Iran, Israel launch new attacks after Tehran rules out nuclear talks
A fragment falls through the sky after Israel's Iron Dome intercepted a missile launched from Iran towards Israel, amid the Iran-Israel conflict, as seen from Ashkelon, Israel June 20, 2025. REUTERS/Amir Cohen
A missile launched from Iran is intercepted as seen from Ashkelon, Israel, June 21, 2025. REUTERS/Amir Cohen
JERUSALEM/WASHINGTON - Iran and Israel exchanged fresh attacks early on Saturday, a day after Tehran said it would not negotiate over its nuclear programme while under threat and Europe tried to keep peace talks alive.
Shortly after 2:30 a.m. in Israel (2330 GMT on Friday), the Israeli military warned of an incoming missile barrage from Iran, triggering air raid sirens across parts of central Israel, including Tel Aviv, as well as in the Israeli-occupied West Bank.
Interceptions were visible in the sky over Tel Aviv, with explosions echoing across the metropolitan area as Israel's air defence systems responded.
At the same time, Israel launched a new wave of attacks against missile storage and launch infrastructure sites in Iran, the Israeli military said.
Sirens also sounded in southern Israel, said Magen David Adom, Israel's national emergency service. An Israeli military official said Iran had fired five ballistic missiles and that there were no immediate indications of any missile impacts.
There were no initial reports of casualties.
The emergency service released images showing a fire on the roof of a multi-storey residential building in central Israel. Local media reported that the fire was caused by debris from an intercepted missile.Israel began attacking Iran last Friday, saying its longtime enemy was on the verge of developing nuclear weapons. Iran, which says its nuclear programme is only for peaceful purposes, retaliated with missile and drone strikes on Israel.
Israel is widely assumed to possess nuclear weapons. It neither confirms nor denies this.
Its air attacks have killed 639 people in Iran, according to the Human Rights Activists News Agency, a U.S.-based human rights organisation that tracks Iran. The dead include the military's top echelon and nuclear scientists.
In Israel, 24 civilians have been killed in Iranian missile attacks, according to authorities.
Reuters could not independently verify casualty figures for either side.
TALKS SHOW LITTLE PROGRESS
Iran has repeatedly targeted Tel Aviv, a metropolitan area of around 4 million people and the country's business and economic hub, where some critical military assets are also located.
Israel said it had struck dozens of military targets on Friday, including missile production sites, a research body it said was involved in nuclear weapons development in Tehran and military facilities in western and central Iran.
Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi said there was no room for negotiations with the U.S. "until Israeli aggression stops". But he arrived in Geneva on Friday for talks with European foreign ministers at which Europe hopes to establish a path back to diplomacy.
U.S. President Donald Trump on Friday reiterated that he would take as long as two weeks to decide whether the United States should enter the conflict on Israel's side, enough time "to see whether or not people come to their senses", he said.
Trump said he was unlikely to press Israel to scale back its airstrikes to allow negotiations to continue.
"I think it's very hard to make that request right now. If somebody is winning, it's a little bit harder to do than if somebody is losing, but we're ready, willing and able, and we've been speaking to Iran, and we'll see what happens," he said.
The Geneva talks produced little signs of progress, and Trump said he doubted negotiators would be able to secure a ceasefire.
"Iran doesn't want to speak to Europe. They want to speak to us. Europe is not going to be able to help in this one," Trump said.
Hundreds of U.S. citizens have fled Iran since the air war began, according to a U.S. State Department cable seen by Reuters.
Israel's envoy to the United Nations, Danny Danon, told the Security Council on Friday his country would not stop its attacks "until Iran's nuclear threat is dismantled". Iran's U.N. envoy Amir Saeid Iravani called for Security Council action and said Tehran was alarmed by reports that the U.S. might join the war.
Russia and China demanded immediate de-escalation.
A senior Iranian official told Reuters that Iran was ready to discuss limitations on uranium enrichment but that it would reject any proposal that barred it from enriching uranium completely, "especially now under Israel's strikes". REUTERS
Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
25 minutes ago
- Straits Times
Israeli defense minister says military killed head of Palestine corps in IRGC's overseas arm
Israel's Defense Minister Israel Katz said on Saturday that the military had killed a veteran commander in the Iranian Revolutionary Guards' overseas arm, in a strike in an apartment in Iran's Qom. The veteran commander, Saeed Izadi, who led the Palestine Corps of the Quds Force, Katz said in a statement. There was no confirmation from the IRGC. The Quds Force built up a network of Arab allies known as the Axis of Resistance, establishing Hezbollah in Lebanon in 1982 and supporting the Palestinian militant Islamist group Hamas in the Gaza Strip. But Iran-aligned network has suffered major blows over the last two years, as Israeli offensives since Hamas' October 7, 2023, attacks on Israel have weakened both the Palestinian group and Hezbollah. Katz said Izadi financed and armed Hamas during the initial attacks, describing the commander's killing as a "major achievement for Israeli intelligence and the Air Force". Izadi was sanctioned by the U.S. and Britain over what they said were his ties to Hamas and Palestinian militant faction Islamic Jihad, which also took part in the October 7 attacks. REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Straits Times
an hour ago
- Straits Times
22 arrested over links to Israeli spy services since start of conflict: Iranian media
22 arrested over links to Israeli spy services since start of conflict: Iranian media TEHRAN - Police in Iran's Qom province said on June 21 that 22 people 'linked to Israeli spy services' had been arrested since June 13, Fars news agency reported. '22 people were identified and arrested on charges of being linked to the Zionist regime's spy services, disturbing public opinion and supporting the criminal regime,' the agency said, citing the head of police intelligence in Iran's Qom province. It came after Iranian police announced the arrest on June 19 of 24 people accused of spying for Israel and of seeking to tarnish the country's image, according to a statement carried by Tasnim news agency. A European national was also arrested for spying, Tasnim reported on June 20 , without giving their nationality or the date of the arrest. Iran regularly announces arrests of suspected spies. Several have been executed in recent weeks. Norway-based NGO Iran Human Rights said at least 223 people have been arrested nationwide on charges related to collaboration with Israel, cautioning that the actual figure was likely higher. AFP Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Straits Times
an hour ago
- Straits Times
An Iran deal in two weeks? Hard to achieve, even if Trump really wants one
President Donald Trump told reporters that he is interested largely in the coercive part of coercive diplomacy at Morristown Airport in New Jersey on June 21. PHOTO: ERIC LEE/NYTIMES News analysis An Iran deal in two weeks? Hard to achieve, even if Trump really wants one WASHINGTON – Ask diplomats who have negotiated with Iran, and they usually describe it with some variant of: Brace yourself, it takes a long time. It took the better part of two years to put together the Obama-era agreement that all but halted Iran's nuclear program. After President Donald Trump scrapped that deal in his first term, it took 15 months for the Biden administration to negotiate a way to piece it back together – at which point Iran's supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei vetoed the near-final agreement. So what could Mr Trump, dangling the possibility that last-minute diplomacy could provide an alternative to bombing Iran's main uranium enrichment facility, hope to accomplish in the two-week window he has given himself to make a decision? Not much, the veterans of such negotiations warn. But then again, the environment is very different this time. Ayatollah Khamenei is the final word in all foreign policy issues – but he is also most likely in hiding, US intelligence officials say. Iran's foreign minister and lead negotiator Abbas Araghchi says he is open to placing limitations on Iran's nuclear output similar to what he and his colleagues negotiated with the United States a decade ago. But on June 20 , he told his European counterparts in Geneva that Iran would never negotiate as long as Israel was dropping missiles on its military bases and nuclear facilities, and carrying out targeted killings of Iran's Revolutionary Guard officers and nuclear scientists. Mr Trump, for his part, made clear to reporters on June 20 that he is interested largely in the coercive part of coercive diplomacy. Iran, he insisted, had only minutes left on the clock. 'I'm giving them a period of time, and I would say two weeks would be the maximum,' he said. And he dismissed the idea that the meeting in Europe would do anything but slow things down. 'Iran didn't want to speak to Europe,' he said. 'They want to speak to us. Europe is not going to be able to help.' Whether Mr Trump is serious about negotiations or just buying time to better prepare for a military assault and its aftermath remains unclear. But there was no public evidence yet that the contacts between Mr Araghchi and the president's Middle East envoy Steve Witkoff could lead to a meeting, much less a deal that would satisfy Mr Trump. Or even that such a deal would be enough to hold back Israel's determination to wipe out Iran's nuclear facilities. Mr Araghchi knows every inch of the Iranian nuclear complex and was a central player in negotiating the 2015 nuclear deal, which Trump exited three years later. But even today , US officials do not know how much sway he holds with Ayatollah Khamenei . Mr Witkoff is the mirror opposite: He knew virtually nothing about the Iranian programme and has spent the past few months cramming on the details of nuclear enrichment and Iranian negotiating history. But he has a tight relationship with Mr Trump that goes back to their New York real estate days and holds considerable sway over what constitutes an acceptable deal. If the two men were able to come to the kind of agreement that has eluded them through two and a half months of negotiations, they would still have to sell it back home. 'These are not normal times,' said Dr Richard Haass, who oversaw Iran policy for President George H.W. Bush and was a senior State Department official for President George W. Bush. 'The pressure on Iran, since they are losing, is more intense than it has ever been. And the pressure on Trump to use military force if it looks like the Iranians are trying to buy time rather than reach an agreement will be huge.' Success may depend on exactly what Mr Trump demands: the 'unconditional surrender' that he keeps talking about or a narrower, face-saving halt in remaining nuclear enrichment, with the understanding that while Iran may retain what it views as its 'right' to produce nuclear fuel, it will never again exercise that right. 'Two weeks may be enough time for an unconditional capitulation. A day suffices for that,' said Mr Robert Malley, who participated in the negotiations that led to the 2015 agreement and then led the failed Biden-era effort to reconstitute some version of that deal. But, Mr Malley added, 'that may be what President Trump wants, but it is almost certainly not what he will get. As the Islamic Republic sees it, it's tantamount to being offered the choice between committing suicide and taking their chances at being killed. History suggests they will take their chances.' Mr Malley noted that there might be room for a diplomatic off-ramp, one in which 'Iran agrees to 'voluntarily' and 'temporarily' stop enriching uranium, which is much easier now that its enrichment capacity is a shadow of its former self.' That, he added, could 'give space for US -Iranian negotiations and halt the mad dash to a US war'. It is the kind of creative approach that, when missiles were not flying, might be wordsmithed over weeks or months in Vienna, then taken back to Tehran and Washington for formal sign-off . Clearly, no one has time for that process now. As he emerged from the talks in Geneva on June 20, Mr Araghchi did not sound in the mood for even starting down that road, any more than Mr Trump sounded very interested in negotiating. The Iranian foreign minister suggested that, in retrospect, perhaps his talks with Mr Witkoff had been an elaborate US -engineered shadow play, a cover for the Israelis as they prepared for war. 'So they had perhaps this plan in their mind, and they just needed negotiations perhaps to cover it up,' Mr Araghchi told NBC's Andrea Mitchell . 'We don't know how we can trust them anymore. What they did was in fact a betrayal to diplomacy.' Iran, he said, would never entirely stop making nuclear fuel. 'Zero enrichment is impossible,' he said. 'This is an achievement of our own scientists. It is a question of national pride.' NYTIMES Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
