logo
Tesco basks in the sun as sales surge - but boss warns Labour tax hikes are fuelling inflation

Tesco basks in the sun as sales surge - but boss warns Labour tax hikes are fuelling inflation

Daily Mail​20 hours ago

Cyber security drive
The boss of Tesco said cyber security was a top priority after a high-profile attack on Marks & Spencer.
'This is probably top of my inbox on a daily, weekly basis. We stay on top of cyber all the time,' said Ken Murphy. 'We have invested continuously in upgrading our cyber capabilities, because this is a moving target.'
M&S was attacked over Easter by hackers who stole the data of millions of customers. It only restored online shopping this week after 46 days.
The Co-op and Harrods have also recently fallen victim to cyber attacks.
Recent warm weather has given Tesco a boost as shoppers snap up its picnic food and summer clothing.
Britain's largest supermarket said sales in the UK rose 5.1 per cent to £12.3billion in the 13 weeks to May 24.
'The summer weather, the good weather, is definitely helpful,' said chief executive Ken Murphy.
But with a supermarket price war raging, he warned the grocery market was 'intensely competitive'.
And he said Labour's tax increases were fuelling inflation.
'There are definitely continued inflationary pressures on the market,' said Murphy. 'I think you've got to
look at things like the impact of all the new taxation and regulatory costs on the industry.'
Total sales across the Tesco business, which includes stores in Ireland and central Europe, rose 4.6 per cent to £16.4billion in the first quarter.
And its market share in the UK has risen to 28 per cent as its premium range drove sales up.
But Tesco stuck to profit guidance for the year of between £2.7billion and £3billion, given the fierce supermarket rivalry.
'We're seeing intense competition from all aspects of the market,' said Murphy. 'Our guidance reflects that and continues to reflect that.'
In April, Murphy warned that Tesco was ready to take a £400million hit to profits this year as the competition hots up.
Speaking yesterday, he said he was 'pleased' with the group's performance as it attracted new customers by matching prices at Aldi on more than 600 items.
Customers are dining at home more and eating more fresh food, according to Murphy.
But supermarkets and their supply chains have had to grapple with higher cost pressures in the wake of measures introduced in Chancellor Rachel Reeves's autumn Budget.
A sharp increase in employer National Insurance Contributions (NICs) and a big increase in the national minimum wage have hit businesses. Retailers face a £5billion higher bill after the Budget, according to the British Retail Consortium.
Tesco said it will pay an extra £235million in the current financial year as a result of the NICs hike.
The supermarket announced earlier this year that it would be cutting 400 jobs and Murphy has also refused to rule out further losses.
Rising commodity prices for goods such as cocoa, meat and poultry are also piling on the 'greatest pressure' to food prices, he said.
The supermarket is the 'best-in-class player' in UK food, said the Royal Bank of Canada's analysts Manjari Dhar and Richard Chamberlain.
'It has done well to gain market share in recent years, but we note a step up in competitiveness by some key peers may mean that further gains are more difficult to come by,' the pair added.
Garry White, chief investment commentator at Charles Stanley, said: 'Britain's largest grocer has delivered a resilient performance despite a price war initiated by Asda and waning consumer confidence.'
Tesco shares rose 1.6 per cent, or 6.3p, to 391.6p yesterday.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Spending billions on unclean, risky energy? What a nuclear waste
Spending billions on unclean, risky energy? What a nuclear waste

The Guardian

time14 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

Spending billions on unclean, risky energy? What a nuclear waste

Rolls-Royce pressurised water reactors have powered British nuclear subs since 1966, but small modular reactors (SMRs) aren't yet proven at scale anywhere on land (Rolls-Royce named winning bidder for UK small nuclear reactors, 10 June). Only three are operating worldwide: two in Russia, one in China. Argentina is constructing the world's fourth; is Labour simply keen to keep up with historical geopolitical rivals (Sizewell C power station to be built as part of UK's £14bn nuclear investment, 10 June)? The Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis (IEEFA) reported actual cost overruns of 300% to 700% for all four projects. Rolls-Royce claims costs of £35 to £50 per MWh; so should we triple this? The government says the SMR project would create 3,000 new low-carbon British jobs, but at what cost? The energy secretary, Ed Miliband, can't know the true costs yet, and three reactors doesn't scream 'economies of scale'. Yet £2.5bn is already 10 times more than Great British Energy has invested into simple, cheap rooftop solar, which democratises energy savings. The true cost of renewables must consider intermittency and balancing costs, but why not invest more in flexibility through distributed renewables and grid-scale storage? And what of energy security? SMRs may mitigate against Putin snipping offshore wind cables, but increased reliance on imported uranium, and a heightened nuclear waste security threat, are significant risks. Last May, the IEEFA concluded that SMRs 'are still too expensive, too slow and too risky', and that we 'should embrace the reality that renewables, not SMRs, are the near-term solution to the energy transition'. Has this truly changed? The climate crisis requires scaling all feasible solutions as fast as possible, but, with limited capital, we should prioritise those that make economic sense HillMBA student, Cambridge Judge Business School As Nils Pratley says, Great British Energy's budget has been nuked to divert funding away from local energy initiatives (11 June). But let's get away from the idea that SMRs are a cutting-edge technology. Rolls-Royce is proposing a 470MW reactor, the same size as the first-generation Magnox reactors. Their 'small' modular reactor, if it ever emerges, will use the familiar method of generating a lot of heat in a very complex and expensive manner, in order to boil water and turn a turbine. It will bequeath yet more radioactive waste to add to the burden and risk at Sellafield. In the meantime, if government SMR funding continues, it takes money away from opportunities for cutting-edge technical and social innovation, discovery and training all around the country, as schools, hospitals, community groups, network operators and all of us get to grips with renewables-based systems. This sort of innovation is necessary, it's already benefiting us and it needs full-on government support rather than uneasy compromises with an increasingly redundant nuclear DarbyEmerita research fellow, Environmental Change Institute I'm a Scot who moved to the US in 1982. I returned to the UK seven years ago. In my time in the US, I worked with a few contractors as a chemist and health and safety manager on a number of environmental clean-up projects, chemical, biological and nuclear. The nuclear clean-up sites I worked on directly and indirectly were Hanford in Washington state, and Rocky Flats, Colorado. The multibillion-dollar Hanford cleanup is ongoing. Most of the problems there are as a result of gross mismanagement of nuclear waste during the cold war. I very much believe in wind, solar and other environmental solutions to energy production. I am cautiously supportive of small‑scale nuclear energy, but outraged by this government's failure to include the costs of the disposal of past, current and future nuclear waste in its support of 'cheap energy'. Has Ed Miliband taken into account future waste management issues? Google Hanford cleanup to see the real expense. Can we trust this and any future government to protect the environment, public health and the taxpayer from future nuclear 'cost overruns'?Peter HolmyardEdinburgh The more I read about the government's nuclear intentions, the more it sounds like HS2 all over again, ie another financial boondoggle. Where are the detailed costings? What is our experience with cost overruns, eg at Hinkley Point C? What is the overseas experience with pressurised water reactors (the kind proposed for Sizewell C) at Olkiluoto, at Flamanville, at Taishan? Uniformly bad in all cases, actually. No matter which way you look at this, viz the future cost overruns, the facts that we consumers will be on the hook for them, that reactors are never constructed on time, that nuclear wastes are unaudited, that we have to import all our uranium, that the UN's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change stated in 2023 that renewables are 10 times better than nuclear at lowering carbon emissions, all point to a remarkably poor decision by the government, sad to Ian FairlieIndependent consultant on radioactivity in the environment; vice-president, Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament Have an opinion on anything you've read in the Guardian today? Please email us your letter and it will be considered for publication in our letters section.

Bowie challenges Tories to ‘step up' against Miliband's ‘eco-zealotry'
Bowie challenges Tories to ‘step up' against Miliband's ‘eco-zealotry'

The Independent

time25 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Bowie challenges Tories to ‘step up' against Miliband's ‘eco-zealotry'

Tories need to 'step up' as Labour at Westminster and the SNP government at Holyrood are making the UK 'more vulnerable', acting shadow energy minister Andrew Bowie has said. The Scottish Conservative MP criticised both Labour and the SNP over their opposition to new oil and gas developments in the North Sea. Accusing the UK Government of 'overseeing the wilful deindustrialisation of this nation', Mr Bowie hit out at the 'frankly dangerous eco-zealotry of Ed Miliband', the Energy Secretary. Speaking at the Scottish Conservative conference at Murrayfield in Edinburgh Mr Bowie told his party: 'We must step up. Britain needs us more than ever.' The Tory insisted: 'The future of Scotland and Britain is at stake, our country's security depends on a strong Conservative Party to stand up for what is right.' He recalled how former US president Ronald Reagan had 'once said the first duty of government is to protect' – but added that 'on every front the SNP and Labour are failing to do that'. Attacking both Labour and the SNP, Mr Bowie, who is also his party's shadow Scottish secretary, said: 'They haven't protected everyone's economic security, by raising taxes, or ripping away their winter fuel payment, even if they are now apparently going to hand it back to them. 'They haven't protected our energy security by insisting on no new oil and gas developments.' The Conservative MP continued: 'We can all see what is happening in the world, there is more risk out there, we as a country are more vulnerable. 'That is why the decisions of this Labour Government are so gravely concerning. Their economic incompetence, coupled with their frightening ineptitude when it comes to our energy security is making the United Kingdom more vulnerable.' He attacked the Labour Government over its 'madcap drive to clean power by 2030', as he said ministers were 'actively accelerating the decline of our North Sea'. This, he said, was 'forcing us to become increasingly exposed to over-reliance on imports from overseas, imports that are shipped in diesel-chugging tankers across the Atlantic from America or from Norwegian wells'. The Tory said the opposition to new oil and gas developments meant 'investment is drying up, work is being put on pause, companies are literally shutting up shop and jobs are being lost'. But he added: 'This hostility for our oil and gas workers is not simply the preserve of the zealots in the Labour Party. 'The SNP have their fingerprints all over the job losses, the well closures.' Mr Bowie added: 'We need Conservative leadership because we know where the SNP and Labour will take us.' He also used his speech to attack the 'snake oil salesmen' in Reform UK, insisting that Nigel Farage's party do not 'care one jot for Scotland, or for our United Kingdom'. The Tory said: 'Let me be clear. Reform is quite simply not a conservative party, not a unionist party, frankly they are not a serious party.'

How would you spend a lottery jackpot? This is Money podcast
How would you spend a lottery jackpot? This is Money podcast

Daily Mail​

time34 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

How would you spend a lottery jackpot? This is Money podcast

What would you do with £208million? Ahead of another Euromillions rollover, This is Money spoke to an adviser to those fortunate few who have scooped a jackpot to get some practical tips on what to do if you win big…just in case. Would friends and family be top of your list when it comes to how to spend it... or something else? Lee Boyce, Simon Lambert and Georgie Frost discuss. Simon turns his focus on The Big Winter Fuel u-turn and the spending review – 'pray for Rachel and all of us,' he says. We borrowed too much to buy our home - what can we do about our huge mortgage? And an auction expert revealed the four types of property that savvy buyers are snapping up right now. Listen to the This is Money podcast We publish the podcast every Friday on This is Money and at Apple Podcasts, Spotify, Amazon Music and more. Search for it at your favourite podcast platform. To download Apple Podcasts go to the App store. On Android devices, go to the Google Play store to download the podcast app of your choice. You can press play to listen to this week's full episode on the player above, and wherever you get your podcasts please subscribe and review us if you like the podcast. You can also listen to the latest episode, find the archive and join in the debate in reader comments on the This is Money podcast page.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store