Director James Toback ordered to pay $1.68B in sexual assault trial involving 40 women
A judge is ordering director James Toback to pay $1.68 billion in damages Wednesday, following a jury finding him liable in a sexual assault trial in New York, during which he was accused by 40 women of sex crimes over decades.
Attorneys for the accusers believe the sum represents the largest sexual assault civil suit verdict in state history.
"The jury's verdict is about justice," Brad Beckworth, an attorney for the accusers wrote in a statement to USA TODAY. "But more importantly, it's about taking power back from the abusers — and their and enablers — and returning it to those they tried to control."
Toback, who has previously denied any wrongdoing, was not reachable for comment. He did not have legal representation during the trial.
The screenwriter behind films like "Bugsy" and "Two Girls and a Guy," Toback, 80, was one of the first major Hollywood names to be thrown out during the #MeToo reckoning over sexual violence in the entertainment industry nearly a decade ago. Along with the aspiring actresses listed in the suit, he has also been accused by big-name stars like Rachel McAdams, Selma Blair and Julianne Moore of on-set harassment.
'Grey's Anatomy' star Ellen Pompeo: James Toback once asked me to get naked in a movie
"Several years ago, when the Me-Too movement began, I think many of us thought that we were past the point where men in positions of power would prey on women and try to steal their dignity and honor in exchange for allowing them to advance in their careers," Beckworth continued. "We now know that the movement didn't go far enough. We still have a lot of people in this country who abuse their power—and there are many more who turn a blind eye to it."
The lawsuit in New York, which loops together over a dozen named accusers and several anonymous ones, alleged that Toback over the course of 40 years used his "reputation, power and influence" to "lure young women … through fraud, coercion, force and intimidation into compromising situations where he falsely imprisoned, sexually abused, assaulted, and/or battered them." Many of the women are now in their 30s and 40s.
Filed under the Adult Survivors Act, the lawsuit was allowed to proceed despite the large amount of time that had lapsed since many of the assaults by way of a one-year look-back window. The state opened the window in 2022 to allow accusers a brief opportunity to skirt the statute of limitations. That same look-back window was used by journalist E. Jean Carroll to sue President Donald Trump over an alleged assault during the mid-1990s.
The original suit also ensnared the Harvard Club of New York, where lawyers for the women allege Toback was a frequent customer, often taking his victims there for meals and drinks before attacking them. Because of his status as a prestige member, the club turned a blind eye to the abuse, the lawsuit alleged − the organization was ultimately not part of the trial.
Toback was a graduate of the Ivy League university and directed a 2001 dramedy about the school entitled "Harvard Man."
McAdams and Blair both told Vanity Fair in 2017 that during the production of the movie Toback engaged in inappropriate sexual behavior, asking them to take their clothing off during auditions, masturbating in front of them or discussing personal pleasure habits and threatening them about speaking out.
Blair, who originally spoke to the Los Angeles Times anonymously, said she decided to come forward after Toback's blanket denial.
"When he called these women liars and said he didn't recall meeting them and that the behavior alleged could not be attributed to him, I just felt rage and an obligation to speak publicly now," she told Vanity Fair.
"For decades, I carried this trauma in silence, and today, a jury believed me. Believed us," Mary Monahan, the lead accuser in the case resolved Wednesday, told Variety. "That changes everything. This verdict is more than a number — it's a declaration. We are not disposable. We are not liars. We are not collateral damage in someone else's power trip. The world knows now what we've always known: what he did was real. And what we did — standing up, speaking out — was right."
Contributing: Lorena Blas
This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: James Toback to pay $1.68 billion to women after sexual assault trial
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
28 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Ellen Pompeo Says She Was Detained by TSA for an Hour, Had Bomb Squad Called In: ‘Is This a Joke?'
Ellen Pompeo says she was delayed by TSA for an hour after trying to board a flight with a pricey snack that, triggered a bomb squad investigation. The 'Grey's Anatomy' star joked about the ordeal, saying she thought her publicist wouldn't believe it if she missed her flight A self-described nervous flier, Pompeo says she now sticks to carry-on essentials like wipes and water — and leans on her kids for comfort during Pompeo got an unexpected lesson on what snacks are safe to munch on in flight after a recent security debacle. The Grey's Anatomy star, 55, was stopped by TSA in March for attempting to board a plane with a bag of Erewhon sunflower seeds, she reveals in a new interview with Travel + Leisure. 'I had a bag of sunflower seeds, like organic sunflower seeds from Erewhon, so they were probably the most expensive sunflower seeds money can buy,' she says. 'They literally held me for an hour, and they brought the bomb squad in.' Pompeo asked the officials, 'What is happening? Is this a joke?' They replied that 'it was most likely a chemical on the packaging of these super expensive, fancy, organic, clean sunflower seeds' that triggered the search. To get on with the security and boarding process, the award-winning actor-director offered to simply throw the bag in the trash; however, she said they told her that she'd have to wait for the bomb squad to confirm the unopened bag of seeds was secure before being released. 'I almost missed the flight,' Pompeo recalls. 'It was really like no one would ever believe this! I was texting my publicist saying, 'I might not get on this plane, and you're never gonna guess why.'' Despite the TSA kerfuffle, Pompeo tells T+L that she loves to travel and reveals what she brings in her carry-on, excluding Erewhon sunflower seeds going forward, and her pre-seating routine. 'Mints, glasses, water, hand sanitizer, and baby wipes,' she shared. 'I have to do the Naomi Campbell thing and wipe down the entire seat.' As for how she likes to travel, the proud mom says her favorite way to jet set is with her family. Pompeo shares three children – Stella Luna, 15, Sienna May, 10, and Eli Christopher, 8 – with her husband, music producer Chris Ivery, to whom she's been married since 2007. As a self-proclaimed nervous flier, the Good American Family star says her family is her support system during any uneasy moments. 'I like to hold my kids' hands when I take off,' she confessed, 'which is probably a little selfish, and they're probably feeling my anxiety, which probably isn't the best thing to do.' Read the original article on People
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
President Trump pardons Florida divers who cut 19 sharks free from longline
WEST PALM BEACH, FL — President Donald Trump pardoned two Florida shark divers convicted of theft for cutting 19 sharks and a goliath grouper free from a fisherman's line they falsely assumed was illegal. The May 28 pardon granted full clemency to both John Moore Jr. and Tanner Mansell, who spotted the longline 3 miles off the Jupiter Inlet on Aug. 10, 2020, and pulled it ashore. The gear alone cost the vessel owner about $1,300 while the value of the lost sharks amounted to several thousand more. "Whether people believe in his politics or not, he chose to pardon me — somebody who deeply cares for the environment and only ever wanted to help," Mansell said in a text after his pardon. "I can't help but feel extremely grateful." Defense attorneys Marc Seitles and Ashley Litwin, who helped secure the men's pardon, said the decision to charge them anyway was a clear case of government overreach. While the two avoided prison time, their pardons mean they are no longer felons, restoring their rights to vote, own firearms, and freely travel abroad. USA TODAY has reached out to the White House for comment. Moore and Mansell said they thought they were doing the right thing by confiscating the line and releasing the sharks snagged by its hooks. The two said it is the reason they called state wildlife officers to report the line, and why they snapped photos as they freed the sharks and pulled the gear from the water, which were later used against them in court. The 3-mile longline belonged to one of only five vessels in the world permitted by NOAA to harvest sandbar sharks for research. Scott Taylor, captain of the boat the longline belonged to, called the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and sought a criminal investigation. Federal prosecutors argued that the divers knew the line was legal and sabotaged it anyway to preserve shark populations for their commercial interests. Moore Jr. and Mansell were found guilty on Dec. 2, 2022, after jurors deliberated for three days — longer than the trial itself. U.S. District Judge Donald Middlebrooks later sentenced the pair to one year of probation and ordered them to pay $3,345 in restitution to the Fort Pierce fisherman whose equipment was destroyed. Trump wasn't the first to question Moore and Mansell's prosecution. During a 2024 hearing in the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals, two judges asked why the men were charged with a crime. Judge Barbara Lagoa said Assistant U.S. Attorney Tom Watts-Fitzgerald prosecuted the men "for reasons that defy understanding." She compared him to Inspector Javert — the relentless lawman from "Les Misérables" who pursued a man for decades over the theft of a single loaf of bread. "Moore and Mansell are felons because they tried to save sharks from what they believed to be an illegal poaching operation," Lagoa wrote. "They are the only felons I have ever encountered, in eighteen years on the bench and three years as a federal prosecutor, who called law enforcement to report what they were seeing and what actions they were taking in real time.' But the court held that, under federal law, it was enough that the divers intentionally took property that wasn't theirs. "Often in criminal defense, it's a long road where you feel like you're banging your head against the wall and no one cares," Litwin said. "This felt that way." This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Trump pardons Florida divers who cut 19 sharks free from longline


USA Today
2 hours ago
- USA Today
President Trump pardons Florida divers who cut 19 sharks free from longline
President Trump pardons Florida divers who cut 19 sharks free from longline Show Caption Hide Caption Great white shark splashes close to shore Drone footage captured a great white shark swimming along the beach in Montauk, New York. WEST PALM BEACH, FL — President Donald Trump pardoned two Florida shark divers convicted of theft for cutting 19 sharks and a goliath grouper free from a fisherman's line they falsely assumed was illegal. The May 28 pardon granted full clemency to both John Moore Jr. and Tanner Mansell, who spotted the longline 3 miles off the Jupiter Inlet on Aug. 10, 2020, and pulled it ashore. The gear alone cost the vessel owner about $1,300 while the value of the lost sharks amounted to several thousand more. "Whether people believe in his politics or not, he chose to pardon me — somebody who deeply cares for the environment and only ever wanted to help," Mansell said in a text after his pardon. "I can't help but feel extremely grateful." Defense attorneys Marc Seitles and Ashley Litwin, who helped secure the men's pardon, said the decision to charge them anyway was a clear case of government overreach. While the two avoided prison time, their pardons mean they are no longer felons, restoring their rights to vote, own firearms, and freely travel abroad. USA TODAY has reached out to the White House for comment. Why did they cut the sharks loose? Moore and Mansell said they thought they were doing the right thing by confiscating the line and releasing the sharks snagged by its hooks. The two said it is the reason they called state wildlife officers to report the line, and why they snapped photos as they freed the sharks and pulled the gear from the water, which were later used against them in court. Who did the longline belong to? The 3-mile longline belonged to one of only five vessels in the world permitted by NOAA to harvest sandbar sharks for research. Scott Taylor, captain of the boat the longline belonged to, called the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and sought a criminal investigation. Federal prosecutors argued that the divers knew the line was legal and sabotaged it anyway to preserve shark populations for their commercial interests. When were the pair convicted? Moore Jr. and Mansell were found guilty on Dec. 2, 2022, after jurors deliberated for three days — longer than the trial itself. U.S. District Judge Donald Middlebrooks later sentenced the pair to one year of probation and ordered them to pay $3,345 in restitution to the Fort Pierce fisherman whose equipment was destroyed. Why was their prosecution questioned? Trump wasn't the first to question Moore and Mansell's prosecution. During a 2024 hearing in the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals, two judges asked why the men were charged with a crime. Judge Barbara Lagoa said Assistant U.S. Attorney Tom Watts-Fitzgerald prosecuted the men "for reasons that defy understanding." She compared him to Inspector Javert — the relentless lawman from "Les Misérables" who pursued a man for decades over the theft of a single loaf of bread. "Moore and Mansell are felons because they tried to save sharks from what they believed to be an illegal poaching operation," Lagoa wrote. "They are the only felons I have ever encountered, in eighteen years on the bench and three years as a federal prosecutor, who called law enforcement to report what they were seeing and what actions they were taking in real time.' But the court held that, under federal law, it was enough that the divers intentionally took property that wasn't theirs. "Often in criminal defense, it's a long road where you feel like you're banging your head against the wall and no one cares," Litwin said. "This felt that way."