from increased operating and supply costs, to higher rents, and unique labor challenges," her presentation said. It also cited an April article in The Washington Post that noted food establishments in the District have been "pushed to the brink." That outcome should not have been a surprise. As I wrote in 2018 after Initiative 77 passed: In the wake of Seattle's 2015 minimum wage hike, the University of Washington conducted a study to explore long-term effects. While the policy is still too young to definitively assess the total impact on restaurants, findings suggest that food-service establishments hit a proverbial fork in the road: switch to a counter-service model or make the place an extravagant dining experience. The former all but eliminates tipping, hampering staff opportunity to maximize income. The latter increases prices drastically for the consumer, turning a casual lunch outing into an elitist affair. Somewhat puzzlingly, it also found that a significant portion of restaurant base wages surpassed $19 an hour, whereas positions paying the minimum plunged. That suggests an unfortunate trend: Many restauranteurs appear to be adapting to the higher wage requirements by prioritizing high-skill employees while kicking low-skill workers to the curb—the very people that Initiative 77 purports to help. Meanwhile, over in San Francisco, researchers from Harvard analyzed the dining scene and found that for every additional dollar added to the tipped wage, there was an additional 14 percent chance that a median rated restaurant (3.5 stars on Yelp) would close. Those aren't great odds for mom-n-pop neighborhood staples—particularly of the hole-in-the-wall variety—many of which are located in the District's low-income areas. Fast-forward to today, and those dire predictions are already becoming reality across D.C., even before the full minimum wage hits restaurants. "We're watching a beloved bar back, a beloved busser, a dishwasher have their jobs taken away," Valerie Graham, a D.C. restaurant worker, told Reason's Justin Zuckerman in his recent documentary about the fight to end the tipped wage. Chef Geoff Tracy, who owns two restaurants in D.C., meanwhile estimated that the law would add $400,000 to his payroll costs each year. There are countless more examples. It is understandably jarring for some to wrap their heads around the fact that many workers would prefer a lower minimum wage. It may not pop on a poster or in a chant at a rally. But economic reality is often more complicated than a protest sign can pithily convey. The post D.C. Pauses Plans To Hike Minimum Wage for Tipped Workers appeared first on
CNBC
20 minutes ago
- CNBC
New Elizabeth Warren report chronicles '130 days of Elon Musk'
Sen. Elizabeth Warren's office issued a report Tuesday chronicling Elon Musk's "130 days" in President Donald Trump's administration, accusing the billionaire of using his government perch to enrich himself and his businesses. "Musk and individuals acting on his behalf have been involved in dozens of questionable actions that raise questions about corruption, ethics and conflicts of interest," says the report by the Massachusetts Democrat's office. The 14-page report outlines more than 100 times that Warren's team believes Musk abused his role as a "special government employee" to benefit his private interests. It accuses Musk of violating "norms at an astonishing pace," actions that it calls "scandalous behavior regardless of whether it subjects him to criminal prosecution." The White House did not respond to CNBC's request for comment on the report. CNBC also reached out for comment to Musk, Quinn Emanuel partner Alex Spiro and Omead Afshar, a Tesla vice president. They did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Musk last week wrapped up his official government service leading DOGE, or Department of Government Efficiency," which is engaged in a broad effort to slash federal government spending. His four months leading DOGE as a special government employee were marked by unprecedented upheaval to the federal workforce and government agencies. Warren's team accuses Musk of using the federal government to promote his businesses. Musk, who is the world's richest person, is CEO of Tesla, SpaceX and artificial intelligence startup xAI. For instance, it highlights the time the White House lawn was turned into a temporary Tesla showroom. It also outlines more than two dozen instances where the Trump administration or government agencies "have entered or explored new lucrative contracts" with Musk's companies, such as Customs and Border Protection exploring using Starlink technology in surveillance towers. The report also outlines six times that the Trump administration or federal agencies halted enforcement actions against any of Musk's companies, or the times that DOGE targeted government agencies investigating the companies. For instance, it says that the Occupational Safety and Health Administration closed an investigation into Tesla for "allegedly violating workplace safety rules." "Musk's companies have received or are being considered for large contracts with the federal government, with foreign governments, and with other private sector companies," the report says. The report is not the first time that Musk has come under fire for alleged conflicts of interest during his DOGE tenure. Three Democratic senators, including Warren, sent a letter last week urging the Justice Department and other authorities to probe whether DOGE employees broke conflict-of-interest laws by owning stocks in companies that may have benefited from their government-cutting work.
Yahoo
32 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Gov. Polis signs bill meant to help Colorado tackle sexual assault kit backlog
Police evidence bag containing DNA swabs. (Tek Image/Science Photo Library via Getty Images) Colorado Gov. Jared Polis signed a bill Tuesday intended to improve to the Colorado Bureau of Investigations' capacity to review sexual assault kits, which include DNA samples and other evidence from survivors. Senate Bill 25-304 establishes the Colorado Sexual Assault Forensic Medical Evidence Review Board, which will review the effectiveness of the state's medical, legal and criminal response to sexual assault and make victim-centered recommendations to the Colorado Legislature. The governor and attorney general have until Aug. 1 to appoint members of the board, including representatives from state agencies and various organizations that advocate for sexual assault victims. The board will need to submit a preliminary report to the Legislature by Dec. 15. SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX Law enforcement agencies overseeing sexual assault criminal cases will be required to update victims on the status of their kit every 90 days. The bill also sets a 60-day turnaround goal for crime labs reviewing forensic medical evidence from sexual assault kits. The agency's current goal is 90 days, which it expects to achieve in 2027. The estimated turnaround time for kits at the end of April was about a year and a half, with 1,369 kits in the backlog, according to a recently implemented data dashboard. Colorado's forensic services are facing a historic backlog of sexual assault kits due to reduced staff capacity and ballooning fallout from the discovery that a former CBI forensic scientist manipulated more than 1,000 DNA test results over her career. The backlog means delayed justice for survivors, as DNA evidence can often be critical for a criminal conviction. The bill originally would have created a full-time position to oversee the state's work to improve the kit review process, but it was amended to reduce spending given the tight budget year. Sponsors include Rep. Jenny Willford, a Northglenn Democrat, Rep. Meg Froelich, an Englewood Democrat, and Sen. Mike Weissman, an Aurora Democrat. SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
