‘Not Funny': Cow Manure Stunt Leaves Victoria Premier Steaming
A box of cow manure dumped on the premier's door has her steamed off and prompted calls for a parliamentary probe.
A farmer made the delivery outside Premier Jacinta Allan's parliamentary office on Tuesday as a protest raged on the front steps over the Emergency Services and Volunteers Fund levy.
A note on the box read: 'Dearest Jacinta,
The vacuum-sealed dung package came wrapped in pink twine and with a photo of a cow attached.
Manager of government business Mary-Anne Thomas accused Liberal MPs Bev McArthur and Nicole Werner of facilitating the placing of the 'offensive prop.'
She has written to parliament's privileges committee to request an investigation into the pair for bringing 'discredit' to parliament.
Related Stories
5/15/2025
5/5/2025
Allan said it was disgraceful behaviour and would not be tolerated in any other workplace.
'It's not funny, it's not a joke, it's not larrikin,' she told ABC Radio Melbourne on Wednesday.
'The staff member who had to deal with this told me that they didn't feel safe, they told me how their safety in their workplace was violated by this behaviour.'
She criticised Opposition Leader Brad Battin for failing to condemn the behaviour and suggested he had instead 'backed it because it was done by one of his backers.'
McArthur, who is a shadow cabinet member, has confirmed she was with the farmer when the package was delivered and described it as a 'harmless stunt.'
'Labor MPs are acting like they've never seen cow [expletive] before—maybe they don't get out of Melbourne much,' she said in a statement. 'If they're genuinely more upset about a pile of manure than the total mess they've made of their budget and this state, it's no wonder Victoria's going broke.'
The only way regional Victorians can get a message through to Labor politicians was to deliver a '[expletive] cake direct to their door,' she added.
Battin, who has been approached for comment, has pledged to scrap the expanded levy if the coalition wins government at the next state election in November 2026.
Tuesday's state budget confirmed that the expansion of the levy from July 1 will raise an extra $2.1 billion in revenue over the next three financial years.
It is expected to generate $1.8 billion a year from 2026/27 to cover the responses of more emergency services.
'Revenue will remain at that level over the forward estimates,' the budget papers say.
'Active (Country Fire Authority) and (Victoria State Emergency Service) volunteers and life members will be eligible for a rebate on their principal place of residence, farmland or single farming enterprise.
'The existing $50 concession for pensioners and veterans, and the concession for single-farm enterprises, will continue to apply.'
The Victorian government also promised partial rebates for drought-affected farmers and to lower the charge rate for primary production land.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Epoch Times
an hour ago
- Epoch Times
Liberals Introduce Border Security Bill Focused on Fentanyl, Organized Crime, Asylum Seekers
The Liberal government has announced new legislation aiming to strengthen the Canada-U.S. border, which would allow border officials to cancel asylum applications, give law enforcement expanded powers to search mail and access private communications, and crack down on money laundering and fentanyl precursors. 'This legislation will ensure Canada has the right tools to keep our borders secure, combat transnational organized crime and fentanyl, and disrupt illicit financing,' Public Safety Minister Gary Anandasangaree told reporters in Ottawa after tabling the legislation on June 3.
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
Abortion laws are Victorian era, says grieving mum
Women's bodies are still controlled by "Victorian era" laws, a mum has said, after police issued new guidelines which allow officers to search grieving women for abortion drugs. Elen Hughes, from the Llŷn Peninsula in Gwynedd, whose baby was stillborn, called the plans horrifying. They include allowing searches of mothers' mobile phones if a baby dies unexpectedly in the womb. The National Police Chiefs' Council (NPCC) said such cases were rarely investigated and only if there was suspicion an illegal abortion had taken place, with each case treated with "sensitivity". But Ms Hughes, who lost her son Danial 37-and-a-half weeks into her pregnancy, said if police had investigated her while she was still grieving, "that might well have been the end of me". "I couldn't imagine on top of everything else that goes through a woman's mind and the families who go through the experience of losing a baby, miscarriage or stillbirth that the threat that the police can turn up and question or inspect the house or telephone. "The fact that they can do this is terrible. And why is a law from the Victorian era still regulating women's bodies in 2025? Women from Wales have to travel to England for abortions Woman's abortion delayed partly due to NHS 'annual leave' Buffer zones set to come in around abortion clinics Llinos Eames Jones lost Mari Lois due to complications during pregnancy in 2000. She said she was disappointed about the police guidelines and the last thing a grieving mum needs was having police searching through their phones and computers. Since losing Mari Lois, she has been engaging with Sands, which supports grieving families. "At a time that is so difficult for families, I don't know who makes these decisions but I can tell you one thing, they haven't lost a piece of their heart. "They don't know what it is to bury a baby." Six women in the UK have appeared in court over the past two years charged with ending their own pregnancy, according to the British Medical Journal. Before this, only three convictions for an illegal abortion had been reported since the law was introduced in 1861. Clea Harmer, chief executive at Sands, said: "The trauma of baby death and pregnancy loss can last a lifetime. "No parent experiencing pregnancy or baby loss should ever be fearful of accessing the care they need. "Many parents tell us that baby loss remains challenging to talk about openly, further adding to their pain. And recent discussions around police guidance have been distressing to read for many bereaved parents." Dr Ranee Thakar, president of the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists said she was "very alarmed" by " the NPCC guidance. She added: "Women in these circumstances have a right to compassionate care and to have their dignity and privacy respected, not to have their homes, phones, computers and health apps searched, or be arrested and interrogated." The British Pregnancy Advisory Service, which provides abortions, added it was "harrowing" to see such guidance "in black and white". Katie Saxon, its chief strategic communications officer, said the guidance allowed police to "use women's period trackers and medical records against them" and was the "clearest sign yet that women cannot rely on the police, the Crown Prosecution Service, or the courts to protect them". The Women's Equality Network Wales said women "should not fear criminal investigations into already difficult and highly personal choices and circumstances around pregnancy". NPCC emphasised the legislation was complex and varied across the UK and only in cases where someone has told the police there was a suspicion of a crime, would there be an investigation. It added police officers were encouraged to prioritise the physical, emotional and psychological needs of the mother over the need to investigate. Wales' four police forces have been asked for comment on how the legislation is applied in their areas. Abortion decriminalisation plans pushed by Labour MP Woman accused of illegal abortion found not guilty Allow home abortion treatment - minister
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
Matthew Lau: More evidence that central planning of daycare doesn't work
Two recent reports on Canada's government takeover of child care are worth highlighting, each covering a province in which the expansion of government control has been especially intense. One is a study in the journal Canadian Public Administration by Rebecca Wallace and Kaytland Smith, who interviewed 22 for-profit child-care operators in Nova Scotia, a province for which then-prime minister Justin Trudeau in 2021 declared 'the goal of moving to a fully not-for-profit and publicly managed system.' The second is a report by the Coalition of Child Care Advocates of British Columbia (CCCABC). B.C.'s child-care situation is notable because of the province's early start on government-controlled daycare: its NDP government has been at it since 2017, well before the federal Liberal program announced in 2021. Begin with the Nova Scotia study. When the federal and provincial governments agreed to move to a fully non-profit publicly managed system, more than half of the province's 333 licensed child-care facilities were for-profit. The province provided $10 million in 'transition funding' to for-profit providers who agreed to become non-profits. It's no surprise that, despite this help, many Nova Scotia entrepreneurs who had poured their savings into opening child-care centres did not take kindly to the government's hostile takeover. 'Pushback from for-profits to the transition options and timelines were (sic) swift and multi-faceted,' the study documents, 'with critiques coming from for-profit providers, members of the opposition parties, and the public.' Of the 22 child-care facility-owners interviewed by Wallace and Smith, 17 said the government compensation for giving up their for-profit centres was too little, given how much they had put into them. At least two simply closed down as a result. One of the interviewees called the proposed government payment 'a slap to the face basically to the owners that have put their blood, sweat, and tears into building up these centres from the ground up … basically a bare minimum yearly salary for that hard work.' Another said, 'We're not going to give our centre away for free.' According to this interviewee, neither their lawyer nor accountant believed the options presented were even possible, and 'the accountant had a word for it — 'extortion.'' Ten of the 22 interviewees noted that food, electricity and other costs were going up and they were unsure if they could cover their costs with government grants. Daycares across Canada have encountered this problem: costs rise while governments control revenue, making finances unsustainable. In addition to financial concerns, the study said, 'many owners indicated that they had concerns about the funding agreement's impact on their ability to manage their child-care centres.' The entrepreneurs were concerned they would effectively be relegated to being government employees in government-controlled centres. Some also feared transitioning under government control would harm quality, a problem all across Canada. The government takeover of child care in Nova Scotia has clearly had many disastrous effects. As for the CCCABC paper, it finds that while 15 to 25 per cent of British Columbia families need flexibly scheduled child-care, such as non-standard hours, this flexibility is only offered by one per cent of licensed providers in the province. The one-size-fits-all government funding models 'weren't designed to support flexible delivery.' The result is 'families needing flexible care — often those least able to pay — face higher costs for under-resourced care.' Earlier data published by CCCABC similarly suggested the government daycare system was failing the least advantaged families most badly. That top-down government control fails to meet the diverse needs of diverse families is something economists have known for decades. As F.A. Hayek's famous essay on the use of knowledge in society explained 80 years ago, knowledge is decentralized, so centralized decision-making is doomed to fail. And yet, more centralization is exactly what CCCABC proposes. Its report makes 30 recommendations to increase government control and spending, including a 'shift from a decentralized expansion of child care to a provincially led expansion,' more funding for paid vacation and professional development, and 'a provincewide pension and benefits plan.' Matthew Lau: Government and union control is ruining daycare in Canada Matthew Lau: Child care is for kids, not labour market statistics But if government has failed to deliver the flexibility families need — on top of many other child-care bungles by the B.C. NDP — more government centralization shouldn't be the prescribed solution. Indeed, there is significant evidence that increased government child-care spending and control simply have not benefited families overall in B.C., Nova Scotia or anywhere else. They have, however, benefited certain activists: the CCCABC received over $369,000 in federal transfer payments in the 2023-24 fiscal year and its latest report advocating more centralization was also funded in part with federal tax dollars. Matthew Lau is a Toronto writer. Sign in to access your portfolio
