‘Bhool Chuk Maaf' movie review: Rajkummar Rao and Wamiqa Gabbi light up this timely parable
In the story of Satyanarayan, an important multi-stranded tale in religious storytelling in Indian homes, the protagonists tend to forget the noble deed they promise when they seek a blessing or a favour from the Almighty. But God has His ways to remind the faithful of the unkept vows.
Cutting through a web of rituals, writer-director Karan Sharma brings the message of this timeless katha to theatres with a modern-day parable. A rollicking social commentary laced with a layer of magic realism, Bhool Chuk Maaf makes a sharp comment on the growing schism in society where goodness and compassion are often measured on a scale of religious identity, where the goal corrupts our action even when the Bhagavad Gita is invoked on a daily basis.
Underlining the everyday hypocrisy where practice and preaching don't often match, the film begins in Banaras among Tiwaris, Dwivedis, and Pandeys. Ranjan (Rajkummar Rao) loves Titli (Wamiqa Gabbi). Caste and religion are not an issue. The problem is more immediate. Ranjan is jobless, and the girl's father wants a groom with a government job. In the race against time, Ranjan bribes Mahadev in the temple and Bhagwan Das (Sanjay Mishra), an endearing fixer, outside.
Things seem to fall in place, but on the wedding day, Ranjan finds himself caught in a time loop. The poor boy repeatedly wakes up on the day of his Haldi ceremony. Soon, we discover that Sharma is not just making fun of the Haldi ceremony, which has become the most significant wedding ritual for the youth. There is more to it than situational humour. Banaras has more to it than just Brahmin surnames, that unemployment is not community-centric, and that doing the right thing is not always the most acceptable thing socially.
Bhool Chuk Maaf (Hindi)
Director: Karan Sharma
Cast: Rajkummar Rao, Wamiqa Gabbi, Seema Pahwa, Sanjay Mishra, Raghubir Yadav, Vineet Kumar, Zakir Hussain
Runtime: 121 minutes
Storyline: Ranjan gets his girl after he lands a government job, but an unfulfilled promise to Lord Shiva sends him into a time loop
The best part is that Sharma makes us believe in his leap of faith for a while. The trap of the time loop feels realistic, for we don't learn from our mistakes and allow history to repeat itself. Curiously, after Operation Sindoor, it seemed that the film's release would also get stuck like its protagonist's love life, but the producers quickly fulfilled their pre-release promises.
Returning to Ranjan and Titli, the vernacular jokes and jibes hit the right notes, and Rajkummar and Wamiqa seamlessly merge into the Banarasi setting. Titli has more agency than Ranjan, but Sharma doesn't turn their romance into a feminist exercise and presents both with their faults and prejudices. Usually, heroes, heroines, and the supporting cast seem to inhabit disparate worlds in modern-day rom-coms set in rurban locales. Here, if seasoned players like Seema Pahwa, Raghubir Yadav, Vineet Kumar, and Sanjay Mishra stitch a relatable social tapestry, Rajkummar and Wamiqa become the warp and weft in it.
Wamiqa lives up to her character's name. Livewire with a sense of purpose, like many talented outsiders, Wamiqa's career is clogged in the labyrinthine Bollywood talent lines that remain jammed because of the film family ward quota system. Like a butterfly, her talent, it seems, has finally found an outlet in the big sea. In contrast, Rajkummar Rao, another outsider, is seafaring after years of struggle. Of course, he is attempting to repeat the box office gains made with Stree in Vicky Vidya Ka Woh Wala Video and here. But, for now, he is in a Bhool Chuk Maaf kind of space often reserved for a star. He should be careful with his everyman charm as it can easily turn into a slippery slope, as we discovered with Ayushmann Khurrana. However, Rajkummar has an edge over his contemporaries because he can dig deeper to be a Shahid or a Newton any day.
The time loop is the crux of the story, but the trick is not to let it fall into a rut. After a lively build-up, which was reflected in the trailer, Sharma seems a bit insecure about how the big reveal will land and overwrites the portion. The jokes start overspeaking to keep the levity intact, making it an increasingly laboured exercise towards the denouement.
For a story that demands a certain lightness of touch, the makers don't really trust the audience and pad it with an unnecessarily heavy background score. The song and dance sequences remain utterly bland despite names like Irshad Kamil and Tanishk Bagchi in the credits. So much so that Maddock has to recycle Irshad's gem from Love Aaj Kal to send the audience home humming Chor Bazari. On OTT, the audience remains in a Bhool Chuk Maaf mode but becomes the Almighty in theatres where it doesn't ignore unkept promises!
Bhool Chuk Maaf is currently running in theatres
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
‘Bhool Chuk Maaf' Box Office Collection Day 15: Rajkummar Rao and Wamiqa Gabbi starrer records its lowest on Friday, while Akshay Kumar's ‘Housefull 5' takes the lead
The time loop love story - 'Bhool Chuk Maaf,' headlined by Rajkummar Rao and Wamiqa Gabbi, has completed two weeks at the box office. Despite the initial release delay and controversies, the movie was able to find its footing with the audience. However, now with Akshay Kumar, Ritesh Deshmukh, and Abhishek Bachchan's 'Housefull 5' taking charge at the box office, 'Bhool Chuk Maaf' is losing its grip. According to Sacnilk, the comedy film opened its third week with a major dip, collecting only Rs 47 lakhs on Friday. 'Bhool Chuk Maaf' Box Office Update The opening week of 'Bhool Chuk Maaf' saw a solid business of Rs 44.1 crore. However, in the second week, with a dip of 48.59%, the movie was able to make only Rs 22.5 crore. On Friday, the movie entered its third week with Rs. 47 lakh. With a drop of 68.67%, it is by far the lowest the film has recorded. Currently, the film stands at a total of Rs. 67.07 crore. Day-wise collection of 'Bhool Chuk Maaf' in India Day 1 [Friday] Rs 7 Cr Day 2 [Saturday] Rs 9.5 Cr Day 3 [Sunday] Rs 11.5 Cr Day 4 [Monday] Rs 4.5 Cr Day 5 [Tuesday] Rs 4.75 Cr Day 6 [Wednesday] Rs 3.5 Cr Day 7 [Thursday] Rs 3.35 Cr Week 1 Total Rs 44.1 Cr Day 8 [Friday] Rs 3.25 Cr Day 9 [Saturday] Rs 5.25 Cr Day 10 [Sunday] Rs 6.35 Cr Day 11 [Monday] Rs 2.2 Cr Day 12 [Tuesday] Rs 2.2 Cr Day 13 [Wednesday] Rs 1.75 Cr Day 14 [Thursday] Rs 1.5 Cr Week 2 Total Rs 22.5 Cr Day 15 [Friday] Rs 0.47 Cr (rough data) Total Rs 67.07 Cr Competition with 'Housefull 5' and 'Thug Life' One of the reasons behind the falling business can be attributed to the release of new movies. On Friday, Akshay Kumar's much-awaited comedy film 'Housefull 5' with two different endings made it to the theatres and collected Rs. 23 crore in the opening haul. On the other hand, in the South, Kamal Haasan's 'Thug Life' was released on June 5. The movie opened with Rs. 15.5 crore, and on Friday minted Rs 7.50 crore, making the total equivalent to the opening day collection of 'Housefull 5. ' Check out our list of the latest Hindi , English , Tamil , Telugu , Malayalam , and Kannada movies . Don't miss our picks for the best Hindi movies , best Tamil movies, and best Telugu films .
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
Scaachi Koul: 'Every writer should be in therapy'
After your first book of personal essays [One Day We'll All Be Dead and None of This Will Matter (2017)] was published, you married your long-term boyfriend, moved to New York, became aware of your husband's affair, spent the early pandemic months anxious as your parents were stuck in Jammu during India's lockdown, got divorced, lost your job at Buzzfeed, and your mom was diagnosed with cancer. You signed the book deal seven years ago, before the two major events it's about — your divorce and mom's cancer — unfolded. What was the book you were intending to write originally? When did you finally start working on the first draft of Sucker Punch? It was supposed to be an essay collection about the utility and futility of conflict, so I was still trying to mine this thing. You're already laughing because you can imagine me banging my head against a wall like, 'Why can't I write this book about fighting?' And meanwhile, my marriage is on fire. I entered this relationship clearly without the facts, not knowing what was going on and not knowing what would happen. I think a lot of people felt that way — you marry someone, and then the pandemic happens, and you're like, 'Hey, who the hell is this?' I even felt that in watching how my parents handled the issues of where they were. My mom has health issues, so she's really concerned about her access to things. They're not Indian citizens, so I was thinking about what government would take care of them. They were in Jammu, which is also tricky — getting in and out of there was kind of challenging. Dad, meanwhile, was having a scotch, having a laugh. And so, I was trying to write this conflict book, and I just couldn't do it because everything was hard, and I was struggling to see the value of conflict. I had always felt like a protest worked. And then you watch Trump steamroll, the first time, through the American government. I was just disillusioned. I would send my book editor passages and she'd be like, 'This is bad. No.' I was lucky that I had someone who's really honest with me. But it wasn't really until my ex and I separated, and I was in my own apartment, I started filing things and I was being told, 'Yes, this is good.' I'd say, the day he and I broke up, I was like, 'OH. Oh, I see.' It really was like a cloud lifted over me. I didn't know what I needed to say, but it was very clear that this was going to be a book about the collapse of what I thought was a fundamental truth. While reading your book, I thought I understood all the reasons for your divorce: different fighting styles, the pandemic, too many years together... you'd analysed the relationship, his faults, your faults, the small things, all things. So, I was startled when I got to the part about his affair. Less than a year into your marriage, you discovered that he had been cheating on you for five years. Why did you decide to withhold it until much later in the book? I felt like if I told the audience, at the very beginning of the book, my white ex-husband cheated on me with a white woman — no one was going to be able to read anything after that! I'm trying to tell you all these other things that were genuinely, to me, more structurally damaging to my relationship than that. Like the funny thing about where it's placed: I don't leave. I find out [about the affair] and I think, 'Here's another thing for me to try to figure out how is my fault, and then I'll reverse engineer it.' The earlier drafts were much kinder, and information like this was parceled out slowly and sparingly. Even still, I'm pretty careful about how much I'm saying, because I don't really care. It's not important to me, but it was important to the narrative. And when I've explained to you that I had hidden from myself so effectively, I have to tell you how and why. I was hiding from myself within the relationship. Then I felt like I was being hidden through this strange relationship with this woman. Even her confronting me about it and telling me the information felt like a way to kind of obfuscate my existence in it. I really resent non-fiction books that don't tell you what happened... I promised you a story. I'm also not embarrassed by any of this. I didn't do it. I'm a passenger on a lot of this. You deleted most of your Instagram posts and later some tweets. You cringed re-reading your first book. Tell me about the act of writing this very vulnerable memoir while also experiencing this need for erasure or distance from the past. I'm okay with the decision about how public I am. I'm good at it. If I was bad at it, if the work was bad, then for sure, send me away. But if I'm going to do it, then I have to be really honest. So, I'm slower. I take longer, I think a little harder about it... The funny thing is, the criticism the second book gets is 'Oh, this is mundane. Everybody's had stuff like this happen.' And, yeah, you're right. You're totally right. Sexual assault is incredibly common. Divorce is sooo boring. Cancer? Oh my god. My mom got one of the most common forms of breast cancer. ABSOLUTELY, you're right. And still, nobody's saying anything. Shutting my mouth and dealing with the consternation privately just doesn't work for me. But also, Sucker Punch is 25 percent of what happened. It's only my version, and then it's maybe half of what I want to tell you. There's lots in there that isn't in there... because I don't really want to do if I don't need to do it. Maybe one day I will. I've also gotten more comfortable with the fact that the work will feel outdated eventually. It should. I want it to feel outdated. If I read One Day We'll All Be Dead Again today and was like, yeah, I still feel like this. Oh my god, kill me! I don't want to be 34 and relate to work that I wrote at 22. No, no, no, no, no, NO. In 10 years, I hope I read Sucker Punch, and I'm like, what a stupid little girl. You write that you'd rather 'punch my cat in the face, eat a leech... allow someone to watch me try to pluck an ingrown hair from the most tender part of my groin…' in public than 'write about my body and, specifically, my struggle for self-esteem.' But you do write about it. How did you let go of your body to write about your body? I think it's a daily decision. Every day you wake up and it's really like, am I going to obsess over this today, or can I just be a person? Can I get through the day? The first thing I had to get over was the idea that I was hiding, because I wasn't. Everybody could tell that I was tugging at myself and feeling uncomfortable. If you're stuck, even hiding that you're not happy about something, that's its own fight and everybody can tell. I also think the worsening political environment has made it easier for me to not think so much about my body. It feels hard to me to wake up and be like, 'Ooh, my abs, I don't have any' when many people got murdered in a drone strike while you were sleeping. But it was when my mom got sick, I started to not think about my body at all. It was very forgotten. Caretaking will do that. She's had, in the last three years, three major surgeries. And because I've been with her in some of these, I've seen that the body is remarkable; it really bounces back. That's not a great lesson: to caretake for someone you love, and then you will appreciate your body. What a morose way to go through life... My relationship with food changed a lot, too, because when my mom got radiation, she lost her appetite. That's really what I'm still trying to get back for her. All of these things are, to me, remarkable privileges. And I hope I can hold on to that feeling as long as possible. How does therapy help the writing process — do you have to be able to process something before you write about it or is writing itself therapeutic? No. Oh, my god. People who are like, 'I don't go to therapy. I just do X.' NO, YOU DON'T. Every writer should be in therapy. I do not trust, I do not trust, an essayist who does not go to therapy. I don't care what they're doing instead. No, I went so much. I just did my taxes yesterday — and I pay [for therapy] out of pocket because I love my therapist, so I won't put her through my awful insurance — and I wrote down how much I paid her. I'm like, damn it, this woman, she must be buying boats with what I'm spending. The funny thing about divorce — any breakup, too — is that it f*cks with your sense of reality, and you need someone who's going to be able to tell you what happened. It's hard to trust your friends sometimes because they hated him. If I trust my mother, then I would move home and that's a different path too that isn't quite right. But I needed somebody who could be like, 'Let's figure out what our version of it is, and I'll help.' It was so necessary. Everybody should be in therapy. It opens with your memories of visiting the mandir, growing up in Canada. And your metaphors are quite strongly rooted in the stories of Hindu goddesses, starting with Parvati and ending with Kali. What made you use Hindu mythology as a framework for the book? That framework was the last thing I put in the book, which is funny to think about because it feels, to me, important. But I had written all of the essays and they just weren't speaking to each other, and I couldn't figure out what I needed to do to make them talk to each other. The thing that I kept thinking about is that in all of my guilt around the divorce was my earliest memory of being at the mandir and this old auntie yelling at me for spilling a glass of water. The embarrassment that I used to feel at the temple felt so similar to how embarrassed I felt after my divorce. And so, the rebellion of the divorce felt religious. It felt like I was committing an affront to a god. I'm not an expert on any of this. These are the stories I was told. And it felt like if I'm untangling stuff that I think is true about my life, then I have to start with these fundamental ones from the very beginning of my life: that this is how women behave, they behave this way in kind of a religious context, we're taught to follow that spirit. But what if I think about it differently? And why haven't I heard about Kali? Nobody talks to me about the fun ones! The divorce didn't drive me to God that much because I still viewed it as a temporal event. When my mom got sick, I was like, am I being punished for something? And that's really when I felt that this is all I have. The original title of your book was going to be I Hope Lightning Falls on You — a translation of 'Paye thraat,' a Kashmiri curse phrase your mother casually hurled at you whenever exasperated — and I thought it would've been quite apt because this is maybe your most Indian writing. How did it become Sucker Punch? I know, I know. I really had so many conversations with myself and with my editors about it. I think the reason why I changed it ultimately was that 'I hope lightning falls on you' to me, is such a tender phrase, so associated with my mom and with my family. When I thought about this book, which is full of really a lot of cruel stuff and stuff that does not have to do with my mother (she doesn't really come in full until after the divorce), it just felt too tender for what the content was. I was talking to my book editor about it and her husband was in the room, and he was like, what about Sucker Punch? I was so mad, I cannot believe a man has figured it out. But it just made more sense. But yeah, something will come, and it will be called I Hope Lightning Falls on You, for sure. Saudamini Jain is an independent journalist. She lives in New Delhi.
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
The Great Indian Kapil Show 3: Cricketers Rishabh Pant, Abhishek Sharma, Gautam Gambhir, Yuzvendra Chahal shoot for an episode; Navjot Singh Sidhu to fill in for Archana Puran Singh
The Great Indian Kapil Show is gearing up for its return with Season 3, and shooting for the upcoming episodes has already begun. After wrapping an episode with the 'Metro In Dino' cast, The Great Indian Kapil Show recently welcomed Indian cricketers Gautam Gambhir , Rishabh Pant , Abhishek Sharma , and Yuzvendra Chahal . Navjot Singh Sidhu will also apparently be seen making a return on season 3 as he allegedly steps in as Archana Puran Singh's replacement for an episode. Archana is currently vacationing in Switzerland with her family and has been sharing videos and photos from her trip. The episode is set to deliver a mix of humour, fond memories, and fun tales from the dressing room. It's already generating excitement among viewers. With Rishabh's wit, Yuzvendra's playful humour, and Gautam's sharp comebacks, the episode is bound to be full of laughs and entertaining moments. Pictures from the shoot have been making waves across social media platforms and judging by the glimpses, the episode is set to be packed with fun, laughter, and unforgettable moments. Last two seasons, Kapil and the team invited Rohit Sharma and a bunch of cricketers on the show and the episodes were well received. During the debut season of the show, Rohit Sharma and Shreyas Iyer made a special appearance on the couch. Following India's remarkable victory at the 2024 T20 World Cup, Rohit made a comeback in Season 2, and this time he was joined by Suryakumar Yadav, Arshdeep Singh, Shivam Dube, and Axar Patel. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 임플란트 최대 할인 지원해드려요 임플란터 더 알아보기 Undo The first episode will premiere on June 21. Recently, Kapil Sharma shared his excitement about the return of the show with season 3, in a statement. He shared, "Coming back for another season truly feels like coming home to family — and this time, the family's only getting bigger! Every season, we've brought together an exciting mix of guests from all walks of life to keep the laughs rolling and the energy fresh. We have aimed at showcasing diverse conversations about careers, life choices, family, love, and used comedy as the medium to reach everyone. This time, in season 3 apart from our interactions and amazing guests, The Great Indian Kapil Show is doing something extra special. As a thank you for the incredible love we've received, we're turning the spotlight on our superfans. Their stories, their quirks, their talent — they never fail to amaze us. Toh is baar socha kyu na apne fans ko show ka ek bohot hi mazzeddar hissa bana de. Hume to ab 192 countries ne dekh liya... ab aapko milwate hain humare superfans se (So this time, we thought — why not make our fans a truly fun part of the show? After all, we've now been watched in 192 countries… now it's time to introduce you to our superfans!)!" The Great Indian Kapil Show Cast: Sunil Grover On Patch-Up, SRK-Salman Act, Archana On Kapil-Krushna Get the latest lifestyle updates on Times of India, along with Eid wishes , messages and quotes !
